Your message dated Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950435: fixed in haproxy 2.1.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #950435,
regarding haproxy build-depends on package that has been dropped.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 950684 serious
Bug #950684 [sbuild] systemd: upgrade fails in a chroot where /var/log/ owner
is not root:root
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
95
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 950684 0.79.0-1
Bug #950684 [sbuild] systemd: upgrade fails in a chroot where /var/log/ owner
is not root:root
Marked as found in versions sbuild/0.79.0-1.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
950684
For reference, upgrading this to Python 3 should be simple. sshuttle
works fine with Python <= 3.7.
BUT: sshuttle is currently incompatible with Python 3.8.
See https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle/issues/381
Help fixing this appreciated. I don't have a lot of time right now, and
this looks like
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org (was andre...@debian.org).
> usertags 938579 py2keep
Usertags were: py2removal.
Usertags are now: py2keep py2removal.
> severity 938579 normal
Bug #938579 [src:subv
Control: tags -1 + more-info
On Monday, November 11 2019, pete wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>I have some problems with MIME associations (browsers such as midori and
> epiphany try to download local htm files instead of opening them), and I
> encountered
> this bug while solving these probl
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + more-info
Unknown tag/s: more-info.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-i
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
control: severity -1 important
Hello Matthias,
On Mon 27 Jan 2020 at 01:13AM +01, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:propellor
> Version: 5.10.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
>
> uninstallable build dependencies:
>
> propellor build-depends on:
> - libgh
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #949914 [src:propellor] propellor ftbfs in unstable in a binNMU
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 important
Bug #949914 [src:propellor] propellor ftbfs in unstable in a binNMU
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
949914: https://bu
Source: webdis
Version: 0.1.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: bullseye, sid
webdis build-depends on the python-msgpack binary package, which is no longer
built by the python-msgpack source package. It is still present in unstable as
a cruft package, but is completely gone from testing.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2
> from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:25:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951522: fixed in a2ps 1:4.14-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #951522,
regarding FTBFS: wants long-removed emacs25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Source: clips
Version: 6.24-3.2
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 6.30-4
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 6.30-4
Bug #951620 [src:clips] clips: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Marked as fixed in versions clips/6.30-4.
--
951620: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951620
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:45:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948186: fixed in openvdb 6.2.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #948186,
regarding openvdb: FTBFS against python3.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 20:20:51 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: python-bleach
> Version: 3.1.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Forwarded: https://github.com/mozilla/bleach/issues/503
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/python-bleach.html
>
> ...
We'll see
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 949029 python3.8
Bug #949029 [src:python-bleach] Breaking change intorduced in python3.8 3.8.1
breaks python-bleach
Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-bleach' to 'python3.8'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #949029 t
Revert is being done upstream for python 3.8.2:
https://bugs.python.org/msg361815
Since it appears this is going to be solved in python3.8, I'm going to
reassign again. Please don't reassign back, there's no point. There's
another open bug against ptyhon-bleach for this.
Scott K
signature.a
Hi
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 13:41:37 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> control: tags -1 +confirmed
> control: retitle -1 node-terser FTBFS: fails 7 tests in "bin/uglifyjs"
and "bin/uglifyjs with input file globs"
>
> Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-02-04 16:29:34)
> > Source: node-terser
> > Version: 4.1.2-4
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #948186 [src:openvdb] openvdb: FTBFS against python3.8
Added tag(s) pending.
--
948186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948186
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #948186 in openvdb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/openvdb/commit/656b97eec10ce56735cfdf3a26b
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:59:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951562: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #882541,
regarding validator.js FTBFS: Error: validator.isBefore(Fri Nov 10 2017
00:00:00 GMT-1200 (-12)) passed but should have failed
Source: python-django-modelcluster
Version: 5.0.1-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainers,
Your new package python-django-modelcluster has an autopkgtest, great.
However, it fails. I copied some of the o
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:23:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951578: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #884033,
regarding src:scilab-celestlab: FTBFS, scilab hangs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Source: switchconf
Version: 0.0.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: out-of-sync unstable-to-testing
Dear switchconf maintainer,
The last upload of package switchconf was not a source-only upload. As a
result, the most recent upload will not migrate to Testing.
According to the policy of Releas
Source: peony
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-CC: jianfen...@ubuntukylin.com
Hi handsome_feng,
As you can see in https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=peony ,
there's some mishandling of symbols as indicated in the build log. Please
consider fixing them. Thanks!
--
Best,
Boy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 950490 by 936869
Bug #950490 [release.debian.org] transition: gnat-9, Ada component of GCC-9
950490 was not blocked by any bugs.
950490 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 950490: 936869
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
x@xxL:~$ chromium-browser
Using PPAPI flash.
../../sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf-helpers/sigsys_handlers.cc:**CRASHING**:(tg)kill()
failure
../../sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf-helpers/sigsys_handlers.cc:**CRASHING**:(tg)kill()
failure
[31074:7:0218/192244.240822:ERROR:command_buffer_proxy_impl.cc(
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:05:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951004: fixed in libmath-prime-util-gmp-perl 0.51-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #951004,
regarding libmath-prime-util-gmp-perl: FTBFS with gmp 6.2.0: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Source: zoneminder
Version: 1.32.3-2
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu focal ubuntu-patch
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation in behaviour of build target causing FTBFS
Tags: patch
Hi,
In Ubuntu this package FTBFS. The reason seems to be that the
build-inde
David Bremner writes:
> Matthew Flatt writes:
>
>> At Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:43:15 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>>> Matthew Flatt writes:
>>> > At Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:31:22 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>>> >> => 0xb6ea3254 <+8>: stmdb sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11,
>>> >> lr}
>>> >>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #951004 in libmath-prime-util-gmp-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libmath-pri
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #951004 [src:libmath-prime-util-gmp-perl] libmath-prime-util-gmp-perl:
FTBFS with gmp 6.2.0: test failure
Added tag(s) pending.
--
951004: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951004
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:26:09 +0100, Marco Bodrato wrote:
> > I tried to convert it into the following unified patch:
> > Does this look correct?
> Perfect.
Thanks for the confirmation!
I added the information to the upstream ticket, and I'll upload the
package with the patch shortly to debian/
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:34:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#933631: fixed in kazoo 2.6.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #933631,
regarding kazoo: autopkgtest regression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Ciao,
Il 2020-02-18 16:49 gregor herrmann ha scritto:
Il 2020-02-18 12:39 Marco Bodrato ha scritto:
> A proposed patch:
I tried to convert it into the following unified patch:
Does this look correct?
Perfect.
(The package builds and passes all tests with the above patch.)
Great!
Ĝis
Hi Bastian,
On 18.02.20 01:36, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a merge request at
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swupdate/merge_requests/2 which fixes
> the issue. Please consider merging and uploading to sid.
>
Thanks for this - anyway, debian package was officially pushed b
As I mentioned in a previous mail to debian-release the dependency tracking in
auto-removals seems to be buggy, this has resulted in britney trying and
failing to remove rust-rand. This in turn blocks any attempt to migrate the new
(and fixed) rust-rand.
I am bumping this bug report to get the
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:01:19 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> the kubernetes package has been requested to be removed (#950247), but
> kubectx still build-depends on it.
>
> Please find a solution.
Just adding my two cents, as I'm the one who originally reported the RM
bug against kubernetes
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:19:05 +0100, Marco Bodrato wrote:
> Il 2020-02-18 12:39 Marco Bodrato ha scritto:
> > A proposed patch:
> Looking at it twice, it is probably better to propose a cleaner patch, that
> can be adopted also upstream:
Thanks for your help!
I have to admit that I haven't seen a
Package: cups-filters,
Version: 2.2.1-8+deb9u4
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
try to install several times in several machines graphicmagicks event
imagemagick (graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat)m but it's impossible..
cups-filters package has a hard depends
Ciao,
Il 2020-02-18 12:39 Marco Bodrato ha scritto:
A proposed patch:
Looking at it twice, it is probably better to propose a cleaner patch,
that can be adopted also upstream:
*** squfof126.c~2020-02-18 15:03:43.371325091 +0100
--- squfof126.c 2020-02-18 15:25:46.208271285 +0100
***
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:00:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#937850: fixed in python-jenkinsapi 0.3.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #937850,
regarding python-jenkinsapi: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #949339 [libshiboken2-py3-5.14] libshiboken2-py3-5.14: missing
Breaks+Replaces: libshiboken2-py3-5.13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
949339: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949339
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #950127 in pyside2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/pyside2/commit/8a9d202032d706e916d562cb7292
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #950127 [src:pyside2] pyside2 fails all autopkg tests
Added tag(s) pending.
--
950127: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950127
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #949339 in pyside2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/pyside2/commit/7ce804e315f1f3b24768429f92bf
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:45:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#917869: fixed in python-escript 5.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #917869,
regarding python-escript FTBFS on armhf, mips, mipsel and mips64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:25:56 +0100
with message-id
and subject line interface flags must match (Re: Bug#951474: libfmt-dev: spdlog
try to load fmt v5 function())
has caused the Debian Bug report #951474,
regarding libfmt-dev: spdlog try to load fmt v5 function()
to be marked as do
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #930869 [pm-utils] Don't release with buster
Marked Bug as done
--
930869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: close -1
Michael, I am the maintainer of this package. As the maintainer I
have declared this a non-bug. Reopening it is pure bug tag.
Ie, it is abuse. Please stop.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that
Package: kontact
Version: 4:19.08.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Application: Akonadi Control (akonadi_control), signal: Aborted
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7ff192558800 (LWP 1433258))]
Thre
On 18 févr. 2020 13:39, "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" wrote:
[...]
> I'd need more details to reproduce and understand the problem, particularly
> whether
> packaged libfmt v5 is a root case or not.
>
> I can see the from lines that there is a linking problem in the package
> 'gerbera`,
> but I do not
Source: ruby-batch-loader
Version: 1.4.1+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
User pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ruby2.7-transition
LoadError:
cannot load such file -- irb/ruby-token
# /<>/spec/spec_helper.rb:12:in `'
#
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 943695
Bug #943695 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:didjvu] didjvu: FTBFS: ERROR: tests.test_timestamp.test_timezones
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may
reopen 943695
found 943695 0.8.2-2
fixed 943695 0.9-2+rm
thanks
Reopening because packages in stable must build in stable.
I guess that at this point anybody willing to fix this should also be
free to set maintainer to "Debian QA" in the same upload.
Thanks.
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hello,
Christian Marillat kirjoitti 17.2.2020 klo 8.45:
> Note : This bug is for armel, armhf, arm64 and powerpc arches.
>
> As said in bug #950857 spdlog is build using an embedded copy of version 6+
> and thus fail to load include from version 5.
>
> [...]
I'd need
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #951474 [libfmt-dev] libfmt-dev: spdlog try to load fmt v5 function()
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
951474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951474
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
reopen 949227
found 949227 4.5.0-4
fixed 949227 4.5.0-7
retitle 949227 python-pysaml2: FTBFS in buster because of expired certificate
thanks
Reopening because packages in stable *must* build in stable.
In fact, it fails right now, without waiting to 2020-11-28.
Error message says something like t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 949227
Bug #949227 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:python-pysaml2] python-pysaml2 FTBFS after 2020-11-28
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-a
Ciao,
in my opinion, the issue arises from a function that is directly
accessing the internal structure. Using the documented interface heals
the bug.
A proposed patch:
*** squfof126.c~2020-02-18 12:25:12.210812063 +0100
--- squfof126.c 2020-02-18 12:23:50.647283918 +0100
***
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:16:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#951398: fixed in texlive-extra 2019.202000218-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #951398,
regarding FTBFS: pax.jar
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:20:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950045: fixed in python-morph 0.1.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #950045,
regarding python-morph FTBFS: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:21:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#950037: fixed in python-proliantutils 2.9.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950037,
regarding python-proliantutils FTBFS: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #950045 [src:python-morph] python-morph FTBFS: test failure
Added tag(s) pending.
--
950045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #950045 in python-morph reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-morph/commit/06e6a06abff
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #950037 [src:python-proliantutils] python-proliantutils FTBFS: test failures
Added tag(s) pending.
--
950037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950037
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #950037 in python-proliantutils reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/libs/python-proliantutils/comm
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/taoliu/MACS/issues/359
I have forwarded the issue upstream.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream
Bug #949204 [src:macs] macs FTBFS on most architectures. test failures
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/taoliu/MACS/issues/359
Bug #949204 [src:macs] macs FTBFS on most architectures. test failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address
Hi Santiago,
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 15:46 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> BTW, I will prepare a git branch in my personal salsa namespace. But
> I
> am not sure against which branch should I propose a MR.
Thank you for taking care of the packages in Buster. I just created a
branch for Buster. You ca
71 matches
Mail list logo
