Processed (with 1 errors): merging 789253 790012

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 789253 790012 Bug #789253 {Done: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) } [python-googleapi] discovery.py: cannot import name GoogleCredentials (version conflict with python-oauth2client?) Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #790012 is 'grave' not

Processed: tagging 738295, severity of 792870 is serious, user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 792870

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 738295 - jessie Bug #738295 [guile-1.8-non-dfsg] guile-1.8-non-dfsg: FTBFS: ./gh.texi:1000: must be after '@deftypefun' to use '@deftypefunx' Removed tag(s) jessie. > severity 792870 serious Bug #792870 [redmine] redmine: apt-get install fai

Bug#793436: lttoolbox: FTBFS on most architectures due to symbol changes

Source: lttoolbox Version: 3.3.2~r61000-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The recently uploaded lttoolbox has symbol file mismatches on most architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lttoolbox&suite=unstable And

Processed: tagging 738120, reassign 793197 to src:sparse, reassign 793193 to src:mgltools-pmv, tagging 759232 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 738120 - jessie Bug #738120 [gawk-doc] gawk-doc: FTBFS: could not open gawk.texi: No such file or directory Removed tag(s) jessie. > reassign 793197 src:sparse 0.4.5~rc1-1 Bug #793197 [sparse] sparse: FTBFS with linker errors (missing libs)

Bug#778068: marked as done (pork: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:19:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778068: fixed in pork 0.99.8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #778068, regarding pork: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#793367: marked as done (kic: FTBFS due to linking with -L without argument which gobbles -lX11)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:19:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#793367: fixed in kic 2.4a-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #793367, regarding kic: FTBFS due to linking with -L without argument which gobbles -lX11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#791869:

An alternative explanation is that my original hung update-initramfs that required "pvscan --cache" to complete created a broken or incomplete initramfs. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-re

Bug#778109: s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:14:41 -0600, Brett Johnson wrote: > > Unfortunately the patch introduces a FTBFS with gcc 4.9: > D'oh! I was sloppy and did not test, nor read the standards thoroughly. > My apologies :(. Given that the function is implemented in a single "c" file, > but used in > multiple

Bug#791869: Info received (Bug#791869: System hangs on boot with lvmetad not active)

I am unable to reproduce this hang. When I re-enable lvmetad in lvm.conf and run "update-initramfs -u", reboot succeeds (many trials). Perhaps it is just the very intermittent failures on SSDs reported by Stefan? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited

Bug#793425: apertium: FTBFS on multiple architectures

Package: apertium Version: 3.4.0~r61013-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS, but did so in the past The most recent upload of apertium fails to build from source because of changed symbols: dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-g

Bug#789109: marked as done (FTBFS: JSSSupport [..] does not override abstract method getProtocol() in [..].tomcat.[..]SSLSupport)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:22:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#789109: fixed in tomcatjss 7.1.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #789109, regarding FTBFS: JSSSupport [..] does not override abstract method getProtocol() in [..].tomcat.[..]SSLSupport to be marked as done.

Bug#778109: s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5

tags 778109 +patch thanks > Unfortunately the patch introduces a FTBFS with gcc 4.9: D'oh! I was sloppy and did not test, nor read the standards thoroughly. My apologies :(. Given that the function is implemented in a single "c" file, but used in multiple places, the C89 and C99 standards seem t

Processed: Re: Bug#778109: s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778109 +patch Bug #778109 [src:s51dude] s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #778109 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778109: http://b

Processed: quarry: diff for NMU version 0.2.0.dfsg.1-4.1

Processing control commands: > tags 778098 + pending Bug #778098 [src:quarry] quarry: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 778098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Bug#791869: System hangs on boot with lvmetad not active

This bug now makes any kernel upgrade (in this case linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64) cause the system to be unbootable. The system is unable to contact lvmetad and unable to locate the root partition. There is no luks passphrase prompt. Please upgrade this bug to CRITICAL. Or should I file a critica

Bug#778098: quarry: ftbfs with GCC-5

On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:10:29 +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > I am sending an NMU that fixes the FTBFS by adding -std=gnu89 to > CFLAGS. I also fixed linitian warnings, added hardening, bumped > standards and compat. That's a bit excessive for an NMU, I'm afraid ... I'm about the upload an

Bug#778098: quarry: diff for NMU version 0.2.0.dfsg.1-4.1

Control: tags 778098 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for quarry (versioned as 0.2.0.dfsg.1-4.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :

Processed: tagging 778098

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778098 + patch Bug #778098 [src:quarry] quarry: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778098 Debian Bug

Bug#778099: ratbox-services: diff for NMU version 1.2.4+repack-2.1

Control: tags 778099 + patch Control: tags 778099 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ratbox-services (versioned as 1.2.4+repack-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/

Processed: ratbox-services: diff for NMU version 1.2.4+repack-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 778099 + patch Bug #778099 [src:ratbox-services] ratbox-services: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 778099 + pending Bug #778099 [src:ratbox-services] ratbox-services: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 778099: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

Processed: s51dude: diff for NMU version 0.3.1-1.1

Processing control commands: > tags 778109 + patch Bug #778109 [src:s51dude] s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 778109 + pending Bug #778109 [src:s51dude] s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 778109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778109 Debian B

Bug#778109: s51dude: diff for NMU version 0.3.1-1.1

Control: tags 778109 + patch Control: tags 778109 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for s51dude (versioned as 0.3.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key

Processed: Re: Bug#778109: s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - patch Bug #778109 [src:s51dude] s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5 Removed tag(s) patch. -- 778109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778109 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b

Bug#778122: marked as done (skyeye: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:48:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778122: fixed in skyeye 1.2.5-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #778122, regarding skyeye: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#778051: marked as done (overgod: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:47:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778051: fixed in overgod 1.0-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #778051, regarding overgod: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#778109: s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5

Control: tag -1 - patch On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:33:48 -0600, Brett Johnson wrote: > tags 778109 +patch > thanks > > GCC5 defaults to the C99 standard, which changes inline function semantics. > This patch fixes the FTBFS by declaring the print_error function explicitly > extern, since it's called

Processed: tagging 778109

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778109 + patch Bug #778109 [src:s51dude] s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #778109 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778109: http://

Bug#791833: marked as done (gstreamer-qapt: Bump Breaks+Replaces to cover gstreamer1.0-qapt 2.2.0-1 in experimental)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:42:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#791833: fixed in libqapt 3.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #791833, regarding gstreamer-qapt: Bump Breaks+Replaces to cover gstreamer1.0-qapt 2.2.0-1 in experimental to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#778109: s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5

tags 778109 +patch thanks GCC5 defaults to the C99 standard, which changes inline function semantics. This patch fixes the FTBFS by declaring the print_error function explicitly extern, since it's called from multiple source files. --- s51dude-0.3.1.orig/s51dude.c +++ s51dude-0.3.1/s51dude.c @@ -

Processed: Re: s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778109 +patch Bug #778109 [src:s51dude] s51dude: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778109 Debian Bug

Bug#791869: Infinite hang on update-initramfs

I have found new GRAVE manifestation of this bug. Rather than create a new bug report, I am adding it to this list. Should this be a new new GRAVE bug. Today I upgraded linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64 to 4.0.8-2 and encountered an infinite hang in initramfs-tools while it was running vgs: /etc/ker

Bug#793418: plasma-nm menu very tiny

Package: plasma-nm Version: 4:5.3.2-1 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The plasma-nm applet always renders its menu (upon clicking) in the size of the icon. Thus, placing it in the system tray, the menu gets rendered the size of a tray icon, making it completely unu

Bug#793417: nfstrace: FTBFS: tests 46 and 47 still fail on some architectures

Source: nfstrace Version: 0.4.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) I'm happy to see that nfstrace's test suite now succeeds on more architectures. However, a pair of tests still fails on armhf, powerpc, and ppc64el, and possibly othe

Processed: bug 793417 is forwarded to https://github.com/epam/nfstrace/issues/8#issuecomment-124221089

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 793417 > https://github.com/epam/nfstrace/issues/8#issuecomment-124221089 Bug #793417 [src:nfstrace] nfstrace: FTBFS: tests 46 and 47 still fail on some architectures Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/epam/nfstrace/i

Processed: Re: screader: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778114 +patch Bug #778114 [src:screader] screader: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778114: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778114 Debian B

Bug#778114: screader: ftbfs with GCC-5

tags 778114 +patch thanks gcc5 makes C99 standard default, which changes inline function semantics, and usually breaks functions previously simply declared "inline" without specifying static or extern. screader has a rather large function "Auto_TTS" declared inline, but which could not actually b

Bug#792780: [debian-mysql] Bug#792780: Bug#792780: mariadb-10.0: FTBFS on powerpc but succeded previously

This has now been fairly well debugged with gdb stack traces and all, and from now on is tracked in upstream bug report at https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-8536 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.

Bug#778020: marked as done (mz: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:50:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778020: fixed in mz 0.40-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #778020, regarding mz: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Processed: tcpcopy: diff for NMU version 0.6.3-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 778140 + patch Bug #778140 [src:tcpcopy] tcpcopy: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 778140 + pending Bug #778140 [src:tcpcopy] tcpcopy: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 778140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778140 Debian B

Bug#778140: tcpcopy: diff for NMU version 0.6.3-2.1

Control: tags 778140 + patch Control: tags 778140 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for tcpcopy (versioned as 0.6.3-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key

Processed: tagging 778140

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > https://github.com/wangbin579/tcpcopy/commit/6419499ab372a69f98af04ee28908c3670658b13 > tags 778140 + fixed-upstream Bug #778140 [src:tcpcopy] tcpcopy: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please c

Processed: thewidgetfactory: diff for NMU version 0.2.1-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 765023 + patch Bug #765023 [thewidgetfactory] thewidgetfactory: run dh-autoreconf to update for new architectures Bug #765261 [thewidgetfactory] thewidgetfactory: run dh-autoreconf to update for new architectures Added tag(s) patch. Added tag(s) patch. > tags

Bug#778145: thewidgetfactory: diff for NMU version 0.2.1-2.1

Control: tags 765023 + patch Control: tags 765023 + pending Control: tags 778145 + patch Control: tags 778145 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for thewidgetfactory (versioned as 0.2.1-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regar

Processed: thewidgetfactory: diff for NMU version 0.2.1-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 765023 + patch Bug #765023 [thewidgetfactory] thewidgetfactory: run dh-autoreconf to update for new architectures Bug #765261 [thewidgetfactory] thewidgetfactory: run dh-autoreconf to update for new architectures Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #765023 t

Bug#793411: src:btcheck: maintainer address bounces

Hi Ansgar, On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:04:46 +0200 Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Source: btcheck > Source-Version: 1.9-1 > Tags: sid > Severity: serious > > The maintainer address for btcheck bounces, see below. I received the email. Can the bug be closed ? > > Ansgar > > Mail Delivery System write

Bug#786801: marked as done (nfstrace: FTBFS: test suite errors (esp. #60, json_analyzer))

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:20:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#786801: fixed in nfstrace 0.4.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #786801, regarding nfstrace: FTBFS: test suite errors (esp. #60, json_analyzer) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Processed: [bts-link] source package kamailio

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kamailio > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.

Processed: vtun: diff for NMU version 3.0.3-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 778164 + pending Bug #778164 [src:vtun] vtun: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 778164: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778164 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Bug#778164: vtun: diff for NMU version 3.0.3-2.1

Control: tags 778164 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for vtun (versioned as 3.0.3-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debia

Bug#793411: src:btcheck: maintainer address bounces

Source: btcheck Source-Version: 1.9-1 Tags: sid Severity: serious The maintainer address for btcheck bounces, see below. Ansgar Mail Delivery System writes: > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of i

Bug#777975: marked as done (libssh: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:07:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#777975: fixed in libssh 0.6.3-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #777975, regarding libssh: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Processed: tagging 778164

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778164 + patch Bug #778164 [src:vtun] vtun: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778164: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778164 Debian Bug Trac

Processed: block 778179 with 787018

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 778179 with 787018 Bug #778179 [src:xbmc] xbmc: ftbfs with GCC-5 778179 was not blocked by any bugs. 778179 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 778179: 787018 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: tagging 778046

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778046 + fixed-upstream Bug #778046 [src:openmprtl] openmprtl: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Processed: tagging 777862

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 777862 + fixed-upstream Bug #777862 [src:gbsplay] gbsplay: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 777862: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Processed: Patch for GCC5 build issue

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 777854 + patch Bug #777854 [src:freecraft] freecraft: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 777854: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777854 Debia

Bug#777854: Patch for GCC5 build issue

tags 777854 + patch thanks Here's a fix for the GCC 5 build issue. Change extern inline to static to prevent redefinition. The package builds and links with GCC5 with this change. Upstream may prefer to move to C99 instead, please see section "Different semantics for inline functions" at htt

Bug#777903: marked as done (hugs98: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:49:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#777903: fixed in hugs98 98.200609.21-5.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #777903, regarding hugs98: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Processed: ebview: diff for NMU version 0.3.6.2-1.4

Processing control commands: > tags 777837 + pending Bug #777837 [src:ebview] ebview: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 777837: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777837 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Bug#777837: ebview: diff for NMU version 0.3.6.2-1.4

Control: tags 777837 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ebview (versioned as 0.3.6.2-1.4) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : D

Bug#777766: adun.app: ftbfs with GCC-5

Thanks a lot! I'll upload this patch once adun.app has passed NEW. Andreas. On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:13:59PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > Control: found -1 0.81-7 > > On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:29:40 +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Package: src:adun.app > > Version: 0.81-6 > > Severity:

Processed: sflphone: diff for NMU version 1.4.1-0.2

Processing control commands: > tags 778115 + pending Bug #778115 [src:sflphone] sflphone: ftbfs with GCC-5 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #778115 to the same tags previously set > tags 787390 + pending Bug #787390 [src:sflphone] sflphone: FTBFS in sid Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #

Bug#787390: sflphone: diff for NMU version 1.4.1-0.2

Control: tags 778115 + pending Control: tags 787390 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for sflphone (versioned as 1.4.1-0.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru sflphone-1.4.1/debian/changelog

Processed: sflphone: diff for NMU version 1.4.1-0.2

Processing control commands: > tags 778115 + pending Bug #778115 [src:sflphone] sflphone: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. > tags 787390 + pending Bug #787390 [src:sflphone] sflphone: FTBFS in sid Added tag(s) pending. -- 778115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778115 7873

Bug#790464: marked as done (Please drop conditional build-depend on libmysqlclient15-dev)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:34:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#790464: fixed in flow-tools 1:0.68-12.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #790464, regarding Please drop conditional build-depend on libmysqlclient15-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#793298: CVE-2015-1331 CVE-2015-1334

On 07/23/2015 04:48 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I can handle the jessie-security upload based on the > debdiff proposed earlier. thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.

Processed: Re: Bug#790464: Please drop conditional build-depend on libmysqlclient15-dev

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #790464 [flow-tools] Please drop conditional build-depend on libmysqlclient15-dev Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor' -- 790464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790464 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian

Bug#777766: adun.app: ftbfs with GCC-5

Control: found -1 0.81-7 On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:29:40 +, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:adun.app > Version: 0.81-6 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid stretch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-5 > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with

Processed: Re: Bug#777766: adun.app: ftbfs with GCC-5

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.81-7 Bug #66 [src:adun.app] adun.app: ftbfs with GCC-5 Marked as found in versions adun.app/0.81-7. -- 66: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=66 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSU

Bug#792875: What plasmoid causes the crash?

Both packageName and appletId are optimised out in the crash trace, any idea what plasmoid is causing the crash? Cheers, Jeremy

Bug#793010: pax-utils: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: lddtree.py.list

On 20 July 2015 at 15:08, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > Well, upstream is already working on this. In fact, the test above > passes in the new version (which I've just pushed to collab-maint), > but the next one fails. You may try to pinpoint the problem, but it is > very likely the fact that python-p

Bug#777881: marked as done (gngb: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:51:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#777881: fixed in gngb 20060309-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #777881, regarding gngb: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#777853: marked as done (flow-tools: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:19:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#777853: fixed in flow-tools 1:0.68-12.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #777853, regarding flow-tools: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#777880: marked as done (gnac: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:19:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#777880: fixed in gnac 0.2.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #777880, regarding gnac: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#793369: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#793369: Any volunteer to maintain JAI that is RC buggy and dead upstream (Was: Bug#793369: jai-core: FTBFS - JPEGImageDecoder.java:29: error: package com.sun.ima

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:31:23PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > and, in any case, difficult to keep it in sync with upstream (or is > upstream dead?) Dead like a fish for years # Last Changed Date: 2007-08-31 18:25:50 +0200 (Fri, 31 Aug 2007) That's one of the reasons for my mail. Kind regard

Bug#777817: marked as done (clearsilver: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:49:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#755963: fixed in clearsilver 0.10.5-1.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #755963, regarding clearsilver: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#755963: marked as done (FTBFS with clang instead of gcc)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:49:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#755963: fixed in clearsilver 0.10.5-1.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #755963, regarding FTBFS with clang instead of gcc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#793369: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#793369: Any volunteer to maintain JAI that is RC buggy and dead upstream (Was: Bug#793369: jai-core: FTBFS - JPEGImageDecoder.java:29: error: package com.sun.ima

On 07/23/2015 06:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > since Mathieu declared he will not keep on maintaining his Debian Med > packages we have no active Uploader for this package to care for bugs > like this. Since I have no idea how to fix this I'm just asking for > volunteers whether we will

Bug#777765: #777765 : activiz.net: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi Corentin, On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:11:17PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > 2015-07-15 16:03 GMT+02:00 Steve Robbins : > > > You are right. Either gccxml needs to be updated or replaced. I don't know > > if the latter is possible for activiz but gccxml is dead upstream. ITK is > > moving t

Bug#777783: marked as done (atftp: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:19:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#83: fixed in atftp 0.7.git20120829-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #83, regarding atftp: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#787533: mariadb-common: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/mysql/my.cnf

Oh darn, error 141 is just another instance of #790875 manifesting. I had a workaround for stretch and sid and magically that worked for mysql jessie->sid upgrades, but not for mariadb jessie->sid upgrades. Looks clean from the piuparts side now (except for libmariadbd-dev uninstallability). And

Bug#793369: Any volunteer to maintain JAI that is RC buggy and dead upstream (Was: Bug#793369: jai-core: FTBFS - JPEGImageDecoder.java:29: error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist)

Hi, since Mathieu declared he will not keep on maintaining his Debian Med packages we have no active Uploader for this package to care for bugs like this. Since I have no idea how to fix this I'm just asking for volunteers whether we will be able to properly maintain the package inside Debian or

Bug#793398: Remote execution of untrusted code, DoS (CVE-2015-3253)

Package: groovy2 Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-3 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream cpnrodzc7, working with HP's Zero Day Initiative, discovered that Java applications using standard Java serialization mechanisms to decode untrusted data, and that have Groovy on their classpath, can be passed a seriali

Bug#793397: Remote execution of untrusted code, DoS (CVE-2015-3253)

Package: groovy Version: 1.8.6-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream cpnrodzc7, working with HP's Zero Day Initiative, discovered that Java applications using standard Java serialization mechanisms to decode untrusted data, and that have Groovy on their classpath, can be passed a serialized ob

Bug#778016: marked as done (mstflint: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:43:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778016: fixed in mstflint 4.0.1+1.43.g97d7275-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #778016, regarding mstflint: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#777780: marked as done (asmon: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:36:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#80: fixed in asmon 0.71-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #80, regarding asmon: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#793391: Package oath-toolkit FTBFS on 32bit archs

Package: oath-toolkit Version: 2.6.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid + patch User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org Usertags: mips-patch Hello, Package oath-toolkit_2.6.0-1 FTBFS on 32bit archs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=oath-toolkit&suite=sid https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch

Bug#793298: CVE-2015-1331 CVE-2015-1334

Hi Daniel, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 06:35:46PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > I'm uploading to sid as we speak.. Thanks a lot. I can handle the jessie-security upload based on the debdiff proposed earlier. Regards, Salvatore -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Bug#789991: Adoption?

I will look into producing a fix for this bug, as it is a dependency for some of the packages I have been working on. Sergio, Would you be interested in the pkg-go team adopting this package for co-maintainership? -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@

Bug#792066: marked as done (FTBFS: patsy.test_highlevel.test_formula_likes + test_return_pandas fail)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:30:14 -0400 with message-id <20150723133014.gl28...@onerussian.com> and subject line Re: Bug#792066: FTBFS: patsy.test_highlevel.test_formula_likes + test_return_pandas fail has caused the Debian Bug report #792066, regarding FTBFS: patsy.test_highlevel.test_

Bug#778157: marked as done (user-mode-linux: ftbfs with GCC-5)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:20:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#778157: fixed in user-mode-linux 4.0-1um-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #778157, regarding user-mode-linux: ftbfs with GCC-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#787979: marked as done (user-mode-linux: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: linux-source-3.16)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:20:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#787979: fixed in user-mode-linux 4.0-1um-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #787979, regarding user-mode-linux: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: linux-source-3.16 to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#787533: mariadb-common: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/mysql/my.cnf

2015-07-22 22:56 GMT+03:00 Andreas Beckmann : >> That one was fixed already in December in >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-mysql/mariadb-10.0.git/commit/?id=3afe791ed47b897de8fa9be998a4217fc2a36bad > > Robie added recently in 6bc2c1a5 in mysql-5.6 an explicit 'exit 0' at > the end of the ini

Bug#793369: jai-core: FTBFS - JPEGImageDecoder.java:29: error: package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg does not exist

Source: jai-core Version: 1.1.4-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid stretch Justification: fails to build from source from a rebuild in a clean jessie pbuilder environment (full log attached): [...] compilation: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/jai-core-1.1.4/build/linux-amd64/opt/classes

Bug#793367: kic: FTBFS due to linking with -L without argument which gobbles -lX11

Source: kic Version: 2.4a-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie stetch sid Justification: fails to build from source from a rebuild in a clean pbuilder jessie environment: [...] cd ../xmfb; /usr/bin/make make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/buildd/kic-2.4a/src/xmfb' gcc -O -Wall -DUSE_OLD_MALLOC -DHAVE

Bug#792646: marked as done (wolfssl: CVE-2014-2901 CVE-2014-2902 CVE-2014-2903 CVE-2014-2904)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:07:59 -0700 with message-id and subject line Vulnerabilities not present in initial upload has caused the Debian Bug report #792646, regarding wolfssl: CVE-2014-2901 CVE-2014-2902 CVE-2014-2903 CVE-2014-2904 to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#791752: [Python-apps-team] Bug#791752: puddletag: Puddletag crashes on start-up

> Upstream has a one-line fix for this problem, about which more can be found > here. https://github.com/keithgg/puddletag/issues/261 thanks, I'll address it soon Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.de

Bug#785035: ugene: FTBFS on amd64

Followup-For: Bug #785035 The FTBFS Lisandro reported already happens in jessie: [...] g++ -m64 -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-O1 -o ../_release/ugenecl _tmp/obj/release/DumpHelpTask.o _tmp/obj/release/DumpLicenseTask.o _tmp/obj/release/DumpVersionTask.o _tmp/obj/release/ForeverTask.o _tmp/obj/release/LogD

Bug#791508: package gccxml reached end-of-life, successor castxml now available

Control: tags -1 - patch On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Mathieu, you have tagged the bug patch but I'm not really sure whether > this slight hint is really a patch or whether some more work needs to > be done. Any quilt patch would be more than welcome. Removed. I assu

Processed: Re: Bug#791508: package gccxml reached end-of-life, successor castxml now available

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - patch Bug #791508 [gdcm] Switch from gccxml to castxml Removed tag(s) patch. -- 791508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791508 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug

  1   2   >