Processed: Re: Bug#950079: grub-cloud-amd64: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/grub

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #950079 [grub-cloud-amd64] grub-cloud-amd64: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/grub Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 950079: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Bug#950079: grub-cloud-amd64: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/default/grub

Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 09:25:28PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then > prompted the user for an action. As there is no use

Bug#951565: freerdp2-x11: does not work at all, immediately exits, against xrdp server (rdesktop works)

Package: freerdp2-x11 Version: 2.0.0~git20190204.1.2693389a+dfsg1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable tglase@tglase-nb:~ $ xfreerdp /v:tglase-edge [07:15:07:750] [29233:29234] [INFO][com.freerdp.client.common.cm

Bug#877221: marked as done (node-babylon: B-D npm not available in testing)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:50:45 +0100 with message-id <8620756f-be5d-099a-f03a-4147f0058...@debian.org> and subject line fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #877221, regarding node-babylon: B-D npm not available in testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#925625: marked as done (abr2gbr: ftbfs with GCC-9)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2020 03:19:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925625: fixed in abr2gbr 1:1.0.2-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #925625, regarding abr2gbr: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: Re: Bug#951398: pax.jar FTBFS: issue introduction

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 951398 2019.20191208-1 Bug #951398 [src:texlive-extra] FTBFS: pax.jar Marked as found in versions texlive-extra/2019.20191208-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 951398: https://bugs.debian.or

Bug#951398: pax.jar FTBFS: issue introduction

found 951398 2019.20191208-1 thanks On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, John Scott wrote: > pax.jar seems to exist in version 2019.20191208-1 as well. If someone could > affirm this is not an issue introduced with the new upload, could one set > this > bug as being found in 2019.20191208-1? This would enable

Bug#951398: pax.jar FTBFS: issue introduction

Hello, pax.jar seems to exist in version 2019.20191208-1 as well. If someone could affirm this is not an issue introduced with the new upload, could one set this bug as being found in 2019.20191208-1? This would enable the transition to testing. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally s

Bug#950127: pyside2 fails all autopkg tests

Package: pyside2 Followup-For: Bug #950127 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu focal ubuntu-patch These tests fail because the test dependencies are always buggy when there is more than one supported version of python in the archive; the tests invoke py3versions to enumerat

Processed: Bug#951494 marked as pending in procps

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #951494 [procps] libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname Added tag(s) pending. -- 951494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#950772: Patch: swupdate: FTBFS during separate arch/indep builds

Hi, I have created a merge request at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swupdate/merge_requests/2 which fixes the issue. Please consider merging and uploading to sid. Regards, Bastian

Bug#951494: marked as pending in procps

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #951494 in procps reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/procps/commit/c35a627e92cee8585e5ada867a94c2a6ae8ebc

Bug#951398: Rebuild pax

BTW, you messed up the $dist variable, the pax.jar needs to go to texmf-dist/scripts/pax/ not texmf-dist/tex/latex/pax/ The correct replacement in the build file is that + Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wie

Bug#951398: Rebuild pax

On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > They need to be replaced by link to their respective package (normally > it is symlink to /usr/share/commons-logging.jar) THanks, this is what I already implemented and test-building now. Norbert -- PREINING Norbert htt

Bug#950305: marked as done (debci: autopkgtest regression: test_localtest.sh failed at least one test)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 22:49:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950305: fixed in debci 2.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #950305, regarding debci: autopkgtest regression: test_localtest.sh failed at least one test to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#950172: marked as done (gpscorrelate ftbfs with libexiv2-27)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 22:49:13 +0100 with message-id <9528f172-5e11-0b7f-df6d-18fc18dd1...@probeta.net> and subject line Re: gpscorrelate ftbfs with libexiv2-27 has caused the Debian Bug report #950172, regarding gpscorrelate ftbfs with libexiv2-27 to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#943215: marked as done (sosreport: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:53:55 -0500 with message-id and subject line Re: sosreport: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye has caused the Debian Bug report #943215, regarding sosreport: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#951398: Rebuild pax

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:12 PM Norbert Preining wrote: > > Hi Bastien, > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > For rebuilding pax you need to apply this patch then from > > Ok, it is not that easy but done that now. > > > source/pax/latex/pax run ant > > ok. > > This script generat

Bug#951538: golang-github-sylabs-sif: FTBFS: Can't exec "go"

package: src:golang-github-sylabs-sif version: 1.0.9-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, The latest upload of golang-github-sylabs-sif to unstable fails everywhere: Can't exec "go": No such file or directory at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 484. https://buildd.debian.org/sta

Bug#951537: php-horde-data: CVE-2020-8518

Source: php-horde-data Version: 2.1.4-6 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole Control: found -1 2.1.4-5 Control: found -1 2.1.4-3 Hi, The following vulnerability was published for php-horde-data. CVE-2020-8518[0]: | Horde Groupware Webmail Edition 5.2.22 allow

Processed: php-horde-data: CVE-2020-8518

Processing control commands: > found -1 2.1.4-5 Bug #951537 [src:php-horde-data] php-horde-data: CVE-2020-8518 Marked as found in versions php-horde-data/2.1.4-5. > found -1 2.1.4-3 Bug #951537 [src:php-horde-data] php-horde-data: CVE-2020-8518 Marked as found in versions php-horde-data/2.1.4-3.

Bug#951398: Rebuild pax

Hi Bastien, On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > For rebuilding pax you need to apply this patch then from Ok, it is not that easy but done that now. > source/pax/latex/pax run ant ok. This script generates **three** files: texmf-dist/tex/latex/pax/pax.jargood

Bug#936358: cwiid: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

I am interested in maintaining the sonic-pi package [1] which depends on cwiid. For this reason I would also like to keep the cwiid package or is there already someone working on this? Regards [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sonic-pi El 2/17/20 a las

Bug#936358: cwiid: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Hi Im happy to help with this issue... Pablo Mestre

Bug#951531: network-manager: unable to activate wired connection when network-manager manages it

Package: network-manager Version: 1.14.6-2+deb10u1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? (Default Debian 10.3 installation with Plasma) I wanted NetworkManager to manage my connection. I've disabled /etc/network/interfaces lik

Bug#951522: FTBFS: wants long-removed emacs25

Source: a2ps Version: 1:4.14-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! I'm afraid this package build-depends on emacs25, which is long since gone. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-d

Bug#951521: nipy: build-depends on removed package python-scipy

Source: nipy Version: 0.4.2-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, nipy build-depends on python-scipy which was removed from unstable on 2020-01-15. -Ralf.

Bug#950474: python-cogent FTBFS on armel and i386: test failures

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:47PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:06:30PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > While we are waiting for the RM bug processing, can you please do another > > source-only upload of this package, so that it can migrate to testing >

Bug#950474: python-cogent FTBFS on armel and i386: test failures

Hi Dmitry, On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:06:30PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > Will do so once the packages are removed. I reported the issue > > upstream as well. > > While we are waiting for the RM bug processing, can you please do another > source-only upload of this package, so that it can

Bug#922589: FTBFS against opencv 4.0.1 (exp)

Hi again, I seriously need help to port the code to OpenCV 4. Unfortunately I did not found a porting guide. Could you help? Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 04:09:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 05:15:14PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > pkg-confi

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:ndpi

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:ndpi > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Settin

Processed: [bts-link] source package mariadb-10.3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mariadb-10.3 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Se

Bug#950474: python-cogent FTBFS on armel and i386: test failures

Hi Andreas! On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 07:33:35AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 upstream > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cogent3/cogent3/issues/534 > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 01:12:27PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > The armel port has no FPU in the baseline, > > and t

Bug#925797: marked as done (opensurgsim: ftbfs with GCC-9)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:48:02 +0100 with message-id <20200217174802.gi7...@an3as.eu> and subject line Closing manually due to typo in changelog has caused the Debian Bug report #925797, regarding opensurgsim: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#947031: marked as done (Fails to build with python3.8)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:35:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947031: fixed in python-libarchive-c 2.9-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #947031, regarding Fails to build with python3.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#947031: python-libarchive-c: diff for NMU version 2.9-0.1

Control: tags 947031 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-libarchive-c (versioned 2.9-0.1) The change can be smaller if you would like to cherry-pick the upstream commit, as the patch from the bug submitter. I also took the liberty to update Standards-Version to current

Processed: Rebuild pax

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #951398 [src:texlive-extra] FTBFS: pax.jar Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #951398 to the same tags previously set > severity -1 serious Bug #951398 [src:texlive-extra] FTBFS: pax.jar Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 951398: http

Bug#950535: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#950535: iptables-restore segfaults on nat table

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1407 Control: severity -1 normal Hi Christoph, I'm quoting a email from Jamie Strandboge, who is both the maintainer in Debian and the creator of ufw, and has kindly replied my question about this bug: [quote] ... These rules

Processed: Re: [pkg-netfilter-team] Bug#950535: iptables-restore segfaults on nat table

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1407 Bug #950535 [iptables] iptables-restore segfaults on nat table Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1407'. > severity -1 normal Bug #950535 [iptables] iptable

Processed: python-libarchive-c: diff for NMU version 2.9-0.1

Processing control commands: > tags 947031 + pending Bug #947031 [src:python-libarchive-c] Fails to build with python3.8 Added tag(s) pending. -- 947031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947031 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: found 951494 in 2:3.3.16-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 951494 2:3.3.16-1 Bug #951494 [procps] libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #951494 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Processed: Re: Bug#951494: libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname

Processing control commands: > notfound -1 2:3.3.15-2+b1 Bug #951494 [procps] libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #951494 to the same values previously set > found -1 2:3.3.16-1 Bug #951494 [procps] libprocps-dev: dead symlink point

Bug#951494: libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname

control: notfound -1 2:3.3.15-2+b1 control: found -1 2:3.3.16-1 On 2020-02-17 13:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: procps > Version: 2:3.3.15-2+b1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > The libprocps.so symlink in libprocps-dev points to: > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/li

Processed: notfound 951494 in 2:3.3.15-2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 951494 2:3.3.15-2 Bug #951494 [procps] libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname No longer marked as found in versions procps/2:3.3.15-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 951494:

Bug#951455: marked as done (byobu: FTBFS: dh_installdocs failed)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:51:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#951455: fixed in byobu 5.133-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #951455, regarding byobu: FTBFS: dh_installdocs failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#950216: marked as done (missing xsltproc autopkg test dependency)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:52:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950216: fixed in git-buildpackage 0.9.18 has caused the Debian Bug report #950216, regarding missing xsltproc autopkg test dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Processed: retitle 949834 to firefox-esr: illegal instruction in /usr/lib/firefox-esr/libxul.so

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 949834 firefox-esr: illegal instruction in > /usr/lib/firefox-esr/libxul.so Bug #949834 [firefox-esr] firefox-esr: illegal instruction in /usr/lib/firefox-esr/libxul.so Ignoring request to change the title of bug#949834 to the same title

Processed: retitle 949834 to [arm64] firefox-esr: illegal instruction in /usr/lib/firefox-esr/libxul.so

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 949834 [arm64] firefox-esr: illegal instruction in > /usr/lib/firefox-esr/libxul.so Bug #949834 [firefox-esr] firefox-esr: illegal instruction in /usr/lib/firefox-esr/libxul.so Changed Bug title to '[arm64] firefox-esr: illegal instructi

Processed: tagging 949834

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 949834 + unreproducible Bug #949834 [firefox-esr] firefox-esr: illegal instruction in /usr/lib/firefox-esr/libxul.so Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 949834: https

Bug#950074: marked as done (python-pipx FTBFS: test failure)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:49:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950074: fixed in python-pipx 0.12.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #950074, regarding python-pipx FTBFS: test failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#895640: marked as done (openstack-trove FTBFS: test failures)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:49:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#895640: fixed in openstack-trove 1:12.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #895640, regarding openstack-trove FTBFS: test failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#939436: marked as done (node-js-beautify: does not start: 'config-chain' not found)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:16:04 +0100 with message-id <21b185e9-cdef-b69b-c03a-c1d9fe0e1...@debian.org> and subject line Unable to reproduce & proven by tests has caused the Debian Bug report #939436, regarding node-js-beautify: does not start: 'config-chain' not found to be marked as

Bug#933334: Remove ugene from Buster (Was: ugene: FTBFS in buster (dpkg-shlibdeps error))

> reopen 94 > found 94 1.31.1+dfsg-1 > fixed 94 33.0+dfsg-1 > thanks > > Reopening because packages in stable must build in stable. I wonder whether it might be the best solution to simply ask for removal of 1.31.1+dfsg-1 in buster and provide a backport of the latest version? In an

Bug#950337: marked as done (rust-num-traits: FTBFS on mipsel/mips64el: assertion failed: x.max(y) == min)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 12:34:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950337: fixed in rust-num-traits 0.2.11-1+doctestfix has caused the Debian Bug report #950337, regarding rust-num-traits: FTBFS on mipsel/mips64el: assertion failed: x.max(y) == min to be marked as done. This

Bug#951494: libprocps-dev: dead symlink point to the old soname

Package: procps Version: 2:3.3.15-2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The libprocps.so symlink in libprocps-dev points to: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libprocps.so -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libprocps.so.7 However libprocps.so.7 is gone and has been replaced by libprocps.so.8

Bug#951488: rspamd/buster causes extensive load on upstream servers, will be disabled

Package: rspamd Version: 1.8.1-2 Severity: serious As mentioned in https://twitter.com/rspamd/status/1229088580078837760, rspamd 1.8.1 contains a serious issue that causes excessive server load, causing upstream to want to block IPs using it from the server. This needs to be updated in stable, o

Bug#951120: marked as done (hydra: Non-free licence exception)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:30:35 +0100 with message-id <20200217103035.ga142...@home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#951120: hydra: Non-free licence exception has caused the Debian Bug report #951120, regarding hydra: Non-free licence exception to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: fixed 949393 in 3.2.1-1+deb8u1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 949393 3.2.1-1+deb8u1 Bug #949393 [src:storebackup] storebackup: CVE-2020-7040: denial of service and symlink attack vector via fixed lockfile path /tmp/storeBackup.lock The source 'storebackup' and version '3.2.1-1+deb8u1' do not appear to

Bug#948186:

Control: tags -1 patch -D_Python_CONFIG:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-python3.7-config \ -DPython_EXECUTABLE:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/python3.7 \ should read: -D_Python_CONFIG:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-python3.8-config \ -DPython_EXECUTABLE:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/python3.8 \ Maybe double-chec

Processed:

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #948186 [src:openvdb] openvdb: FTBFS against python3.8 Added tag(s) patch. -- 948186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: block 948080 with 951407

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 948080 with 951407 Bug #948080 {Done: Andreas Tille } [src:python-cogent] python-cogent build depends on and recommends the removed blast2 transitional package 948080 was blocked by: 948415 819649 948080 was not blocking any bugs. Added bl

Processed: tagging 938734

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 938734 + upstream Bug #938734 [src:txsocksx] txsocksx: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 938734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

Bug#948097: marked as done (libbio-db-hts-perl: autopkgtest failure: Can't locate Bio/SeqFeature/Lite.pm in @INC)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:46:50 +0100 with message-id <20200217084650.gv7...@an3as.eu> and subject line Re: libbio-db-hts-perl: autopkgtest failure: Can't locate Bio/SeqFeature/Lite.pm in @INC] has caused the Debian Bug report #948097, regarding libbio-db-hts-perl: autopkgtest failure

Bug#948097: libbio-db-hts-perl: autopkgtest failure: Can't locate Bio/SeqFeature/Lite.pm in @INC

On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:29:26 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > You are perfectly right - but I'm wondering why the bug is listed as > open in BTS (also the typical "Done" is missing in the header of the bug > report). Despite it seems to be open per BTS the package migrated to > testing. Maybe the m

Bug#948097: libbio-db-hts-perl: autopkgtest failure: Can't locate Bio/SeqFeature/Lite.pm in @INC

Hi Gregor, On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:26:30AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:53:02 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > it seems we need some help again for this issue. Despite > > libbio-db-hts-perl depends libbio-perl-perl which contains > > > >/usr/share/perl5/Bio/Se