On 2018-10-30 09:52, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
>> I've prepared updates for the davmail backport and its libhtmlcleaner
>> dependency :
>> https://sml.zincube.net/~niol/tmp/
>>
>> Those are awaiting sponsorship (the process for granting me upload
>> rights also to backports is ongoing).
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:m4
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 08:07:23AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> gzip fails to build from source in unstable (since the glibc upgrade to
> 2.28):
m4 has another copy of the bug.
Helmut
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #915150 [src:gzip] gzip FTBFS: ../../lib/fseeko.c:110:4: error: #error
"Please port gnulib fseeko.c to your platform! Look at the code in fseeko.c,
then report this to bug-gnulib."
Bug 915150 cloned as bug 915152
> reassign -2 src:m4
Bug #915152 [sr
Source: gzip
Version: 1.9-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 gnulib
Control: found -2 gnulib/20140202+stable-3
Control: retitle -2 gnulib does not work with glibc/2.28
Control: affects -2 + src:lbzip2
gzip fail
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #915150 [src:gzip] gzip FTBFS: ../../lib/fseeko.c:110:4: error: #error
"Please port gnulib fseeko.c to your platform! Look at the code in fseeko.c,
then report this to bug-gnulib."
Bug 915150 cloned as bug 915151
> reassign -2 gnulib
Bug #915151 [sr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 915148 3.12.3-3thanks
Bug #915148 [cmake] cmake: regression in ros-ros-comm build
There is no source info for the package 'cmake' at version '3.12.3-3thanks'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '3.12.3-3thank
control: affects -1 ros-ros-comm
control: notfound -1 3.12.3-3
fixing tags.
G.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 ros-ros-comm
Bug #915148 [cmake] cmake: regression in ros-ros-comm build
Added indication that 915148 affects ros-ros-comm
> notfound -1 3.12.3-3
Bug #915148 [cmake] cmake: regression in ros-ros-comm build
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #9
Hello,
>I don't know how I can help here. Performous only fails on powerpc
>architectures which looks like a Boost bug to me. This only happened
>recently when we switched to 1.67, so maybe forward upstream and let's
>find out what the upstream developers think about that?
the boost patch is now
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #911492 [src:htslib, src:python-pysam] htslib breaks python-pysam
autopkgtest
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
911492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 04:04:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#914685: fixed in android-platform-system-core 1:8.1.0+r23-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #914685,
regarding android-platform-frameworks-base FTBFS on C++ "atomic" lib
to be marked as done.
This means that
Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Control: severity -1 grave
>
> This software appears to be non-functional. A tcpdump confirms that no
> network traffic between the client and the server is being generated.
Fwiw, I have filed many bugfixes against this package years ago
but the maintainer is not respo
Eric Wong wrote:
> AFAIK, there was one unresolved corner-case with readdirplus
> support I never got around to fixing[1], but it works for common
> cases with "ls"
[1] Sorry, correct URL is:
https://marc.info/?i=CAJfpeguWVhpPkUoTxGrW=kc43rrksjtwoq0ysczl0_oc9jl...@mail.gmail.com
for Miklos's resp
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 03:05:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915038: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #895292,
regarding systemd-shim: incompatibility with a new version of systemd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 03:05:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915038: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #903295,
regarding libpam-systemd: Depends: systemd-shim (>= 10-4~) but it is not going
to be installed
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 03:05:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915029: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #912267,
regarding uddi4j: FTBFS with Java 11 due to JAXWS removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 03:05:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915038: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #895292,
regarding Restart, Suspend, Hibernate, Shut Down all greyed out in lightdm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 03:05:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915038: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #901404,
regarding systemd-shim: Please dpkg-divert the dbus services you want
dbus-activatable
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 03:05:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915038: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #901405,
regarding systemd-shim: Please add a sysvinit service to create directories on
/run at boot
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 03:05:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915038: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #903295,
regarding libpam-systemd: Depends: systemd-shim (>= 10-4~) but it is not going
to be installed
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 02:45:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#893863: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #866671,
regarding webkitgtk: Unmaintained, not suitable for buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.18.20-2
Followup-For: Bug #914495
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? Booting into linux-image-4.18.0-3-amd64.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2018 01:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#910547: fixed in gutenprint 5.3.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #910547,
regarding gutenprint: make distclean deletes doc/gutenprint{,ui2}/* which is
not regenerated
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing control commands:
> tags 906977 + pending
Bug #906977 [src:parley] parley: FTBFS in buster/sid ('QItemSelection' does not
name a type)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
906977: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi
Control: tags 906977 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for parley (versioned as 4:17.08.3-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 765854 critical
Bug #765854 [ecryptfs-utils] ecryptfs-utils: Private directory not
automatically unmounted anymore on logout
Severity set to 'critical' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing control commands:
> tags 906187 + patch
Bug #906187 [facter-dev] facter-dev: missing Depends: libfacter3.11.0 (=
${binary:Version})
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 906187 + pending
Bug #906187 [facter-dev] facter-dev: missing Depends: libfacter3.11.0 (=
${binary:Version})
Added tag(s) pend
Control: tags 906187 + patch
Control: tags 906187 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for facter (versioned as 3.11.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer ht
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #914051 [src:python-freecontact] python-freecontact FTBFS with boost 1.67
Added tag(s) help.
--
914051: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 help
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_python-py27
It seems libboost_python-py*.so is not provided by libboost > 1.63
since these do not provide any libboost-python package any more.
I have no idea how to work around
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #914049 [src:progressivemauve] progressivemauve FTBFS with boost 1.67
Added tag(s) help.
--
914049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
I think the main problem is that xemacs21 is quite stale, latest upstream
release dating back to 2013.
Thus it doesn't support (string-to-syntax)
Regards
Racke
--
Ecommerce and Linux consulting + Perl and web application programming.
Debian and Sympa administration. Provisioning
Control: tags -1 help
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 10:36:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_vector.h:1074:7: note: candidate: 'void
> std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::push_back(const value_type&) [with _Tp =
> boost::tuples::tuple std::allocator >, std::vector std::allocator > >; _
This even happens on a normal system - looks like it enters an infinite loop:
Loading 50w3m-el...
Loading 20apel...
Loading 50flim...
Loading 50w3m-el...
Loading 20apel...
Loading 50flim...
Loading 50w3m-el...
Loading 20apel...
Loading 50flim...
Loading 50w3m-el...
Loading 20apel...
Loading 50flim
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 22:19:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915096: fixed in libperl-apireference-perl 0.22-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #915096,
regarding libperl-apireference-perl: Missing support for perl 5.28.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:36:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#909814: fixed in r-cran-afex 0.22-1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #909814,
regarding r-cran-afex: autopkgtest regression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 915128 + buster sid
Bug #915128 [src:swftools] Dont't include in buster
Added tag(s) sid and buster.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
915128: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 915129 + buster sid
Bug #915129 [src:jquery-jplayer] Stop using swftools
Added tag(s) sid and buster.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
915129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 915128 with 915129
Bug #915128 [src:swftools] Dont't include in buster
915128 was not blocked by any bugs.
915128 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 915128: 915129
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:59:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#914393: fixed in keepalived 1:2.0.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #914393,
regarding keepalived: CVE-2018-19115 heap-based buffer overflow and DoS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
That is already fixed upstream in
https://github.com/zeroc-ice/ice/commit/4aea9fc787892842af17d119332a7f6fef2f35c4
I will upload a patch
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:15 PM Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:zeroc-ice
> Version: 3.7.1-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster patch
>
> zeroc-ice
Don't wait for me on shibboleth-resolver or moonshot-gss-eap to file the
removal requests.
They are both basically broken in unstable, so there's no reason to
block.
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 19:40 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Dear Hideki, dear src:debootstrap maintainers,
>
> tl;dr: debootstrap maintainers; can you agree to disable "merged /usr" by
> default now, or are you OK letting the TC decide on this subject?
There were discussions about enabling
Source: exiv2
Version: 0.26-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Forwarded: https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/561
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for exiv2, it only affects
experimental (thus filling as RC severity so does not enter u
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:35:20PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:gnucap-python
> Version: 0.0.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this package but it failed:
Thank you.
there's a new package for the 0.0.1 release [1]. the build issue caus
Source: jquery-jplayer
Severity: serious
jquery-jplayer currently depends on swftools for Flash support. swftools
however is orphaned, has frequent security issues, is dead upstream
(as is Flash).
Also, per the package description Flash is entirely a fallback for
browsers which don't support HTML
Source: swftools
Severity: serious
swftools is orphaned for a year, dead upstream and has frequent security
issues. Also, Flash is a thing of the past, so let's drop it from buster
(initially filing this bug to out it out of testing, will also sort out
the removal, which will take longer).
One on
Dear Hideki, dear src:debootstrap maintainers,
tl;dr: debootstrap maintainers; can you agree to disable "merged /usr" by
default now, or are you OK letting the TC decide on this subject?
Longer version:
As you might be aware, #914897 (initially filed on src:debootstrap) has now
been reassigned
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 835590 serious
Bug #835590 [libsoundio1] libsoundio1: Missing hard dependency on
libjack-jackd2-0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
835590: https:/
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:21:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#912461: fixed in jaxb 2.3.0.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #912461,
regarding jaxb: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #912461 [src:jaxb] jaxb: FTBFS with Java 11 due to javax.activation removal
Added tag(s) pending.
--
912461: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #912461 in jaxb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jaxb/commit/3acccaec4959c8848a1cf5abeebe0db4bd6613
Pyzo is not compatible with Python-3.7 because using of the reserved word
'async.
See also Pyzo on github:
https://github.com/pyzo/pyzo/issues/529
Seems to be fixed in Pyzo 4.6.0 and 4.6.1.
This bug should be linked to
https://bugs.debian.org/914332
Jean-Marc
https://6jf.be/keys/ED863AD1.txt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 913014 + buster sid
Bug #913014 [e3] e3 (all binaries): immediate segmentation fault
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
913014: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:34:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#913709: fixed in boost1.67 1.67.0-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #913709,
regarding boost1.67: intermitent FTBFS on mips64el: build hangs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:34:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#914688: fixed in boost1.67 1.67.0-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #914688,
regarding "boost: please do not use __linux macro"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Source: shibboleth-sp2
Version: 2.6.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=shibboleth-sp2&suite=sid
...
SPConfig.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool
shibsp::SPConfig::instantiate(const char*, bool)':
SPConfig.cpp:427:117: error: no matching funct
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 890086 grave
Bug #890086 [ufraw-batch] ufraw: CVE-2018-19655: stack buffer overflow while
running ufraw-batch
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
8900
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:01:26 +0200
Jan Groenewald wrote:
> There is https://packages.gitlab.com/gitlab/gitlab-ce
>
> (deb https://packages.gitlab.com/gitlab/gitlab-ce/debian/ stretch main)
Sorry, but no. Just no, no, no and no. Those binary dumps are horrible. They
are essentially just dumping
Processing control commands:
> tags 903190 + patch
Bug #903190 [src:ruby-sham-rack] ruby-sham-rack: FTBFS in buster/sid
(dh_installdocs: Cannot find "README.markdown")
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 903190 + pending
Bug #903190 [src:ruby-sham-rack] ruby-sham-rack: FTBFS in buster/sid
(dh_installdocs
Control: tags 903190 + patch
Control: tags 903190 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ruby-sham-rack (versioned as 1.4.1-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked
Source: glew
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 + src:pymol
Hi,
I just noticed that pymol stated to FTBFS, this seems to be caused by
glew (which was updated recently, while libglvnd hasn't seen changes
for some time):
In file included from layer0/os_gl.h:60,
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:pymol
Bug #915112 [src:glew] glew: conflicting definitions in glext.h and glew.h
cause pymol to FTBFS
Added indication that 915112 affects src:pymol
--
915112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915112
Debian Bug Tracking System
Con
Hi
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 16:43, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:39:20PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > >Backports are *always* from testing because a backport is
> > >supposed to be replaced by the regular stable version of
> > >the subsequent release.
> > That is indeed the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 839161 + buster sid
Bug #839161 [crrcsim] crrcsim: FTBFS on several architectures
Added tag(s) buster and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
839161: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 itstool 2.0.4-2
Bug #912099 [src:gnumeric] gnumeric: FTBFS with itstool 2.0.4: 'ascii' codec
can't decode byte 0xc2
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gnumeric' to 'itstool'.
No longer marked as found in versions gnumeric/1.12.43-1.
Ignoring request to alt
Control: reassign -1 itstool 2.0.4-2
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/itstool/itstool/issues/22
Control: affects -1 src:gnumeric
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:05:47AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Source: gnumeric
> Version: 1.12.43-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Control: block 902557 wit
Control: tags 914332 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pyzo (versioned as 4.4.3-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. The
Processing control commands:
> tags 914332 + pending
Bug #914332 [pyzo] "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" in postinst
Added tag(s) pending.
--
914332: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914332
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:19:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#913494: fixed in bindex 2.2+svn101-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #913494,
regarding bindex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Source: caffe
Version: 1.0.0+git20180821.99bd997-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi,
Your package failed to build on mips:
[ FAILED ] 2 tests, listed below:
[ FAILED ] AdaDeltaSolverTest/0.TestSnapshot, where TypeParam =
caffe::CPUDevice
[ FAILED ] AdaDeltaSolverTest/1.TestSnapshotShare,
Linux 4.19.5-1~exp1 works.
On the other hand it possibly comes with ext4 file system corruption.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 914495 914980
Bug #914495 [src:linux] linux-image-4.18.0-3-amd64: does not boot here
Bug #914495 [src:linux] linux-image-4.18.0-3-amd64: does not boot here
Marked as found in versions linux/4.18.20-2.
Bug #914980 [src:linux] linux-image
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 915102 by 808839
Bug #915102 [src:scilab] scilab: FTBFS on amd64: Could not find or use the Java
package/jar jlatexmath-fop used by LaTex Rendering
915102 was not blocked by any bugs.
915102 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s)
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #913494 in bindex reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/bindex/commit/67fbbd602769f6ef5f180488d0c9162935
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #913494 [src:bindex] bindex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal
Added tag(s) pending.
--
913494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913494
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:52:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#907409: fixed in casync 2+20180321-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #907409,
regarding casync: FTBFS with glibc 2.28, header mismatch wih new renameat2()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 913494 bindex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal
Bug #913494 [src:bindex] bindex FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
Changed Bug title to 'bindex: FTBFS with Java 11 due to CORBA removal' from
'bindex FTBFS with OpenJDK 11'.
>
End of message, sto
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:39:20PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> >Backports are *always* from testing because a backport is
> >supposed to be replaced by the regular stable version of
> >the subsequent release.
> That is indeed the current definition.
Me too is very happy with it.
> Another op
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 911154 pending
Bug #911154 [src:netkit-ntalk] netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 912120 pending
Bug #912120 [src:biff] biff misses the generator for configure
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 912121 pendi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #915096 [src:libperl-apireference-perl] libperl-apireference-perl: Missing
support for perl 5.28.1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
915096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #915096 in libperl-apireference-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libperl-apir
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> That is indeed the current definition. The question is about the
> possibility of changing that definition or finding other ways to
No. It’s there for good reasons, including stability.
> accommodate fast changing software like gitlab. Broadening the
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:52:30PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 30.11.2018 um 13:47 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > Control: tags 907409 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for casync (versioned as 2+20180321-2.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to te
I fixed this via
https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.91.git.gitgitgad...@gmail.com/T/#t and
the latest word is that this will be part of v2.20.0-rc2 (which I would
expect before Monday, maybe even tonight).
On 2018, നവംബർ 30 5:14:20 PM IST, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> How about allowing gitlab to be backported directly from unstable?
>
>No.
>
>Backports are *always* from testing because a backport is
>supposed to be replaced by the regular stable version
Source: scilab
Version: 6.0.1-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
On a rebuild against libhdf5-103, scilab has failed on amd64 twice. The second
failure was during configure:
checking commons-logging... /usr/share/java/fop-transcoder-allinone.jar
checking jlatexmath... /usr/share/java/jlatexmath-1.0.7.jar
c
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #839161 {Done: Agustin Henze } [crrcsim] crrcsim FTBFS on
hppa architecture (with patch)
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longe
On Nov 29, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thus: sorry but there is no way we can possibly support usrmerged and
> non-usrmerged systems at the same time. Usrmerge is not viable without a
> flag day.
We have being doing exactly this opt-in (the usrmerge package) for over
three years and opt-out (the deb
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #840388 [fusedav] doers nothing
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
--
840388: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags 914064 + patch
Bug #914064 [src:vdr-plugin-fritzbox] vdr-plugin-fritzbox FTBFS with boost 1.67
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 914064 + pending
Bug #914064 [src:vdr-plugin-fritzbox] vdr-plugin-fritzbox FTBFS with boost 1.67
Added tag(s) pending.
--
914064: https://
Control: tags 914064 + patch
Control: tags 914064 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for vdr-plugin-fritzbox (versioned as 1.5.3-7.1)
and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan a
Am 30.11.2018 um 13:47 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Control: tags 907409 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for casync (versioned as 2+20180321-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
> cancel it.
Feel free to upload without delay.
Thanks
Processing control commands:
> tags 907409 + pending
Bug #907409 [casync] casync: FTBFS with glibc 2.28, header mismatch wih new
renameat2()
Added tag(s) pending.
--
907409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Control: tags 907409 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for casync (versioned as 2+20180321-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the dark
Source: libperl-apireference-perl
Version: 0.22-9
Severity: grave
Justification: ftbfs
This package needs an update for perl 5.28.1, which was uploaded to
unstable yesterday.
Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:05:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915020: fixed in munin 2.999.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #915020,
regarding munin-plugins-java: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> How about allowing gitlab to be backported directly from unstable?
No.
Backports are *always* from testing because a backport is
supposed to be replaced by the regular stable version of
the subsequent release. Hence, only from testing, in the
hope tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 913512 fixed-upstream
Bug #913512 [src:ucto] ucto FTBFS with ICU 63.1
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
913512: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913
Control: tags 913380 + patch
Control: tags 913380 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for tarantool (versioned as 1.9.1.26.g63eb81e3c-1.1)
and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Ta
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
