Bug#698910: zoneminder: arbitrary command execution vulnerability

2013-01-24 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: zoneminder Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi The following arbitrary command execution vulnerability was disclosed for zoneminder: http://itsecuritysolutions.org/2013-01-22-ZoneMinder-Video-Server-arbitrary-command-execution-vulnerability/ Regards, Sa

Processed: Re: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notforwarded 368297 Bug #368297 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps Bug #545414 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID, user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users Bug #566351 [libldap

Processed: Re: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 368297 libldap-2.4-2 2.4.31-1 Bug #368297 [libldap-2.4] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps Bug #545414 [libldap-2.4] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID, user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users Bug #

Bug#658896: LDAP, GnuTLS/libgcrypt

2013-01-24 Thread Howard Chu
Hi! I have been digging on this issue and I found the ultimate cause of this problem. When sudo/su/passwd/ on a system configured with PAM/LDAPs it chains into libldap, which uses GnuTLS/libgcrypt to manage the TLS channel. The problem is that when OpenLDAP calls gnutls_global_init(), this f

Bug#698822: closing 698822

2013-01-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
close 698822 2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1 thanks #698822 ("Enigmail is incompatible with Icedove 10.0.12" (10.0.12-1~bpo60+1) - at least after upgrading") appears to be a bug report about version conflicts within backports.debian.org. I've uploaded 2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1 to backports.debian.org, and verified t

Processed: closing 698822

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 698822 2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1 Bug #698822 [enigmail] [enigmail] "Enigmail is incompatible with Icedove 10.0.12" (10.0.12-1~bpo60+1) - at least after upgrading There is no source info for the package 'enigmail' at version '2:1.4.1-2~bpo60+1' wit

Bug#675315: Update 5.9 to 5.10?

2013-01-24 Thread Andrey Gursky
Hi Dominique, 2012/8/16, Andrey Gursky : > There is a new upstream version: > http://www.kitware.com/news/home/browse/VTK?2012_05_16&VTK+5.10+Now+Available > > Citation: ...In addition to new and updated classes, support for new > compilers, such as Visual Studio 2011 and Clang, was added, along w

Processed: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 368297 libldap-2.4 2.4.31-1 Bug #368297 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps Bug #545414 [libgcrypt11] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo: setreuid(ROOT_UID, user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users Bug #56

Bug#368297: [PATCH] Fix dropping privileges issue on setuid programs on systems with PAM/LDAP and GnuTLS/libgcrypt

2013-01-24 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
reassign 368297 libldap-2.4 2.4.31-1 thanks Hi! I have been digging on this issue and I found the ultimate cause of this problem. When sudo/su/passwd/ on a system configured with PAM/LDAPs it chains into libldap, which uses GnuTLS/libgcrypt to manage the TLS channel. The problem is that when

Bug#697402: bzr-gtk: causes crash in pydoc -k when python-gtk2 is also installed

2013-01-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2013-01-24, 23:48: from gi.repository import Gtk import _gtk The last line should read: from import _gtk Third time lucky: from gtk import _gtk -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#698846: wiggle: non-DFSG document in source tarball

2013-01-24 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:12:38 +0200 jari wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Would you have any ideas for the *.ps file? > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698846 > I'm sorry, but I don't understand the question. Maybe you could use more words? NeilBrown signature.asc Description: PGP sig

Processed: Re: Bug#698737: owncloud: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities (oC-SA-2013-001)

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #698737 [src:owncloud] owncloud: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities (oC-SA-2013-001) Added tag(s) patch. -- 698737: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698737 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#697402: bzr-gtk: causes crash in pydoc -k when python-gtk2 is also installed

2013-01-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Samuel Bronson , 2013-01-04, 16:20: from gi.repository import Gtk import _gtk The last line should read: from import _gtk This bug should be reassigned somewhere else, but I haven't decided where yet. Anyway, here are some ideas how to fix (or "fix") it: 1) Make pydoc more robust. It cou

Bug#663009: marked as done (sysvinit: (chroot) .init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl)

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:03:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#663009: fixed in sysvinit 2.88dsf-38 has caused the Debian Bug report #663009, regarding sysvinit: (chroot) .init: timeout opening/writing control channel /run/initctl to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

2013-01-24 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> > > grappa:~# debsums --changed > > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/README > > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/TODO > > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.Debian.gz > > > /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/changelog.gz > > > > This one seems clearish, a previous version of libtiff-tools used to >

Processed: Re: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # upgrade problem > severity 691180 serious Bug #691180 [connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7 Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: bug 697974 is forwarded to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1619

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 697974 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1619 Bug #697974 [axis2c] axis2c: CVE-2012-6107: Does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's CN or subjectAltName field of the x.509 certificate Se

Processed: Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #698827 {Done: Abou Al Montacir } [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control Bug #698828 {Done: Abou Al Montacir } [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

2013-01-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: reopen -1 On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 22:05 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Sorry bu I did not understand why this is a serious issue, can you please > clarify this? > > but additional binaries were included in the upload: > control file is indeed modified upon build, based on control.in entr

Processed: Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #698827 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build Bug 698827 is not marked as done; doing nothing. -- 698827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

2013-01-24 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Control: reopen -1 Control: notfixed -1 0.9.30.4-4 Abou Al Montacir writes: > fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4 That's wrong. The merged bug is *not* fixed in that version. > On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 08:55 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Severity: serious >> Justification: 1 > > Sorry bu I did not understa

Bug#691180: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

2013-01-24 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 24.01.2013 09:22, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Fixing this properly would presumably require an iptables update in >> testing (either bumping shlibs or, better, backporting the >> introduction of a separate libxtables9 package from sid) followed by a >> binnmu. > > Introdu

Bug#698879: Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

2013-01-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 15:05 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > I'd be eager and delighted to fix this bug as a part of pushing out > e2fsprogs 1.42.7, but I'd like to get a ruling from the release team > that this is something they would support. Whether the justification > is this particular symlink b

Bug#698828: marked as done (src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build)

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:05:40 +0100 with message-id <1359061540.22057.7.ca...@no.domain.at.all> and subject line Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control has caused the Debian Bug report #698827, regarding src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during bu

Bug#698827: marked as done (src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control)

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:05:40 +0100 with message-id <1359061540.22057.7.ca...@no.domain.at.all> and subject line Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control has caused the Debian Bug report #698827, regarding src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/cont

Processed: Re: Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4 Bug #698827 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build Marked as fixed in versions lazarus/0.9.30.4-4. Marked as fixed i

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

2013-01-24 Thread Abou Al Montacir
fixed 698827 0.9.30.4-4 thanks On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 08:55 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Package: src:lazarus > Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1 This was already fixed in 0.9.30.4-4 which is in sid since few days > Severity: serious > Justification: 1 Sorry bu I did not understand why this is a seriou

Processed: merge 698828 698827

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 698828 698827 Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build Bug #698828 [src:lazarus] src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build Marked as found in versions lazarus/0.9.30.4-1.1. Bug #698827 [src:la

Bug#698879: Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

2013-01-24 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:41:38PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > [ Sven, thanks for the investigation on e2fsck-static! ] > > Please see the bug log for further details and logs, it's a split of a > conglomerate bug, but the gist of it (should) be quoted below. > > I've still set the severity to

Processed: Re: Bug#689016: nagios-nrpe-server: /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 689016 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #689016 [nagios-nrpe-server] nagios-nrpe-server: /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#689016: nagios-nrpe-server: /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon

2013-01-24 Thread Alexander Wirt
tag 689016 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, wforumw wrote: > Package: nagios-nrpe-server > Version: 2.13-1 > Severity: normal > > /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop - does not stop the daemon. > You need to kill it manually and then start the daemon again. > I have several se

Processed: m68k is not a release arch

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 696844 important Bug #696844 [src:pmw] pmw: FTBFS due to pointer, integer and sign bit confusion (argh!) Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 696844:

Processed: Re: Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #698745 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' > clone -1 -2 Bug #698745 [dpkg] dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package Bug 698745 cloned as bug 698879 > re

Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

2013-01-24 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: severity -1 serious Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -1 src:tiff Control: retitle -1 tiff: Incorrect /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transition Control: found -1 3.8.2-7 Control: reassign -2 src:e2fsprogs Control: retitle -2 e2fsprogs: Unhandled /usr/share/doc symlink to doc transitio

Bug#698745: dpkg breaks other packages during installation of a package

2013-01-24 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 20:45:36 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2013-01-23 19:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org): > >> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other > >> packages. > > > > And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "

Bug#698871: [Pkg-sssd-devel] Bug#698871: CVE-2013-0219 CVE-2013-0220

2013-01-24 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 24.01.2013 20:30, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: sssd Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, multiple security issues have been discovered in sssd. Please see the Red Hat bugzilla entries for details and patches: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0219 https://bugzilla.redh

Bug#698871: CVE-2013-0219 CVE-2013-0220

2013-01-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: sssd Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, multiple security issues have been discovered in sssd. Please see the Red Hat bugzilla entries for details and patches: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0219 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-0220 Cheers,

Processed: severity of 689016 is serious

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 689016 serious Bug #689016 [nagios-nrpe-server] nagios-nrpe-server: /etc/init.d/nagios-nrpe-server stop, does not stops the daemon Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#694908: Redistribution of OBO Relation Ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Chris Mungall
Note the note at the top of the web page - OBO_REL is deprecated. The new relation ontology is here: http://code.google.com/p/obo-relations/ • Code license • New BSD License • • Content license • Creative Commons 3.0 BY If you need to distribute the legacy one by all means do it, it should be CC

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

2013-01-24 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi, 2013/1/24 Andreas Tille : > I'm sorry to say that I became immediately uninterested when I noticed > that the package became a candidate for removal from Wheezy. I'm not > using the package and I just wanted to help speeding up the release. > So I will definitely not take over. > > Sorry for

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

2013-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Romain, I'm sorry to say that I became immediately uninterested when I noticed that the package became a candidate for removal from Wheezy. I'm not using the package and I just wanted to help speeding up the release. So I will definitely not take over. Sorry for not beeing really helpful

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

2013-01-24 Thread Romain Beauxis
2013/1/24 Andreas Tille : > Hi, Hi Andreas, > I wonder whether it would help if I would just dh_python2-ify (switching > from cdbs to dh) to solve this problem. I do not feel prepared to fix the > issue in cdbs but I did some dh based Python packages - so feel free to > ping me if this is accept

Processed: reassign 698740 to gnome-panel, tagging 698740

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 698740 gnome-panel 3.4.2.1-3 Bug #698740 [gnome-applets] gnome-applets: Force-Quit applet freezes/crashes, refuses to recognize mouse clicks or escape key Bug reassigned from package 'gnome-applets' to 'gnome-panel'. No longer marked as

Bug#672524: bitcoin: FTBFS[any-i386]: testsuite errors

2013-01-24 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hello, It's interesting to note that the package is building fine in Ubuntu on i386. Cheers Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694908: Status update (Was: Bug#694908: Contains non-free data)

2013-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Another status update: Just pinged all those authors that did not yet responded since the last status update http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694908#97 Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#698832: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Dominik George
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: tags 698635 + patch pending Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of package "gosa". The upload would fix RC bug #698635. Package name: gosa Version : 2.7.4-4.1 Section : web It builds those binary p

Processed: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 698635 + patch pending Bug #698635 [gosa] gosa: package configuration calls a2enmod even if apache is not installed Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #698635 to the same tags previously set -- 698635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69863

Processed: RFS: gosa/2.7.4-4.1 [RC] [NMU] -- make package installable again

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 698635 + patch pending Bug #698635 [gosa] gosa: package configuration calls a2enmod even if apache is not installed Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 698635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698635 698853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Bug#694908: Redistribution of Sequence Ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hello Karen, I hope you are fine and got my last mail. In case you might need some time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to give us some confirmation that you are working on this. Any response from your side (or somebody else in charge for Sequence Ontology) will b

Bug#694908: Redistribution of Pathway ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hello Victoria, I hope you are fine and got my last mail. In case you might need some time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to give us some confirmation that you are working on this. Any response from your side (or somebody else in charge for Pathway ontology) will

Bug#694908: Redistribution of OBO Relation Ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Chris, I hope you are fine and got my last mail. In case you might need some time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to give us some confirmation that you are working on this. Any response from your side (or somebody else in charge for OBO Relation Ontology) will

Bug#694908: Redistribution of Evidence codes inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

2013-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hello Michelle, I hope you are fine and got my last mail. In case you might need some time for negotiating these licensing issues it would be really great to give us some confirmation that you are working on this. Any response from your side (or somebody else in charge for Evidence codes) will b

Bug#694589: lastfmproxy: python module/script files in wrong location

2013-01-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I wonder whether it would help if I would just dh_python2-ify (switching from cdbs to dh) to solve this problem. I do not feel prepared to fix the issue in cdbs but I did some dh based Python packages - so feel free to ping me if this is accepted. On the other hand popcon seems to show h

Bug#658739: libnss-ldapd/libpam-ldapd not a solution

2013-01-24 Thread Martijn van Brummelen
The suggested solution of using libnss-ldap/libpam-ldapd is not a solution for this problem, since libnss-ldap/libpam-ldapd does not provide nested groups. Regards, Martijn van Brummelen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#696011: virtualbox: kernel modules fail to build against linux kernel v3.7

2013-01-24 Thread Chris Knadle
Unfortunately I find that even with the patch, the VirtualBox modules will not compile when built with upstream Linux 3.6.11 and 3.7.4 from the linux-stable Git tree. They build fine against upstream 3.5.7. ... kmk[3]: Entering directory `/home/cknadle/src/LinuxDev/linux-3.6.11' LD /hom

Bug#698129: marked as done (unionfs-fuse: Depends on fuse-utils; uninstallable in sid)

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:32:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#698129: fixed in unionfs-fuse 0.24-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #698129, regarding unionfs-fuse: Depends on fuse-utils; uninstallable in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processed: Bug#698846 forwarded to upstream

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 698846 Neil Brown Bug #698846 [src:wiggle] non-DFSG document in source tarball Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Neil Brown '. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 698846: http://bugs.debian.o

Bug#698846: Fwd: Bug#698846: wiggle: non-DFSG document in source tarball

2013-01-24 Thread jari
Hi Neil, Would you have any ideas for the *.ps file? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698846 Thanks, Jari - Forwarded message from Robert Ransom - | Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:51:37 -0800 | Subject: Bug#698846: non-DFSG document in source tarball | | Source: wiggle | Ve

Bug#698846: non-DFSG document in source tarball

2013-01-24 Thread Robert Ransom
Source: wiggle Version: 0.8-2 Severity: serious DOC/diff.ps in wiggle_0.8.orig.tar.gz (also present as a Git blob in the .git/ directory) is not provided in its preferred form for modification, and is also not clearly redistributable. DOC/diff.ps is also present in wiggle_0.6.orig.tar.gz . --

Bug#698832: [Tails-dev] Bug#698832: keepassx: icons license and copyright information is missing

2013-01-24 Thread Robert Ransom
On 1/24/13, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > I see that Felix Geyer added this information to the COPYING file in > upstream 2.x rewrite Git repository [2], so if the icon files are the > same as in the 0.4 series, then the fix should be pretty easy. None of the icon files present in the 0.4.3 tarb

Bug#698837: Bug#695774 cloned and reopened to #698837

2013-01-24 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 24/01/2013 10:42, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > rake aborted! > Please install the pgsql adapter: `gem install activerecord-pgsql-adapter` > (cannot load such file -- active_record/connection_adapters/pgsql_adapter) Cloning and reopening. The bug fixed at #695774 was also serious enough to be fixe

Processed: Re: Bug#695774: closed by Jérémy Lal (Bug#695774: fixed in redmine 1.4.4+dfsg1-2)

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 695774 -1 Bug #695774 {Done: Jérémy Lal } [redmine] redmine: fails to upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter Bug 695774 cloned as bug 698837 > reopen -1 Bug #698837 {Done: Jérémy Lal } [redmine] redmine: fails to upgrade, says somet

Bug#691180: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

2013-01-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 24.01.2013 09:22, Jonathan Nieder wrote: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: close 691180 thanks Hi, there have been new uploads of connman both into testing and unstable, the issue has been resolved as the package has been rebuilt in both cases. [...] In wheezy, there is instead an unver

Bug#696210: Acknowledgement (no video, only audio)

2013-01-24 Thread intrigeri
Hi Antoine, Antoine Beaupré wrote (18 Dec 2012 05:36:43 GMT) : > So I guess this may be moved to the gstreamer backend package, [...] Can you please try to reproduce the minitube side of the bug (#696210) after upgrading the binary packages built from gst-plugins-bad0 to the version in sid, that

Bug#694473: Bug#691318: Bug#694473 session extension causes endless recursion after graceful reload

2013-01-24 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:47:52PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi, > > I have pulled Stephan's patch and the one from referenced bug. Could > you please confirm that this fixes the issue (5.4.4-12), Thanks alot. I've just tested with 5.4.4-12 from unstable, and it seems to fix the issue : I

Bug#694473: [php-maint] Bug#691318: Bug#691318: Maybe duplicate of 694473 ?

2013-01-24 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Ondřej Surý writes: > There's a slight problem and that is I can't reproduce the problem > with 5.4.4-11 in amd64 wheezy chroot neither with mediawiki package > nor the vanilla mediawiki 1.20.2, so I cannot confirm if the 5.4.4-12 > fixed the error or not. > > Could one of the affected peopl

Bug#661018: Bug#698341: RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3

2013-01-24 Thread David Paleino
Hello Andreas, hello everybody, On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:55:54 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > [..] before continuing, please check #698341. There have been developments, and I asked for comments about two possible uploads. I'm waiting for comments by the RT on what to do. Kindly, David -- . ''`

Bug#695774: closed by Jérémy Lal (Bug#695774: fixed in redmine 1.4.4+dfsg1-2)

2013-01-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Jérémy Lal > by > replying to this email. Hm. I set debconf priority to low, added sid to sources.list and upgraded

Bug#698832: keepassx: icons license and copyright information is missing

2013-01-24 Thread intrigeri
Package: keepassx Version: 0.4.3-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: tails-...@boum.org Hi, Robert Ransom discovered [1] that some icons shipped with keepassx are missing license and copyright information. Quoting him: "The icons in share/keepassx/icons/ appear to be from the Oxygen theme, and

Processed: Re: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 691180 - sid experimental Bug #691180 [connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7 Removed tag(s) sid and experimental. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691180:

Processed: Re: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 691180 connman/1.0-1.1+wheezy1 Bug #691180 {Done: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz } [connman] connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7 Marked as found in versions connman/1.0-1.1+wheezy1 and reopened. > fixed 691180 connman/1.0-1

Bug#691180: connman: Connman won't run due to missing libxtables.so.7

2013-01-24 Thread Jonathan Nieder
found 691180 connman/1.0-1.1+wheezy1 fixed 691180 connman/1.0-1.2 quit Hi Adrian, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > close 691180 > thanks > > Hi, > > there have been new uploads of connman both into testing and unstable, > the issue has been resolved as the package has been rebuilt in both > ca

Bug#698042: NMU for python-visual versioned 5.12-1.5

2013-01-24 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Control: tags 681701 + pending Control: tags 698042 + pending Dear Maintainer, I uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of python-visual fixing this bug. Please find the debdiff attached. Don't hesitate to tell me if I should delay the upload longer. Cheers, -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debi

Processed: NMU for python-visual versioned 5.12-1.5

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 681701 + pending Bug #681701 [python-visual] invalid Vcs-Git tag Added tag(s) pending. > tags 698042 + pending Bug #698042 [python-visual] python-visual: needs rebuild because of python-numpy ABI change and must add corresponding versioned dependency Added tag(

Processed: NMU for python-visual versioned 5.12-1.5

2013-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 681701 + pending Bug #681701 [python-visual] invalid Vcs-Git tag Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #681701 to the same tags previously set > tags 698042 + pending Bug #698042 [python-visual] python-visual: needs rebuild because of python-numpy ABI change an

Bug#698828: src:lazarus: regenerates debian/control during build

2013-01-24 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: src:lazarus Severity: serious In at least version 0.9.30.4-1.1 and 0.9.30.4-4 debian/rules has a target debian-files that is called during binary builds that will regenerate debian/control. I expect this to be the reason for the problem reported in #698827. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#698827: src:lazarus: builds binaries not listed in d/control

2013-01-24 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: src:lazarus Version: 0.9.30.4-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: 1 The .dsc says Source: lazarus Binary: lazarus, lazarus-src, lazarus-ide, lazarus-ide-gtk2, lazarus-ide-qt4, lcl, lcl-utils, lcl-units, lcl-nogui, lcl-gtk2, lcl-qt4, lazarus-doc Architecture: all i386 powerpc spar