On 12/05/2012 11:43 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: tomcat6
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> More Tomcat security issues have been disclosed:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
>
> The page contains links to the upstream fixes.
>
> BTW,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 695250 + pending
Bug #695250 [tomcat6] tomcat6: CVE-2012-4534 CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-3546
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
I don't know Ruby AT ALL, but I did a bit of googling and this appears
to make unhide.rb work with 1.9:
--- unhide.rb.orig 2012-12-06 23:53:57.0 -0500
+++ unhide.rb 2012-12-06 23:52:51.0 -0500
@@ -29,7 +29,11 @@
# Support for libc functions not covered by the standard Ruby
Your message dated Fri, 07 Dec 2012 01:32:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694295: fixed in speech-dispatcher 0.7.1-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694295,
regarding libspeechd-dev: missing Breaks+>Replaces: speech-dispatcher (<<
0.7.1-6)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hello,
I'm having a look and committing things in the git repository, thanks
for the heads-up.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Rob Browning writes:
>
> # The version-specific site-lisp dir, say emacs/21.1/site-lisp, needs
> # to be in share/FLAVOR so that as we upgrade from 21.1 to 21.2,
> # etc., add-on package bits don't get left behind.
Hmm. I suppose if an add-on is removed by a flavour upgra
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 694295 + pending
Bug #694295 [libspeechd-dev] libspeechd-dev: missing Breaks+>Replaces:
speech-dispatcher (<< 0.7.1-6)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
694295: http://bug
Hi,
Michael Stapelberg writes:
> Unfortunately, the upload is broken currently due to me canceling it
> and dcut being stalled for some reason. Anyway, I will upload this
> package ASAP (hopefully within the next few days).
This is now uploaded to DELAYED/5.
--
Best regards,
Michael
--
To UN
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 695272 + patch
Bug #695272 [libphone-utils0] libphone-utils0: harmful postrm purge action in
M-A:same package
Added tag(s) patch.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695272: http://bugs.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 693288 + wheezy-ignore squeeze-ignore
Bug #693288 [src:jsxgraph] src:jsxgraph: maintainer address bounces
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore and wheezy-ignore.
> # bouncing mail addresses are not relevant for releases, they need to be
> fixed in si
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #695216 [agda-stdlib] agda-stdlib: Package does not contain Data.FFI
haskell module needed for compilation
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
695216: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695216
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Control: severity -1 important
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:07:24PM +0400, Vladimir Lysikov wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
The package has uses beyond compilation.
> Data.FFI module is contained in ffi subdirectory of source tarball.
> It is needed for compilati
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:32:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683010: fixed in evolvotron 0.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683010,
regarding FTBFS on ia64: one or more PCH files were found, but they were invalid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 683010 - squeeze-ignore + wheezy sid
Bug #683010 [src:evolvotron] FTBFS on ia64: one or more PCH files were found,
but they were invalid
Removed tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
Bug #683010 [src:evolvotron] FTBFS on ia64: one or more PCH files were fou
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:56:07 +0100
with message-id <20121206215607.gx5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695248: mesa: CVE-2012-5129
has caused the Debian Bug report #695248,
regarding mesa: CVE-2012-5129
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:48:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692130: fixed in vlc 2.0.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #692130,
regarding vlc: CVE-2012-5470
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:32:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694521: fixed in libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694521,
regarding libxml2: CVE-2012-5134
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Hi
I've reopened the two bugs.
The first patch was incomplete, as pointed by David and by other bug
i've found reviewing the code.
The bug pointed by David can occur in some rare cases where the CA
issues malformed certificates. It's rare, but there are may CA...
The other bug it's about wildc
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 05:17:58PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> See also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258974 and
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/office/kmymoney/repository/revisions/7019c148079fbb9ba3d1b8331c09d2c994215c91/diff/kmymoney/dialogs/kreportconfigurationfilter
Am 06.12.2012 20:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
> Tobias Hansen writes:
>> since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
>> (see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
>
> Yes but maybe notify the maintainers of the sole package still depending
> on it, ghdl. This package is the r
Tobias Hansen writes:
> since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
> (see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
Yes but maybe notify the maintainers of the sole package still depending
on it, ghdl. This package is the reason I've refrained from asking for
removal of gnat-4.
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:02:54PM +0100, Alberto Fernández wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've uploaded new packages to mentors. I'll be out until Monday, so feel
> free to review the patches and sponsor the new version if all you are
> confident it's all ok
I admit I'm no Java programmer and I do not fee
The package FTBFS in a clean environment:
=
gfortran seclf1.F
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/geant321-3.21.14.dfsg/build/geant321/matx55'
cd /tmp/buildd/geant321-3.21.14.dfsg/lib && ln -s
../src/geant321/data/xsneut95.dat xsneut95.dat
/bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to /tmp/buildd/ge
On Sat, April 7, 2012 17:22, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> We'll have to investigate how to best fix this.
I'm currently preparing a patch in cooperation with upstream.
Cheers,
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Your message dated Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:13:24 +0100
with message-id <20121206181324.ga2...@elende.valinor.li>
and subject line Re: Bug#694368: libfuzzy{2,-dev}: missing Breaks+Replaces:
ssdeep (<< 2.6)
has caused the Debian Bug report #694368,
regarding libfuzzy{2,-dev}: missing Breaks+Replaces: ssd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 695239 important
Bug #695239 [winetricks] winetricks won't install alongside wine:i386
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> reassign 695239 wine 1.4.1-1
Bug #695239 [winetricks] winetricks won't install alongside wine:i386
Bug rea
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #695274 [libparse-debian-packages-perl] libparse-debian-packages-perl:
Problem parsing stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
695274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695274
De
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Simon
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:11:27PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> Version: 0.03-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Using libparse-debain-packages-perl, the following problem arises when parsing
> stanzas wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
severity 695239 important
reassign 695239 wine 1.4.1-1
retitle 695239 wine meta-package is not multiarch
kthxbye
Hi,
this bug is in the wine metapackage rather than in winetricks. I also
think it is not grave because what you did is not what the a
Hi
I've uploaded new packages to mentors. I'll be out until Monday, so feel
free to review the patches and sponsor the new version if all you are
confident it's all ok
I think now it's fine , but if you find some other bug or improvement,
I'll be happy to correct it.
I'll insist next week upstre
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:22:00 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
> > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
> > > decide what to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 695050 grave
Bug #695050 [python-webob] python-webob: webob last stable version 1.1.1
response header bug
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695050:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed patch
Bug #695284 [tsung] tsung compiled with outdated erlang version
Added tag(s) confirmed and patch.
--
695284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
Control: tags -1 + confirmed patch
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:53:48AM -0500, Stuart Freeman wrote:
> When I run `tsung -f tsung.xml start` it says:
>
> Erlang version has changed ! [5.8.5] != [5.9.1]
> Must create new boot files (you may have to run this one time as root ! )
> creating boot file
What is broken about it? Has anyone estimated how much effort it would take
to fix? Are we talking needing assembly language bindings or just some dumb
SIGBUS error?
Patrick Baggett
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Michael Stapelberg dijo [Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:22:00AM +0
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #695254 [clementine] clementine does not start
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
695254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:29:04AM +0100, phileom wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> After d-u clementine isn't usable anymore, and I have a segmentation fault
> from
> Konsole.
Unable to reproduce. See http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace for
some info ab
Michael Stapelberg dijo [Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:22:00AM +0100]:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
> > decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
> > months, and hasn't seen
Source: ssdeep
Source-Version: 2.7-2
Hi Christophe
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:08:03PM +0100, Christophe Monniez wrote:
> the fix was just uploaded.
Thanks!
> Do we need a release excpetion for this to be accepeted ?
Just fill a bug for pseudopackage release.debian.org for a unblock
request. In
Hi,
since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
(see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed?
Best regards,
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Am 06.12.2012 12:07, schrieb Neil McGovern:
> So, it looks like this bug isn't going to get fixed :(
I'm unsure, if flex-sdk can compile AS1 code, but it can compile AS3
code. So at least the AS3 part can be fixed, whenever flex-sdk enters
debian.
> Hrm. This doesn't quite cover the expected lif
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:22:00 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
> > decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
> > months, and hasn't se
Package: tsung
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I run `tsung -f tsung.xml start` it says:
Erlang version has changed ! [5.8.5] != [5.9.1]
Must create new boot files (you may have to run this one time as root ! )
creating boot file for tsung application
Hi Enrico,
I'm currently busy to squash all "missing Breaks+Replaces" bugs opened
by "the other Andreas". Just let me know if you need a helping hand to
NMU the package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:37:33 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when debchecking out speech-dispatcher Vcs-Git I noticed there is some
> work going on done by people who are usually known to do a reasonable
> job. Before I fiddle around with this package to apply the quite simple
> patch for the bug I
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > But rebuilding it in sid now with the proposed patch would make it
> > uninstallable in wheezy, which still has swig2.0 2.0.7.
> > I guess we should tag this bug 'sid' for the time being?
> I agree, this bug only applies to sid. Setting t
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:47:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694361: fixed in phpunit-story 1.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694361,
regarding phpunit-story: missing Breaks+Repalces: phpunit (<< 3.6.10)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi Luis,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:23:26AM -0500, Luis Uribe wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:53:06PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Please tell me if I should sponsor some upload.
>
> I just upload the package to mentors, it will be great if you could check it
> and sponsor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 677943 by 694790
Bug #677943 [munin] /etc/apache2/conf.d/munin removed on upgrade
677943 was not blocked by any bugs.
677943 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 677943: 694790
> block 694355 by 694790
Bug #694355 [munin-doc]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 695274 + confirmed
Bug #695274 [libparse-debian-packages-perl] libparse-debian-packages-perl:
Problem parsing stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 695274 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=81744
Bug #695274 [libparse-debian-packages-perl] libparse-debian-packages-perl:
Problem parsing stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://rt.c
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 03:53:06PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Please tell me if I should sponsor some upload.
I just upload the package to mentors, it will be great if you could check it
and sponsor it, after that i will ask for unblock.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/
Hi,
I considered NMUing ssdeep to fix this bug. When debcheckout-ing the
packaging repository I noticed that there is a changelog entry
* Adding the missing Breaks+Replaces (Closes: #694368).
for a not yet released version 2.9-1.
Could you please confirm that you understood that you can no
block 677943 by 694790
block 694355 by 694790
block 675377 by 694790
block 676798 by 694790
block 678662 by 694790
block 687495 by 694790
block 687715 by 694790
block 689291 by 694790
block 690711 by 694790
block 691309 by 694790
block 691390 by 694790
block 691327 by 694790
block 691448 by 694790
Hi,
I did a
debcheckout phpunit-story
and noticed that the patch for bug #694361 is applied and the new
version even tagged - any reason it did not made its way to unstable?
Please tell me if I should sponsor some upload.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBS
Package: src:dspam
Version: 3.10.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Let me give an example of the general issue in libdspam7. All the other
issues are of similar nature.
It is possible to install libdspam7:amd64 and libdspam7:i386 in
parallel. Now a user could purge libdspam7:i386, but still use
libdspam
Package: libparse-debian-packages-perl
Version: 0.03-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Using libparse-debain-packages-perl, the following problem arises when parsing
stanzas with more than 1 multiline entry:
If a multiline entry is found, all lines of th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 692650
Bug #692650 {Done: Alberto Fernández Martínez } [axis] axis:
CVE-2012-5784
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No
Hi Salvatore,
the fix was just uploaded.
Do we need a release excpetion for this to be accepeted ?
--
Christophe Monniez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
when debchecking out speech-dispatcher Vcs-Git I noticed there is some
work going on done by people who are usually known to do a reasonable
job. Before I fiddle around with this package to apply the quite simple
patch for the bug I would like to ping those people mentioned in the
latest chan
Package: libphone-utils0
Version: 0.1+git20110523-1.2
Severity: serious
It is technically possible to install libphone-utils0:amd64 and
libphone-utils0:i386 in parallel. If I then purge libphone-utils0:i386,
/etc/phone-utils.conf will disappear even though it is still needed by
libphone-utils:amd6
Hi Alberto,
thanks for your continuous work on this. As I said in my previous mail
please remember to reopen the according bugs to make sure the previous
solution will not migrate to testing. I'll volunteer to sponsor your
new version if you confirm that this is needed to finally fix the issue.
Hi,
I uploaded the suggested patch to DELAYED/3. I will file an unblock
request once the package might have hit unstable.
Remark: Peter, I usually commit changes to some packaging VCS if the
package is maintained in a DD-accessible VCS. It seems that this is
not the case for the gri package ev
Description: Fixed CN extraction from DN of X500 principal and wildcard validation
axis (1.4-16.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed CN extraction from DN of X500 principal and wildcard validation
Author: Alberto Fernández MartÃnez
Origin: other
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/692650
Fo
Hi All,
I've prepared the patch with the problem pointed by David fixed (thanks
David). It also fixes a bug related to wildcard certificates.
The first patch is backported from httpclient 4.0 and apache synapse.
This second patch backports some fixes from httpclient 4.2
The patch differ a lot
Hi,
I just NMUed the package with the suggested patch to DELAYED/3.
I'll file an unblock request once the package might have hit unstable.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi Roger,
On 12/06/2012 01:15 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:25:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes
Package: liblockfile1
Version: 1.09-4
Severity: serious
Steps taken:
Install liblockfile1:amd64. Observe that it ships
/usr/share/doc/liblockfile1. Install liblockfile1:i386. Observe that
/usr/share/doc/liblockfile1 is still correctly there. Remove
liblockfile1:i386, but not liblockfile1:amd64. N
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:25:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > > But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
> > > for the protocol. ;-) So others won't be
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#687848: fixed in syslinux 2:4.06+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #687848,
regarding extlinux-update: fails to correctly update changed syslinux debian
themes
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#665642: fixed in xarchiver 1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665642,
regarding xarchiver: don't show correct file list with 7zip archive
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677650: fixed in unhide.rb 13-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677650,
regarding unhide.rb: in `': uninitialized constant DL::Importable
(NameError)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#665642: fixed in xarchiver 1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665642,
regarding [xarchiver] crashes when opening 7z archives
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:12:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#665642: fixed in xarchiver 1:0.5.2+20090319+dfsg-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665642,
regarding xarchiver fails to open 7z archives
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694285: fixed in proofgeneral 4.2~pre120605-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694285,
regarding proofgeneral-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: proofgeneral (<< 4)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694810: fixed in plib 1.8.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #694810,
regarding plib: CVE-2012-4552
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:51:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694271: fixed in freevo 1.9.2b2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #694271,
regarding freevo: missing Breaks+Replaces: freevo-doc (<< 1.9.2b2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:49:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695192: fixed in bind9 1:9.9.2.dfsg.P1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695192,
regarding bind9: CVE-2012-5688
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:47:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692650: fixed in axis 1.4-16.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692650,
regarding axis: CVE-2012-5784
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
tags 591969 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:56:11PM +0100, Christian Welzel wrote:
> Am 05.12.2012 13:07, schrieb Neil McGovern:
>
> > Can someone explain: 1) Why there were no updates to the bug
> > between December 2010 and June 2012?
>
> The bug could not be resolved, so i d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 591969 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #591969 [src:typo3-src] typo3-src: does not build .swf files from source
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
591969: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 664895
Bug #664895 {Done: Thijs Kinkhorst } [squirrelmail]
squirrelmail: completely broken with PHP 5.4
Unarchived Bug 664895
> reopen 664895
Bug #664895 {Done: Thijs Kinkhorst } [squirrelmail]
squirrelmail: completely broken with PHP
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 694846 with 677721
Bug #694846 [dicomscope] dicomscope: Exception in thread "main"
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError
694846 was not blocked by any bugs.
694846 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 694846: 677721
> thanks
Stoppin
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:21:56PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> My impression after a short test of the game is that it is quite buggy
> also without this bug.
Yeah, just look at the list of bugs in our BTS. The bug that requires
disabling sound is enough for me, and it's not the only one.
The g
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
> decide what to do with Ruby 1.9.X on ia64. It has been broken for
> months, and hasn't seen any activity in Debian (#539141) or upstream
> (http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:59:46 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> This resulted in all my local configuration in /etc/dovecot/ being
> trashed, and overwritten with the shipped dovecot-core versions.
Ian, neither Helmut nor Lisandro could reproduce the bug report you
submitted.
Can you provide any furthe
Hi,
sorry, I’m too tied up in other work that keeps popping
up to check the new version if it’s ready for uploading
in a timely manner.
Just saying. If nobody pops up, I’ll do it eventually,
of course, but it’s not on the top of my stack, so *if*
someone else wants to help, be our guest.
(Plus,
Package: clementine
Version: 1.0.1+dfsg-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After d-u clementine isn't usable anymore, and I have a segmentation fault from
Konsole.
Thanks for your help.
*** End of the template - remove these lines ***
-- System Inform
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:17:30PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:20:48 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > This has now made python-dolphin not installable in sid since the version of
> > swig in sid has passed to 2.0.8-1 on 2012-10-31. However, python-dolphin
> > still
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692852 + sid
Bug #692852 [dolfin] dolfin: Avoid hardcoding the swig2.0 version
Added tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692852: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692852
90 matches
Mail list logo
