Bug#697697: ecere-sdk: binary package conflict with eclib

Thanks Dmitrijs. I already have /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ec/libec.so I will verify, but I think the symlink /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libec.so might not be required I think those symlinks are only required for libecere and libecereCOM since they are linked by the system dynamic linker... The /ec/ p

Bug#697651: marked as done (Fails to restore mixer settings)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:06:01 +0100 with message-id <50ee4c39.2000...@debian.org> and subject line Fails to restore mixer settings has caused the Debian Bug report #697651, regarding Fails to restore mixer settings to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#694675: marked as done (emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in dependency chains is actually compiled)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:17:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693472: fixed in emacsen-common 2.0.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #693472, regarding emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in dependency chains is actually compiled to be marked as

Bug#693472: marked as done (emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in dependency chains is actually compiled)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:17:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693472: fixed in emacsen-common 2.0.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #693472, regarding emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in dependency chains is actually compiled to be marked as

Bug#694674: marked as done (emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in dependency chains is actually compiled)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:17:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693472: fixed in emacsen-common 2.0.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #693472, regarding emacsen-common: wrong compilation logic; only the last script in dependency chains is actually compiled to be marked as

Processed: tagging 697808

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 697808 + pending Bug #697808 [zsh] zsh: missing copyright file after upgrade from 5.0.2-1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 697808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#689332: marked as done (bind9: postinst uses shipped file /usr/share/bind9/bind9-default.md5sum as statefile)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:33:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#689332: fixed in bind9 1:9.9.2.dfsg.P1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #689332, regarding bind9: postinst uses shipped file /usr/share/bind9/bind9-default.md5sum as statefile to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#696282: gnucash silently removes the scheduled transactions under some condition

On 2012-12-19 22:02:52 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Please confirm that it fixes the problem for you on the GnuCash side > (i.e. that you get an error message instead of a silent data > truncation). If you have libxml knowledge, please also review my patch. I confirm that the error is detect

Bug#697669: marked as done (missing conflict with latex-cjk-chinese (old))

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:02:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697669: fixed in tex-common 3.15 has caused the Debian Bug report #697669, regarding missing conflict with latex-cjk-chinese (old) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Re: [Pkg-zsh-devel] Bug#697808: zsh: missing copyright file after upgrade from 5.0.2-1

Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #697808 [zsh] zsh: missing copyright file after upgrade from 5.0.2-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 697808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697808 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUB

Bug#697808: [Pkg-zsh-devel] Bug#697808: zsh: missing copyright file after upgrade from 5.0.2-1

Control: tag -1 confirmed Hi Sebastian, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: zsh > Version: 5.0.2-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy §12.5 While that's definitely a policy violating issue, there's also the rule that packages in experimental can't have bugs of RC severity. I though con

Processed: merging

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 688792 serious Bug #688792 [mysql-server-5.5] mysql-server-5.5: error in SQL syntax in postinst Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tag 688792 -moreinfo +pending Bug #688792 [mysql-server-5.5] mysql-server-5.5: error in SQL syntax i

Processed: Re: Bug#697669: texlive-base: Can not upgrade from squeeze to wheezy

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 697669 tex-common Bug #697669 [texlive-base] texlive-base: Can not upgrade from squeeze to wheezy Bug reassigned from package 'texlive-base' to 'tex-common'. No longer marked as found in versions texlive-base/2012.20120611-5. Ignoring req

Processed: r2206 - in mysql-5.5/branches/unstable/debian: . patches

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 695001 pending Bug #695001 [mysql-5.5] mysql-5.5: New MySQL issues Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695001 Debian

Bug#696445: nslcd: Discards local modifications in nslcd.conf without warning

Hi Arno, On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 12:39 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote: > Do you by any change have the configuration file before and after the > upgrade? > > Also, can you confirm that this debconf information was in place after > the upgrade for the broken machine: > > * nslcd/ldap-auth-type: none >

Bug#694908: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#694908: Status update (Was: Bug#694908: Contains non-free data)

Le Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:32:34PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > So we have confirmation about the free distribution from three out of > seven questionable files. I'm positive we will get more like this and > would consider it safe to set the bug wheezy-ignore for the moment if > the release

Bug#674156: Bug#697025: gstreamer0.10: please re-upload built against GLib 2.32

On 09.01.2013 22:29, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 01/01/13 13:26, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 23:28:13 +, Simon McVittie wrote: >>> I've only tested this fairly trivially (totem still plays >>> videos); I'll do some more testing before uploading if it becomes >>> necessary, b

Bug#697802: marked as done (ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:48:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697802: fixed in ruby-actionpack-3.2 3.2.6-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #697802, regarding ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#697744: marked as done (ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697744: fixed in ruby-activerecord-3.2 3.2.6-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #697744, regarding ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#697805: marked as done (Package gcc-4.7 fails to build with dpkg-buildpackage)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:39:09 +0100 with message-id <50ede37d.2040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697805: Package gcc-4.7 fails to build with dpkg-buildpackage has caused the Debian Bug report #697805, regarding Package gcc-4.7 fails to build with dpkg-buildpackage to be ma

Bug#674156: Bug#697025: gstreamer0.10: please re-upload built against GLib 2.32

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 21:29:11 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > The broken situation is that at runtime, you have a "new" libglib2.0-0, > an "old" libgstreamer0.10-0, and a "new" third-package. > That situation can be prevented by making sure every "new" third-package has versioned depends on "ne

Bug#697809: [cgdb] You have a gfdl text with invariant section

Package: cgdb Severity: serious Dear maintener, Please repackage in order to avoid gfdl documentation with invariant section or contact upstream to change the license. Thanks Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#697808: zsh: missing copyright file after upgrade from 5.0.2-1

Package: zsh Version: 5.0.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy §12.5 Usertags: adequate After an upgrade from 5.0.2-1 to 5.0.2-2 /usr/share/doc/zsh is empty and /usr/share/doc/zsh/copyright is missing. It looks like a maintainer script is missing to replace the <= 5.0.2-1 /usr/share/doc/zs

Bug#674156: Bug#697025: gstreamer0.10: please re-upload built against GLib 2.32

On 01/01/13 13:26, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 23:28:13 +, Simon McVittie wrote: >> I've only tested this fairly trivially (totem still plays >> videos); I'll do some more testing before uploading if it becomes >> necessary, but it'd be better if a maintainer could do proper

Bug#697805: Package gcc-4.7 fails to build with dpkg-buildpackage

Package: gcc-4.7 Version: 4.7.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (using dpkg-buildpackage) I obtained the gcc 4.7 sources via `apt-get source gcc-4.7'. I then tried debuild on the newly created directory (gcc-4.7-4.7.2), when it failed, I tried using dpkg-buildpac

Processed: Re: Bug#697744: ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 697744 -1 Bug #697744 [ruby-activerecord-3.2] ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155 Bug 697744 cloned as bug 697802 > reassign -1 ruby-actionpack-3.2 Bug #697802 [ruby-activerecord-3.2] ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155 Bug reassigned from

Bug#697744: ruby-activerecord-3.2: CVE-2013-0155

clone 697744 -1 reassign -1 ruby-actionpack-3.2 thanks On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:48:08AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: ruby-activerecord-3.2 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > Please see http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/01/08/1

Bug#696156: marked as done (hobbit-plugins: ircbot plugin non-functional since switch to POE::Component::IRC)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:17:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#696156: fixed in hobbit-plugins 20120532 has caused the Debian Bug report #696156, regarding hobbit-plugins: ircbot plugin non-functional since switch to POE::Component::IRC to be marked as done. This means t

Processed: reassign 697790 to ruby-activesupport-3.2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 697790 ruby-activesupport-3.2 Bug #697790 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [ruby-actionpack-3.2] rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack Bug reassigned from package 'ruby-actionpack-3.2' to 'ruby-acti

Bug#697790: marked as done (rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:02:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697790: fixed in ruby-activesupport-3.2 3.2.6-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #697790, regarding rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#697789: marked as done (rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:52:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697789: fixed in ruby-activesupport-2.3 2.3.14-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #697789, regarding rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack to be marked as done. Th

Bug#697774: marked as done (php-horde-turba: fix FTBFS due to rm failure)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:52:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697774: fixed in php-horde-turba 4.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #697774, regarding php-horde-turba: fix FTBFS due to rm failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#697773: marked as done (php-horde-mnemo: fix FTBFS due to rm failure)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:49:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697773: fixed in php-horde-mnemo 4.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #697773, regarding php-horde-mnemo: fix FTBFS due to rm failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#697772: marked as done (php-horde-ingo: fix FTBFS due to rm failure)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:49:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697772: fixed in php-horde-ingo 3.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #697772, regarding php-horde-ingo: fix FTBFS due to rm failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#695716: upstream relicensing docs

update: upstream agreed to relicense the documentation and make a new release with these over the next week or so regards robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 697721

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 697721 + patch Bug #697721 [src:python-django-registration] python-django-registration: FTBFS with python3-sphinx: AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute '__dict__' Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contac

Processed: Re: Bug#680856: offlineimap: FTBFS with python3-sphinx: invalid syntax (imaplib2.py, line 376)

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #680856 [src:offlineimap] offlineimap: FTBFS with python3-sphinx: invalid syntax (imaplib2.py, line 376) Added tag(s) patch. -- 680856: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680856 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Bug#680856: offlineimap: FTBFS with python3-sphinx: invalid syntax (imaplib2.py, line 376)

Control: tag -1 + patch * Jakub Wilk , 2012-07-08, 20:50: If python3-sphinx is installed, but python-sphinx is not, offlineimap FTBFS: | sphinx-build -b html -d html/doctrees doc-src html | Running Sphinx v1.1.3 | Making output directory... | | Configuration error: | There is a syntax error in

Bug#697586: libpango1.0-0: Segfaults and takes Evolution with it

Am 09.01.2013 20:39, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: >> Since you are using glib2.0 from experimental, which version of gtk+3.0 >> are you using? > > Also from experimental: > > $ dpkg -l libgtk-3-0 | grep ^ii > ii libgtk-3-0:amd64 3.6.3-1 amd64 GTK+ graphical user interface library 3.6.3 is known bug

Bug#695721: marked as done (gcl: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections))

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:47:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695721: fixed in gcl 2.6.7+dfsg-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #695721, regarding gcl: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections) to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#697586: libpango1.0-0: Segfaults and takes Evolution with it

> Since you are using glib2.0 from experimental, which version of gtk+3.0 > are you using? Also from experimental: $ dpkg -l libgtk-3-0 | grep ^ii ii libgtk-3-0:amd64 3.6.3-1 amd64 GTK+ graphical user interface library - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.o

Bug#697586: libpango1.0-0: Segfaults and takes Evolution with it

> Since you are using glib2.0 from experimental, which version of gtk+3.0 > are you using? Also from experimental: $ dpkg -l libgtk-3-0 | grep ^ii ii libgtk-3-0:amd64 3.6.3-1 amd64 GTK+ graphical user interface library - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.o

Processed: reassign 697789 to ruby-activesupport-2.3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 697789 ruby-activesupport-2.3 Bug #697789 [ruby-actionpack-2.3] rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack Bug reassigned from package 'ruby-actionpack-2.3' to 'ruby-activesupport-2.3'. Ignoring re

Processed: severity of 692035 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 692035 normal Bug #692035 [src:glassfish] CVE-2012-3155: vulnerability in the CORBA ORB component Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692035: http://bu

Processed: severity of 689417 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 689417 important Bug #689417 [opencryptoki] opencryptoki: CVE-2012-4454 CVE-2012-4455 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689417: http://bugs.debian.or

Bug#658739: status?

Brian Paul Kroth 2013-01-09 12:32: Andreas Metzler 2013-01-09 19:17: On 2013-01-09 Brian Kroth wrote: [...] May I ask what the proposed/potential solutions for this is then? This is a major problem holding us up from serious wheezy consideration where I work. Please let me know if you'd l

Bug#658739: status?

Andreas Metzler 2013-01-09 19:17: On 2013-01-09 Brian Kroth wrote: [...] May I ask what the proposed/potential solutions for this is then? This is a major problem holding us up from serious wheezy consideration where I work. Please let me know if you'd like help testing something. Hello,

Bug#697721: python-django-registration: FTBFS with python3-sphinx: AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute '__dict__'

* Jakub Wilk , 2013-01-08, 22:23: | File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/environment.py", line 1215, in get_doctree | doctree = pickle.load(f) | AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute '__dict__' This happens because the source package includes doctree pickles (in which pars

Processed: NMU uploaded to security

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 697722 +pending Bug #697722 [rails] rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 697722: http://bug

Bug#697722: NMU uploaded to security

tags 697722 +pending thanks I uploaded a NMU to security-master.debian.org just now. This should be sufficient to fix rails security on squeeze since #697744 / CVE-2013-0155 doesn't affect 2.x. I don't have more time to work on this issue so others will pick up the upload for sid. Thanks to the

Bug#658739: status?

On 2013-01-09 Brian Kroth wrote: [...] > May I ask what the proposed/potential solutions for this is then? > This is a major problem holding us up from serious wheezy > consideration where I work. > Please let me know if you'd like help testing something. Hello, sadly I have not got a plan. The

Bug#697722: rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack

notfound 697722 2:2.3.14.2 found 697722 2.3.5-1.2+squeeze4 clone 697722 -1 -2 reassign -1 ruby-actionpack-2.3 reassign -2 ruby-actionpack-3.2 thanks On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:42:46PM +0200, Henri Salo wrote: > Package: rails > Version: 2:2.3.14.2 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > http://www

Processed: Re: Bug#697722: rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 697722 2:2.3.14.2 Bug #697722 [rails] rails: CVE-2013-0156: Multiple vulnerabilities in parameter parsing in Action Pack No longer marked as found in versions rails/2:2.3.14.2. > found 697722 2.3.5-1.2+squeeze4 Bug #697722 [rails] rails:

Bug#697787: jenkins-job-builder: FTBFS with python3-sphinx: ImportError: No module named pkg_resources

Source: jenkins-job-builder Version: 0.3.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Tags: patch If python3-sphinx is installed, but python-sphinx is not, jenkins-job-builder FTBFS: | /usr/bin/make -C doc html man BUILDDIR=/build/jenkins-job-builder-WPd8v9/jenkins-job-build

Bug#697786: wand: FTBFS with python3-sphinx: syntax error in your configuration file

Source: wand Version: 0.2.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Tags: patch If python3-sphinx is installed, but python-sphinx is not, wand FTBFS: | debian/rules build | dh build --with python2 |dh_testdir |dh_auto_configure |debian/rules override_dh_auto_bu

Bug#697722: working on a NMU?

Anyone working on an upload? I'd be ready to help with this or do a straight out NMU.. By the way, it seems the git repo for the package is totally out of date... Anyone still working on that? A. -- Man really attains the state of complete humanity when he produces, without being forced by physi

Bug#694500: marked as done (nordugrid-arc-hed: missing Breaks+Replaces: nordugrid-arc-nox-client)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:00:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694500: fixed in nordugrid-arc 2.0.0-3+wheezy1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694500, regarding nordugrid-arc-hed: missing Breaks+Replaces: nordugrid-arc-nox-client to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#692228: marked as done (dist-upgrade: Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-4-486)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:00:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638339: fixed in blcr 0.8.5~b2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #638339, regarding dist-upgrade: Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-4-486 to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#668348: marked as done (blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:00:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638339: fixed in blcr 0.8.5~b2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #638339, regarding blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#689729: marked as done (blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:00:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638339: fixed in blcr 0.8.5~b2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #638339, regarding blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#651747: marked as done (blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:00:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638339: fixed in blcr 0.8.5~b2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #638339, regarding blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#638339: marked as done (blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:00:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638339: fixed in blcr 0.8.5~b2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #638339, regarding blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#697780: marked as done (libglib2.0-0: fails to remove: libglib2.0-0:amd64.postrm: 36: Syntax error: "fi" unexpected)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:23:45 +0100 with message-id <50ed9991.9050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697780: libglib2.0-0: fails to remove: libglib2.0-0:amd64.postrm: 36: Syntax error: "fi" unexpected has caused the Debian Bug report #697780, regarding libglib2.0-0: fails to r

Bug#697780: libglib2.0-0: fails to remove: libglib2.0-0:amd64.postrm: 36: Syntax error: "fi" unexpected

Package: libglib2.0-0 Version: 2.33.12+really2.32.4-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Removing libglib2.0-0:amd64 ... /var/lib/dpkg

Bug#658739: status?

On 2012-11-30 Martijn van Brummelen wrote: Hello, The patch from Ubuntu breaks other stuff. See and duplicates. Note that although this (LP 1013798) was fixed in 1.5.0-3ubuntu2 the patch had to be pulled again in 1.5.0-3ubuntu2

Bug#697774: php-horde-turba: fix FTBFS due to rm failure

Package: php-horde-turba Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, This patch fixes an FTBFS issue in sid for this p

Bug#697773: php-horde-mnemo: fix FTBFS due to rm failure

Package: php-horde-mnemo Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, Fix FTBFS due to rm failure. In Ubuntu, the attac

Bug#697772: php-horde-ingo: fix FTBFS due to rm failure

Package: php-horde-ingo Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, This patch fixes an FTBFS issue in sid for this pa

Bug#697580: connman: CVE-2012-6459

Package: connman Followup-For: Bug #697580 tags 697580 patch thanks Hi, I have created an NMU which includes the upstream patch to fix the vulnerabilty CVE-2012-6459. I am attaching the debdiff towards the NMU version as well as the extracted upstream patch. I haven't tested the patch yet. Che

Processed: tagging 697580

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 697580 + patch Bug #697580 [connman] connman: CVE-2012-6459 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 697580: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697580 Debian Bug Track

Bug#694908: Status update (Was: Bug#694908: Contains non-free data)

Hi, after pinging all authors of the data files in question I would like to give a short status update: Solved == File: emboss/data/OBO/gene_ontology*.obo Homepage: http://www.geneontology.org/GO.cite.shtml Copyright: 1999–2013 Gene Ontology Consortium Comment: License is clarified at

Bug#694908: [mal...@ebi.ac.uk: Re: Redistribution of The Software Ontology]

James Malone, maintainer of The Software Ontology has given permission to publish his mail in our BTS as reference. - Forwarded message from James Malone - Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:34:47 + From: James Malone To: Andreas Tille Subject: Re: Redistribution of The Software Ontology A

Bug#694908: Redistribution of The Software Ontology

Just to keep track of the activity regarding this bug I'm forewarding the text I've send to the author of the Software Ontology http://theswo.sourceforge.net/ via Sourceforge webform. This is the last database to clarify in this bug report - now waiting for news from the authors. Kind regard

Bug#694908: Redistribution of Sequence Ontology inside EMBOSS suite packaged for Debian

Hello Karen, I'm writing you on the behalf of the Debian Med team which has included the EMBOSS suite into official Debian distribution. The EMBOSS suite does contain the file so.obo of the Sequence Ontology. I failed to find any licensing information at http://www.sequenceontology.org/ So

Bug#684443: marked as done (rep-gtk: sawfish-ui requires gtk.la)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:47:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#684443: fixed in rep-gtk 1:0.90.0-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #684443, regarding rep-gtk: sawfish-ui requires gtk.la to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#694908: EBI HELP: ChEBI

Hi Janna, thanks for your quick and very helpful response. I added the following notice to the according copyright file of the Debian EMBOSS package: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/emboss.git;a=commitdiff;h=b60238c3eeb7a650bfeddeb7a276980e68af0bdd We need to sort out other d

Bug#696530: menu-xdg: Populates XDG user directory with system entriesi

On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 05:13:10PM +0100, Bernat wrote: > On 29/12/12 00:31, Bill Allombert wrote: > >If you do not like the result, just do 'update-menus --remove' and move on. > > FYI, I've removed this package and we'll learn to live without it, > so moving on. My concern was with some dependen

Bug#697747: marked as done (salt-common: package is lacking salt/modules/debian_service.py)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:47:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#697747: fixed in salt 0.11.1+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #697747, regarding salt-common: package is lacking salt/modules/debian_service.py to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 07:48 +0100, Hanno Hecker wrote: > > * why does this only happen while I use the wheezy2 package? I've > rebuilt the initramfs now ~10 times with this, with the wheezy1 and > the sid version this never happened (and those were always > generated, > I've used the deb ins

Bug#697734: marked as done (RM: huayra-icon-theme -- ROM/RoQA; Not part of Debian yet.)

Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:04:55 +0100 with message-id <50ed40c7.4090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697734: RM: huayra-icon-theme -- ROM/RoQA; Not part of Debian yet. has caused the Debian Bug report #697734, regarding RM: huayra-icon-theme -- ROM/RoQA; Not part of Debian yet

Bug#697697: ecere-sdk: binary package conflict with eclib

On 9 January 2013 00:01, Jerome St-Louis wrote: > Will renaming the package mean renaming the actual library as well for > Lintian to be happy? > > The ecere-dev package also provides /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libec.so > Renaming just the package will not be enough as there would still be left file

Bug#697747: salt-common: package is lacking salt/modules/debian_service.py

Package: salt-common Version: 0.11.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The modules salt/modules/debian_service.py which is used to manage services on Debian hosts has disappeared in this 0.11.1-1 version... this is annoying as it breaks service management by salt. I get th

Bug#656584: initscripts: /run transition: Please update /etc/network/if-up.d/mountnfs

Hi Florian, the attached patch solves our remaining problems with NetworkManager, ifupdown and mountnfs. Thank you and regards! Guido Il 31/12/2012 Florian Schlichting ha scritto: > Hi Guido, > > could you please test the attached patch for > /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/01ifupdown (taken f