Processed: Reassign Bug#666959 to src:pfstools

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 666959 src:pfstools 1.8.1-2 Bug #666959 [src:pfstools] pfstools: Adjust for the new octave package version 3.6.1 Ignoring request to reassign bug #666959 to the same package Bug #666959 [src:pfstools] pfstools: Adjust for the new octave

Bug#675306: libdbus-c++-dev: fails to upgrade from 'squeeze' - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/dbusxx-xml2cpp

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libdbus-c++-dev Version: 0.9.0-5 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'squeeze'. It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite fil

Bug#675304: upgrade from 5.1.61-3 to 5.5.23+dfsg-2 broke amarok

2012-05-30 Thread Erwan David
Package: mysql-common Version: 5.5.23+dfsg-2 Severity: critical Since upgrading to 5.5.23+dfsg-2, I get following amarok error The amarok database reported the following errors: GREPME MySQLe query failed! (2000) on init In most cases you will need to resolve these errors before Amarok will run

Processed: fixed 674937 in 1.1.12p7-1

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 674937 1.1.12p7-1 Bug #674937 [check-mk-multisite] check-mk-multisite: .postinst broken Marked as fixed in versions check-mk/1.1.12p7-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674937: http://bugs.de

Bug#675301: license of palp 1.1

2012-05-30 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:48:14AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > The problem has been settled for 2.1 since a few days. See my package page > on mentors! I already wrote on the bug report that "the problem does not apply to version 2.1-1 at mentors. Uploaded: 2012-05-30 13:20". So I don't know wh

Bug#674937: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#674937: check-mk-multisite: .postinst broken

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: check-mk-multisite > Followup-For: Bug #674937 > > Hi, > > > chown: cannot access `/etc/check_mk/conf.d': No such file or directory > > thats a duplicate of http://bugs.debian.org/649316 > and can be fixed by updating the backport of chec

Bug#670422: libstarpu-dev: uninstallable in sid: too strict gcc dependency

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libstarpu-dev Version: 1.0.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #670422 Hi, libstarpu-dev is still uninstallable Package: libstarpu-dev Version: 1.0.1-1 Depends: ..., gcc-4.6 (= 4.6.3), ... That gcc version does not exist ... I attach a small patch that changes the depedencies to * Depends: gcc-4.6

Processed (with 1 errors): Reassign Bug#666959 to src:pfstools

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package pfstools Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'pfstools' Limit currently set to 'package':'pfstools' > reassign 666959 src:pfstools 1.8.1-2 Bug #666959 [pfstools] pfstools: Adjust for the new octave package ver

Bug#674937: check-mk-multisite: .postinst broken

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: check-mk-multisite Followup-For: Bug #674937 Hi, > chown: cannot access `/etc/check_mk/conf.d': No such file or directory thats a duplicate of http://bugs.debian.org/649316 and can be fixed by updating the backport of check-mk-multisite to the latest version from testing. Andreas -

Bug#675275: marked as done (phpunit-selenium: fails to install, trying to overwrite other packages files: /usr/share/php/PHPUnit/Extensions/SeleniumTestCase.php)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 05:48:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675275: fixed in phpunit-selenium 1.2.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #675275, regarding phpunit-selenium: fails to install, trying to overwrite other packages files: /usr/share/php/PHPUnit/Extensions/Sel

Bug#675301: license of palp 1.1

2012-05-30 Thread Julien Puydt
The problem has been settled for 2.1 since a few days. See my package page on mentors! Snark on #debian-science and #debian-mentors -- Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté. Bart Martens a écrit : Hello Harald, Please read the following bug report. http://

Bug#675301: license of palp 1.1

2012-05-30 Thread Bart Martens
Hello Harald, Please read the following bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675301 It would be nice if you would agree that the part "The package must be distributed as a whole, including this file." in the file COPYING no longer applies to version 1.1 of palp. I would a

Bug#667215: marked as done (jffi: ftbfs with GCC-4.7)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 05:17:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667215: fixed in jffi 1.0.2-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #667215, regarding jffi: ftbfs with GCC-4.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#675301: palp: non-free license and copyright/license violation

2012-05-30 Thread Bart Martens
Package: palp Severity: serious Version: 1.1-1.1 The file COPYING in the source package contains this: The package must be distributed as a whole, including this file. The file COPYING is not shipped in the binary package. http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/palp/filelist /usr/lib/palp/class

Bug#674306: marked as done (gcc-4.7: FTBFS: tests failed)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ing files) libobjc4 - Runtime library for GNU Objective-C applications libobjc4-dbg - Runtime library for GNU Objective-C applications (debug symbols) libquadmath0 - GCC Quad-Precision Math Library libquadmath0-dbg - GCC Quad-Precision Math Library (debug symbols) libstdc++6 - GNU Standard

Bug#672525: marked as done (blackbox: FTBFS[any-i386]: symbol changes)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 03:32:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672525: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #672525, regarding blackbox: FTBFS[any-i386]: symbol changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#675298: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#675298: ugene: FTBFS in experimental: reverseInPlace' was not declared in this scope

2012-05-30 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:01:13AM +0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Package: ugene > Version: 1.9.8+repack-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > src/bowtie/alphabet.h:49:3: error: 'reverseInPlace' was not declared in this > scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent l

Bug#675298: ugene: FTBFS in experimental: reverseInPlace' was not declared in this scope

2012-05-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: ugene Version: 1.9.8+repack-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: experimental User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7 Hello, ugene currently FTBFS in experimental: src/bowtie/alphabet.h:49:3: error: 'reverseInPlace' was not declared in this scope, and no dec

Bug#674612: marked as done (openvas-server: Install fails due to post-installation error)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 02:53:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#674612: fixed in openvas-server 2.0.3-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #674612, regarding openvas-server: Install fails due to post-installation error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#669518: marked as done (btanks: FTBFS: Checking for zlibVersion() in C library z... no)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 02:47:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#669518: fixed in btanks 0.9.8083-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #669518, regarding btanks: FTBFS: Checking for zlibVersion() in C library z... no to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#675295: matanza: FTBFS in experimental: format not a string literal and no format arguments

2012-05-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: matanza Version: 0.13+ds1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: experimental User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7 Hello, matanza currently FTBFS in experimental: ./matanza.w:1509:1: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format

Processed: tagging 674305, found 674305 in 3.1.0-alpha2-1

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 674305 + experimental Bug #674305 {Done: Anton Gladky } [src:eigen3] eigen3: FTBFS: KdBVH.h:60:7: error: 'bounding_box' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiati

Bug#675294: installation-reports: "No disk drive was detected" during 6.0 install

2012-05-30 Thread Mike Bianchi
Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable While installing squeeze from a netinstall cd, after entering the user name and password, the message "No disk drive was detected" came up with a list of driver names. The drive is a new SATA 6.0Gb/s

Bug#675293: juffed: FTBFS in experimental: converting 'false' to pointer type

2012-05-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: juffed Version: 0.9.1137-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: experimental User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7 Hello, The experimental version of juffed currently FTBFS: /tmp/buildd/juffed-0.9.1137/src/lib/Document.cpp: In static member function 'static

Bug#675291: FTBFS: symbols errors on any-i386

2012-05-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Source: eris Version: 1.3.19-3.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hello, eris currently FTBFS on any-i386 due to yet more symbol issues, see logs on http://buildd.debian.org/eris e.g.: +#MISSING: 1.3.19-3.1# (optional)_ZSt13copy_backwardISsESt15_Deque_iteratorIT_RS1_PS1_ES0_IS1_RKS1_PS5_E

Bug#675290: mlterm: FTBFS in sid: /usr/lib/libscim-1.0.so: No such file or directory

2012-05-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: mlterm Version: 3.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hello, See http://buildd.debian.org/mlterm : it failed to build on almost all arches, probably due to multi-arch path: g++ -I../../kiklib/include -I../../mkf/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ss

Bug#673256: marked as done (openbabel: FTBFS in sid: Could NOT find PkgConfig)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 01:35:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673256: fixed in openbabel 2.3.1+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #673256, regarding openbabel: FTBFS in sid: Could NOT find PkgConfig to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#674343: marked as done (openwalnut: FTBFS: WModuleOutputForwardData.h:106:9: error: 'updateData' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 01:03:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#674343: fixed in openwalnut 1.2.5-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #674343, regarding openwalnut: FTBFS: WModuleOutputForwardData.h:106:9: error: 'updateData' was not declared in this scope, and no declara

Bug#674343: add patch

2012-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 674343 + patch thanks diff -Nru openwalnut-1.2.5/debian/changelog openwalnut-1.2.5/debian/changelog --- openwalnut-1.2.5/debian/changelog 2011-09-27 13:10:02.0 +0200 +++ openwalnut-1.2.5/debian/changelog 2012-05-30 16:20:16.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +openwalnut (1.2.5-1.1) u

Processed: add patch

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 674343 + patch Bug #674343 [src:openwalnut] openwalnut: FTBFS: WModuleOutputForwardData.h:106:9: error: 'updateData' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation

Processed: Bug #674488 seems to be a serious one

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 674488 serious Bug #674488 [cdrom] Debian testing weekly CD images (i386, amd64) fail to install the base system (starting from 21-May-2012) Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Bug#671064: closed by Hilko Bengen (Bug#671064: fixed in nmap 5.51.6-0.3)

2012-05-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 31/05/12 00:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > #671064: nmap: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' undeclared > It has been closed by Hilko Bengen . Ah, I'm too late! I just came up with a patch to fix the testcase that caused both these issues. I've attached it anyway in case this

Bug#675287: apt-dater: FTBFS on !linux archs

2012-05-30 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: apt-dater Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hello, apt-dater currently FTBFS on !linux archs, e.g.: i486-gnu-gcc -Wall -DPKGLIBDIR='"'/usr/lib/apt-dater'"' -Wl -o apt-dater apt-dater.o colors.o exec.o keyfiles.o lock.o parsecmd.o report.o screen.o sighandler.o

Bug#669473: marked as done (django-celery: FTBFS: tests failed)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 23:33:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#669473: fixed in django-celery 2.5.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #669473, regarding django-celery: FTBFS: tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#671064: marked as done (nmap: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' undeclared )

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 23:20:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#671064: fixed in nmap 5.51.6-0.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #671064, regarding nmap: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'CLOCK_MONOTONIC' undeclared to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#674302: marked as done (ricochet: FTBFS: /bin/bash: nickle: command not found)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 23:05:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#674302: fixed in ricochet 0.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #674302, regarding ricochet: FTBFS: /bin/bash: nickle: command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#622788: marked as done (sbuild: Removes versioned virtual build-conflicts)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 23:05:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#622788: fixed in sbuild 0.63.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #622788, regarding sbuild: Removes versioned virtual build-conflicts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#675279: jffnms: fails to upgrade from squeeze: Duplicate column name 'dmii_up'

2012-05-30 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:17:49AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > mysql said: ERROR 1060 (42S21) at line 32: Duplicate column name 'dmii_up' Hmm, its got the old update script. OK, shouldn't be too hard to fix. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.

Bug#672356: marked as done (libspread-perl: DynaLoader now requires versions to be numbers, Spread.pm uses a string.)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 22:20:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672356: fixed in spread 3.17.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #672356, regarding libspread-perl: DynaLoader now requires versions to be numbers, Spread.pm uses a string. to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#675279: jffnms: fails to upgrade from squeeze: Duplicate column name 'dmii_up'

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: jffnms Version: 0.9.3-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'squeeze'. It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails. >From the attached log (scroll to the bo

Bug#675278: php5-suhosin: fails to upgrade from squeeze

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: php5-suhosin Version: 0.9.33-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'squeeze'. It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails. >From the attached log (scroll to

Bug#675277: icinga-idoutils: fails to install, remove, and install again

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: icinga-idoutils Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install, remove (but not purge), and install again. Before the second installation the package is in config-files-remain

Bug#672085: marked as done (qof: FTBFS: md5.c:119:2: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing])

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 21:51:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672085: fixed in qof 0.8.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #672085, regarding qof: FTBFS: md5.c:119:2: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing] to

Bug#568362: upstream moved

2012-05-30 Thread Philipp Kern
So one problem is that it ships an outdated kernel module in usbip-source which should simply be dropped. The module is even activated in the Debian kernel, despite its staging status. But the other is that upstream moved into the kernel: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stab

Bug#675275: phpunit-selenium: fails to install, trying to overwrite other packages files: /usr/share/php/PHPUnit/Extensions/SeleniumTestCase.php

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: phpunit-selenium Version: 1.2.6-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a Breaks/Replaces relation. See policy 7.

Bug#675196: marked as done (swig2.0: swig2.0/2.0.7 simply segfault)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 21:30:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675196: fixed in swig2.0 2.0.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #675196, regarding swig2.0: swig2.0/2.0.7 simply segfault to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#675271: nova-common: fails to remove: pre-removal script returned error exit status 10

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: nova-common Version: 2012.1-5 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Removing nova-common ... dpkg: error processing nova-common

Processed: tagging 675235, severity of 675235 is important

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 675235 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug #675235 [libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-0] miro: fails to start: undefined symbol Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. > severity 675235 important Bug #675235 [libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-0] miro: fails to sta

Bug#675111: marked as done (merkaartor: Uploading changes to OpenStreetMap fails (404 Error))

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 22:46:24 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#675111: merkaartor: Uploading changes to OpenStreetMap fails (404 Error) has caused the Debian Bug report #675111, regarding merkaartor: Uploading changes to OpenStreetMap fails (404 Error) to be marked a

Bug#675235: miro: fails to start: undefined symbol

2012-05-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 22:19:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-05-30 at 08:55pm, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Does ldd -r /usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0 complain about the > > missing symbol? > > It does. > > ...and then it segfaults: > I'd check for corrupted files... Cheers, J

Processed: i call this RC

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 674037 grave Bug #674037 [libapache2-mod-proxy-html] libapache2-mod-proxy-html: Cannot load /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 into server Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#675235: miro: fails to start: undefined symbol

2012-05-30 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-05-30 at 08:55pm, Julien Cristau wrote: > Does ldd -r /usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0 complain about the > missing symbol? It does. ...and then it segfaults: jonas@auryn:~$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffe617c000) libpth

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Wednesday 30 May 20:03:31 UTC 2012 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: allegro4.4 > tags 666524 + pending Bug #666524 [wnpp] ITP: allegro4.4 --

Processed (with 1 errors): forcemerge 674037 670633

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 674037 670633 Bug #674037 [libapache2-mod-proxy-html] libapache2-mod-proxy-html: Cannot load /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 into server Unable to merge bugs because: package of #670643 is 'src:mod-proxy-html' not 'libapache2-mod-proxy-html' pac

Bug#674844: Bug#674850: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute"

2012-05-30 Thread Julien Cristau
tag 675167 moreinfo kthxbye On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:58:07 +, Bart Martens wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from unstable, testing, stable and oldstable. > > The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is > t

Bug#675235: miro: fails to start: undefined symbol

2012-05-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 19:11:36 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > ImportError on miro.plat.frontends.widgets: > /usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0: undefined symbol: > _ZN3JSC8JSObject10putByIndexEPNS_6JSCellEPNS_9ExecStateEjNS_7JSValueE Weird. $ objdump -T /usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-1.

Bug#675235: miro: fails to start: undefined symbol

2012-05-30 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-05-30 at 07:28pm, Julien Cristau wrote: > What version of libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-0 and other webkit packages > is installed? On 12-05-30 at 07:11pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Versions of packages miro depends on: [snip] > ii libwebkitgtk-1.0-01.8.1-3.1 [snip] > ii py

Bug#675162: marked as done (lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u`)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:47:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675197: fixed in lsb 4.1+Debian6 has caused the Debian Bug report #675197, regarding lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u` to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#675239: marked as done (zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable")

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:47:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675197: fixed in lsb 4.1+Debian6 has caused the Debian Bug report #675197, regarding zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#675162: marked as done (lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u`)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:47:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675162: fixed in lsb 4.1+Debian6 has caused the Debian Bug report #675162, regarding lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u` to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#675197: marked as done (lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u`)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:47:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675197: fixed in lsb 4.1+Debian6 has caused the Debian Bug report #675197, regarding lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u` to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#675239: marked as done (zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable")

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:47:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675162: fixed in lsb 4.1+Debian6 has caused the Debian Bug report #675162, regarding zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#675197: marked as done (lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u`)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:47:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#675162: fixed in lsb 4.1+Debian6 has caused the Debian Bug report #675162, regarding lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u` to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#675162: lsb-base: mysql doesn't start

2012-05-30 Thread Didier Raboud
Le mercredi, 30 mai 2012 13.20:13, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > this is the newborn incarnation of the #390085 fixed in lsb-base 3.1-17. > I can confirm the reported behaviour and will apply the attached patch > to the next upload of lsb, hence hereby tagging +patch and +pending. By > the way,

Processed: affects 675162, affects 675162

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 675162 + mdadm Bug #675162 [lsb-base] lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u` Bug #675197 [lsb-base] lsb-base breaks init.d scripts that use `set -u` Bug #675239 [lsb-base] zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variabl

Bug#673295: marked as done (drupal6: FTBFS in sid)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:32:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673295: fixed in drupal6 6.26-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #673295, regarding drupal6: FTBFS in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: Re: Bug#675239: zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable"

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 675239 lsb-base 4.1+Debian5 Bug #675239 [zfs-fuse] zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable" Bug reassigned from package 'zfs-fuse' to 'lsb-base'. No longer marked as found in versions zfs-fuse/0.7.0-7. Ignoring request

Processed: Re: Bug#675235: miro: fails to start: undefined symbol

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 675235 libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-0 Bug #675235 [miro] miro: fails to start: undefined symbol Bug reassigned from package 'miro' to 'libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-0'. No longer marked as found in versions miro/4.0.4-1. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#675239: zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable"

2012-05-30 Thread Didier Raboud
reassign 675239 lsb-base 4.1+Debian5 forcemerge 675162 675239 affects 675162 +zfs-fuse +mdadm +mysql thanks Le mercredi, 30 mai 2012 19.17:04, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit : > Package: zfs-fuse > Version: 0.7.0-7 > Severity: grave > > > Hi. > > On postinst the following happens: > Setting u

Bug#675235: miro: fails to start: undefined symbol

2012-05-30 Thread Julien Cristau
reassign 675235 libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0-0 kthxbye On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 19:11:36 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Package: miro > Version: 4.0.4-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Fails to start, speweing the following: > > using /usr/bin/miro.real > ImportErro

Bug#672035: marked as done (znc: FTBFS: std_pair.i:31: Error: Can't copy typemap (directorout) std::pair< CString,CString > = std::pair<

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 17:19:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#672035: fixed in znc 0.206-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #672035, regarding znc: FTBFS: std_pair.i:31: Error: Can't copy typemap (directorout) std::pair< CString,CString > = std::pair< CString,CString > &

Bug#675239: zfs-fuse: postinst fails with "FANCYTTY: unbound variable"

2012-05-30 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Package: zfs-fuse Version: 0.7.0-7 Severity: grave Hi. On postinst the following happens: Setting up zfs-fuse (0.7.0-7) ... /lib/lsb/init-functions: line 428: FANCYTTY: unbound variable invoke-rc.d: initscript zfs-fuse, action "restart" failed. dpkg: error processing zfs-fuse (--configure): sub

Bug#675235: miro: fails to start: undefined symbol

2012-05-30 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: miro Version: 4.0.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Fails to start, speweing the following: using /usr/bin/miro.real ImportError on miro.plat.frontends.widgets: /usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-1.0.so.0: undefined symbol: _ZN3JSC8JSObject10putByIndexEPNS_6JSCellE

Processed: tag patch

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 674212 patch Bug #674212 [libalkimia] libalkimia: ftbs missing dependency on pkg-config Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#675231: psad: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: psad Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then prompted the user for an action. As there is no us

Processed: found 668954 in 2.1.10-1

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 668954 2.1.10-1 Bug #668954 [policycoreutils] policycoreutils: /usr/bin/sandbox "Invalid argument" error Marked as found in versions policycoreutils/2.1.10-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#674956: marked as done (pegasus-wms: FTBFS on non-x86 architectures)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 08:51:19 -0700 with message-id <4fc641f7.4040...@rynge.net> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #674956, regarding pegasus-wms: FTBFS on non-x86 architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: retitle 675222 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675222 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675222 [viewpdf.app] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) Ma

Bug#667111: marked as done (bcov: ftbfs with GCC-4.7)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 15:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667111: fixed in bcov 0.2-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #667111, regarding bcov: ftbfs with GCC-4.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Processed: retitle 675223 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675223 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675223 [xdms] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) Mail del

Processed: retitle 675221 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675221 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675221 [unadf] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) Mail de

Processed: retitle 675220 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675220 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675220 [textedit.app] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) M

Processed: retitle 675218 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675218 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675218 [ree] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) Mail deli

Processed: retitle 675219 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675219 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675219 [supertransball2] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd

Processed: retitle 675217 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675217 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675217 [mazeofgalious] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd)

Processed: retitle 675216 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675216 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675216 [lie] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) Mail deli

Processed: retitle 675215 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675215 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675215 [gnustep-icons] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd)

Bug#675224: libscim-dev: broken *.so symlinks

2012-05-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: libscim-dev Version: 1.4.13-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ file /usr/lib/libscim-*so /usr/lib/libscim-1.0.so: broken symbolic link to `libscim-1.0.so.8.2.6' /usr/lib/libscim-gtkutils-1.0.so: broken symbolic link to `libscim-gtkutils-1.0.so.8.2.6' /u

Processed: retitle 675213 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675213 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675213 [aclock.app] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) Mai

Processed: retitle 675214 to Maintainer or uploader address bounces

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675214 Maintainer or uploader address bounces Bug #675214 [adplay] (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org] Changed Bug title to 'Maintainer or uploader address bounces' from '(fwd) Mail d

Bug#674000: python-pyopencl-headers: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/include/pyopencl/pyopencl-ranluxcl.cl

2012-05-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-05-29 19:50, Tomasz Rybak wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. > I have decided to put: > > Replaces: python-pyopencl (<< 2011.2+git20120508-1) > Breaks: python-pyopencl (<< ${source:Version}), > python-pyopencl (>> ${source:Version}), > python3-pyopencl (<< ${source:Version}), > python

Bug#675223: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: xdms Version: 1.3.2-3.1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning

Bug#675222: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: viewpdf.app Version: 1:0.2dfsg1-3.1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery faile

Bug#675221: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: unadf Version: 0.7.11a-1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery failed: returnin

Bug#675220: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: textedit.app Version: 4.0+20061029-3.1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery fa

Bug#675219: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: supertransball2 Version: 1.5-3 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery failed: re

Bug#675218: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: ree Version: 1.3-2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning mess

Bug#675216: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: lie Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-1.2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery failed: retur

Bug#675217: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: mazeofgalious Version: 0.62.dfsg2-2.2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery fai

Bug#675215: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

2012-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Package: gnustep-icons Version: 1.0-4 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System - From: Mail Delivery System Subject: Mail delivery failed: retu

  1   2   3   >