Bug#935375: buffycli: Depends on to be removed libs

2019-08-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: buffycli Version: 0.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 The libbuffy-bindings/libbuffy maintainer has requested these packages be removed from Debian. Please either request rm of this package or port it to no longer require the libbuffy bindings. Scott K

Bug#909276: marked as done (xorg-server breaks qbzr autopkgtest: AssertionError: Timeout!)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:21:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935357: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #909276, regarding xorg-server breaks qbzr autopkgtest: AssertionError: Timeout! to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#933674: marked as done (Buffer overflow during processing of large server replies in "pump")

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:18:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935332: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #933674, regarding Buffer overflow during processing of large server replies in "pump" to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#875138: marked as done ([qsapecng] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:19:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935338: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875138, regarding [qsapecng] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#933994: marked as done (ocaml-sqlexpr FTBFS because it depends on lwt.syntax)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:16:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935248: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #933994, regarding ocaml-sqlexpr FTBFS because it depends on lwt.syntax to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#875500: marked as done (Qt4 removal form Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:15:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935242: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875500, regarding Qt4 removal form Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#875499: marked as done (hgview: Qt4 removal form Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:15:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935240: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875499, regarding hgview: Qt4 removal form Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#907760: marked as done (hgview FTBFS with mercurial 4.7)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:15:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935240: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #907760, regarding hgview FTBFS with mercurial 4.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#935333: marked as done (Should hgview be removed?)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:15:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935240: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #935333, regarding Should hgview be removed? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#875003: marked as done ([kvpnc] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:14:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935238: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875003, regarding [kvpnc] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#872692: marked as done (hgview fails to run)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:15:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935240: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #872692, regarding hgview fails to run to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#874987: marked as done ([kscd] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:14:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935237: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874987, regarding [kscd] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#874979: marked as done ([kredentials] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:13:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935235: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874979, regarding [kredentials] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#925727: marked as done (kremotecontrol: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:13:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935236: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #925727, regarding kremotecontrol: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#925807: marked as done (pulseaudio: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:10:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925807: fixed in pulseaudio 12.99.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #925807, regarding pulseaudio: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#874980: marked as done ([kremotecontrol] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:13:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935236: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874980, regarding [kremotecontrol] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#874973: marked as done ([kprinter4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:47:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935233: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874973, regarding [kprinter4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#874977: marked as done ([kradio4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:48:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935234: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874977, regarding [kradio4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#874970: marked as done ([kppp] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:47:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935232: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874970, regarding [kppp] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#874969: marked as done ([kpartsplugin] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:46:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935231: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874969, regarding [kpartsplugin] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#874953: marked as done ([kfilemetadata] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:45:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935226: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874953, regarding [kfilemetadata] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#874956: marked as done ([kmldonkey] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:46:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935228: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874956, regarding [kmldonkey] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#826473: marked as done (kdesrc-build: FTBFS with Perl 5.26: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:44:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935225: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #826473, regarding kdesrc-build: FTBFS with Perl 5.26: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#874941: marked as done ([kdbg] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:44:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935224: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874941, regarding [kdbg] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#874926: marked as done ([kamerka] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:43:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935221: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874926, regarding [kamerka] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#874938: marked as done ([kcollectd] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:43:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935223: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874938, regarding [kcollectd] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#874927: marked as done ([kaccessible] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:41:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935218: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874927, regarding [kaccessible] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#874928: marked as done ([kalternatives] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:42:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935220: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #874928, regarding [kalternatives] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#875501: marked as done (Qt4 removal from Buster)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:40:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935180: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875501, regarding Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#884997: marked as done (lottanzb: Please don't recommend python-gnome2)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:41:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935206: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #884997, regarding lottanzb: Please don't recommend python-gnome2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#866447: marked as done (opensesame: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with python3-pil or python-pil))

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:40:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935180: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #866447, regarding opensesame: depends on obsolete python-imaging (replace with python3-pil or python-pil) to be marked as done. This

Processed: fixed 934483 in 6.0.10-dfsg-5, affects 934483

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 934483 6.0.10-dfsg-5 Bug #934483 {Done: Gianfranco Costamagna } [virtualbox-guest-dkms] virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae Marked as fixed in versions virtualbox/6.0.10-dfsg-5. > affects 934

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#934483: virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 virtualbox-guest-dkms 6.0.10-dfsg-4 Bug #934483 {Done: Gianfranco Costamagna } [src:linux] virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'virtualbox-guest-dkms'. No longer

Bug#934483: Processed: Re: Bug#934483: virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae

2019-08-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: reassign -1 virtualbox-guest-dkms 6.0.10-dfsg-4 On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 14:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing control commands: > > > reassign -1 src:linux No, this is not our problem to fix. In answer to your question, which *wasn't* cc'd to debian-kernel: > Ben,

Processed: closing 925837

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 925837 2.3.3-4 Bug #925837 {Done: أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) } [src:systemc] systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9 Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #925837 to the same values previously set Bug #925837 {Done: أحمد المحمودي (Ahme

Processed: closing 925837

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 925837 2.3.3-4 Bug #925837 [src:systemc] systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9 Marked as fixed in versions systemc/2.3.3-4. Bug #925837 [src:systemc] systemc: ftbfs with GCC-9 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Bug#925837: closing 925837

2019-08-21 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
close 925837 2.3.3-4 thanks -- ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyIDs: 4096R/A7EF5671 2048R/EDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprints: 6E2E E4BB 72E2 F417 D066 6ABF 7B30 B496 A7EF 5761 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7

Bug#830726: xtrlock: CVE-2016-10894: xtrlock does not block multitouch events

2019-08-21 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > I've been working on an updated patch that detects new devices and > blocks them too. However, "grabbing" devices during the processing of > these "device hierarchy changed" events appears to do something funny > and actually disables all input entirely for me Whilst I've fixe

Bug#934972: marked as done (bubbros: Graphics are too close to copyright infringement)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:39:29 +0200 with message-id <38cf4d77-7886-edcd-5934-5340cc92d...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#934972: bubbros: Graphics are too close to copyright infringement has caused the Debian Bug report #934972, regarding bubbros: Graphics are too close to cop

Processed: tagging 875150

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 875150 + fixed-upstream Bug #875150 [src:qtiplot] [qtiplot] Future Qt4 removal from Buster Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 875150: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/

Bug#931021: marked as done (musescore: phones home, including to Google Analytics, on first start)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931021: fixed in musescore 2.3.2+dfsg2-7~deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #931021, regarding musescore: phones home, including to Google Analytics, on first start to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#930935: marked as done (webkit2gtk: Baseline violation on i386)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:17:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#930935: fixed in webkit2gtk 2.24.3-1~deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #930935, regarding webkit2gtk: Baseline violation on i386 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#934975: marked as done (etw: Borderline copyright violation in team selection graphics)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:05:01 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#934975: etw: Borderline copyright violation in team selection graphics has caused the Debian Bug report #934975, regarding etw: Borderline copyright violation in team selection graphics to be marked as don

Bug#925791: marked as done (octave-octclip: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:38:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925791: fixed in octave-octclip 1.0.8-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #925791, regarding octave-octclip: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#925791: marked as pending in octave-octclip

2019-08-21 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #925791 in octave-octclip reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-octclip/commit/0b6a9c0df5128

Processed: Bug#925791 marked as pending in octave-octclip

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #925791 [src:octave-octclip] octave-octclip: ftbfs with GCC-9 Added tag(s) pending. -- 925791: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925791 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#935359: znc: Missing copyright attributions

2019-08-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Source: znc Version: 1.7.4-6 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, 10:53 pm Chris Lamb, wrote: > missing at least some references to Jquery etc. etc. > > -- Chris Lamb Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:53:36 + > ACK. :) >

Bug#935272: marked as done (astropy-healpix: FTBFS on amd64)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 20:52:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935272: fixed in astropy-healpix 0.4-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #935272, regarding astropy-healpix: FTBFS on amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#934591: Anki fails to start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'PyQt5.sip'

2019-08-21 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:22:23PM +0200, Arnaldo Pirrone wrote: > Hi, i do have python3-sip. > Now the error is this: > $ anki > Traceback (most recent call last): >   File "/usr/bin/anki", line 6, in >     import aqt >   File "/usr/share/anki/aqt/__init__.py", line 32, in >     import aqt.forms

Processed: Re: Bug#858774: modes_rx: ImportError: cannot import name QtWebKit

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #858774 [gr-air-modes] modes_rx: ImportError: cannot import name QtWebKit Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 858774: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858774 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Bug#934336: marked as done (python-shade: (build-)depends on cruft packages.)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:55:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934336: fixed in python-shade 1.30.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #934336, regarding python-shade: (build-)depends on cruft packages. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#875138: Can we remove qsapecng?

2019-08-21 Thread Simone Rossetto
RM bug filed: #935338 Bye Simone

Bug#935339: ruby-svg-graph: depends on ancient 'parsedate' Ruby core library

2019-08-21 Thread duck
package: ruby-svg-graph version: 1.0.5-3 severity: serious Quack, Sorry for the bad news but this library is not fit for release in this state. It depends on parsedate which was last seen in Ruby core in 1.8.7: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/SVG/Graph/TimeSeries.rb 4: require 'parsedate' 197:

Bug#935335: Depends on removed python-zbar

2019-08-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: src:monkeysign Version: 2.2.4 Severity: serious As Python 2 versions of zbar and zbarpygtk were removed, this package should be updated to use Python 3 or removed. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (5

Processed: Re: Bug#935182: Concurrent file open results file deletion by the read-only instance

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 935182 1:6.3.0-1 Bug #935182 [libreoffice-core] Concurrent file open on the same host results file deletion Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:6.3.0-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#935182: Concurrent file open results file deletion by the read-only instance

2019-08-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
found 935182 1:6.3.0-1 thanks On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 08:47:00AM +0200, Gilles MOREL wrote: > Actually, we were almost certain that the problem will be forwarded to the > upstream, so we openned the bug on Document Fondation too. Would have been nice to tell the upstream URL then in the report a

Bug#915270: marked as done (libgovirt: FTBFS because https-cert/ca-cert.pem is expired)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:47:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#915270: fixed in libgovirt 0.3.4-2+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #915270, regarding libgovirt: FTBFS because https-cert/ca-cert.pem is expired to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#875089: [pianobooster] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

2019-08-21 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:18:43PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Source: pianobooster > > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get > removed from the Debian repositorie

Bug#875150: [qtiplot] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

2019-08-21 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:08:00PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Source: qtiplot > > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get > removed from the Debian repositories. >

Bug#875177: [scap-workbench] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

2019-08-21 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Source: scap-workbench > > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get > removed from the Debian repositor

Bug#935333: Should hgview be removed?

2019-08-21 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: hgview Severity: serious Should hgview be removed? - Last maintainer upload in 2015 - Current upstream releases still depend on Python Qt4, which is scheduled for removal - Dropped from testing since almost two years, three RC bugs at this point Cheers, Moritz

Bug#935300: rsyslog: FTBFS on s390x

2019-08-21 Thread Rainer Gerhards
I had a look but to me it seems we actually run out file handles. No failure indication. Is this run in parallel? If so, how many tasks? Sent from phone, thus brief. Michael Biebl schrieb am Mi., 21. Aug. 2019, 19:10: > Am 21.08.19 um 17:43 schrieb Sven Joachim: > > On 2019-08-21 15:43 +0200,

Bug#935300: rsyslog: FTBFS on s390x

2019-08-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.08.19 um 17:43 schrieb Sven Joachim: > On 2019-08-21 15:43 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 8/21/19 3:14 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am 21.08.19 um 14:39 schrieb Ivo De Decker: package: src:rsyslog version: 8.1908.0-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs

Bug#843897: marked as done (Should allow pyqt5)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:50:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#843897: fixed in python-pyqtgraph 0.10.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #843897, regarding Should allow pyqt5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#934483: marked as done (virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:53:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#934483: fixed in virtualbox 6.0.10-dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #934483, regarding virtualbox-guest-dkms: Doesn't build with latest kernel in unstable 5.2.0-2-686-pae to be marked as done. This mea

Processed: tagging 935290, found 935290 in 2019.03.1-1

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 935290 + confirmed Bug #935290 [src:rakudo] rakudo: FTBFS on amd64 Added tag(s) confirmed. > found 935290 2019.03.1-1 Bug #935290 [src:rakudo] rakudo: FTBFS on amd64 Marked as found in versions rakudo/2019.03.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#935324: FTBFS: gluster API has changed

2019-08-21 Thread Adam Borowski
Source: qemu Version: 1:3.1+dfsg-8 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! I'm afraid that a recent incompatible change to gluster's API makes qemu fail to build: /<>/block/gluster.c: In function ‘qemu_gluster_do_truncate’:

Bug#935300: rsyslog: FTBFS on s390x

2019-08-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2019-08-21 15:43 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Hi, > > On 8/21/19 3:14 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 21.08.19 um 14:39 schrieb Ivo De Decker: >>> package: src:rsyslog >>> version: 8.1908.0-1 >>> severity: serious >>> tags: ftbfs >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The latest version of rsyslog in unstable fai

Bug#925831: Fixed : skiboot: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-21 Thread Frédéric Bonnard
Hi Matthias, new upstream skiboot 6.5 fixed that bug and I released a package of it : https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=skiboot&arch=amd64&ver=6.5-1&stamp=1566396860&raw=0 > Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in > a follow-up test rebuild. Is the previous build

Bug#920545: python-intervaltree breaks python-intervaltree-bio autopkgtest

2019-08-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:31:35PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > > I uploaded to Ubuntu the fix that was already in git [1]. > At the bottom right of the package tracker [2] (or the old PTS) is a link to > patches in Ubuntu. So it seems you were just lucky. I checked again, the error

Bug#934591: Anki fails to start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'PyQt5.sip'

2019-08-21 Thread Arnaldo Pirrone
Hi, i do have python3-sip. Now the error is this: $ anki Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/anki", line 6, in import aqt File "/usr/share/anki/aqt/__init__.py", line 32, in import aqt.forms File "/usr/share/anki/aqt/forms/__init__.py", line 44, in from . import

Bug#935314: trafficserver: CVE-2019-9518

2019-08-21 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: trafficserver Version: 8.0.3+ds-4 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole Hi, The following vulnerability was published for trafficserver, additionally to #934887. Filling as separate bug as the fixed version ranges slightly differ. CVE-2019-9518[0]: | S

Bug#935313: missing ebtables dependency

2019-08-21 Thread Antoine Beaupre
Package: libvirt-daemon Version: 5.0.0-4 Severity: grave File: /usr/sbin/libvirtd Vagrant, using the libvirt backend, started failing me recently, with something like this: anarcat@curie:stretch64(master)$ vagrant up --provider libvirt Bringing machine 'default' up with 'libvirt' provider... ==>

Bug#935300: rsyslog: FTBFS on s390x

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On 8/21/19 3:14 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 21.08.19 um 14:39 schrieb Ivo De Decker: package: src:rsyslog version: 8.1908.0-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, The latest version of rsyslog in unstable fails on s390x: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rsyslog It's a test-s

Bug#884632: marked as done (rtv crashes when viewing submission)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 07:35:59 -0600 with message-id <20190821133558.GA2013@diogenes> and subject line Bug affects old-stable has caused the Debian Bug report #884632, regarding rtv crashes when viewing submission to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#920545: python-intervaltree breaks python-intervaltree-bio autopkgtest

2019-08-21 Thread olivier sallou
Le mer. 21 août 2019 à 15:21, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I removed Python2 support from this package in Git[1]. Unfortunately the > autopkgtest failure is for Python3. Graham, I understood your > mail that you've found a solution - but I do not understand what >

Bug#920545: python-intervaltree breaks python-intervaltree-bio autopkgtest

2019-08-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Andreas On 2019/08/21 15:20, Andreas Tille wrote: I removed Python2 support from this package in Git[1]. Unfortunately the autopkgtest failure is for Python3. Graham, I understood your mail that you've found a solution - but I do not understand what this might be. Any hint / patch / team u

Bug#934351: virtualbox-dkms: Fails to build modules

2019-08-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello,lets followup on bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934483 thanks Il sabato 10 agosto 2019, 09:09:15 CEST, Hilmar Preuße ha scritto: Package: virtualbox-guest-dkms Version: 6.0.10-dfsg-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer,

Processed: Re: python-intervaltree breaks python-intervaltree-bio autopkgtest

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #920545 [python-intervaltree-bio] python-intervaltree breaks python-intervaltree-bio autopkgtest Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #920545 to the same tags previously set -- 920545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920545 Debi

Bug#920545: python-intervaltree breaks python-intervaltree-bio autopkgtest

2019-08-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, I removed Python2 support from this package in Git[1]. Unfortunately the autopkgtest failure is for Python3. Graham, I understood your mail that you've found a solution - but I do not understand what this might be. Any hint / patch / team upload that would fix the pac

Bug#935300: rsyslog: FTBFS on s390x

2019-08-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.08.19 um 14:39 schrieb Ivo De Decker: > package: src:rsyslog > version: 8.1908.0-1 > severity: serious > tags: ftbfs > > Hi, > > The latest version of rsyslog in unstable fails on s390x: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rsyslog It's a test-suite failure. Seems the test-s

Bug#935287: uglu patch proposal

2019-08-21 Thread Olivier Sallou
Here is a patch proposal that fix the build issue. However, I feel this patch quite ugly with many tricks to support build. I disable all sphinx related doc generation (due to some auto setup/install). The setup script is too complex. I also disable the clean step, as setup script do some stuff n

Processed: bug 925793 is forwarded to https://github.com/OpenLightingProject/ola/issues/1553

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 925793 https://github.com/OpenLightingProject/ola/issues/1553 Bug #925793 [src:ola] ola: ftbfs with GCC-9 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/OpenLightingProject/ola/issues/1553'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#935300: rsyslog: FTBFS on s390x

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:rsyslog version: 8.1908.0-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, The latest version of rsyslog in unstable fails on s390x: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rsyslog Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935287: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#935287: obitools: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Olivier Sallou
Oneof the issue here is clean is called at the begin of the package build, before applying patches This result in failure due to the particular setup script used here that tries to install requirements etc One solution is to override clean and do nothing, but this will result in last build st

Bug#932653: marked as done (python-overpass: Don't depend on python-geojson)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:33:08 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#932653: python-overpass: Don't depend on python-geojson has caused the Debian Bug report #932653, regarding python-overpass: Don't depend on python-geojson to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: python-overpass: Don't depend on python-geojson

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #932653 [src:overpass] python-overpass: Don't depend on python-geojson Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 932653: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932653 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Processed: python-shodan: Don't depend on python-click-plugins

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #932668 [src:python-shodan] python-shodan: Don't depend on python-click-plugins Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 932668: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932668 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.deb

Bug#935274: marked as done (binutils-xtensa-lx106: FTBFS on amd64)

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:49:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935274: fixed in binutils-xtensa-lx106 3 has caused the Debian Bug report #935274, regarding binutils-xtensa-lx106: FTBFS on amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#935296: reposurgeon: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:reposurgeon version: 3.45-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of reposurgeon in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=reposurgeon Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935293: rampler: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:rampler version: 1.1.0-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of rampler in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rampler Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935294: realmd: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:realmd version: 0.16.3-2 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of realmd in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=realmd Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935274: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#935274: binutils-xtensa-lx106: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:40:29AM +, Ivo De Decker wrote: > A binnmu of binutils-xtensa-lx106 in unstable fails on amd64: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=binutils-xtensa-lx106 > > It probably needs to be updated for the newer binutils. binutils has helpfully changed its v

Bug#935290: rakudo: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:rakudo version: 2018.12-5 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of rakudo in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rakudo Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935288: python-cmarkgfm: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:python-cmarkgfm version: 0.4.2-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of python-cmarkgfm in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-cmarkgfm Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935289: qd: FTBFS on ppc64el

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:qd version: 2.3.22+dfsg.1-2 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of qd in unstable fails on ppc64el: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=qd Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935287: obitools: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:obitools version: 1.2.13+dfsg-1 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of obitools in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=obitools Cheers, Ivo

Bug#935286: mongo-tools: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:mongo-tools version: 3.4.14-4 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of mongo-tools in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mongo-tools Cheers, Ivo

Processed: your mail

2019-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 935275 gdc-8 8.3.0-6 Bug #935275 [src:dustmite] dustmite: FTBFS on amd64 Bug reassigned from package 'src:dustmite' to 'gdc-8'. No longer marked as found in versions dustmite/0~20170126.e95dff8-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions

Bug#935281: lepton-eda: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
package: src:lepton-eda version: 1.9.7-2 severity: serious tags: ftbfs Hi, A binnmu of lepton-eda in unstable fails on amd64: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lepton-eda Cheers, Ivo

  1   2   >