Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:18:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948162: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938013,
regarding python-peak.rules: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948162: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938727,
regarding turbojson: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:17:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948162: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #948162,
regarding RM: python-peak.util -- RoQA; python2-only; combination of modules
most of which deprecated, no py3k available
to be
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:06:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948068: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938712,
regarding trac-wikiprint: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:07:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948069: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938713,
regarding trac-wikitablemacro: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:07:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948070: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938714,
regarding trac-wysiwyg: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:03:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948062: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938701,
regarding trac-odtexport: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:03:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948062: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #866487,
regarding trac-odtexport: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with
python3-pil or python-pil)
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:06:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948067: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938711,
regarding trac-virtualticketpermissions: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:05:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948065: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938707,
regarding trac-subcomponents: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:04:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948064: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938705,
regarding trac-sensitivetickets: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:05:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948066: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938710,
regarding trac-translatedpages: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:04:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948063: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #889277,
regarding trac-privatetickets is empty
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:03:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948061: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938698,
regarding trac-mastertickets: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:00:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948055: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938715,
regarding trac-xmlrpc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:00:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948053: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938709,
regarding trac-tags: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:00:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948054: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938708,
regarding trac-subtickets: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:01:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948057: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938703,
regarding trac-privatewiki: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:01:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948056: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938704,
regarding trac-roadmap: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:03:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948060: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938697,
regarding trac-jsgantt: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:01:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948058: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938700,
regarding trac-navadd: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:02:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948059: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938699,
regarding trac-mercurial: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:02:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948059: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #787722,
regarding trac-mercurial: Upstream Defect #11696 applies to Jessie, too
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:57:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948046: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938695,
regarding trac-icalview: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:57:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948044: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938694,
regarding trac-httpauth: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:58:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948049: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938688,
regarding trac-customfieldadmin: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:58:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948048: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938690,
regarding trac-diavisview: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:58:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948047: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938689,
regarding trac-datefield: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:59:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948051: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938683,
regarding trac-accountmanager: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:57:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948045: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938696,
regarding trac-includemacro: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:59:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948050: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938684,
regarding trac-announcer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:56:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948042: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938685,
regarding trac-authopenid: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:56:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948043: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938693,
regarding trac-graphviz: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:56:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948042: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #895282,
regarding trac-authopenid: fails to work with trac 1.2 (get_db_cnx does not
work)
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:52:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936543,
regarding fontypython: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:51:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#855701: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #855494,
regarding mgltools-pmv: runPmv script does not work: ImportError: No module
named oldnumeric
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:51:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#855701: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #855485,
regarding mgltools-pmv: runPmv script does not work: TclError: cannot use
geometry manager grid
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:52:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #798738,
regarding fontypython: Fonty Python doesn't start, throws
wx._core.PyAssertionError
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:52:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #798738,
regarding Crashes with wx._core.PyAssertionError: C++ assertion "isOpaque"
failed..
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:52:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#938827: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938827,
regarding RM: winpdb -- RoQA; semi-dead upstream; unmaintained; low popcon;
blocking py2 removal
to be marked as done.
This m
close 948452 72.0.1-1
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 948452 72.0.1-1
Bug #948452 {Done: Mike Hommey } [firefox] firefox: Please
update to 72.0.1 (and firefox-esr to 68.4.1) because of CVE-2019-17026
Marked as fixed in versions firefox/72.0.1-1; no longer marked as fixed in
versions 72.0.1-1.
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:49:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948431: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937944,
regarding python-networkx: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 keep cain out of testing
Bug #948473 [src:cain] cain: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'keep cain out of testing' from 'cain: should this package
be removed?'.
--
948473: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948473
Debia
control: retitle -1 keep cain out of testing
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:12 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Sandro,
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 09:28:16PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >
> > * python2-only
> > * no upstream release since July 2012 (not even advertized on their HP)
> > * low popcon (bu
Hi Sandro,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 09:28:16PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> * python2-only
> * no upstream release since July 2012 (not even advertized on their HP)
> * low popcon (but it's also probably part of a niche package)
I once gave it a try with 2to3 but failed. I intend to give
it ano
tags 948404 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi!
Thanks for your report! Unfortunately I can't reproduce this bug, I install
glances via ap-get install and works fine, However, I think that bug is related
with this other bug[1], One Question, Do you have network interfaces?
Regards.
[1]: http
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 948404 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #948404 [glances] glances crashes on startup
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
948404: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jan 2020 04:19:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#943052: fixed in distro-info 0.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #943052,
regarding distro-info: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #943052 in distro-info reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/distro-info/commit/723f1a6ca4f386c371dea4e15f6d
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #943052 [src:distro-info] distro-info: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
943052: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2
> from bullseye
> # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
> # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html
> # See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
Source: cain
Severity: serious
Hello,
it seems to me there are several issues with this package:
* python2-only
* no upstream release since July 2012 (not even advertized on their HP)
* low popcon (but it's also probably part of a niche package)
* one of the only 2 reverse-dependency for python-s
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #939511 {Done: Andreas Tille } [tifffile]
/usr/bin/tifffile doesn't work
Added tag(s) pending.
--
939511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Followup-For: Bug #939511
Control: tag -1 pending
buster-pu request: https://bugs.debian.org/948472
Andreas
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:26:57 +0900
with message-id <20200109002657.nglycrd6zctvo...@glandium.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#948452: firefox: Please update to 72.0.1 (and
firefox-esr to 68.4.1) because of CVE-2019-17026
has caused the Debian Bug report #948452,
regarding firefox: Plea
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2020 00:38:32 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: [Pkg-opencl-devel] Bug#947865: pyopencl: FTBFS in sid
has caused the Debian Bug report #947865,
regarding pyopencl: FTBFS in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Hello Michael and Thomas,
Michael Biebl [2020-01-08 19:42 +0100]:
> > The latest update of network-manager causes an autopkgtest regression in
> > python-dbusmock.
> >
> > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/python-dbusmock/3793816/log.gz
> >
> > ==
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #948385 [src:pykaraoke] pykaraoke: Pykaraoke doesn't work because it needs
packages "ttf-dejavu ttf-dejavu-extra"
Added tag(s) pending.
> found -1 0.7.5-1.2
Bug #948385 [src:pykaraoke] pykaraoke: Pykaraoke doesn't work because it needs
packages "
Followup-For: Bug #948385
Control: tag -1 pending
Control: found -1 0.7.5-1.2
No need for the transitional ttf-* packages, just fix the symlinks:
s/ttf-//.
buster-pu: https://bugs.debian.org/948464
stretch-pu: https://bugs.debian.org/948465
Andreas
On 08/01/2020 16:07, Michael Biebl wrote:
Anyone willing to check the proposed fix
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/848b869c6ede3a796872a0b5cd8b2398804c3697
Hi,
I tested the proposed patch on top of debian's 1.22.2-1 version. This
patch does NOT fix the iss
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 22:08:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948417: fixed in python-astor 0.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #948417,
regarding python-astor ftbfs with Python 3.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On 08/01/2020 21.53, Alexis wrote:
> So I installed packages to use the nvidia proprietary drivers (xserver-xorg-
> video-nvidia-legacy-340xx and related packages).
You didn't install the metapackage nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver, did you?
> pn nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:47:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#930764: fixed in cyrus-imapd 3.0.8-6+deb10u4
has caused the Debian Bug report #930764,
regarding Fails to configure package due to "unknown type of DB: BACKUP" on
upgrade-db
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:47:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#946937: fixed in python-django 1:1.10.7-2+deb9u7
has caused the Debian Bug report #946937,
regarding python-django: CVE-2019-19844: Potential account hijack via password
reset form
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:47:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#946937: fixed in python-django 1:1.11.27-1~deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #946937,
regarding python-django: CVE-2019-19844: Potential account hijack via password
reset form
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:47:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941266: fixed in netty 1:4.1.7-2+deb9u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #941266,
regarding netty: CVE-2019-16869
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:47:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#930774: fixed in guile-2.2 2.2.4+1-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #930774,
regarding guile-2.2: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:47:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#944820: fixed in simplesamlphp 1.16.3-1+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #944820,
regarding SimpleSAMLphp fails when consuming assertion
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 21:47:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#945864: fixed in unhide 20130526-3+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #945864,
regarding unhide[208429]: segfault at 7ffd06cfec58 ip 55c15aa077d3 sp
7ffd06cfec60 error 6 in unhide-linux[55c15aa07
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 948426 + pending
Bug #948426 [src:python-whoosh] python-whoosh ftbfs in unstable
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
948426: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #948417 [src:python-astor] python-astor ftbfs with Python 3.8
Added tag(s) pending.
--
948417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #948417 in python-astor reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-astor/commit/77a011ab0cdb6
Hi!
El mié., 8 ene. 2020 18:08, Sebastian Ramacher
escribió:
> Control: tags -1 + help moreinfo
>
> On 2019-12-28 22:12:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Source: qsynth
> > Version: 0.6.0-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS on s390x
> >
> > Hi! Your package failed t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + help moreinfo
Bug #947679 [src:qsynth] qsynth: FTBFS on s390x: lrelease error: Parse error
... qsynth_sr.ts:734:29: Premature end of document.
Added tag(s) moreinfo and help.
--
947679: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947679
Debian Bug
Control: tags -1 + help moreinfo
On 2019-12-28 22:12:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Source: qsynth
> Version: 0.6.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on s390x
>
> Hi! Your package failed to build from source on s390x with the following
> error:
>
> lrelease error: P
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-legacy-340xx
Version: 340.108-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
first things first, happy new year to all !
I've been using Debian since Potato and I've always found it stable so far.
On 5th january I did a fresh install
Source: sympy, yt
Control: found -1 sympy/1.5-1
Control: found -1 yt/3.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of sympy the autopkgtest of yt fails in
Processing control commands:
> found -1 sympy/1.5-1
Bug #948459 [src:sympy, src:yt] sympy breaks yt autopkgtest: FAIL: Create units
with strings and check attributes.
Marked as found in versions sympy/1.5-1.
> found -1 yt/3.5.1-2
Bug #948459 [src:sympy, src:yt] sympy breaks yt autopkgtest: FAIL:
Processing control commands:
> found -1 sympy/1.5-1
Bug #948458 [src:sympy, src:octave-symbolic] sympy breaks octave-symbolic
autopkgtest: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'Singleton' and 'FiniteSet'
Marked as found in versions sympy/1.5-1.
> found -1 octave-symbolic/2.8.0-1
Bug #948458 [src:sy
Source: sympy, octave-symbolic
Control: found -1 sympy/1.5-1
Control: found -1 octave-symbolic/2.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of sympy the a
(resending as a signed-mail, and with the TS included)
On 05.01.20 10:27, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> I would propose to add the workaround for s390x and wait for new test
> results for armhf resp. ignore them for ppc64el, as they where not
> reproducible. If no one disagrees I will do a NMU and c
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:owfs 3.2p3+dfsg1-2
Bug #943612 {Done: Vincent Danjean } [python3-ownet]
python3-ownet: Python2-only code shipped in Python3 module
Bug reassigned from package 'python3-ownet' to 'src:owfs'.
No longer marked as found in versions owfs/3.2p3+dfsg1-2.
No
Hi Micheal,
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 09:31:43 +0100 Michael Crusoe
wrote:
> > With a recent upload of bio-tradis the autopkgtest of bio-tradis fails
> > in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
> > bio-tradis from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
> > testi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 948452 + security
Bug #948452 [firefox] firefox: Please update to 72.0.1 (and firefox-esr to
68.4.1) because of CVE-2019-17026
Added tag(s) security.
> severity 948452 grave
Bug #948452 [firefox] firefox: Please update to 72.0.1 (and firefox
Followup-For: Bug #943612
Control: reassign -1 src:owfs 3.2p3+dfsg1-2
Control: fixed -1 3.2p3+dfsg1-5
Control: tag -1 pending
(Reassigning to the source package since the BTS does not understand that a
removed python3-ownet is a fixed python3-ownet.)
I've prepared a buster-pu request to drop the
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #943664 [xserver-xorg-video-radeon] xserver-xorg-video-radeon 19.1 (ppc64)
crash at startup: undefined symbol: exaGetPixmapDriverPrivate
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
943664: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Please fix this vulnerability in buster.
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-18224
Thanks and Regards,
Bharath
The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments is
confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intende
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 16:59:23 +0100 "Ralf P." wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
> Version: 1:19.0.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>on the ppc64 architecture the package
Downgrading the severity
Source: ruby-byebug
Version: 11.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of ruby-byebug the autopkgtest of ruby-pry-byebug
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is
Source: python-numpy
Version: 1:1.16.5-2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a (not so) recent upload of python-numpy the autopkgtest of
python-numpy fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run w
Source: python-dmsh
Version: 0.1.6-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of python-dmsh the autopkgtest of python-dmsh fails
in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary
Hi Patryk,
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 08:20:22 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
This bug hasn't seen any activity since it was filed and your package
hasn't been part of testing for 3 years now. I intent to ask for its
remova
Control: tags 945820 + patch
Control: tags 945820 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sysvinit (versioned as 2.96-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru sysvinit-2.96/debian/changelog sysvinit-2.96/debian/ch
Processing control commands:
> tags 945820 + patch
Bug #945820 [src:sysvinit] sysvinit_2.96-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 945820 + pending
Bug #945820 [src:sysvinit] sysvinit_2.96-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Added tag(s) pending.
--
945820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2020 19:19:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#948078: fixed in autoconf-archive 20190106-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #948078,
regarding autoconf-archive: please apply patch to fix boost_python library link
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Package: djview-plugin
Version: 4.11-2
Severity: serious
This package provides an NPAPI plugin.
All major browsers have dropped support for NPAPI.
Package: garmin-plugin
Version: 0.3.23-5
Severity: serious
This package provides an NPAPI plugin.
All major browsers have dropped support for NPAPI.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:35:35 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: network-manager, python-dbusmock
> Version: 1.22.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> The latest update of network-manager causes an autopkgtest regression in
> python-dbusmock.
>
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/p
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jan 2020 19:16:33 +0100
with message-id <42ecf1b7-b69d-6e6b-bf3a-72aed3755...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: python-lamson: non-functioning email address for Maintainer
has caused the Debian Bug report #771615,
regarding python-lamson: non-functioning email address for M
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
