Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #917829 [src:python-intbitset] python-intbitset: FTBFS when built with
dpkg-buildpackage -A
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
917829: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917829
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
control: severity -1 important
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 21:58:05 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 07:52:26PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >...
> > In case it helps, this stopped working in buster sometime between
> > 2018-12-11 and 2018-12-23
> >...
>
> The Python3 default change 3.
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2019 02:49:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#932529: fixed in fbcat 0.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932529,
regarding fbcat: Uses manual dh sequence operations that are going to be removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2019 01:49:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942241: fixed in pyjwt 1.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #942241,
regarding pyjwt: autopkgtest needs update for new version of pytest
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:07:07 +0900
with message-id <20191022100707.e0eb9fd3a635fff11fbe3...@iijmio-mail.jp>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #92,
regarding linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64: [regression] No graphics on some
IvyBridge / Haswell systems
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:07:07 +0900
with message-id <20191022100707.e0eb9fd3a635fff11fbe3...@iijmio-mail.jp>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #92,
regarding linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64: [regression] No graphics on some
IvyBridge / Haswell systems
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:07:07 +0900
with message-id <20191022100707.e0eb9fd3a635fff11fbe3...@iijmio-mail.jp>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #92,
regarding linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64: [regression] No graphics on some
IvyBridge / Haswell systems
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2019 01:19:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942787: fixed in unclutter 8-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #942787,
regarding unclutter,unclutter-startup: both ship
/usr/share/man/man1/unclutter-classic.1.gz
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 92 4.19.67-1
Bug #92 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64: [regression] No graphics on
some IvyBridge / Haswell systems
Bug #925967 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64: [regression] No graphics on
some IvyBridge / Haswell syst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 942787 + pending
Bug #942787 [unclutter,unclutter-startup] unclutter,unclutter-startup: both
ship /usr/share/man/man1/unclutter-classic.1.gz
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - unreproducible
Bug #942787 [unclutter,unclutter-startup] unclutter,unclutter-startup: both
ship /usr/share/man/man1/unclutter-classic.1.gz
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
--
942787: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942787
Debian Bug Tracki
Control: tag -1 - unreproducible
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
> > because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
> > dpkg: error processing archive
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/unclutter-startup_8-23_all.deb (--unpack):
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed unreproducible
Bug #942787 [unclutter,unclutter-startup] unclutter,unclutter-startup: both
ship /usr/share/man/man1/unclutter-classic.1.gz
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
942787: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942787
Debian Bug
Control: tag -1 confirmed unreproducible
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: unclutter,unclutter-startup
> Version: 8-23
[...]
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
> dpkg: error processing archive
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 934868 src:pynwb
Bug #934868 {Done: Yaroslav Halchenko } [pynwb] pynwb:
Please drop python2 support
Bug reassigned from package 'pynwb' to 'src:pynwb'.
No longer marked as found in versions 0.5.1-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 942667 src:cracklib2
Bug #942667 [src:cracklib] cracklib2 ignores build failures
Warning: Unknown package 'src:cracklib'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:cracklib' to 'src:cracklib2'.
No longer marked as found in versions cracklib/2.9.6-2
Package: libhibernate-validator-java
Version: 5.3.6-1
Severity: serious
The update of libhibernate-validator-java to version 5.3.6. broke at
least pdfsam (#942507) and libspring-java. The new version is incompatible with
libgeronimo-validation-1.0-spec-java and requires
libgeronimo-validation-1.1-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #942507 [pdfsam] pdfsam: Not working due to multiple errors
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
942507: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942507
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 942624 + buster-ignore stretch-ignore
Bug #942624 [src:activity-log-manager] src:activity-log-manager: Maintainer
email address not working
Added tag(s) stretch-ignore and buster-ignore.
> tags 938015 + experimental
Bug #938015 [src:python-p
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2019 23:49:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935552: fixed in nomad 0.9.6+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #935552,
regarding nomad: FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:41:57 +0200 Domenico Cufalo wrote:
> Package: pdfsam
> Version: 4.0.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I'm sorry for the generic subject of this bug report, but... I don't know how
> to expla
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 937493 src:pynwb
Bug #937493 [src:pynwb] pynwb: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to reassign bug #937493 to the same package
> forcemerge 934868 937493
Bug #934868 {Done: Yaroslav Halchenko } [pynwb] pynwb:
Please drop py
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 934868 937493
Bug #934868 {Done: Yaroslav Halchenko } [pynwb] pynwb:
Please drop python2 support
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #937493 is 'src:pynwb' not 'pynwb'
Failed to forcibly merge 934868: Did not alter merged bugs.
>
Hey Matthias,
> patch at
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/447871899/nml_0.4.5-1build2_0.4.5-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
Thanks for the report and the patch, looks good. I'll prepare an upload
with it, probably somewhere next week.
Gr.
Matthijs
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hey Matthias,
> Thanks for the report and the patch, looks good. I'll prepare an upload
> with it, probably somewhere next week.
I had another look upstream, seems they fixed it by falling back to
PILLOW_VERSION unconditionally, but I also noticed PIL.__version__ is
actually the recommended replac
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:41:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942785: fixed in klavaro 3.09-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #942785,
regarding klavaro: ships /usr/include/gtkdatabox*.h belonging to
libgtkdatabox-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 08:32:57AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=filezilla shows you
> apparently prepared a new upload including a fix for this about 3.5
> weeks ago, but it seems this hasn't actually been uploaded.
I just noticed your previous filezill
Hi Adrien,
Thanks for you work maintaining filezilla in Debian.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:05:03AM -0400, s...@techie.net wrote:
> Your package appears to be using the wxWidgets GTK 2 implementation. In
> Debian, we have had a GTK 3 implementation of wxWidgets for some time.
> For the bullseye
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #942716 [src:nml] nml ftbfs (test errors)
Added tag(s) patch.
--
942716: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942716
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + patch
patch at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/447871899/nml_0.4.5-1build2_0.4.5-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #942757 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [src:odb-api]
odb-api: fails to build with multiple supported python3 versions
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add t
control: reopen -1
control: notfixed -1 0.18.1-8
hello please see and apply the attached fix.
--- odb-api-0.18.1/debian/changelog 2019-10-20 21:57:26.0 +0200
+++ odb-api-0.18.1/debian/changelog 2019-10-21 16:39:01.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+odb-api (0.18.1-8ubuntu1) focal;
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 942787 + confirmed
Bug #942787 [unclutter,unclutter-startup] unclutter,unclutter-startup: both
ship /usr/share/man/man1/unclutter-classic.1.gz
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package:
libbio-db-biofetch-perl,libbio-db-gff-perl,libbio-db-seqfeature-perl,libbio-searchio-hmmer-perl,libbio-tools-run-remoteblast-perl
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrad
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:03:29 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #942786,
regarding py.test fails to run
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 942786 python-importlib-metadata
Bug #942786 [python-pytest] py.test fails to run
Bug reassigned from package 'python-pytest' to 'python-importlib-metadata'.
No longer marked as found in versions pytest/4.6.6-1.
Ignoring request to alter
On 10/18/19 9:38 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> tag 942617 + patch
> thanks
>
> I've found a patch for that and verified that it works, feel free to
> cherry-pick from here:
>
> https://git.progress-linux.org/distributions/engywuck-backports/packages/kexec-tools/tree/debian/patches/progress-linux/00
Package: unclutter,unclutter-startup
Version: 8-23
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Package: python-pytest
Version: 4.6.6-1
Severity: grave
Attempting to run py.test fails with the following traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/py.test", line 6, in
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
File
"/home/iko/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_r
Package: klavaro
Version: 3.09-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
klavaro does not sound like it is supposed to ship these headers:
u
Package: lazarus-src-2.0
Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 942768 serious
Bug #942768 [lcl-units-2.0] lcl-units-2.0: file conflict with lazarus-src-2.0
(versin 2.0.2+dfsg-5)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Package: openjdk-14-dbg
Version: 14~19-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package repmgr
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'repmgr'
Limit currently set to 'package':'repmgr'
> fixed 942536 5.0.0-2
Bug #942536 {Done: Marco Nenciarini } [repmgr] repmgr needs
a source-only upload
Mark
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #937162 [src:nototools] nototools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
--
937162: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937162
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #937162 in nototools reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/nototools/commit/a82028254de1d5bd024848203c5a
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:26:15 +0200
with message-id <5d76a00c-acf9-11fe-df98-352a5cfda...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: repmgr needs a source-only upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #942536,
regarding repmgr needs a source-only upload
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
reassign 941933 libnormaliz-dev
kthxbye
I'm reassigning this bug to normaliz. As noted by the polymake maintainer,
this is a question of normaliz headers missing a dependency, not polymake
itself being buggy.
In Ubuntu, I patched[1] normaliz to have the arch:any header package depend
on libeanti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 941933 libnormaliz-dev
Bug #941933 [src:polymake] polymake: FTBFS: no more rules available to compute
'HILBERT_BASIS_GENERATORS'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:polymake' to 'libnormaliz-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions polym
Package: tesseract-ocr
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
tesseract-ocr 4.1.0-2 depends on libtesseract4 >= 4.0.0.
However, invokation fails with libtesseract4 4.0.0:
tesseract: symbol lookup error: tesseract: undefined symbol:
_ZN9tesseract10SIMDDetect15avx
50 matches
Mail list logo
