Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:47:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683647: fixed in logol 1.5.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #683647,
regarding logol: creates world writable directory: /var/lib/logol/results
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:10:16 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during piuparts dist-upgrade tests I noticed problems upgrading from
> squeeze if gcj-4.4 is installed. gcj-4.4 was recently removed from sid
> and testing and there is no clean upgrade path and apt decides to keep
> gcc-4.4-base at
Hi,
I've done some checking and the problems so far have all occurred on
motherboards with SATA. The most current motherboard has both SATA and
IDE and puts the CD which is on IDE as primary (Drive0) on primary
controller and the SATA HD as slave on secondary IDE controller (which
this board
Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:03:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683665: fixed in openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #683665,
regarding openvswitch-pki: creates world writable directories:
/var/lib/openvswitch/pki/*ca/incoming/
to be marked as
Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:03:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#680824: fixed in xdotool 1:2.20110530.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #680824,
regarding xdotool: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in
`require': cannot load such file -- xdo_test_h
Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:03:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#642404: fixed in xdotool 1:2.20110530.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #642404,
regarding package ftbfs on i386 (test failures)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
last patch doesn't apply against current version
--- spamassassin-3.3.2-fixed/debian/rules 2012-08-02 04:30:09.987660001
+
+++ spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/rules 2012-06-15 06:52:38.0 +
@@ -112,8 +112,7 @@
# dh_installdocs isn't flexible enough to install all the docs to the
right pla
hod: CD
Image version: netinst alpha1, netinst daily 20120802-7
Date:
Machine: Various
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [ ]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network: [
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 680236 with 596284
Bug #680236 [debirf] debirf: fails to generate minimal image of wheezy on
wheezy as a normal user
680236 was not blocked by any bugs.
680236 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 680236: 596284
> thanks
Stop
Hi,
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
> I can understand the reasons not to fix the trigger bug, sounds like
> something not that tricky.
>
> However, given how it actually break the upgrade process, and will like
> likely in the future, it would probably be a good idea to document
> somewhere f
reassign 677582 general
thanks
I can't see how this is an issue for the gcc-4.4 source package. Therefore
reassigning to general to find a more appropriate package, maybe apt?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2012 01:29:59 +0200
with message-id <501b0d77.4020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: gcc-4.4: FTBFS: libio.h:364: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
has caused the Debian Bug report #676733,
regarding gcc-4.4: FTBFS: libio.h:364: internal compiler error: S
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 23:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678752: fixed in scim-unikey 0.3.1+debian-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678752,
regarding scim-unikey: FTBFS: unikey_setup.cpp:27:43: error: 'GTK_OBJECT' was
not declared in this scope
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677582 general
Bug #677582 [gcc-4.4-base] gcc-4.4-base: upgrade problems since removal of
gcj-4.4
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.4-base' to 'general'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-4.4/4.4.7-1.
Ignoring request to alter f
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libcatalyst-perl
Bug #683656 [libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl]
libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl: should this be removed? merged into
libcatalyst-perl
Bug reassigned from package 'libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl' to
'libcatalyst-perl
Control: reassign -1 libcatalyst-perl
Control: found -1 5.90013-2
Control: retitle -1 libcatalyst-perl: Drop erroneous and harmful
Conflicts/Provides/Replaces on libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl
COntrol: affects -1 libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Thu, 02
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683294: fixed in python3-defaults 3.2.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683294,
regarding bpython: python3 shebang after rebuild
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683294: fixed in python3-defaults 3.2.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683294,
regarding python3: don't rewrite python shebangs to python3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683294: fixed in python3-defaults 3.2.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683294,
regarding ipython: python3 shebangs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
tags 679840 + patch
thanks
Hi Jonathan,
I prepared a new version to fix this RC bug so we hopefully could get
something above 0.5.4 in wheeze.
After pondering a long time on how we could get the modprobe checks
working in a chroot. I finally think we don't need them at all.
We have iptables as
Processing control commands:
> tags 681194 + patch
Bug #681194 [debhelper] dh_installcatalogs: "catalog is now a conffile prompt"
if the old (pre-conffile) package was removed, but not purged
Added tag(s) patch.
--
681194: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681194
Debian Bug Track
Control: tags 681194 + patch
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:59:16AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The preinst contains
> if [ "$1" = "upgrade" ] && ! dpkg-query -S /etc/sgml/jade.cat >/dev/null
> 2>&1; then
> which handles regular upgrades, but the preinst will be called
>install
> if the p
On 2 August 2012 22:28, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, David Watson wrote:
> > Attached is a patch that I have used to build the package on 2.7.3~rc2
> and
> > 2.7.3.
>
> Looks like you forgot the attachment, and please send it to the bug
> (reply-to set).
>
> Cheers,
> --
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:06:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683597: fixed in python-whois 0.6.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683597,
regarding python-whois: Wrong json import
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:16:25PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Even if an ordinary local user cannot list the contents of the
> directory, he may correctly derive/guess filenames (unless they are
> exclusively $(mktemp)) and delete and replace files in there.
>
> I don't know how openvswitch-
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 22:38:13 +0200, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Le 02/08/2012 20:03, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >>diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog
> >>--- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog 2012-06-20 23:55:23.0 +0200
> >>+++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog
Le 02/08/2012 20:03, Julien Cristau a écrit :
diff -Nru gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog
--- gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog 2012-06-20 23:55:23.0 +0200
+++ gnunet-0.9.3/debian/changelog 2012-08-01 22:10:06.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+gnunet (0.9
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 08:04:17 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:40:44PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> > If it is still possible, please do accept the NMU for mootools, which
> > makes it buildable in wheezy, then please undo removals for packages
> > wims/4.03a
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 13:14:14 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> FWIW, I can't reproduce the bug here.
> I don't have the libsqlite3-dev package installed, only libsqlite3-0.
>
Same here, libsqlite3.so.0 gets loaded properly AFAICT.
> plugins/symbol-db/symbol-db-engine-core.c
> does h
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
> this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
> Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following
Hi
>From what I understand, the latest fabric does not depend on paramiko at
all but rather a paramiko fork ("successor" by the fabric developers,
not in debian it would seem) and we patch fabric to use paramiko
instead, which does not have all the stuff in the fork.
>From the backtrace it seems
Original Message
Subject: openvswitch world writable directories (CVE-2012-3449)
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:08:37 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried
To: oss-secur...@lists.openwall.com ,
deb...@abeckmann.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abe
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Henri Salo wrote:
> Hello Raphael,
>
> After applying these patches my applications in Django and Django itself
> function normally. I did test this with normal amount of traffic. Do you
> think I should try to reproduce the security-issues? Patches are pretty
> much 1:1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:41:53PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
> The stable update is ready here. Henri, please test it and report back
> whether it works well for you.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/python-django_1.2.3-3+squeeze3_i386.changes
>
> I'm ccing the release tea
Package: amule
Version: 2.3.1-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
When launching amule from CLI this message appear :
2012-08-02 20:32:20: Initialising aMule 2.3.1 compiled with wxGTK2 v2.8.12
2012-08-02 20:32:20: Checking if there is an instance already r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 683671 serious
Bug #683671 [dash] dash doesn't ignore SIGINT when running an interactive
command
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> # not Debian-specific
> tags 683671 + upstream moreinfo
Bug #683671 [dash] dash doesn't ignore SIGI
severity 683671 serious
# not Debian-specific
tags 683671 + upstream moreinfo
quit
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Can you explain that more precisely? At first glance it seems like an
ordinary important bug.
[...]
> [*] http:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 19:51:46 +0200, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Le 01/08/2012 23:17, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >It's much easier for us if we don't have to go chase patches in other
> >places and stuff is all in the mail.
>
> Here is the full debdiff between gnunet 0.9.3-2 (in
> testing/unstable)
Le 01/08/2012 23:17, Julien Cristau a écrit :
It's much easier for us if we don't have to go chase patches in other
places and stuff is all in the mail.
Here is the full debdiff between gnunet 0.9.3-2 (in testing/unstable)
and the new revision I prepared.
Cheers,
Bertrand
diff -Nru gnunet-0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Package: octave-odepkg
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'octave-odepkg'
Limit currently set to 'package':'octave-odepkg'
> Severity 664797 grave
Bug #664797 [octave-odepkg] octave-odepkg: Crashes in test suite at
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
When running an interactive command, dash doesn't ignore SIGINT
and SIGQUIT.
For instance, here's what I get with Emacs 24 (not a previous
version, since previously, Emacs had its own progress group,
so tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # doesn't affect versions <= sid
> tags 683568 + experimental
Bug #683568 [git] git: NO_HARDLINKS broke in 1.7.11 (renamed to
NO_INSTALL_HARDLINKS)
Added tag(s) experimental.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
# doesn't affect versions <= sid
tags 683568 + experimental
quit
Hi,
Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> Version: 1:1.7.11-1~exp0
This version was never uploaded to the Debian archive, so I hope we
can get away with any temporary migration code tweaks being
PPA-specific (because I really want to get rid of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 683451 + unreproducible
Bug #683451 [rawstudio] rawstudio: segmentation fault. For bug reporting
instructions, please see:
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity 683451 important
Bug #683451 [rawstudio] rawstudio: segmentation fault. For bu
Package: openvswitch-pki
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
openvswitch-pki creates the following world writable directories during
installation:
drwx-wx-wx 2 root root 40 Aug 1 05:32
/var/lib/openvswitch/pki/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 683655 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681081
Bug #683655 [gnome-keyring] gnome-keyring: gpg passphrase cached forever
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681081'.
> thanks
Stopping pro
[Norbert Preining]
> $ svn up
> Updating '.':
> svn: E170001: Unable to connect to a repository at URL
> 'svn://u...@server.org/some/path'
> svn: E170001: Could not create SASL context: generic failure: No such file or
> directory
>
> The same happens with svn+ssh://... on svn.debian.org
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 677558 + pending
Bug #677558 [netgen] Fix build with oce 0.10
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 644069 + pending
Bug #644069 [src:netgen] netgen: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not
libjpeg62-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping proce
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, David Watson wrote:
> Hi Raphaël,
>
> The attached patch should use the correct version of HTMLParser, it will
> use the python version for 2.6.8 and above in the 2.6 series, and 2.7.3 and
> above in the 2.7 series.
Except it does it only for the tests... what we really want
Package: libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: uninstallable in sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl is no longer installable in sid
as it was merged into libcatalyst-perl [1
Slightly different settings, but similar behaviour here:
$ gsettings list-recursively org.gnome.crypto.cache
org.gnome.crypto.cache gpg-cache-authorize false
org.gnome.crypto.cache gpg-cache-method 'timeout'
org.gnome.crypto.cache gpg-cache-ttl 60
Roland.
--
Roland Mas
Despite rumour, Death isn
The actual assigned CVE name for this issue was CVE-2012-3448:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/02/1
--
Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On 2 August 2012 15:25, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, David Watson wrote:
> > > I have just successfully built the package under python 2.7.3 by using
> the
> > > HTMLParser from python rather than Django's version.
> >
> > OK then l
Package: gnome-keyring
Version: 3.4.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
At some point gnome-keyring seemed to obey the configuration asking it
to stop caching passphrases after a while. It no longer does.
$ gsettings list-recursively org.gnome.crypto.cache
org.gn
Package: zabbix-frontend-php
Version: 1:2.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the sever
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 683648 python-django/1.2.3-3+squeeze2
Bug #683648 [python-django] Django's HTMLParser incompatible with python 2.7.3
No longer marked as found in versions python-django/1.2.3-3+squeeze2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, David Watson wrote:
> > I have just successfully built the package under python 2.7.3 by using the
> > HTMLParser from python rather than Django's version.
>
> OK then let's clone a new bug to track this issue separately.
And let'
Package: extplorer
Version: 2.1.0b6+dfsg.3-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed that your packages creates a world
writable directory:
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 60 Aug 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 683364 -1
Bug #683364 {Done: Raphaël Hertzog } [python-django]
CVE-2012-3442/CVE-2012-3443/CVE-2012-3444: Django 1.3.1 and 1.4.0 security
issues
Bug 683364 cloned as bug 683648
> retitle -1 Django's HTMLParser incompatible with python 2.7.
clone 683364 -1
retitle -1 Django's HTMLParser incompatible with python 2.7.3
severity -1 serious
tag -1 = sid
reopen -1
thanks
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, David Watson wrote:
> I have just successfully built the package under python 2.7.3 by using the
> HTMLParser from python rather than Django's versio
Package: logol
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed that your packages creates a world
writable directory:
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 40 Jul 1 21:59 /var/li
I have just successfully built the package under python 2.7.3 by using the
HTMLParser from python rather than Django's version.
--
David Watson
dwat...@debian.org
On 2 August 2012 13:16, David Watson wrote:
> On 2 August 2012 13:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Her
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 683294 + pending
Bug #683294 [python3] python3: don't rewrite python shebangs to python3
Bug #683107 [python3] bpython: python3 shebang after rebuild
Bug #683108 [python3] ipython: python3 shebangs
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:18:47 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #683005,
regarding FTBFS on mips: Caught signal 'Terminated'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:18:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#679874: fixed in qt4-x11 4:4.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679874,
regarding qt4-dev-tools: assistant crashes when compiled with GCC 4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:13:17 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #683020,
regarding FTBFS on mipsel: undefined reference to `gzopen64@ZLIB_1.2.3.3'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:12:37 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #683018,
regarding FTBFS on mips: undefined reference to `gzopen64@ZLIB_1.2.3.3'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:11:47 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #683017,
regarding FTBFS on ia64 and mips: undefined reference to `gzopen64@ZLIB_1.2.3.3'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:56:44 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #683019,
regarding FTBFS on mipsel: undefined reference to `gzopen64@ZLIB_1.2.3.3'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Hi Emmanuel,
I got this serious bug report b/c of some changes in the makeindex
module. The output routine of rubber uses absolute paths when calling
makeindex. Could you comment on this and eventually send a patch, so
the bug can be fixed for wheezy?
According to Sebastian Ramacher the problem h
On 2 August 2012 13:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > If the problem is indeed not in Django, then we can temporarily disable
> > > the test suite and upload the package.
> >
> > I just tried to build the
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > If the problem is indeed not in Django, then we can temporarily disable
> > the test suite and upload the package.
>
> I just tried to build the current python-django 1.4-1 in Debian Sid and it
> also fai
Hi,
I have the same problem. I run unstable and upgrade frequently. I
noticed this on 8/1/12, and everything was fine over weekend.
I cannot do a fresh checkout with svn+ssh, nor an update on an existing
checkout, with the same error that Norbert is reporting.
ii subversion
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:03:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683364: fixed in python-django 1.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683364,
regarding CVE-2012-3442/CVE-2012-3443/CVE-2012-3444: Django 1.3.1 and 1.4.0
security issues
to be marked as done.
This means th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 682979 normal
Bug #682979 [xcp-xapi] xcp-xapi: VM not starting, tasks not cancellable
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
682979: http://bugs.deb
Hi Andreas,
I don't think this happens always, and that this "renders the package
unusable", otherwise a lot of people would know. This must be a
miss-configuration, somehow, on your side, because I haven't see this.
Also, you aren't giving any details of what you are doing exactly (eg:
the seque
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #526478,
regarding xcdroast: complains about cdrecord even with dummy-package cdrecord
installed
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #526478,
regarding xcdroast: Failed to access cdrecord
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #526478,
regarding xcdroast: Failed to access cdrecord
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #523639,
regarding xcdroast: Failed to access cdrecord
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #523639,
regarding xcdroast: complains about cdrecord even with dummy-package cdrecord
installed
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #523639,
regarding xcdroast: Failed to access cdrecord
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #517411,
regarding xcdroast: Failed to access cdrecord
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #517411,
regarding xcdroast: complains about cdrecord even with dummy-package cdrecord
installed
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:36:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#683553: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #517411,
regarding xcdroast: Failed to access cdrecord
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I attach my failed build log for reference. Now I'll go prepare the stable
> upload in the mean time.
The stable update is ready here. Henri, please test it and report back
whether it works well for you.
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> If the problem is indeed not in Django, then we can temporarily disable
> the test suite and upload the package.
I just tried to build the current python-django 1.4-1 in Debian Sid and it
also failed. So this tends to confirm that something else broke
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 683364 + pending
Bug #683364 [python-django] CVE-2012-3442/CVE-2012-3443/CVE-2012-3444: Django
1.3.1 and 1.4.0 security issues
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #683364 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 14:19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> > > W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711,
> > > which I'm not
I prepared a package for a NMU and created sponsorship request #683150.
Then Bart Martens and me discussed if my fix (a preinst script for
libcap-bin cleanly removing the pam module) is appropriate. The problem
is that squeeze users with libcap-bin will lose the pam module when
upgrading. This coul
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 683364 grave
Bug #683364 [python-django] CVE-2012-3442/CVE-2012-3443/CVE-2012-3444: Django
1.3.1 and 1.4.0 security issues
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Package: gcc-mingw-w64
Version: 4.6.3-5+6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
If you upgrade gcc-mingw-w64 from a version in which
/usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw-w64 is a real directory (i.e., << 4.6.3),
you'll end up with this:
$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw-w64
total 0
This is because
Package: python-whois
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
it looks like this package won't work on a default Wheezy install
(ie. with python-2.7).
In whois/_1_query.py it tries to import simplejson, which by default
is not installed:
"""
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> #680931 has been fixed by the latest gcc download, so I don't believe
> that the workaround upload for Armadillo is necessary.
Thanks Kumar. The latest gcc-4.7 package (version 4.7.1-6) fixed the
problem. I guess a binNMU for DOLFIN is needed
Hi Bart
On 08/02/2012 07:35 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> About your package "freefoam" at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-01 08:37.
> If nobody increases the bug severities to at least "important" then I suggest
> that you reduce the changes to what is likely acceptable for an unbl
Package: pyside-tools
Version: 0.2.14-1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I can confirm that this bug is present on the Debian
GNU/Linux testing/sid system too:
csanyipal@debian-asztal:~$ sudo aptitude install pyside-tools
The following NEW packages will be installed:
pyside-too
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #676659 {Done: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz } [liferea]
liferea database grows larger and larger
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
--
676659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676659
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2012 07:32:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664724: fixed in rrdtool 1.4.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #664724,
regarding rrdcached: fails to install, postinst, invoke-rc.d rrdcached start,
start-stop-daemon, segfault
to be marked as done.
This
98 matches
Mail list logo
