Bug#931669: ephoto doesn't even start up

2019-07-08 Thread Michael Meier
Package: ephoto Version: 1.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I've just installed ephoto to try it out. I didn't get very far. It doesn't even start up. If I try to start it up on the console, that's what it tells me: ERR<26189>:ecore_evas lib/elementary

Processed: severity of 931639 is important

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 931639 important Bug #931639 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64: Does not boot - stuck at "Loading initial ramdisk" Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#931529: gnome : session freezed when I've tried to lock it

2019-07-08 Thread Charles BLANC ROLIN
Hi, Today when I've tried to lock my session, my system has totaly freeze. I've needed to halt system from power button. Best regards, Charles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: severity of 931654 is grave

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 931654 grave Bug #931654 [node-json3] node-json3: json3 is no more maintained Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 931654: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/

Processed: severity of 931222 is serious

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # as they will be fixed in stable and raising to avoid regression to > unstable/testing > severity 931222 serious Bug #931222 [src:dosbox] dosbox: CVE-2019-7165 CVE-2019-12594 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processin

Bug#922027: marked as done (CVE-2019-6975: Memory exhaustion in django.utils.numberformat.format())

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:54:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#922027: fixed in python-django 1:1.10.7-2+deb9u5 has caused the Debian Bug report #922027, regarding CVE-2019-6975: Memory exhaustion in django.utils.numberformat.format() to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#931316: marked as done (python-django: CVE-2019-12781: Incorrect HTTP detection with reverse-proxy connecting via HTTPS)

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:54:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931316: fixed in python-django 1:1.10.7-2+deb9u5 has caused the Debian Bug report #931316, regarding python-django: CVE-2019-12781: Incorrect HTTP detection with reverse-proxy connecting via HTTPS to be marked

Bug#931639: linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64: Does not boot - stuck at "Loading initial ramdisk"

2019-07-08 Thread Kinky Nekoboi
This is proberly linked to this Bug, also coreboot used as firmware on the affected system: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930029 So its possible that this only apears in the combination linux 4.19 + coreboot. With earlyprintk= VALUE as bootparameter you can get more output ou

Bug#931639: linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64: Does not boot - stuck at "Loading initial ramdisk"

2019-07-08 Thread QWERTY man
Package: src:linux Version: 4.19.37-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Upgraded from a very stable and largely vanilla Debian Stretch to Debian Buster. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or

Processed: Change severity and add's tags

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 905247 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug #905247 [nload] nload broken when executed via SSH Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. > severity 905247 important Bug #905247 [nload] nload broken when executed via SSH Severity set to 'important' fr

Bug#905247: nload broken when executed via SSH

2019-07-08 Thread Marcio Souza
Hello, I need the more info. I tried to reproduce the bug, but I don't see this problem. I run nload over ssh from Debian 10(Gnome desktop) to other Debian 10 without problem. I've changed severity to important because this problem does not make the package unusable.[1] Please give me more inform

Bug#931635: marked as pending in postgresql-common

2019-07-08 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #931635 in postgresql-common reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/postgresql/postgresql-common/commit/063eb4b33cc1

Processed: Bug#931635 marked as pending in postgresql-common

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #931635 [postgresql-common] pg_upgradecluster writes data_directory to postgresql.auto.conf, and gets confused by it on the next upgrade [DATA LOSS] Added tag(s) pending. -- 931635: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931635 Debian

Bug#905022: marked as done (gcc-doc-defaults: FTBFS, needs update for gcc-8 being default)

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2019 14:52:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#905022: fixed in gcc-doc-defaults 5:18 has caused the Debian Bug report #905022, regarding gcc-doc-defaults: FTBFS, needs update for gcc-8 being default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#931635: pg_upgradecluster writes data_directory to postgresql.auto.conf, and gets confused by it on the next upgrade [DATA LOSS]

2019-07-08 Thread Christoph Berg
Package: postgresql-common Version: 200 Severity: critical Tags: buster sid In postgresql-common 200, pg_upgradecluster learned how to copy the contents of postgresql.auto.conf (where ALTER SYSTEM stores its data; #810615). Internally, adapt_conffiles() gets invoked twice, once for postgresql.con

Bug#928130: marked as done (octave-control: FTBFS in experimental: some tests failed)

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:34:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#928130: fixed in octave-control 3.2.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #928130, regarding octave-control: FTBFS in experimental: some tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processed: Bug#928130 marked as pending in octave-control

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #928130 [src:octave-control] octave-control: FTBFS in experimental: some tests failed Added tag(s) pending. -- 928130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#928130: marked as pending in octave-control

2019-07-08 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #928130 in octave-control reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-control/commit/d67e86413e8dd

Processed: found 931625 in 3:3.2.6-3+deb9u2, found 931625 in 3:3.2.6-3, found 931625 in 5:5.0.3-4 ...

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 931625 3:3.2.6-3+deb9u2 Bug #931625 [redis] redis: CVE-2019-10192 CVE-2019-10193 There is no source info for the package 'redis' at version '3:3.2.6-3+deb9u2' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '3:3.2.6-3+deb9u

Bug#931625: redis: CVE-2019-10192 CVE-2019-10193

2019-07-08 Thread Chris Lamb
Package: redis Version: 2:2.8.17-1+deb8u6 X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for redis. CVE-2019-10192[0]: Heap buffer overflow CVE-2019-10193[1]: Stack buffer overflow If you fix the vulnerabilities please als

Bug#931060: marked as done (ionit.service creates a systemd dependency loop)

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2019 11:07:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931060: fixed in ionit 0.3.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #931060, regarding ionit.service creates a systemd dependency loop to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:50:49AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:41:55 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:17:27AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Control: severity -1 serious > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:11:48AM +0200, Chris

Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:41:55 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:17:27AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Control: severity -1 serious > > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:11:48AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 buster sid > > > > > > Re: To Debia

Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Julian Andres Klode 2019-07-08 <20190708113658.ga10...@debian.org> > We likely do not want to allow arbitrary changes of Suite. One > option is to introduce a new field that specifies that the Suite > field will change to something else soon, and a field to indicate > release notes for that cha

Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:17:27AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:11:48AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Control: tags -1 buster sid > > > > Re: To Debian Bug Tracking System 2019-07-07 > > <20190707183910.ga22...@msg.df7cb.de> > > >

Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #931566 > Control: tag -1 experimental > > IMHO, the intention behind this change is good. > The implementation was completely untested. Well, it's kind of hard to > properly test such a change. > The documentati

Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #931566 Control: tag -1 experimental IMHO, the intention behind this change is good. The implementation was completely untested. Well, it's kind of hard to properly test such a change. The documentation is not really helpful. I initially thought this was caused by my rather comp

Processed: Re: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 experimental Bug #931566 [apt] Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true") Added tag(s) experimental. -- 931566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow.

Bug#931529: gnome : session lost after hibernation

2019-07-08 Thread Charles BLANC ROLIN
Hi, When battery level is very low, my laptop goes into hibernation. When I resuming after hibernation, my session is lost. I enter my password and I'm on a new session, my opened applications are closed. Best regards, Charles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#931547: marked as done (r-base: missing dependency on libpcre3-dev)

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 08 Jul 2019 08:49:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931547: fixed in r-base 3.6.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #931547, regarding r-base: missing dependency on libpcre3-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processed: Re: Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

2019-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #931566 [apt] Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true") Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 931566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931566 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Bug#929151: netdata-core: version in stretch-backports newer than version in buster

2019-07-08 Thread Gardouille
With the release of Buster this weekend, Netdata seems to have moved away from stretch-backports without any warning. The tracker [1] still reference the 1.12.1-2~bpo9+1 version. Do you planned to add another version to stretch-backports ? Thank you for your work ;) [1]: https://tracker.debian