package: gnote
version: 3.14.2-1
severity: grave
reason: gnote is unusable with this
When I manually created this file, I could start gnote and use it normally.
I had just installed it and using it for the first time.
pravi@savannah:~/forge/diaspora$ gnote
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
pravi@
On 2015-03-30 04:30, Tom Lee wrote:
> Hey Niels,
>
> Understood. Hard to see exactly what's going on here because we seem to be
> falling afoul of https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00322.html.
> Do you happen to know if there's another way to get access to
> test-suite.log from thes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #781489 [criu] criu: links against libprotobuf-c0 which it doesn't depend
on$ criu
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #781489 to the same tags previously set
--
781489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78148
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #781489 [criu] criu: links against libprotobuf-c0 which it doesn't depend
on$ criu
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
781489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Hi
This does not look correct at first glance. criu/1.3.1-1 in
jessie/unstable depends on libprotobuf-c1 (as well criu/1.4-1 in
experimental). What does
apt-cache policy criu
shows?
Regards,
Salvatore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-req
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 10:16:01 PM David Goodenough wrote:
> Unfortunately I have a problem with the KDE bugs system. It says my login
> is wrong, won't send me the password reminder, and won't let me create a
> new one. No idea why it does not like me.
>
> David
>
> On Saturday 31 Janua
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 781483 + upstream
Bug #781483 {Done: Simon McVittie } [ikiwiki] ikiwiki:
cross-site scripting via openid_identifier
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
781483: http://bugs.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 762950 4:4.8.4-4+deb7u1
Bug #762950 [libsolid4] digikam: Removes all images from database when
unaccessible mount is found
Marked as found in versions kde4libs/4:4.8.4-4+deb7u1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Source: musl
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream patch fixed-upstream
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for musl.
CVE-2015-1817[0]:
stack-based buffer overflow in ipv6 literal parsing
If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE (Common
On Mar 18, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Well, the root cause IMO is that 75-persistent-net-generator.rules is
> inherently susceptible to races. It's my understanding that it's valid
> for events to be triggered multiple times -- there are multiple places
> in d-i that "udevadm trigger" is called, i
Am 30.03.2015 um 04:56 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Looks like a found a simple reproducer (this is on my work laptop) done
> during normal runtime of the system:
>
> $ rm /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> $ while true ; do echo add > /sys/class/net/eth0/uevent ; done
>
> I let this run fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 778646 potrace: CVE-2013-7437: possible heap overflow
Bug #778646 [potrace] Multiple issues
Changed Bug title to 'potrace: CVE-2013-7437: possible heap overflow' from
'Multiple issues'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Am 18.03.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 18.03.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 18.03.2015 um 18:15 schrieb Faidon Liambotis:
>>> Another less arbitrary/racy workaround I suggesed was a grep near the
>>> top of write_net_rules' write_rule() function.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #765577 [udev-udeb] netboot install writes duplicates to
70-persistent-net.rules
Bug #777126 [udev-udeb] udev: duplicate eth? entries
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
765577: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Hey Niels,
Understood. Hard to see exactly what's going on here because we seem to be
falling afoul of https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/04/msg00322.html.
Do you happen to know if there's another way to get access to
test-suite.log from these builds? The suggested work-around in that mail
Control: tag -1 patch
On 2015-03-24, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:02:05PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:00:08PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> Confirmed after having started an USB stick installation on real (and
> very old) hardware; s
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #780591 [ltsp-client-builder] ltsp-client-builder fails when installing
Debian Edu combined server in virtualbox environment
Added tag(s) patch.
--
780591: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On 2015-03-24, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:02:05PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:00:08PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> Confirmed after having started an USB stick installation on real (and
> very old) hardware; something like /dev/sdXY
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#778631: fixed in icedtea-web 1.5-2+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #778631,
regarding icedtea-netx: Fails to start despite dependencies being met
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:06:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#781483: fixed in ikiwiki 3.20141016.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #781483,
regarding ikiwiki: cross-site scripting via openid_identifier
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:06:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#781451: fixed in gcc-5 5-20150329-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #781451,
regarding gcc-5 uninstallable: /usr/share/doc/gcc-5-base/changelog.gz conflicts
with gcc-5-base
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 21:49:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#781483: fixed in ikiwiki 3.20150329
has caused the Debian Bug report #781483,
regarding ikiwiki: cross-site scripting via openid_identifier
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: ikiwiki
Version: 3.20141016.1
Severity: serious
Tags: security fixed-upstream pending
Justification: cookie theft via XSS
Raghav Bisht reported a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the handling
of the openid_identifier parameter. Unfortunately this was reported in
public and while I wa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was ni...@thykier.net).
> usertags 768926 - jessie-can-defer
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: .
> tags 768926 - jessie-ignore
Bug #768
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was ni...@thykier.net).
> usertags 769344 - jessie-can-defer
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: .
> tags 769344 - jessie-ignore
Bug #769
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was ni...@thykier.net).
> usertags 779420 - jessie-can-defer
Usertags were: jessie-can-defer.
Usertags are now: .
> tags 779420 - jessie-ignore
Bug
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:20:31 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov
wrote:
> Package: qemubuilder
> Version: 0.73
> Severity: serious
>
> After upgrade to Jessie quemubuilder stopped working for me on all
> architectures: "unstable" images successfully install dependencies on
> "--build
> mypkg_1.0-1.dsc" but t
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 09:24:39AM +0100, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Hi,
> there is 1.12 available (but the patch above solves
> the problem as well).
This has been assigned CVE-2013-7437.
Bartosz, can you please upload a fixed package to unstable?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 762700 + pending
Bug #762700 [systemd] systemd: journald fails to forward some messages to syslog
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
762700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
control: severity -1 important
control: retitle -1 libmono-corlib4.5-cil: possible dpkg trigger cycle
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Is this upgrade problem still reproducible? There was an upload of dpkg
> between you filing this upload. I do realise this does not affec
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #775878 [libmono-corlib4.5-cil] libmono-corlib4.5-cil: circular
dependencies cause failures in some upgrade scenarios
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> retitle -1 libmono-corlib4.5-cil: possible dpkg trigger cycle
Bug #775878 [li
Hi Andreas,
On 2015-03-14 01:56, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-03-13 23:49, Christian Kastner wrote:
Would you by chance be available for sponsoring? (No problem if not, but
if yes, please wait for an updated debdiff as the RT approved another
one-line fix.)
>
> I'm not sure th
Hi,
On 2015-03-29 15:57, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2015-03-24 00:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> I think it's also a question of ordering: if libpam-cap is updated first
>> and and libcap2-bin is removed second, things go well. If libcap2-bin is
>> removed first and libpam-cap second, you will enc
Hi Romain,
Am 29.03.2015 um 12:56 schrieb Romain Francoise:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 09:36:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> You could also ship the alias/symlink in the package, and not create it
>> via Alias=
>> Actually, that's what I would suggest to do anyway to align the old and
>> new na
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #781450 [grpn] grpn: dpkg-source refuses to unpack the source (wrong strip
plus fuzz)
Added tag(s) patch.
--
781450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + patch
Dear Maintainer,
I made nmu patch for that bug. But I don't have permission to upload.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grpn/grpn_1.1.2-3.2.dsc
Cheers,
Mateusz
diff -Nru grpn-1.1.2/debian/changelog grpn-1.1.2/debian/changelog
--- grpn-1.1.2/debian/changelo
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #781451 [gcc-5] gcc-5 uninstallable: /usr/share/doc/gcc-5-base/changelog.gz
conflicts with gcc-5-base
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #781451 [gcc-5] gcc-5 uninstallable: /usr/share/doc/gcc-5-base/changelog.gz
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:51:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#781120: fixed in perl 5.20.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #781120,
regarding perl: handling of non-readable directories on @INC
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:47:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#780989: fixed in dulwich 0.8.5-2+deb7u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #780989,
regarding python-dulwich: CVE-2014-9706: arbitrary command execution
vulnerability in conjunction with git
to be marked as done
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:47:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#780989: fixed in dulwich 0.8.5-2+deb7u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #780989,
regarding dulwich: CVE-2014-9706: does not prevent to write files in commits
with invalid paths to working tree
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:48:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#780519: fixed in tomcat7 7.0.28-4+deb7u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #780519,
regarding tomcat7: FTBFS due to failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi again,
sorry for the delay.
On 2015-03-24 00:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I think it's also a question of ordering: if libpam-cap is updated first
> and and libcap2-bin is removed second, things go well. If libcap2-bin is
> removed first and libpam-cap second, you will encounter the problem.
I
Package: gcc-5
Version: 5-20150327-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
when trying to install gcc-5, I get the following error:
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
(Reading database ... 337056 files and directories current
-=| Damyan Ivanov, 21.03.2015 21:23:06 + |=-
> Package: libdbd-firebird-perl
> Version: 0.91-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream patch
I have committed the patch in packaging Git¹. I have also committed
another patch that replaces all sprintf() usage with snprintf(). Both
patches w
Package: grpn
Version: 1.1.2-3.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Attempting to download and unpack the grpn source leads to the
following error:
"""
$ dpkg-source -x grpn_1.1.2-3.1.dsc
gpgv: Signature made 2012-05-14T15:40:11 CEST using DSA key ID C9B55DAC
gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
Source: capnproto
Version: 0.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that the current version of capnproto FTBFS on armel and
armhf due to a segmentation fault in one of the tests. This prevents
the new version of migrating to testing as it is a regression compared
to the version in testing.
Thank
Am Samstag, 28. März 2015, 14:33:04 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:34:02 +0200 Martin Steigerwald
wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I bzr diff on /boot/grub/grub.cfg revealed â but already from last
> > week as I upgraded to the newer backport initramfs-tools, where
> > booting still wor
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 09:36:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> You could also ship the alias/symlink in the package, and not create it
> via Alias=
> Actually, that's what I would suggest to do anyway to align the old and
> new name.
Thanks for the suggestion, that would probably be more reliabl
49 matches
Mail list logo
