On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:52:17 -0500, H. S. wrote:
> I reinstalled the system, however, motion was not happy with the
> target directory permissions. Once I fixed that, it started to work
> properly.
Nice!
> In short, on a freshly installed Wheezy system, motion now works fine.
>
> Next up, I us
On 11/07/2012 07:10 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Thomas Goirand (02/11/2012):
>> Since this affects only the ryu agent, and doesn't render the full
>> Quantum package unusable (you can still continue to use it with
>> OpenVSwitch), I've set this bug's severity as
Package: cm-super
Version: 0.3.4-6
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Since this package's doc dir is just a symlink to the one for
cm-super-minimal, the changelog.Debian.gz file comes from that package.
However, this package doesn't depend on an identical version of that
package, so it could be
Correction:
I reinstalled the system, however, motion was not happy with the
target directory permissions. Once I fixed that, it started to work
properly.
In short, on a freshly installed Wheezy system, motion now works fine.
Next up, I usually change my distro to "testing" ... will do so with
my
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 692411 + pending
Bug #692411 [src:linux] linux: fix for the ext4 corruption issue is in 3.6.6
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692411: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
I guess my problem is fixed. I am not able anymore to reproduce that bug on my
system using kmail Version: 4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3+b1
---
Daniel Koch
GPG: 83DE 2C48 5A9F 9992 843A 0EAD 3B2D 7E8F 13F4 9C39
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 692500 src:linux 3.2.32-1
Bug #692500 [linux-image-amd64] [linux-image-amd64] system freezes with Ivy
Brigde CPU
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-amd64' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux-latest/46.
Ignor
control: tag -1 confirmed
Confirming that "apt-move get && apt-move move" behaves like this.
Building and installing 4.2.27-1 on wheezy doesn't help. Testing on
squeeze, it does work.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #692342 [apt-move] apt-move move command deletes all files without moving
them
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
692342: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688259: fixed in zangband 1:2.7.5pre1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #688259,
regarding zangband: modifies shipped files during postinst, overwrites score
file on upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 19:54 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Drew, if you still intend to upload a fix for this bug, please do it
> sooner rather than later. Otherwise, consider asking someone to
> NMU/fix this package for you.
Uploaded. Thanks for your patience.
Markus, I left some hardening l
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #685251 [quantum-plugin-ryu-agent] quantum-plugin-ryu-agent: ImportError:
No module named ryu.agent.ryu_quantum_agent / ryu.app
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
685251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685251
De
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:41:15 +0200, Julien ÉLIE wrote:
> /etc/news/motd.nnrpd and /etc/news/motd.innd are two new conf files
> shipped with INN 2.5.3.
> /etc/news/motd.news is no longer used.
> During a fresh install, motd.nnrpd and motd.innd are the two files shipped
> in the inn2 tarball.
> Du
Your message dated Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:17:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692062: fixed in enigmail 2:1.4.5+id16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692062,
regarding enigmail FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
While trying to reproduce this, I was able to observe it once, but then
unable to reproduce further.
The only explanation I can think of right now is some edge case related to
upgrading the package. I was unable to reproduce that either, however.
In any case, the working version of this package
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 3.2+46
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Several users reported system freezes with a Wheezy beta. See this
thread: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=85533
I experienced this problem multiple times per day with t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 692492 normal
Bug #692492 [auditd] ITO: Orphaning audit package
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
692492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
severity 692492 normal
thanks
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:01:54PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: auditd
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1:1.7.18-1.1
"serious" severity refers to bugs that are blockers for a release. A
missing maintainer is not a serious bug. The other serious bug sta
On Wednesday, 19. September 2012 21:05:03 Piotr Borkowski wrote:
> File-rc doesn't restore rcX.d dirs at remove. This breaks sysv-rc
> legacy_bootordering postinst function. After sysv-rc installation this
> leads to empty rcX.d dirs and broken system. Maybe file-rc should call
I can reproduce thi
Your message dated Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:43:26 +0100
with message-id <5099685e.1000...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#676141: rt4-extension-assettracker:, fails to upgrade
from wheezy: updating database schema for 1.2.4...command, failed with code 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #676141,
r
On 11/01/2012 12:51 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> I am not sure this would
> be suitable for a freeze exception, if it does not fix a RC bug.
You don't need a bug to be RC to ask for a freeze exception. It's often
allowed (and welcome) to fix non-RC bugs! Just get in touch with the
release team to check.
Control: fixed -1 2.0.0~b2-5
On 2012-11-06 19:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Currently rt4-extension-assettracker is considered an RC-buggy leaf
> package[0] and will eventually be removed from testing unless this RC
> bug is dealt with (fixed, downgraded etc.).
cannot reproduce this problem with piu
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 2.0.0~b2-5
Bug #676141 [rt4-extension-assettracker] rt4-extension-assettracker: fails to
upgrade from wheezy: updating database schema for 1.2.4...command failed with
code 2
Marked as fixed in versions rt-extension-assettracker/2.0.0~b2-5.
--
676141: htt
Package: auditd
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.7.18-1.1
Hi,
I've tried to enter in contact with Philipp Matthias regarding the
status of the audit package. I've sent a first mail a bit more than a
month ago and a second one 15 days later. But I unfortunately didn't
get any answer so far.
The las
Hi,
Currently zangband is considered an RC-buggy leaf package[0] and will
eventually be removed from testing unless this RC bug is dealt with
(fixed, downgraded etc.).
Mind you, the deadline listed in [0] is in the past. If I hadn't by
chance noticed Drew's mail claiming he would upload a patc
Hi,
Currently rt4-extension-assettracker is considered an RC-buggy leaf
package[0] and will eventually be removed from testing unless this RC
bug is dealt with (fixed, downgraded etc.).
Mind you, the deadline listed in [0] is in the past. If I hadn't by
chance noticed Bradley's mail claiming i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 689864 + pending
Bug #689864 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-image-amd64]
linux-image-amd64: Depends un unavailable package
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689864: http://
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 688222 + pending
Bug #688222 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-latest] needs
update for 3.2.30-1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
688222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #691078 [motion] motion keeps restarting after recent upgrade, and appears
unable to find some av codec
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
691078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> >> [UPGRADE] ffmpeg:amd64 7:0.11.1-dmo5 -> 7:1.0-dmo1
> >> [UPGRADE] gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg:amd64 0.10.13-5 -> 1:0.10.13-dmo1
> >> [UPGRADE] libxine2-ffmpeg:amd64 1.2.2-4 -> 1:1.2.2-dmo3
> >> [UPGRADE] libavcodec54:amd64 7:0.11.1-dmo5 -> 7:1.0-dmo1
> >> [UPGRADE] libavde
As far as I can gather from readin sshd(8) and the source code
(get_hostfile_hostname_ipaddr in upstream's openssh-6.1p1), at most two
key lookups are performed:
(a) [Only for protocol version 1] One for the ip address of the remote
host, with put_host_port(ntop, port)
(b) One for the
Package: ncpfs
Version: 2.2.6-8
Severity: grave
ncpmount fails on current Debian kernels with:
| Cannot convert kernel release "3.6-trunk-amd64" to number
It expects three digits, but this is not longer the case.
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
Package: ncpfs
Version: 2.2.6-8
Severity: serious
ncpfs fails to build again:
| dpkg-source: info: using options from ncpfs-2.2.6/debian/source/options:
--compression=bzip2 --compression-level=9
| dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
| dpkg-source: info: building ncpfs using exis
Package: ncpfs
Version: 2.2.6-8
Severity: serious
ncpmount tries to fiddle with /etc/mtab and gives weird warnings about
it. /etc/mtab is a symlink since some time.
| Can't get /etc/mtab~ lock file
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99
Your message dated Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:57:19 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#692448: qemu: system crash on 'libaio1' removal
has caused the Debian Bug report #692448,
regarding qemu: system crash on 'libaio1' removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> Re-uploaded to DELAYED/2.
The debdiff.
Regards,
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-2.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> The gnome-themes-standard-common binary package is superfluous.
>> Afaics the gettext translations are only required to translate the
>> index.theme and background.xml file
On 06.11.2012 17:39, Teodor MICU wrote:
> 2012/11/6 Michael Tokarev :
>> So, can you start it again when libaio1 is NOT installed?
>
> Yes, I was able to start the VMs again after the libaio1 removal. I'm
> not sure about the full Xen system -- I can't test now.
In this case you really do not nee
2012/11/6 Michael Tokarev :
> So, can you start it again when libaio1 is NOT installed?
Yes, I was able to start the VMs again after the libaio1 removal. I'm
not sure about the full Xen system -- I can't test now.
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 0.8-2
Bug #689790 [msva-perl] msva-perl: modifies conffiles during upgrade from
squeeze (policy 10.7.3): /etc/X11/Xsession.d/70monkeysphere_use-validation-agent
No longer marked as found in versions msva-perl/0.8-2.
> notfound -1 0.9.1-1
Bug #689790 [msv
Control: notfound -1 0.8-2
Control: notfound -1 0.9.1-1
Control: close -1
On 2012-10-07 01:41, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 06:09 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> [ ... incredible debugging saga snipped ... ]
>
>> going to look into dpkg :-)
>>
>> ... and suggesting a one-line fix :
On 06.11.2012 17:02, Teodor MICU wrote:
> 2012/11/6 Michael Tokarev :
>> On 06.11.2012 15:40, Teodor wrote:
>>> I've just had a system crash a few seconds after I removed 'libaio1
>>> package (declared orphan by deborphan).
>>
>> What kind of crash? Crash of what, exactly? What you were running?
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The gnome-themes-standard-common binary package is superfluous.
> Afaics the gettext translations are only required to translate the
> index.theme and background.xml files where the translations are directly
> embedded, so you don't actually
2012/11/6 Michael Tokarev :
> On 06.11.2012 15:40, Teodor wrote:
>> I've just had a system crash a few seconds after I removed 'libaio1
>> package (declared orphan by deborphan).
>
> What kind of crash? Crash of what, exactly? What you were running?
Debian Linux 6.0 (amd64) on top of Xen 4.0 hyp
On 06.11.2012 12:05, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
>>> wrote:
So, I agree with spl
Your message dated Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:25:45 +
with message-id <20121106122545.ga32...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#684713: bug 684713 - support for partitioned MD devices
has caused the Debian Bug report #684713,
regarding parted: support for partitioned MD devices
to
Package: jspwiki
Version: 2.8.0-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
10.7.3: "[.
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 2.8.0-5
Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6'
No longer marked as found in versions jspwiki/2.8.0-5.
> fixed -1 2.8.0-5
Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6'
Marked as fix
Control: notfound -1 2.8.0-5
Control: fixed -1 2.8.0-5
Control: close -1
On Tuesday, 10. July 2012 05:38:06 tony mancill wrote:
> In looking into this, I was confused to discover that the latest version
> of jspwiki 2.8.0-5 uploaded to unstable actually does depend on tomcat6,
> but didn't close #
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #692448 [qemu] qemu: system crash on 'libaio1' removal
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
692448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
On 06.11.2012 15:40, Teodor wrote:
> Package: qemu
> Version: 0.12.5+dfsg-3squeeze2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just had a system crash a few seconds after I removed 'libaio1
> package (declared orphan by deborphan).
What kind of crash? Crash o
Package: qemu
Version: 0.12.5+dfsg-3squeeze2
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've just had a system crash a few seconds after I removed 'libaio1
package (declared orphan by deborphan). On KVM systems this is not
a problem because its a dependency of qemu-kvm. But on Xen systems
(+libvirtd) this package is
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
>> wrote:
>>> So, I agree with splitting the gnome-accessibility-themes binary.
>>
>> Any progres
Your message dated Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:47:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#689257: fixed in roundup 1.4.20-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689257,
regarding roundup: deletes conffiles during postrm remove (policy 10.7.3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: tomcat7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
Since Wheezy is frozen, please apply isolated security fixes instead
of updating to a new upstream release.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: tomcat6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
Since Wheezy is frozen, please apply isolated security fixes and do not update
to a new upstream release.
BTW, is it really necessary to have both tomcat6 and tom
Package: gegl
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
please see :
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/215
Can you confirm if any of the Debian packages are affected?
Cheers,
luciano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Package: yui
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
please see :
http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2012/10/30/security-announcement-swf-vulnerability-
in-yui-2/
Are vulnerable versions in Debian?
Cheers,
luciano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 692429 blender
Bug #692429 [libpython3.3-dev] libpython3.3-dev: fatal error: pyconfig.h: No
such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package 'libpython3.3-dev' to 'blender'.
No longer marked as found in versions python3.3/3.3.0-2.
Igno
reassign 692429 blender
severity 692429 important
thanks
Am 06.11.2012 07:10, schrieb IRIE Shinsuke:
> Package: libpython3.3-dev
> Version: 3.3.0-2
> Severity: grave
>
> I attempted to build Blender trunk using python3.3-dev but got the
> following error:
>
> [ 58%] Building C object
> source/b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 674156 glib-2.0
Bug #674156 [gstreamer0.10-plugins-good] gstreamer0.10-plugins-good: rtpmp2tpay
not working on some architectures
Bug reassigned from package 'gstreamer0.10-plugins-good' to 'glib-2.0'.
Warning: Unknown package 'glib-2.0'
reassign 674156 glib-2.0
thanks,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:32:46PM +0900, Koichi Akabe wrote:
> > (gst-plugin-scanner:961): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified instance
> > size for type `GstRtpAC3Depay' is smaller than the parent type's
> > `GstBaseRTPDepayload' instance size
Digging through thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 678786 haskell-llvm-base/3.0.1.0-1
Bug #678786 {Done: Joachim Breitner }
[src:haskell-llvm-base] haskell-llvm-base: FTBFS: error: 'class
llvm::SMDiagnostic' has no member named 'Print'
No longer marked as found in versions haskell-llvm-
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> Would it be possible to get the patches noted to fix these flaws? Other
> distros would be interested in it as well (as would upstream, I
> imagine). Has this been reported upstream yet?
They have been fixed upstream. it is only a backport
64 matches
Mail list logo
