Hi,
it seems that docker.io would be removed from buster if nothing changes
in the next 3 days [0].
Do you need help to fix this ?
Fabrice
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2019/06/msg00542.html
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:54:08 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for
Hello,
вт, 21 мая 2019 г. в 16:58, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov :
>
> Hello,
>
> I've updated gcc-doc/gcc-doc-defaults packages to support new gcc-8
> documentation generation. NMU Packages are uploaded to
> mentors.debian.net
> for review, git trees are put on salsa.debian.org/gcc-doc (-defaults).
It
Source: ghdl
Version: 0.36+20190617
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
When Debianized GHDL package is build it fails with message
Error: No installed ghdl backend found. Terminating!
in context
install -m 755 -p libg
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:18 AM Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
> Package: arc,arcanist
> Severity: serious
>
> arc: /usr/bin/arc
> arcanist: /usr/bin/arc
>
> One of them needs to be renamed, or both.
As one who has made use of various incarnations of the 'arc' program
since the 1990s, and as one
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #923203 [pulseaudio] pulseaudio: fails to start without manual configuration
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #923203 [pulseaudio] pulseaudio: fails to start without manual configuration
Added tag(s) patch.
--
923203:
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #930869 [pm-utils] Don't release with buster
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
> retitle -1 needs purging of quirks
Bug #930869 [pm-utils] Don't release with buster
Changed Bug title to 'needs purging of quirks' from 'Don't release wi
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 needs purging of quirks
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:22:16PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> But, do we even have an alternative for suspending remotely?
> >> Not really, pm-utils is not needed.
> > Could you then please educate me what the replace
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:53:32PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 21.06.19 um 20:05 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> > But, do we even have an alternative for suspending remotely?
>
> What do you mean by that?
So here we have a computer. No GUI tools. No emulation of GUI tools.
And I want to suspend
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:55:18 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129869
> I've reported this upstream with the attached proposed patch.
> Will wait a bit before applying the patch for Debian in case upstream
> has comments.
Upstream has now
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:54:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925473: fixed in tomcat9 9.0.16-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #925473,
regarding tomcat9: sysvinit script missing (Policy §9.11¶2 “must”)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Am 21.06.19 um 20:05 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Package: pm-utils
>> Version: 1.4.1-18
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released
>> with buster.
>> pm-utils is a set of hacks/scr
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge 930743 -1
Bug #930743 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux] ABI
changed without an ABI bump
Bug #930744 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux]
linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64: wlan/wifi not working
Bug #930804 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-5-amd64: After kernel upg
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: pm-utils
> Version: 1.4.1-18
> Severity: serious
>
> As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released
> with buster.
> pm-utils is a set of hacks/scripts which back in the days were necessary
> to succ
Package: pm-utils
Version: 1.4.1-18
Severity: serious
As former maintainer of pm-utils, I don't want to see pm-utils released
with buster.
pm-utils is a set of hacks/scripts which back in the days were necessary
to successfully suspend/hibernate your system.
Nowadays, those hacks do more more harm
> "Crash confirmed. Buthis program is not expected to be able to deal
> with arbitrarily broken input. All I'm going to do about it is add a
> SIGSEGV handler."
> here we have an upstream maintainer explicitly saying that an
> image-processing program is not suitable for use on arbitrary input
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:58:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> At the very least, the limitation that this program cannot safely be
> used with untrusted input needs to be prominently documented (I'd
> suggest the package description and the manual page). web2png would be
> harder to replace this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 930682 normal
Bug #930682 [debian-xcontrol] debian-xcontrol: Remove from archive?
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> reassign 930682 ftp.debian.org
Bug #930682 [debian-xcontrol] debian-xcontrol: Remove from archive?
Bug reassigned
Can I confirm that this is a problem with AMD graphics only--or will this
affect all systems regardless of Video card type?
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:48:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#930857: fixed in ftools-fv 5.5+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #930857,
regarding POW: fv crashes while reading a file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
-- Forwarded message -
From: Ignacio Vargas
Date: Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#930802: nvidia-driver: NVIDIA module fails to load
(Operation not permitted)
To: floris
I tried
$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure nvidia-kernel-dkms
and it completed successfully. Trying to loa
-- Forwarded message -
From: floris
Date: Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 6:31 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#930802: nvidia-driver: NVIDIA module fails to load
(Operation not permitted)
To: Ignacio Vargas
Ignacio Vargas schreef op 2019-06-20 23:56:
> Package: nvidia-driver
> Version: 418.74-1
> Seve
Package: gif2png
Version: 2.5.8-1+b2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
I happened to notice the entry for 2.5.14 (which I realise is newer than
the one in Debian) on http://www.catb.org/~esr/gif2png/NEWS:
"Redirect segfault to a graceful exit. Tired of meaningless
Package: ftools-pow
Version: 5.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
When starting fv with almost any file and trying to display the content,
fv crashes. Backtrace:
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1 0x7708a535 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2 0x7
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:49:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#930746: fixed in bind9 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #930746,
regarding bind9: CVE-2019-6471: A race condition when discarding malformed
packets can cause BIND to exit with an assertion
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 13:15:23 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> that's because python-jedi is a mutli-tarball source package and parso
> was part of it at the beginning. Last time I checked gbp didn't
> support it (or I don't know how to use it) so it was easier for me to
> keep it outside DPMT. I
hi Ondřej,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:14:33PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> thanks for the debdiff. That looks good to me and if you have time
> to do the upload, please do so.
Thanks for confirming, will upload shortly.
I have filled a respective merge request here:
https://sa
Hi Piotr,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 01:15:23PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> >https://github.com/davidhalter/parso/issues/75
> >
> > I understand that it is not fixed but the authors do not consider the
> > issue serious. Could you please give some comment from an insiders
> > point of view
Hi Salvatore,
thanks for the debdiff. That looks good to me and if you have time to do the
upload, please do so.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@sury.org
> On 21 Jun 2019, at 11:55, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Control: tag -1 + patch
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:40:19PM +0200, Salvator
Hi Andreas,
> > Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718212
> >
> > Patch is at https://gist.github.com/dhondta/f71ae7e5c4234f8edfd2f12503a5dcc7
>
> I know you are usually pretty quick in solving serious issues. I tried
> to check the issue and think the link provided for a p
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:48:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#929080: fixed in lvm2 2.03.02-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #929080,
regarding lvm2: lvm2-lvmetad.service is left running on upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
I don't think I have access or permissions to rename/reassign the bug to
ftpmaster so they can remove the armel binaries.
How can I move this forward so that the package doesn't get autoremoved
next week?
Thanks,
Thomas
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:28 PM Thomas Calderon
wrote:
> OK, let's have t
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:40:19PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: bind9
> Version: 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 src:bind 1:9.13.3-1
> Control: retitle -2 bind: CVE-2019-6471: A rac
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #930746 [src:bind9] bind9: CVE-2019-6471: A race condition when discarding
malformed packets can cause BIND to exit with an assertion failure
Added tag(s) patch.
--
930746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930746
Debian Bug Trac
Niko Tyni writes:
> I've reported this upstream with the attached proposed patch.
Hi Niko,
I tried to apply the Radius.pm part to the installed package, but it
failed at first due to a whitespace error: the installed file is
indented with TAB characters, not spaces like your patch. After
adjus
On 19/06/19 22:19, Simon McVittie wrote:
[...]
I would very much appreciate input from the rest of the team, particularly:
- Laurent: I know you've had strong opinions about using Wayland for GNOME.
Do you feel strongly that Debian should be defaulting to Wayland? Are
there any reasons for
Le 21/06/2019 à 06:04, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
>
> On 2019, ജൂൺ 20 5:08:24 PM IST, Xavier wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> there is something wrong with your patch:
>> W: node-terser source: binaries-have-file-conflict node-terser
>> uglifyjs.terser usr/lib/nodejs/terser/dist/bundle.js
>>
>> Your link
36 matches
Mail list logo
