On 2012-08-12 Bruce Korb wrote:
[...]
> It would be especially helpful with:
> cd $top_builddir/autoopts/test
> make verbose TESTS=errors.test
> because it will yield the exact reason the script shot down
> its invoking autogen process. "line 5" is going to be pretty
> early on -- as in the
Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 302.17-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I had installed Sid into an available partition and X was happy with
nouveau. nvidia was functioning well under Linux Mint Xfce 13. After
installing the nvidia packages and porting the Mint xorg.conf
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 09:02 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> For the moment there is the draft proposed by Christoph at
> http://bugs.debian.org/674089#66
I should note perhaps, that this draft expected all the proposals I made
in #674205 to be in place, which they were not yet, when I've looked the
Message ---
Source: svnkit
Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 02:01:01 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Other than the changelog entry, your debdiff looks fine. It's
> completely safe to drop the patch, because upstream has already
> taken care of disabling DeprecationWarnings; if you look at the
> shebang, you'll see:
> #!/usr/bin/python -W ig
Hi Ondřej,
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Yes, I will probably add NEWS file to php5-cgi. Do you already have some
> text which can be added to release notes or we still need to cook something
> up? I would like to keep this text in sync.
For the moment there is th
* gregor herrmann , 2012-08-14, 22:19:
+ocfs2-tools (1.6.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+ [ Sébastien Villemot ]
+ * Remove popen2-ignore-depreciation-warn.patch: DeprecationWarnings are now
+ignored by default in Python 2.7, and this patch messes things up
+
Here is a patch that fixed the issue for me.
--
WBR,
Gleb Golubitsky
Gnolltechdiff --git a/memcached-2.1.0/php_memcached.c b/memcached-2.1.0/php_memcached.c
index 90ea8ab..8c097e7 100644
--- a/memcached-2.1.0/php_memcached.c
+++ b/memcached-2.1.0/php_memcached.c
@@ -2643,9 +2643,9 @@ static memca
Here is symbol dumps of both plugin and libmemcached.so
sectoid@dagon:~$ ldd /usr/lib/php5/20100525+lfs/memcached.so
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7775000)
libmemcached.so.10 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libmemcached.so.10
(0xb76ff000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0
Package: php5-memcached
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
php5-memcached extension fails to load with the following message:
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
'/usr/lib/php5/20100525+lfs/memcached.so' -
/usr/lib/ph
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 684820 linaro-image-tools nautilus-image-manipulator
Bug #684820 [python-distutils-extra] linaro-image-tools: FTBFS: AttributeError:
'tuple' object has no attribute 'major'
Added indication that 684820 affects linaro-image-tools and
naut
On 2012/3/12 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Started discussion at:
>
> http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2012-March/049596.html
Hello Mathieu,
A solution is to move targets related to wrapped languages from
VTKTargets.cmake into VTKTargets${lang}.cmake and install this file
into ${lang}-vtk. Here
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 684836 python-distutils-extra
Bug #684836 [src:nautilus-image-manipulator] nautilus-image-manipulator: FTBFS:
AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'major'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:nautilus-image-manipulator' to
'pytho
reassign 684836 python-distutils-extra
merge 682631 684836
affects 682631 nautilus-image-manipulator
thanks
This is similar to bug #682634, which most probably finds its cause in
python-distutils-extra
Cheers,
+Emilien
P.S.: this is the first time I'm reassigning and merging bugs, let me
know
rsion: 2.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot debian/rule
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:59:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#682601: fixed in scim-anthy 1.2.7-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #682601,
regarding scim-anthy setup is broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:58:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684857: fixed in profphd 1.0.39-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684857,
regarding non-free code shipped in upstream tarball
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:57:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684856: fixed in norsp 1.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684856,
regarding non-free code shipped in upstream tarball
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
1.10.12-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:58:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684781: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 304.37-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684781,
regarding nvidia-glx: CVE-2012-4225: exploitable privilege escalation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678890: fixed in prime 1.0.0.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678890,
regarding scim: fail to start scim after latest upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:57:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#682869: fixed in munin 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682869,
regarding munin: insecure/misleading apache configuration (authentication
bypass)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:57:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684170: fixed in munin 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684170,
regarding init script does not stop service
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:53:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684404: fixed in fex 20120718-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #684404,
regarding fex: fails to install, purge, and install again
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:51:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684697: fixed in clamav 0.97.5+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #684697,
regarding clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:51:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684697: fixed in clamav 0.97.5+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #684697,
regarding clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:50:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#681756: fixed in canna 3.7p3-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #681756,
regarding canna: removes files that were installed by another package:
/etc/canna/default.canna
to be marked as done.
This means that
The default install from source code (tarball) doesn't do this. Observe
/var/spool/hylafax/tmp on such an installation:
drwx-- 2 uucp uucp69632 Aug 14 10:48 tmp
So it seems to be unique to Debian package.
Thanks,
Lee.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.
Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:43:38 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#682636: racket: FTBFS: raco setup: error: during
making for scribblings/tools
has caused the Debian Bug report #682636,
regarding racket: FTBFS: raco setup: error: during making for scribblings/tools
to b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 682517 + pending
Bug #682517 [ocfs2console] ocfs2console: DeprecationWarning at start prevent
usage
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
682517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:59:17 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
> > ocfs2-tools-1.6.4/mkfs.ocfs2/mkfs.ocfs2.8
> > ocfs2-tools-1.6.4/o2image/o2image.8
> > ocfs2-tools-1.6.4/vendor/common/o2cb.init
> > which doesn't exactly matc
tags 682517 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ocfs2-tools (versioned as 1.6.4-1.1) --
well, actually Sébastien Villemot has prepared it -- and uploaded it
to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it
longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 614443
Bug #614443 {Done: Guo Yixuan } [src:boinc-app-seti]
boinc-app-seti: FTBFS: coproc.h:74:23: error: cal_boinc.h: No such file or
directory
Unarchived Bug 614443
> close 614443 6.12~svn1305-1
Bug #614443 {Done: Guo Yixuan } [src:b
gregor herrmann writes:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:05:50 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
>> >> The patch also includes fixes for packaging issues.
>> > This is not a good idea for an NMU for an RC bug during the freeze
>> The package is currently not cleaning properly (violation of policy
>> §4.
Hi
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:11:29PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Ok, with your patch a bit extended, both linaro-image-tools and
> nautilus-image-manipulator finally build! \o/
Only to confirm: works for me too.
Regards,
Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: fontconfig-config
Version: 2.9.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: debconf is not a registry
Hi,
given I like the Fixed font, I got rid of the following file a while
ago: /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf
Restarting my X session today, no more Fixed! And indeed, that file is
back.
Control: tag -1 -wheezy
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:45:50 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I can't replicate this build failure in an up to date sid chroot on
> > amd64. I built twice using sbuild, once sequentially and once with -j10
> FWIW: It also built here in 2 cowbuilder sid chroots (amd64 + i
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -wheezy
Bug #682636 [src:racket] racket: FTBFS: raco setup: error: during making for
scribblings/tools
Removed tag(s) wheezy.
--
682636: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682636
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:05:50 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> >> The patch also includes fixes for packaging issues.
> > This is not a good idea for an NMU for an RC bug during the freeze
> The package is currently not cleaning properly (violation of policy
> §4.1) and not building twice in a ro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 683371 normal
Bug #683371 [squashfs-tools] CVE-2012-4024 CVE-2012-4025
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
gregor herrmann writes:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:18:24 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> The patch also includes fixes for packaging issues.
>
> This is not a good idea for an NMU for an RC bug during the freeze
The package is currently not cleaning properly (violation of policy
§4.1) and not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 682631 + patch
Bug #682631 [python-distutils-extra] linaro-image-tools: FTBFS: AttributeError:
'tuple' object has no attribute 'major'
Bug #682634 [python-distutils-extra] nautilus-image-manipulator: FTBFS:
AttributeError: 'tuple' object ha
Control: -1 + patch
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:18:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> If I apply to the package the change we discussed[1] now the packages
> linaro-image-tools and nautilus-image-manipulator FTBFS in unstable
> with:
>
> cut-cut-cut-cut-cut---
hi, Lucas
I checked your build log.
It seems to me that you need to wait nmu fix until migrating testing
from sid.
You made dash board tells me "RC bug affecting testing only (ensure the
package migrates)"
--
++++++++++++++
Yukiharu Yabu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 684697 0.97.5+dfsg-5
Bug #684697 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Bug #684700 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Marked as found in versions clamav/0.97.5+dfsg-5.
Marked as found in versions clamav
s
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
> # I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 684697 0.97.3+dfsg-1~squeeze1
Bug #684697 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Bug #684700 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #684697 to the same valu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 684697 0.97.5+dfsg-3~squeeze1
Bug #684697 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Bug #684700 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #684697 to the same values
I just raised the severity of the bug to serious because I think this is bad
enough that it must be fixed before release.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 684697 serious
Bug #684697 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Bug #684700 [clamav] clamav: Scan error "bad format or broken data"
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thank
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:18:24 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Please find attached a patch which fixes this issue.
Thanks!
> The patch also includes fixes for packaging issues.
This is not a good idea for an NMU for an RC bug during the freeze
...
> diff -Nru ocfs2-tools-1.6.4/debian/chang
Hi Lucas,
Il 14/08/2012 09:14, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
> Source: numexpr
> Version: 2.0.1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi Lucas,
Il 14/08/2012 09:16, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
> Source: pytables
> Version: 2.3.1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
>
Sorry Mame still segfaults with mame -O3 and the latest gcc available in
debian ( I guess my build env was broken )
The package mame/0.146-2 will fix this bug tough (by recompiling with
-O2 on all arches)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
act ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wireless-regdb
Version: 2011.04.28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 684818 by 684898
Bug #684818 [src:scilab-scimax] scilab-scimax: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`src/c/libmaxima.so': No such file or directory
684818 was not blocked by any bugs.
684818 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 684818: 68
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package scilab-overload.
This release fixes #684818.
unblock scilab-scimax/2.1.4-2
The package will be able to migrate when #684898 is done (removal of
unsupported archs
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package scilab-overload.
This release fixes #684816.
unblock scilab-overload/1.3.3-3
The package will be able to migrate when #684897 is done (removal of
unsupported arch
Source: joblib
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]:
ow
about sid".
Lucas
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Source: pynn
> > Version: 0.7.2-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: wheezy sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTB
On 14 August 2012 at 14:04, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| reopen 684810
| found 684810 rgl/0.92.798-1
| fixed 684810 rgl/0.92.892-1
| thanks
|
| On 14/08/12 at 06:29 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 14 August 2012 at 09:10, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| > | Source: rgl
| > | Version: 0.92.798-1
|
On 08/13/2012 01:43 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 13.08.2012 14:10, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Package: mdadm
Version: 3.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch wheezy sid
The initramfs hook supplied by mdadm doesn't install mdmon. Also, mdmon
is not included in the .udeb for the installer.
Thi
zy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
> for PYVER in `py
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 683075 spatialite/3.1.0~rc2-1
Bug #683075 [src:spatialite] spatialite in wheezy FTBFS
Bug #684813 [src:spatialite] spatialite: FTBFS: configure: error: 'libgeos_c'
is required but it doesn't seems to be installed on this system.
Marked as f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 684822 Failed unittests due to non-functioning multiprocessing
Bug #684822 [src:nipype] nipype: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: hg: not found
Changed Bug title to 'Failed unittests due to non-functioning multiprocessing'
from 'nipype: FTBFS: /bin/sh:
* Didier Raboud:
> as the title says, update-guestfs-appliance fails when trying to install
> wheezy as it will try to install "diff" while it has been replaced by
> "diffutils".
In what way does it fail? Do you get an error message?
> Furthermore, as this initially fails, after modifying
> /usr
ersion: 0.5.3-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
> Hi,
> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
> build on amd64.
> Rel
t; User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
> Hi,
> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
> build on amd64.
> Relevant part:
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
&g
Package: beaker
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/pylons-devel/zOx8OhIDru4[1-25]
Remember we're in freeze, so please fix this in sid through the isolated fix
instead of
updating to 1.6.4.
Cheers,
Package: eglibc
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-3480
for more details.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Package: libguestfs0
Version: 1:1.18.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
as the title says, update-guestfs-appliance fails when trying to install
wheezy as it will try to install "diff" while it has been replaced by
"diffutils".
Furthermore, as this initially fails, after modifying
/usr/lib/guestfs/packag
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I also found https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/18239 which might imply
> > that Django is relying on some internals of HTMLParser so it would
> > actually be a bug in Django in that case...
>
> I see a fix for this in the django upstream issue. Is
reopen 684810
found 684810 rgl/0.92.798-1
fixed 684810 rgl/0.92.892-1
thanks
On 14/08/12 at 06:29 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 14 August 2012 at 09:10, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | Source: rgl
> | Version: 0.92.798-1
>^^
>
> The current version of rgl in Debina 0.92.89
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 684810
Bug #684810 {Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel } [src:rgl] rgl: FTBFS:
types.h:98:5: error: 'copy' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations
were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation
[-fpermissive]
Bug
reassign 681687 evince
tag 681687 - wontfix
thanks
Ian Jackson A B F
Russ Allbery B A F
Don ArmstrongB A F
Bdale Garbee B A F
Steve Langasek B A F
Colin Watson B A F
B wins, defeating A by 5:1 and F by 6:0. The outcome was no longer in
doubt some time ago.
The TC has ther
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm calling for votes on the following proposal. There are
> three options - two positive versions, and FD. In summary
> A. Do not overrule release team. It is too late for automation.
> B. Do not overrule release team. Defer to
>> Dear maintainer,
>> trying to install the headers for 3.5 on Debian Wheezy I've noticed,
>> the package linux-kbuild-3.5 is not available in the repository. Are
>> there any problems with linux-tools for 3.5?
> [...]
>
> I haven't got round to updating it for 3.5. It will need some changes.
OK
On 02.08.2012 14:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> If the problem is indeed not in Django, then we can temporarily disable
>>> the test suite and upload the package.
>>
>> I just tried to build the current pyt
8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBU
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 683075 src:spatialite
Bug #683075 {Done: peter green } [spatialite] spatialite
in wheezy FTBFS
Bug reassigned from package 'spatialite' to 'src:spatialite'.
No longer marked as found in versions 3.0.0~beta20110817-3.
No longer marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 683984 -upstream
Bug #683984 [libapache2-mod-rpaf] libapache2-mod-rpaf: potential Denial of
Service
Removed tag(s) upstream.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683984: http://bugs.debian
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > While reattaching works fine after applying the patch from
> > http://bugs.debian.org/683228, remotely detaching a still attached
> > screen (as necessary before a reattach) shows the same behaviour as
> > without patch:
JFTR: Resizing the terminal (i.e. the WINCH signal) i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 684813 683075
Bug #684813 [src:spatialite] spatialite: FTBFS: configure: error: 'libgeos_c'
is required but it doesn't seems to be installed on this system.
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #683075 is 'spatialite' not 'src:spat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 684820 python-distutils-extra
Bug #684820 [src:linaro-image-tools] linaro-image-tools: FTBFS: AttributeError:
'tuple' object has no attribute 'major'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linaro-image-tools' to
'python-distutils-extra'.
No l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
The bug is no longer appearing, today everything works again.
I have made no modifications at all, the last thing I did yesterday
was running apt-mirror and it crashed. First thing today was to run
the same command and it works.
Might be a good i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 684808 +patch
Bug #684808 [src:mapserver] mapserver: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lstdc++
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 683984 +patch
Bug #683984 [libapache2-mod-rpaf] libapache2-mod-rpaf: potential Denial of
Service
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
the cause.
Best regards,
Tobias Hansen
Am 14.08.2012 09:04, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Source: bsnes
> Version: 0.088-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> H
tags 684808 +patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Source: mapserver
> Version: 6.0.1-3.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> Du
Hi,
This issue is a missing build-dependency on
php-xml-parser, as reported in Launchpad. In fact I
was surprise not to receive such bug report earlier.
I will fix this very soon (probably tonight).
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Hi,
> > Yeah, reproduced here, and looking into it right now. I have a hunch
> > I've already fixed this in my 1.17.x branch, though.
>
> Ok, I fixed this locally and been running some tests, will do some
> more tests and ponder a bit about the implications of the fix before
> pushing to master.
Package: funkload
Version: 1.16.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Most of the fl-* binaries don't start:
$ fl-run-test
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fl-run-test", line 24, in
main()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/funkload/TestRunner.
* Lucas Nussbaum , 2012-08-14, 09:10:
Downloading
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/greenlet/greenlet-0.4.0.zip#md5=87887570082caadc08fb1f8671dbed71
Oops! This is caused by #640577, which has been fixed, but the fix has
never migrated to testing (due to #665890).
eventlet maintainers
erious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 684867 important
Bug #684867 [src:qt4-x11] qt4-x11: binNMU affects qt4-x11 co-installability
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> forcemerge 684556 684867
Bug #684556 [src:qt4-x11] src:qt4-x11: multiarch build broken
Bug #684678 [
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your quick response. Just let me know if I could be of any
help.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:38:41AM +, Hildebrandt, Prof. Dr. Andreas wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thanks for your mail and the explanations. We are currently working on
> unta
> This bug is against conntrackd where the problem resides in libnfnetlink,
> therefore I'll reassign this bug. Also this bug does not affect everybody so
> it is possible to argue if it is really grave, but I'll leave it now as it
> is.
Ok, i'm quite noob reporting bugs, i'm sorry.
> It probably
Source: qt4-x11
Version: 4:4.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
qt4-x11 4:4.8.2-2 was binNMU'd to solve #684177, but this is causing issues of
its own for multiarch users, and will presumably need a sourceful upload.
Jon
tail from today's 'apt-get dist-upgrade':
Preparing to
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:07 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
> build on amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
> > gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLOCALEDIR='"/usr/share/locale"' -I.
> > -I.. -I. -I. -I../lib -I.. -I./../libelf -std=gnu9
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your mail and the explanations. We are currently working on
untangling the patches, but it's pretty nontrivial. I hope we'll have a
better patch ready later today. The current commit was just to test if the
current version of BALL would compile on testing at all (which seems
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
