Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 952107 + ftbfs
Bug #952107 [src:valabind] valabind: FTBFS: ../gowriter.vala:217.16-217.26:
error: The name `data_type' does not exist in the context of `Vala.DataType'
(libvala-0.48)
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
block 952399 by 924937
thanks
Ansgar writes:
> the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger
> than just libpq5: just looking at a small sample of the direct rdeps of
> libssl1.1, one can find the following GPL-licensed programs linking it:
>
> cryptsetup, wesnoth, mydumper
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 952399 by 924937
Bug #952399 [kmod] OpenSSL linking without license exception
952399 was not blocked by any bugs.
952399 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 952399: 924937
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Package: tcpcopy
Version: 0.6.3-2.1
Severity: serious
X-debbugs-cc: peter green
tcpcopy build-depends on removed iptables-dev. Please see Peter's message below
on how to handle the situation (from bug #951090).
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 01:08:16 + peter green wrote:
> Package: keepalived
> Versi
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:20:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#904657: fixed in voltron 0.1.7+git20200109-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #904657,
regarding voltron: fails to install with Python 3.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Le 25/02/2020 à 22:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2020-02-25 21:13:48)
>> Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 19:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>>
>>> control: reassign -1 node-espree
>>> control: affects -1 node-eslint-scope
>>>
>>> Quoting Xavier (2020-02-25 18:29:35)
Le 23
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951494: fixed in procps 2:3.3.16-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #951494,
regarding veyon: FTBFS: ld: final link failed: bad value
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951494: fixed in procps 2:3.3.16-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #951494,
regarding apitrace: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target
'/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libprocps.so', needed by 'glretrace'. Sto
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951494: fixed in procps 2:3.3.16-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #951494,
regarding libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Hi Lucas, because I have been long in responding, I just wanted to drop a
quick note that I acknowledge your bug report. I need to do an upstream
release to fix a
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 20:12:42 -0600
with message-id <1732700.63rbP3Mbes@riemann>
and subject line Re: Bug#952426: digikam: digkam experimental not correctly
instalable
has caused the Debian Bug report #952426,
regarding digikam: digkam experimental not correctly instalable
to be mar
The Timeshift author has informed me that he will fix this bug in an
upstream release before the end of March.
Nudging this closed bug (again) to avoid auto-kicking from testing
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:10:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952033: fixed in ruby-fog-aliyun 0.3.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #952033,
regarding ruby-fog-aliyun: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.5" failed: NoMethodError:
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:08:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952028: fixed in gist 5.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #952028,
regarding gist: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error:
subject.filename.should be filename
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:09:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950092: fixed in node-base64url 3.0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #950092,
regarding node-base64url FTBFS: error TS2688: Cannot find type definition file
for 'node'
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:08:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952311: fixed in docker.io 19.03.6+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952311,
regarding docker.io: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd .gopath && go install
-trimpath -v -p 4 [...] returned exit code 2
to b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 944496 by 952542
Bug #944496 [src:xfonts-efont-unicode] FTBFS: Assigning non-zero to $[ is no
longer possible at tools/hex2bdf
944496 was not blocked by any bugs.
944496 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 944496: 952542
> t
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:35:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951951: fixed in gzip 1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #951951,
regarding gzip: FTBFS: stdio.h:366: undefined reference to `__chk_fail'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952028 in gist reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gist/-/commit/59c171a27b92bf72edc7f57548fbcbb5544cf
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #950092 in node-base64url reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-base64url/-/commit/374d05af5ae25b9dc65
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952028 [src:gist] gist: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
Failure/Error: subject.filename.should be filename
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952028: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #950092 [src:node-base64url] node-base64url FTBFS: error TS2688: Cannot
find type definition file for 'node'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
950092: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952311 [src:docker.io] docker.io: FTBFS: dh_auto_build: error: cd .gopath
&& go install -trimpath -v -p 4 [...] returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952311
Debian Bug Tracking S
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952311 in docker.io reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/docker-team/docker/-/commit/e0897f72b2a60528b8fcf5f3347e
Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:19:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952244: fixed in qtcurve 1.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #952244,
regarding qtcurve: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:35:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952545: fixed in irssi-scripts 20200223
has caused the Debian Bug report #952545,
regarding irssi-scripts: Duplicate usercount.pl conflict with irssi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Am 25.02.20 um 23:38 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> Control: found 26+20191223-1
>
> On Feb 23, Bastian Germann wrote:
>
>> All of the GPL-2+ licensed executables contained in the kmod
>> binary package link to libcrypto even though they do not have any
>> OpenSSL license exception. ftp-master considers
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952546: fixed in pydoctor 19.11.0+git20200114.c74016b-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952546,
regarding pydoctor: d/copyright & DFSG issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:10:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952018: fixed in ruby-http-accept-language 2.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #952018,
regarding ruby-http-accept-language: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.5" failed:
NoMethodError:
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952033 [src:ruby-fog-aliyun] ruby-fog-aliyun: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.5"
failed: NoMethodError:
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952033: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952033
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952033 in ruby-fog-aliyun reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-fog-aliyun/-/commit/df3066b2d72a3d6
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952018 [src:ruby-http-accept-language] ruby-http-accept-language: FTBFS:
ERROR: Test "ruby2.5" failed: NoMethodError:
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 952399 26+20191223-1
Bug #952399 [kmod] OpenSSL linking without license exception
Marked as found in versions kmod/26+20191223-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
952399: https://bugs.debian.o
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952018 in ruby-http-accept-language reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-http-accept-language/-/co
Control: found 26+20191223-1
On Feb 23, Bastian Germann wrote:
> All of the GPL-2+ licensed executables contained in the kmod binary
> package link to libcrypto even though they do not have any OpenSSL
> license exception. ftp-master considers this a serious issue. So please
> remove this option
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:35:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952029: fixed in ruby-mathml 0.14-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #952029,
regarding ruby-mathml: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error:
e.rest << @scanner.rest.to_s
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:23:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950020: fixed in meson 0.53.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950020,
regarding meson autopkg tests failing on arm64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #952545 [irssi-scripts] irssi-scripts: Duplicate usercount.pl conflict with
irssi
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
--
952545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952545
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #952029 [src:ruby-mathml] ruby-mathml: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
Failure/Error: e.rest << @scanner.rest.to_s
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952029: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952029
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952029 in ruby-mathml reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-mathml/-/commit/ec836f39b73d10e6a30c340
fixed 902241 2.6.0-2
thanks
(Marking the bug as fixed in buster)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 902241 2.6.0-2
Bug #902241 [src:python-proliantutils] python-proliantutils: FTBFS in stretch
(AssertionError: IloConnectionError not raised)
Marked as fixed in versions python-proliantutils/2.6.0-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Quoting Anthony Fok (2020-02-25 22:35:03)
> A fix to this bug is almost ready: I have expanded d/copyright to
> include the missing epydoc and bootstrap.min.css copyright info, and
> added debian/missing-sources/bootstrap.css (vanilla Bootstrap v3.3.4,
> equivalent to the embedded minified versi
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Replacing the IP by 198.51.100.1, which is reserved by IETF for
> documentation (according to
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses) fixes the issue.
Maybe I misread Debian Policy, but I believe packages are not allowed
to even *try* In
Hi,
here is some update I'm also forwarding to NeuroDebian Team list to have
some public record of the current status.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:36:35AM +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> I also looked at nipype (but its source is very odd and I can't build what is
> in the repo; I think that w
reopen 902241
tags 902241 + patch
thanks
This bug was already diagnosed by you here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/proliantutils/+bug/1779342
I suggest applying the patch below. I can take care of filing the bug
against release.debian.org if it helps.
(Remember that packages in stretch *must* buil
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #952546 [src:pydoctor] pydoctor: d/copyright & DFSG issues
Added tag(s) pending.
--
952546: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952546
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:06 PM Colin Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:40:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (The d/copyright problem with epydoc should be easy if tedious to fix;
> > I don't understand why it wants epydoc which I thought was obsolete
> > b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 902241
Bug #902241 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [src:python-proliantutils]
python-proliantutils: FTBFS in stretch (AssertionError: IloConnectionError not
raised)
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2
> from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2020-02-25 21:13:48)
> Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 19:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>
> > control: reassign -1 node-espree
> > control: affects -1 node-eslint-scope
> >
> > Quoting Xavier (2020-02-25 18:29:35)
> > > Le 23/02/2020 à 14:50, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > > D
Le 25/02/2020 à 19:15, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> control: reassign -1 node-commander
> control: affects -1 uglify-js
>
> Quoting Xavier (2020-02-25 18:43:53)
>> Le 23/02/2020 à 14:31, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
>>> build on amd6
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:09:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952275: fixed in ipxe 1.0.0+git-20190125.36a4c85-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #952275,
regarding ipxe: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess
returned exit status 2
to be marked as
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #951927 [src:murano] murano: FTBFS: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such
file or directory: '/tmp/tmp1ojzxlld'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
951927: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951927
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #951927 in murano reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/murano/-/commit/f447ddec47318b2ad65
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:20:19 +0100
with message-id <9eca9499-865e-440f-8f0b-1ad332754...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #902241,
regarding python-proliantutils: FTBFS in stretch (AssertionError:
IloConnectionError not raised)
to be ma
Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 19:48, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> control: reassign -1 node-espree
> control: affects -1 node-eslint-scope
>
> Quoting Xavier (2020-02-25 18:29:35)
> > Le 23/02/2020 à 14:50, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
>
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:47:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950581: fixed in python-django 1:1.11.28-1~deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950581,
regarding python-django: CVE-2020-7471: Potential SQL injection via
StringAgg(delimiter)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:47:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949227: fixed in python-pysaml2 4.5.0-4+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #949227,
regarding python-pysaml2: FTBFS in buster because of expired certificate
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:49:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950581: fixed in python-django 1:1.10.7-2+deb9u8
has caused the Debian Bug report #950581,
regarding python-django: CVE-2020-7471: Potential SQL injection via
StringAgg(delimiter)
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:47:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949322: fixed in python-pysaml2 4.5.0-4+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #949322,
regarding python-pysaml2: CVE-2020-5390
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 952464 important
Bug #952464 [src:clazy] clazy: flaky arm64 autopkgtest: unable to execute
command: Segmentation fault
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
severity 952464 important
thanks
In data lunedì 24 febbraio 2020 21:10:53 CET, Paul Gevers ha scritto:
> Source: clazy
> Version: 1.6-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: flaky
The test is not flaky.
Hi Ian,
On 2/24/20 5:14 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Fixed I think. I have created this:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/network-manager-strongswan
and made you ("harri-guest") a maintainer of it.
I think you can do all the rest of the setup yourself. Let me know if
you want anything else doing
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 20:36:05 +0100
with message-id <96c56008-3223-4d47-ddef-72e4f2dd0...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#952494: Can not manage wired
interface
has caused the Debian Bug report #952494,
regarding Can not manage wired interface
to be mar
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 20:36:05 +0100
with message-id <96c56008-3223-4d47-ddef-72e4f2dd0...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#952494: Can not manage wired
interface
has caused the Debian Bug report #952494,
regarding Wired network interface can not be manag
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:21:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#905877: fixed in unattended-upgrades 1.18
has caused the Debian Bug report #905877,
regarding regression in 1.4: upgrades random packages from testing to
experimental (doesn't respect pinning?)
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 951907 python-bleach: CVE-2020-6802: mutation XSS vulnerability
Bug #951907 {Done: Scott Kitterman } [src:python-bleach]
src:python-bleach: Security issue: mutation XSS vulnerability
Changed Bug title to 'python-bleach: CVE-2020-6802: mut
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:40:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (The d/copyright problem with epydoc should be easy if tedious to fix;
> I don't understand why it wants epydoc which I thought was obsolete
> but this is far from my field of expertise.)
epydoc has been unmaintained for a long time, b
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:50:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952543: fixed in spdlog 1:1.5.0+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952543,
regarding Using old libfmt breaks sopt and purify
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:50:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952543: fixed in spdlog 1:1.5.0+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952543,
regarding sopt: FTBFS: core.h:266: undefined reference to
`fmt::v6::internal::assert_fail(char const*, int, char const*)'
to be ma
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:50:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952428: fixed in sympa 6.2.40~dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #952428,
regarding sympa: CVE-2020-9369: Security flaws in CSRF prevention
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:49:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951924: fixed in diodon 1.9.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #951924,
regarding diodon: FTBFS: testcase.vala:32.5-32.19: error: Creation method of
abstract class cannot be public.
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:50:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952543: fixed in spdlog 1:1.5.0+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #952543,
regarding purify: FTBFS: ld: ../purify/libpurify.so.2.0.0: undefined reference
to `fmt::v6::internal::basic_data::signs'
to be mar
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:01:02 +0100 "Michael R. Crusoe"
wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:22:10 +0100 Ole Streicher
wrote:
>
> > Since spdlog uses the old (included) libfmt, the builds of purify and
> > sopt fail with linker errors like:
> >
> > undefined reference to `fmt::v6::internal::assert_f
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-espree
Bug #952312 [src:node-eslint-scope] node-eslint-scope: FTBFS: tests failed
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-eslint-scope' to 'node-espree'.
No longer marked as found in versions node-eslint-scope/4.0.3-4.
Ignoring request to alter fixed v
control: reassign -1 node-espree
control: affects -1 node-eslint-scope
Quoting Xavier (2020-02-25 18:29:35)
> Le 23/02/2020 à 14:50, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
> > build on amd64.
>
> Some test are incompatible with node-espree-6.
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:34:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943423: fixed in ccfits 2.5+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #943423,
regarding libccfits-doc: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.16-1~exp3 from experimental)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Hi,
On 2020-02-05 15:04, Gordon, Craig A. (GSFC-660.1)[INNOVIM] wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> It was never intended for end users to have to generate the CCfits manual
> themselves (nor is it intended to be compatible with all versions of
> Doxygen). That's why CCfits-2.5.pdf is included with the sta
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:22:10 +0100 Ole Streicher wrote:
> Since spdlog uses the old (included) libfmt, the builds of purify and
> sopt fail with linker errors like:
>
> undefined reference to `fmt::v6::internal::assert_fail(char const*, int,
> char const*)
>
> See the merged bugs for the reports
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-commander
Bug #952335 [src:uglify-js] uglify-js: FTBFS: ERROR: `m` is not a supported
option
Bug reassigned from package 'src:uglify-js' to 'node-commander'.
No longer marked as found in versions uglify-js/3.6.3-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed ve
control: reassign -1 node-commander
control: affects -1 uglify-js
Quoting Xavier (2020-02-25 18:43:53)
> Le 23/02/2020 à 14:31, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
> > build on amd64.
>
> At least uglify-js (https://salsa.debian.org/js-tea
Quoting Ian Jackson (2020-02-25 18:40:47)
> For -devel, context is that Anthony Fok just uploaded a new upstream
> version of pydoctor (a tool for extracting API docs for python
> modules) in order to fix a couple of upstream bugs. Anthony, thank
> you very much for your work to help fix one of
On 20/02/25 01:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On 20/02/24 09:10, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Source: clazy
> > Version: 1.6-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid bullseye
> > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: flaky
> >
> > Dear
Le 23/02/2020 à 14:31, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: uglify-js
> Version: 3.6.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on am
For -devel, context is that Anthony Fok just uploaded a new upstream
version of pydoctor (a tool for extracting API docs for python
modules) in order to fix a couple of upstream bugs. Anthony, thank
you very much for your work to help fix one of our (mutual) indirect
dependencies.
Unfortunately t
I have now prepared merge requests for fixing ktp-common-internals,
ktp-accounts-kcm,
and kaccounts-providers respectively [1] [2] [3]. These issues are all fixed in
new upstream releases, but I am not comfortable with such an undertaking and
hope these fixes will suffice in the meantime.
[1]
ht
Le 23/02/2020 à 14:50, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-eslint-scope
> Version: 4.0.3-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 15:02:21 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> It would be interesting to see whether game-data-packager could consume
> data from snaps, and avoid all these pitfalls.
That would remove the sandboxing and known-runtime-libraries properties
of the snap packaging system. I wouldn't
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:11:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952234: fixed in liblog4ada 1.3.1.b6dafb49-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #952234,
regarding liblog4ada: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `letltxmacro.sty' not found.
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Le 23/02/2020 à 14:44, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: jssip
> Version: 0.6.34-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:50:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952216: fixed in node-prelude-ls 1.1.2+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #952216,
regarding node-prelude-ls: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -e
debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1
to be mar
On 20/02/24 09:10, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: clazy
> Version: 1.6-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: flaky
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
Hi Paul, thanks for the bug report.
> With a recent upload of g
On dimanche 23 février 2020 14:09:03 CET you wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
The failed test depend on licensecheck behavior. A bug in this package was
recently fixed, which led to this test failure.
I'll fix this test.
All the best
Do
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948831: fixed in pydoctor 19.11.0+git20200114.c74016b-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #948831,
regarding git-buildpackage: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named cachecontrol
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948831: fixed in pydoctor 19.11.0+git20200114.c74016b-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #948831,
regarding git-buildpackage: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named cachecontrol
to be marked as done.
This means t
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 11:12:48PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
2) These kind of methods are done for special packages like firmware,
very popular apps like flash (at the time), etc, or *data* packages
from games.
We have game-data-packager (gdp, which I originally wrote) for
sit
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #951956 [src:manila] manila: FTBFS: testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError:
[(4, 21, 'M310')] != [(4, 20, 'M310')]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
951956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #951956 in manila reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/manila/-/commit/5ffae3e86b4876f8c62
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
