Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #688606 [mlterm-im-uim] mlterm-im-uim: copyright file missing after upgrade
(policy 12.5)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #688606 to the same tags previously set
--
688606: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688606
Debian Bug T
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #688605 [mlterm-im-m17nlib] mlterm-im-m17nlib: copyright file missing after
upgrade (policy 12.5)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #688605 to the same tags previously set
--
688605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688605
Debi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #688604 [mlterm-im-scim] mlterm-im-scim: copyright file missing after
upgrade (policy 12.5)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #688604 to the same tags previously set
--
688604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688604
Debian Bug
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #688603 [mlterm-tools] mlterm-tools: copyright file missing after upgrade
(policy 12.5)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #688603 to the same tags previously set
--
688603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688603
Debian Bug Tra
control: tag -1 patch
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing these issues to delayed/5. I saw this
was commited to git, but hasn't been uploaded after a long while. The
delayed upload is to give you time to do a maintainer upload instead.
Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
mlterm.patch
Desc
> You're a DD. You have the power to cancel stuff in the deferred
> queue.
Sure, especially when I am travelling and have access via iphone only and no
way to sign my stuff.
That is the reason one gives a heads up, like: "Hi, I am planning to upload an
NMU with the following debdiff. erc et
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #693575 [iproute] Upstream version is not included in package version
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
693575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi
control: severity -1 important
> The continued use of datestamps in the package version makes it
> difficult to understand which upstream version it is based on, and
> appears to violate policy §5.6.12 (hence the severity). Policy says
> "Usually this will be in the same format as that specified
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 692440 6.0.35-5+nmu1
Bug #692440 {Done: Michael Gilbert } [tomcat7] tomcat7:
CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439
There is no source info for the package 'tomcat7' at version '6.0.35-5+nmu1'
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version f
> We have three options:
>
> - Drop openjdk6 from Wheezy (and proceed with the needed changes to allow
> that)
> - The Java maintainers take up the responsibility and step up to support
> openjdk6 in stable- and oldstable-security for Wheezy
> - A note is being added to the release notes that o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 692440 6.0.35+nmu1
Bug #692440 {Done: Michael Gilbert } [tomcat7] tomcat7:
CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439
There is no source info for the package 'tomcat7' at version '6.0.35+nmu1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for v
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2012 06:02:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692440: fixed in tomcat7 7.0.28-3+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692440,
regarding tomcat7: CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
tomcat7.patch
Description: Binary data
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:02:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678890: fixed in prime 1.0.0.1-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678890,
regarding scim: fail to start scim after latest upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
prime.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> May I remind you Michael about the proper NMU procedure??? It seems that your
> D-D courses have been become a bit forgotten.
You're a DD. You have the power to cancel stuff in the deferred
queue. That's why it's deferred: to give you a
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2012 03:17:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693479: fixed in horizon 2012.1.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #693479,
regarding openstack-dashboard: fails to install: postinst: Syntax error: "then"
unexpected (expecting "fi")
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2012 03:02:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692534: fixed in sqldeveloper-package 0.2.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #692534,
regarding Fails to build sqldeveloper package with "chmod: missing operand
after `755'"
to be marked as done.
This means t
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.20-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
...
CCLD src/expand
CC src/expr.o
CCLD src/expr
CC src/factor.o
/tmp/ccyQkvJI.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccyQkvJI.s:312: Error: Invalid Compare/S
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:47:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#635969: fixed in apt-p2p 0.1.6+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #635969,
regarding apt-p2p: Failed to load application: cannot import name OpProgress
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:47:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#635969: fixed in apt-p2p 0.1.6+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #635969,
regarding /usr/sbin/apt-p2p: Failed to load application: cannot import name
OpProgress
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Package: iproute
Version: 20120521-3
Severity: serious
The package version uses a datestamp for the upstream version. As you
know, upstream started making formal releases where the version string
indicates the latest kernel version for which it is expected to
provide full feature coverage.
The c
Source: libfso-glib
Severity: serious
Usertags: built-using sentpatch
Tags: patch
Not sure if this bug should be RC or not, please downgrade it if not.
Either way, I suppose it should be wheezy-ignore since fixing it will
probably require a transition.
The source code that is in this package is a
Hi Roger,
> Package: insserv
> Version: 1.14.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: Breaks boot
>
> See also:
> #677097
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677097
>
> When we added mountall-bootclean to initscripts, I didn't realise
> at the time that the dependenc
Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch.
Best wishes,
Mike
apt-p2p.patch
Description: Binary data
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:48:41 -0500
with message-id
and subject line re: tomcat6: CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439
has caused the Debian Bug report #692439,
regarding tomcat6: CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:47:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693490: fixed in pyatspi 2.5.3+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #693490,
regarding python3-pyatspi: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to
overwrite /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyatspi/enum.py
t
We have resolved this upstream in version 2.4
(http://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-36457).
We will consider back-porting this in http://tracker.moodle.org/browse/MDL-36463
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
Processing control commands:
> tags 693490 + pending
Bug #693490 [python3-pyatspi] python3-pyatspi: fails to upgrade from 'testing'
- trying to overwrite /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyatspi/enum.py
Added tag(s) pending.
--
693490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693490
Debia
Control: tags 693490 + pending
Andreas Beckmann, le Sat 17 Nov 2012 01:37:42 +0100, a écrit :
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'testing'.
> It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
> because it tries to overwrite other packages fil
Steve Thompson, le Sat 17 Nov 2012 21:12:05 +, a écrit :
> Is this a bug - or just pebcak,
It's the whole point of this bug report, yes. See the bug history, it's
fixed in version 2.5.3+dfsg-2.1, which hasn't propagated to testing
yet. That's why we are still seeing it in testing, of course.
> On Miércoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 17:35:44 Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> >
> > if
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681654#52
> >
> > is correct and the issue is commercial use (and not nondistributability)
> > how about just moving kstars-data-extra-tycho2 to non-fr
Dear all,
(cc ing -release since it seems that the practice of brute forcing nmus is
becoming a problem for release)
ping ping
As I predicted:
Unblock request by nthykier ignored due to version mismatch: 0.3.4-7
Could you please state your position to this case?
May I remind you Michael
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692440: fixed in tomcat6 6.0.35-5+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692440,
regarding tomcat7: CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: openvpn-auth-ldap
Version: 2.0.3-4
Followup-For: Bug #692936
Hum. It seems that this packaging is failing to build on kfreebsd, and for good
reasons:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openvpn-auth-ldap&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=2.0.3-4&stamp=1352718255
auth-ldap.m:538:4: err
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:17:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693567: fixed in getfem++ 4.1.1+dfsg1-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #693567,
regarding getfem++: The upstream tarball ships precompiled .so-files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:17:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693419: fixed in libltc 1.0.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #693419,
regarding libltc: FTBFS on PowerPC due to misnamed member name in LTCFrame
struct
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692555 + patch
Bug #692555 [x2goplugin] x2goplugin fails to resolve hostname
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692555
Package: subversion
Version: 1.7.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #692237
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've run into this issue as well:
Updating '.':
Utools/sed/Makefile
Utools/upx/Makefile
svn: E235000: In file
'/tmp/buildd/subversion-1.7.5/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' l
Package: getfem++
Version: 4.1.1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1(2)
The source tarball contains .so-files:
find ./ -name *.so
./interface/src/scilab/sci_gateway/c/libscigetfem_c.so
./interface/src/scilab/src/c/libsp_get.so
-- System Information:
Debian Release: whe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package mahara
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'mahara'
Limit currently set to 'package':'mahara'
> found 691883 1.2.6-2
Bug #691883 [mahara] Multiple security issues
Marked as found in versions mahara/1.2.6-2.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package mahara
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'mahara'
Limit currently set to 'package':'mahara'
> found 691883 1.5.1-2.1
Bug #691883 [mahara] Multiple security issues
Marked as found in versions mahara/1.5.1-2.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package mahara
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'mahara'
Limit currently set to 'package':'mahara'
> fixed 691883 1.5.1-3
Bug #691883 [mahara] Multiple security issues
Marked as fixed in versions mahara/1.5.1-3.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 669025 + patch
Bug #669025 [flightgear] CVE-2012-2090 / CVE-2012-2091
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
669025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669025
Debian
Hallo,
I am trying to upgrade my VIA ITX from squeeze to wheezy in the hope that
the browsers will be more up to date as measured by gmail. I am not very
clued up but have got so far :-
root@itx:/home/steve# dpkg -l | grep linux-image
ii linux-image-2.6-486 3.2+46
Linux for olde
Dear Vincent,
thank you for following up on this report.
Am Samstag, den 17.11.2012, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> On 2012-10-12 13:23:20 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 20.12.2011, 01:49 +0100 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> > > I've burnt a data DVD with brasero and got no
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:02:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#682013: fixed in fai 4.0.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #682013,
regarding fai-server: fai-setup failing on dracut setup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
I have an upload of tiff 3.9.4-5+squeeze7 build against squeeze ready to
upload to stable-security. This includes a fix for CVE-2012-4564. I've
attached the debdiff. Please let me know if I should proceed with the
upload. Thanks.
--
Jay Berkenbilt
diff -Nru tiff-3.9.4/debian/changelog tiff-
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Adrian La Duca wrote:
>
>> Attaching debdiff patches for both squeeze and wheezy/experimental
>> packages.
>
> I uploaded a fixed version to unstable and opened an unblock request
> after verifying proper functionality. Although the patch applies
> cleanly to the version
Adrian La Duca wrote:
> Attaching debdiff patches for both squeeze and wheezy/experimental
> packages.
I uploaded a fixed version to unstable and opened an unblock request
after verifying proper functionality. Although the patch applies
cleanly to the version in squeeze, it does not compile bec
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:47:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692345: fixed in tiff 4.0.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #692345,
regarding tiff: CVE-2012-4564
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:02:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#666334: fixed in gnustep-back 0.20.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #666334,
regarding FTBFS: build-arch problems with patch applying and installation of
files generated only in build-indep target
to be
Hi
I've made a patch (attached)
It's basically the same patch i've submitted to commons-httpclient
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692442 ),
This patch is tested in commons-httpclient but untested in axis (sorry)
Description: Validates the hostname requested is the same in the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 688233 uim-mozc/1.5.1090.102-4
Bug #688233 {Done: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) } [uim-utils]
/usr/bin/uim-module-manager: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3):
/etc/uim/installed-modules.scm, /etc/uim/loader.scm
The source uim-mozc and version
fixed 688233 uim-mozc/1.5.1090.102-4
thanks
--
Regards,
dai
GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:17:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#689493: fixed in youtube-dl 2012.09.27+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689493,
regarding src:youtube-dl: missing source for Windows binary
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 689493 -1
Bug #689493 [src:youtube-dl] src:youtube-dl: missing source for Windows binary
Bug 689493 cloned as bug 693534
> retitle -1 please, remove --update option from youtube-dl
Bug #693534 [src:youtube-dl] src:youtube-dl: missing source
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:48:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693520: fixed in ibus 1.4.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #693520,
regarding ibus: double-unref when looping over attachment
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:48:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693517: fixed in ibus 1.4.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #693517,
regarding ibus should not generate empty preedit strings on focus switch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:48:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693516: fixed in ibus 1.4.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #693516,
regarding ibus: language bar does not work with multiple monitors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:48:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684852: fixed in python-eventlet 0.9.16-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684852,
regarding python-eventlet: FTBFS: greenlet.h:8:20: fatal error: Python.h: No
such file or directory
to be marked as done.
Th
Package: ibus
Version: 1.4.1-8
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
It is scarely to keep memmory assertion failure.
Prevent:
> /ibus/attachment:
> (/home/ueno/devel/ibus/src/tests/.libs/lt-ibus-serializable:2870):
GLib-CRITICAL
> **: g_variant_unref: assertion
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #693508 [hamster-applet] hamster-applet: hamster-time-tracker fails to start
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #693508 [hamster-applet] hamster-applet: hamster-time-tracker fails to start
Added tag(s) patch.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 692628 mail...@parser.ru
Bug #692628 [src:parser] non-free files in upstream tarball ("The Software
shall be used for Good, not Evil")
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'mail...@parser.ru'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
On sam., 2012-11-17 at 11:30 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> Hi Security Team,
>
> I'm forwarding this email to ask for review on the correction for
> CVE-2012-0698 in stable (other versions are not affected).
>
Hey,
is the fixed package robust against the python script and did you test
if it d
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + patch
> When I start hamster-time-tracker, it fails with the error message:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/hamster-time-tracker", line 602, in
> app = ProjectHamster()
> File "/usr/bin/hamster-time-tracker", line
Package: ibus
Version: 1.4.1-8
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
As reported in:
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=1445
ibus generates a pre-edit-changed signal on focus switch, with an empty
preedit string. It appears the purpose of this is to c
Package: ibus
Version: 1.4.1-8
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
language bar does not work with multiple monitors
Without language bar under ibus, it makes all keyboard imnput prectically
impossible under some conditions. So very bad for any program waiting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 693508 + upstream
Bug #693508 [hamster-applet] hamster-applet: hamster-time-tracker fails to start
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
693508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 693460 + patch
Bug #693460 [bcrypt] bcrypt: Mangles at least some files
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
693460: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693460
Debi
Package: hamster-applet
Version: 2.91.3+git20120514.b9fec3e1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
When I start hamster-time-tracker, it fails with the error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/hamster-time-tracker", line 602, in
Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:53:31 +0100
with message-id <20121117085331.ga16...@upsilon.cc>
and subject line Re: test mailing, re #690130
has caused the Debian Bug report #690130,
regarding tryton: maintainer address still bounces
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 680311 Depends on obsoleted package sugar-hulahop
Bug #680311 [pyjamas-desktop] "Depends on obsoleted package sugar-hulahop"
Changed Bug title to 'Depends on obsoleted package sugar-hulahop' from
'"Depends on obsoleted package sugar-hulah
73 matches
Mail list logo
