Bug#814600: [Android-tools-devel] Bug#814600: android-tools: B-D on obsolete android-system-dev

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 04:25:39PM +0100, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > we're going to be removing this package anyway, so I don't think we need > to fix it. And if someone wants to backport it, then android-system-dev > can be backported too. if you want to remove this package, why not doing i

Bug#819772: /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/15.9/build/firegl_public.c:6516:49: error: 'XSTATE_FP' undeclared

Package: fglrx-modules-dkms Version: 1:15.9-4~deb8u1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- Package-specific info: Full fglrx package list: ii fglrx-atieventsd 1:15.9-4~deb8u1 amd64 events daemon for the non-free ATI/AMD

Bug#788725: marked as done ([src:jffnms] Some sources are not included in your package)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:56:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#819547: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #788725, regarding [src:jffnms] Some sources are not included in your package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#631610: marked as done (libmusicbrainz3: should be removed, incompatible with web service API, replacement exists)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:50:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#819169: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #631610, regarding libmusicbrainz3: should be removed, incompatible with web service API, replacement exists to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#741908: marked as done (extplorer: CVE-2013-5951)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:44:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818984: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #741908, regarding extplorer: CVE-2013-5951 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#802410: marked as done (openais: FTBFS: error: corosync/coroipc_types.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:43:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818911: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #802410, regarding openais: FTBFS: error: corosync/coroipc_types.h: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#806352: marked as done (django-openid-auth: FTBFS with Django 1.9)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:41:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818883: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #806352, regarding django-openid-auth: FTBFS with Django 1.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#783231: marked as done (CVE-2015-0896: multiple XSS issues)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:44:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818984: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #783231, regarding CVE-2015-0896: multiple XSS issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#733965: marked as done (Please migrate to yui3)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:44:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818984: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #733965, regarding Please migrate to yui3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#736794: marked as done ([src:jpoker] Sourceless flash file)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:32:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818425: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #736794, regarding [src:jpoker] Sourceless flash file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#765129: marked as done (tcos: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libxmlrpc-c3-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:25:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818108: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #765129, regarding tcos: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libxmlrpc-c3-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#800284: marked as done (ciphersaber: Please migrate a supported debhelper compat level)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:19:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#800284: fixed in ciphersaber 0.61-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #800284, regarding ciphersaber: Please migrate a supported debhelper compat level to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#785891: marked as done (psimedia: Please update to GStreamer 1.x)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:10:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#817839: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #785891, regarding psimedia: Please update to GStreamer 1.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#819618: openjdk-8-source: "source" package is empty (does not contain src.zip anymore)

Chris, looks like this just got fixed in 8u77-b03-3. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

Processed: gnome-builder: build against vala 0.32

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Found 819538 3.18.1-1 Bug #819538 [gnome-builder] gnome-builder: build against vala 0.32 Marked as found in versions gnome-builder/3.18.1-1. > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 819538: http://bugs.debi

Bug#819538: gnome-builder: build against vala 0.32

Found 819538 3.18.1-1 Thanks > Your package needs to be updated to build against the new vala 0.32. Testing is also affected by this issue.

Bug#819725: ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module

Control: tag -1 sid upstream Control: found -1 4.4.6-1 Control: retitle -1 ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module Control: severity -1 important On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 14:51 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: reassign -1 src:linux > > please don't use html in your emails, it'll probably make o

Processed: ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module

Processing control commands: > tag -1 sid upstream Bug #819725 [src:linux] ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module Added tag(s) sid and upstream. > found -1 4.4.6-1 Bug #819725 [src:linux] ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module Marked as found in versions linux/4.4.6-1. > retitle -1 ext4 missing soft

Processed: Re: Bug#819190: libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx: post-installation-Skript returns error code 137

Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible Bug #819190 [libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx] libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx: post-installation-Skript returns error code 137 Added tag(s) unreproducible. > severity -1 normal Bug #819190 [libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx] libgl1-nvidia-legacy-34

Bug#819190: libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx: post-installation-Skript returns error code 137

Control: tags -1 unreproducible Control: severity -1 normal On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 15:35 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:14 +0100, Peter Schütt wrote: > > Package: libgl1-nvidia-legacy-340xx-glx > > Version: 340.96-3 > > Severity: critical > > J

Processed: retitle 819725 to ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 819725 ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module Bug #819725 [src:linux] EXT4-fs (sda2): Cannot load crc32c driver. Changed Bug title to 'ext4 missing softdep on crc32c module' from 'EXT4-fs (sda2): Cannot load crc32c driver.'. > thanks Stopp

Bug#804616: marked as done (sslscan: FTBFS: undefined reference to `SSLv3_client_method')

Your message dated Fri, 01 Apr 2016 19:50:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#804616: fixed in sslscan 1.11.5-rbsec-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #804616, regarding sslscan: FTBFS: undefined reference to `SSLv3_client_method' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#819710: marked as done (libxdmf-dev and libgzstream-dev: error when trying to install together)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Apr 2016 19:20:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#819710: fixed in xdmf 2.1.dfsg.1-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #819710, regarding libxdmf-dev and libgzstream-dev: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#807698: srtp: CVE-2015-6360

Am 01.04.2016 um 18:52 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: [...] > Okay, please go ahead with your upload to security-master. Since the > version for jessie-security is new to dak on security-master please > remember to build with -sa to include the original source tarball. > > Thanks for your work on t

Bug#819618: marked as done (openjdk-8-source: "source" package is empty (does not contain src.zip anymore))

Your message dated Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:52:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#819618: fixed in openjdk-8 8u77-b03-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #819618, regarding openjdk-8-source: "source" package is empty (does not contain src.zip anymore) to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#807698: srtp: CVE-2015-6360

Hi Markus, On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:21:32PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: severity -1 grave > Control: tags -1 patch > > Am 31.03.2016 um 15:14 schrieb John Foley: > > It's my understanding the obsolete versions of libsrtp are vulnerable. > > Quoting the original text from Randell J

Bug#819725: EXT4-fs (sda2): Cannot load crc32c driver.

control: reassign -1 src:linux please don't use html in your emails, it'll probably make our tooling grumpy (as it did in this case). Also, 1) there are no packages "linux-image" 2) 4.4.0-1 is surely something non-current Then I haven't read the bug report, though I'm somehow confident this is no

Bug#819618: openjdk-8-source: "source" package is empty (does not contain src.zip anymore)

On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Lukas Degener wrote: > it seems that the src.zip contained in openjdk-8-jdk-headless is only > a symlink to a (now missing) file /usr/lib/jvm/openjdk-8/src.zip Yes, that’s how it always was. openjdk-8-source is seriously broken (hah…) right now: openjdk-8-source: missing-cop

Bug#819618: openjdk-8-source: "source" package is empty (does not contain src.zip anymore)

Hi all, it seems that the src.zip contained in openjdk-8-jdk-headless is only a symlink to a (now missing) file /usr/lib/jvm/openjdk-8/src.zip Older versions of openjdk-8-source (I checked 8u72-b05-6) provided the src.zip file at this location. Cheers, --lu signature.asc Description: PGP sign

Bug#819725: EXT4-fs (sda2): Cannot load crc32c driver.

Package: linux-image Version: 4.4.0-1 Severity: critical Tags: d-i, stretch I have used today's version of http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/netboot.

Bug#796611: ferm causes a unit ordering cycle that breaks booting

On 1 April 2016 at 08:14, Sam Morris wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 07:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> On 29 Mar 2016 04:03, "Felix Geyer" wrote: >> > >> > Hi Felipe, >> > >> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:56:48 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote: >> > > I have uploaded an nmu. I have made the unit call

Processed: Re: Bug#819676: ansible: CVE-2016-3096: Code execution vulnerability in ansible lxc_container

Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #819676 [src:ansible] ansible: CVE-2016-3096: Code execution vulnerability in ansible lxc_container Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' -- 819676: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819676 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#807698: srtp: CVE-2015-6360

Yes, that fix should address the vulnerability. There was one Cisco product that reported an issue with this patch. Specifically, it prevents a zero length payload packet from being decrypted. We never received reports of this problem from downstream open source projects. So you're probably

Bug#817039: marked as done (volti: Fails to start due to incorrect python-dbus version check)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Apr 2016 12:51:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#816801: fixed in volti 0.2.3-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #816801, regarding volti: Fails to start due to incorrect python-dbus version check to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#816801: marked as done (volti: The script /usr/bin/volti incorrectly checks the version of dbus)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Apr 2016 12:51:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#816801: fixed in volti 0.2.3-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #816801, regarding volti: The script /usr/bin/volti incorrectly checks the version of dbus to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#796611: ferm causes a unit ordering cycle that breaks booting

On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 07:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On 29 Mar 2016 04:03, "Felix Geyer" wrote: > > > > Hi Felipe, > > > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:56:48 -0300 Felipe Sateler wrote: > > > I have uploaded an nmu. I have made the unit call out to the init > > > script, because it does more w

Bug#819710: libxdmf-dev and libgzstream-dev: error when trying to install together

Hi, libgzstream was created to replace the number of code copies inside Debian. Libxdmf-dev has just one of these code copies. Please remove this from the package and use libgzstream-dev instead. Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:08:09AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Pack

Processed: found 818485 in 0.164-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 818485 0.164-1 Bug #818485 [src:elfutils] elfutils: FTBFS on mips and mipsel Marked as found in versions elfutils/0.164-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 818485: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#819715: node-starttls: FTBFS: Uncaught Error: unable to get local issuer certificate

Source: node-starttls Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, node-starttls fails to build from source in unstable/amd6

Bug#819714: nifti2dicom: FTBFS: No rule to make target '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libproj.so'

Source: nifti2dicom Version: 0.4.11-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, nifti2dicom fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

Bug#819618: openjdk-8-source: "source" package is empty (does not contain src.zip anymore)

Chris, is the incomplete debug information worthy of a separate bug report against openjdk-8-jdk-headless? This sounds to me like a separate issue. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

Bug#814589: marked as done (otrs2: source-less files; undocumented copyrights/licenses; abuse of lintian-overrides; systematic DFSG violations)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Apr 2016 08:22:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#814589: fixed in otrs2 5.0.8+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #814589, regarding otrs2: source-less files; undocumented copyrights/licenses; abuse of lintian-overrides; systematic DFSG violations to be

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 795211 grave Bug #795211 [yaboot-installer] Yaboot in Jessie, following Jessie OS installation, fails to boot Mac OS X Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 795211 to the same value. > user debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Setting us

Bug#819618: openjdk-8-source: "source" package is empty (does not contain src.zip anymore)

On 01.04.2016 02:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Chris, > > according the file list > > openjdk-8-jdk-headless contains /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/src.zip > > Perhaps openjdk-8-source is now obsolete? Ben, that is pos

Bug#819710: libxdmf-dev and libgzstream-dev: error when trying to install together

Package: libgzstream-dev,libxdmf-dev Version: libgzstream-dev/1.5+dfsg-1 Version: libxdmf-dev/2.1.dfsg.1-13 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2016-04-01 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a fi