Hi Mike,
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 04:47:10PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for isc-dhcp (versioned as 4.3.5-3.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
>
>
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2018 05:52:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891786: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.3.5-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #891786,
regarding isc-dhcp: CVE-2018-5732: A specially constructed response from a
malicious server can cause a buffer overflow in dhclient
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #891258 [wv] wvSummary Segmentation fault (core dumped) when ran on any
supported file format.
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> forwarded -1 ircs://irc.gnome.org/abiword
Bug #891258 [wv] wvSummary Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Control: severity -1 important
Control: forwarded -1 ircs://irc.gnome.org/abiword
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 21:22:06 + Beau Moore wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
This is not the case since...
> When running wvSummary on any supported file format a Segmentaiton f
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2018 01:20:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#887306: fixed in obs-build 20180302-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #887306,
regarding obs-build: CVE-2017-14804: Exploit extractbuild to write to files in
the host system
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2018 01:05:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891278: fixed in ntpsec 1.0.0+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #891278,
regarding ntpsec-ntpviz: fails to install: install: invalid user 'ntp'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
control: close -1
thanks
Hello,
I'm sorry, apparently this is already fixed in the actual current
version. It appears that the git repo is older than whatever apt-get
source serves.
Cheers,
Ben Wiederhake
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #892079 [rakarrack] rakarrack: Cannot compile due to -Werror=format-security
Marked Bug as done
--
892079: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: rakarrack
Version: 0.6.1-4+b2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
tl;dr: Remove `-Werror`!
History: I'm trying to rebuild rakarrack (#892077), and write a lot about it
(#892078).
Steps to reproduce: Install d
Package: rakarrack
Version: 0.6.1-4+b2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
tl;dr: Add 'dpatch' to Build-Depends or similar.
History: I wanted to rebuild rakarrack from source in order to debug a problem
(#892077).
I gu
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 23:21:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860747: fixed in ruby-defaults 1:2.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #860747,
regarding ruby-all-dev: include upper bound on generated ruby dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Source: uwsgi
Version: 2.0.15-10.2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
I am about to upload ruby-defaults to unstable, switching the default
Ruby to ruby2.5. With that in place, uwsgi fails to build from source
like this:
[...]
CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fst
Source: weechat
Version: 1.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: will FTBFS soon
Tags: patch
Hi,
I am about to upload ruby-defaults to unstable, switching the default
Ruby to ruby2.5, and ruby2.3 support will be removed right after that.
Please consider applying the attached patch, obtained from
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for isc-dhcp (versioned as 4.3.5-3.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Hi Salvatore,
Some meaningless whitespace is touched, but otherwise your patches
look
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
On 16:46 Sun 04 Mar , dAgeCKo wrote:
> Trying to install dovecot on debian 9.2 leaded to error during the
> post-install process, leading to dovecot partially installed and
> non-working, resulting in an unusable program
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #892049 [dovecot-core] dovecot post-install fails
Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #892049 [dovecot-core] dovecot post-install fails
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
892049: https://bugs.
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 20:50:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891242: fixed in libquazip 0.7.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #891242,
regarding libquazip binary-any FTBFS: mv: cannot stat
'debian/*-doc/usr/share/doc/*-dev/html': No such file or directory
to be marke
Control: tags 887413 + patch
Control: tags 887413 + pending
Control: tags 891785 + patch
Control: tags 891785 + pending
Control: tags 891786 + patch
Control: tags 891786 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for isc-dhcp (versioned as 4.3.5-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel
Processing control commands:
> tags 887413 + patch
Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2017-3144: dhcp: omapi code doesn't
free socket descriptors when empty message is received allowing
denial-of-service
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #887413 to the same tags previously set
> tags 8
Processing control commands:
> tags 887413 + patch
Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2017-3144: dhcp: omapi code doesn't
free socket descriptors when empty message is received allowing
denial-of-service
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 887413 + pending
Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2
Processing control commands:
> tags 887413 + patch
Bug #887413 [src:isc-dhcp] isc-dhcp: CVE-2017-3144: dhcp: omapi code doesn't
free socket descriptors when empty message is received allowing
denial-of-service
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #887413 to the same tags previously set
> tags 8
Source: ruby-crb-blast
Version: 0.6.9-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby-crb-blast&arch=all&ver=0.6.9-1&stamp=1520009847&raw=0
...
┌──┐
│ Run tests for ruby2.3 from debian/ruby-tests.r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 892062 important
Bug #892062 [libproj13] libproj13: PROJ4 version 5 ignores +vunits
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
892062: https://bugs.debian.o
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libproj13
Control: retitle -2 libproj13: PROJ4 version 5 ignores +vunits
Control: block -1 by -2
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:55:00PM +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Your package FTBFS due to missing compatibility with Proj 5.0.0:
>
> ./csbadsdfix.svx:2: er
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #889936 [src:survex] survex: FTBFS with proj 5.0.0
Bug 889936 cloned as bug 892062
891966 was blocked by: 889936 889931 876934
891966 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 891966: 892062
> reassign -2 libproj13
Bug #892062 [src:survex] s
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 19:35:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#892046: fixed in puredata 0.48.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #892046,
regarding puredata-gui-l10n: needs Breaks+Replaces: puredata-gui (<< 0.48.1-3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 05:50:15PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> I don't think a rant posted on reddit by the author of a fork
> >> is justified enough to ask for a package to be removed from
> >> the archive.
> >
> > The author posted his opinion to his personal blog and did not
>
Now I have investigated the problem further. My findings here:
1) The per-user layout influences the console layout when there is only one
user. This in itself is somewhat reasonable, if little confusing to someone who
has used to the old UNIX model that normal user cannot edit system-wide
sett
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #892046 [puredata-gui-l10n] puredata-gui-l10n: needs Breaks+Replaces:
puredata-gui (<< 0.48.1-3)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
892046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #892046 in puredata reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/pd/puredata/commit/01d9aca0628aae7640db6
Hi Stephen,
>> Installing that library fixes it, so it’s just a missing Depends.
>
>Thanks for reporting this Thorsten, the dependency is present in
>version 3.5.2-2 (via libmaven3-core-java).
indeed it is, thanks. I guess that version had not hit my
mirror yet when I reported that, and the chang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885287
Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead
Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debian
885135 was blocked by: 885304 885476 885293 885300 886276 88552
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 18:35:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891519: fixed in putty 0.70-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #891519,
regarding putty FTBFS: error: 'gdk_beep' is deprecated: Use 'gdk_display_beep'
instead
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #891519 [src:putty] putty FTBFS: error: 'gdk_beep' is deprecated: Use
'gdk_display_beep' instead
Added tag(s) pending.
--
891519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #891519 in putty reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ssh-team/putty/commit/ac93fee951f122dde5fe4c4d3d5f196a0ca4c
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 18:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#892048: fixed in udunits 2.2.26-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #892048,
regarding udunits-bin: missing Breaks+Replaces: libudunits2-0 (<< 2.2.26-2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Friday, February 23 2018, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libquazip&suite=sid
>
> ...
> dh_installdocs
> find debian -name "*.md5" -delete
> # somehow the docs are installed to libquazip-dev which is not good since
> there are two -dev packages
> mv debian/*
Your message dated Sun, 4 Mar 2018 18:57:07 +0100
with message-id <20180304175707.xtejmg73gwwnw...@sk2.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#891661: maven: missing Depends on libcommons-cli-java
has caused the Debian Bug report #891661,
regarding maven: missing Depends on libcommons-cli-java
to be marked a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 887873 important
Bug #887873 [src:linux] linux-image-4.9.0-5-marvell: frequent "usercopy: kernel
memory overwrite attempt detected" on QNAP NAS (ARM)
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
A Debian user reported the following issue on QNAP TS-119P II with
4.9.65:
* Menno Finlay-Smits [2018-01-21 23:08]:
> Rsyncing files between 2 HDDs on a QNAP 119p with a fresh, minimal install of
> stretch NAS (armel) causes the kernel to fail after ~20mins with a kernel
> memory overwrite attemp
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 17:34:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#890774: fixed in glade 3.20.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #890774,
regarding glade 3.20.2-1 has same filename for all images
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:53:25PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On വ്യാഴം 15 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2018 12:07 രാവിലെ, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > What's the status?
> > Cheers,
> > Moritz
> Some cve patches are backported, but help is welcome,
> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gitlab/tree/master-
On 03/04/2018 05:26 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> 1. "in the maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release" [1]
Didn't you say there is no longer an upstream maintainer?
Please note we have had similar cases with other packages where the maintainer
of a forked project or the original
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 16:49:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891946: fixed in datalad 0.9.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #891946,
regarding datalad: tries to download msgpack-python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
!SESSION Fri Mar 02 18:36:55 CST 2018
--
!ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.launcher 4 0 2018-03-02 18:36:55.263
!MESSAGE Exception launching the Eclipse Platform:
!STACK
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter
at jav
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:14 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Could you provide any references to bug reports which indicates
> that there are problems with the xchat package which make it
> unfit for release or violate against any of the points mentioned
> in the Debian Policy?
1. "in the
Package: prelude-utils
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other p
Package: python3-panko
Version: 3.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other
Package: dovecot-core
Version: 2.2.27-3+deb9u2
Severity: grave
Debian: Stretch amd64
Regression: Unknown
Trying to install dovecot on debian 9.2 leaded to error during the
post-install process, leading to dovecot partially installed and
non-working, resulting in an unusable program (all doveco
Nobody objected, so let's hold out until libcurl breaks us for good or
OpenSSL 1.1 support emerges...
Package: udunits-bin
Version: udunits-bin
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite oth
Package: libvlfeat-doc
Version: 0.9.21+dfsg0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrit
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 15:49:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#887785: fixed in jtb 1.4.12-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #887785,
regarding javacc-maven-plugin and build-rdeps FTBFS with jtb 1.4.12-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 15:49:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#887785: fixed in jtb 1.4.12-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #887785,
regarding libjavacc-maven-plugin-java: plugin fails at runtime after jtb
1.4.12-1 update
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Package: puredata-gui-l10n
Version: 0.48.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU versioned as 1.4.12-1.1 to address this issue.
Please find attached the debdiff.
Regards,
Markus
diff -Nru jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog
--- jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog 2018-01-08 04:18:07.0 +0100
+++ jtb-1.4.12/debian/chang
Package: src:xchat
Followup-For: Bug #891982
Hi Jeremy!
Could you provide any references to bug reports which indicates
that there are problems with the xchat package which make it
unfit for release or violate against any of the points mentioned
in the Debian Policy?
Please note that we have oth
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 887785 1.4.12-1
Bug #887785 [src:jtb] javacc-maven-plugin and build-rdeps FTBFS with jtb
1.4.12-1
Bug #888994 [src:jtb] libjavacc-maven-plugin-java: plugin fails at runtime
after jtb 1.4.12-1 update
Marked as found in versions jtb/1.4.12-1
Package: usbguard-applet-qt
Version: 0.7.0+ds1-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Nothing prevents the user from installing an incompatible Qt 5.10
libraries:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ usbguard-applet-qt
Cannot mix incompatible
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 887785 src:jtb
Bug #887785 [src:javacc-maven-plugin] javacc-maven-plugin and build-rdeps FTBFS
with jtb 1.4.12-1
Bug #888994 [src:javacc-maven-plugin] libjavacc-maven-plugin-java: plugin fails
at runtime after jtb 1.4.12-1 update
Bug re
reassign -1 src:jtb
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:54:36 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.03.2018 um 06:33 schrieb Tiago Daitx:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A simple relocation in jtb fixed the FTBFS - tested for surefire,
> > javacc-maven-plugin, hawtbuf, avro-java, and activemq-protobuf.
>
> Thank you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303
> 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379
> 885280 885493 885476 885292 885279 885355 885511 885275 885495 885361 885377
> 885351 885
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303
> 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379
> 885280 885493 885476 885292 885279 885355 885511 885275 885495 885361 885377
> 885351 885
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885368 885513 885470 885356 885496 885282 885517 885483
> 885374 885467 885519 885523 885482 885515 885271 885474 885266
Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead
Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885529 885491 885469 885485 885468 885479 885528 885267
> 885301 885880
Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead
Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885488 885471 885278 885477 885365 885289 885300 885303
> 885297 885258 885287 885509 885268 885140 885498 885298 885372 885510 885379
> 885280 885493 885476 885292 885279 885355 885511 885275 885495 885361 885377
> 885351 885
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885508 885274 885505 885371 885530 885304 885256 885490
> 885270 885380
Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead
Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885357 885263 885527 886198 885478 885494 885360 886276
> 885362 885299
Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead
Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885368 885513 885480 885470 885356 885496 885282 885517
Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead
Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debian
885135 was not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 885135 with 885483 885374 885467 885519 885523 885482 885515 885271
> 885474 885266
Bug #885135 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, use GObject Introspection instead
Bug #885752 [src:pygtk] pygtk: Unmaintained, should not be released with Debi
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #890774 in glade reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glade/commit/f90d70655367c48278fbc08c88e62997bcd
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #890774 [glade] glade 3.20.2-1 has same filename for all images
Added tag(s) pending.
--
890774: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890774
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 11:50:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#887525: fixed in poppler 0.62.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #887525,
regarding poppler FTBFS with gtk-doc-tools 1.27-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
On 03/04/2018 11:55 AM, Kai Pastor, DG0YT wrote:
> Am 04.03.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
>> severity 876934 serious
>> thanks
>>
>> The proj transition (#891966) has started, these build failures are
>> now RC.
>
> Again, 876934 was reported for FTBFS in reproducible builds. This s
Am 04.03.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
severity 889931 serious
severity 876934 serious
severity 889936 serious
thanks
The proj transition (#891966) has started, these build failures are now RC.
Kind Regards,
Bas
Again, 876934 was reported for FTBFS in reproducible builds. This
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 10:50:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#870308: fixed in ruby-ridley 5.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #870308,
regarding ruby-ridley FTBFS: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2018 09:50:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#890957: fixed in live-tasks 0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #890957,
regarding live-tasks missing live-task-base binary.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 890957 + pending
Bug #890957 [live-tasks] live-tasks missing live-task-base binary.
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #890957 to the same tags previously set
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 889931 serious
Bug #889931 [src:python-cartopy] python-cartopy FTBFS with proj 5.0.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 876934 serious
Bug #876934 [src:openorienteering-mapper] openorienteering-mapper FTBFS: test
failu
Source: python-meshio
Version: 1.11.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that python-meshio installs tes
Package: node-grunt-cli
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: grave
It is really depending on grunt -- but doesn't, so it's possible to
install the package in a broken state.
Snark on #debian-js
81 matches
Mail list logo
