Processed: 656204 does not affect testing - let's not block the transition

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656204 important Bug #656204 [libcapi20-dev] libcapi20-dev: conflict when overwriting `/usr/lib/libcapi20.so` during upgrade Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Bug#655506: iceowl: Fails to start with an "XML Parsing Error"

2012-01-20 Thread François Revol
> Another reporter nailed it down to the iceowl-l10n-fr language pack. > Do you have that installed? I can confirm that removing iceowl-l10n-fr works around the issue for me as well. Icedove dropped using french at last upgrade anyway so... It's not a proper fix though. François. -- To UNSUB

Bug#654497: radare: diff for NMU version 1:1.5.2-4.1

2012-01-20 Thread Sebastian Reichel
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:48:45PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for radare (versioned as 1:1.5.2-4.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Thanks for fixing this :) I added the diff to the git [0]. Feel free to upload i

Processed (with 1 errors): r4438 - in packages/fonts-komatuna/tags: . 20101113-3/debian

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 655701 pending Bug #655701 {Done: Hideki Yamane } [fonts-komatuna] fonts-komatuna: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ... Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #655701 to the same tags previously set > tags 521246 pending Fa

Processed: r4437 - in packages/fonts-komatuna: tags trunk/debian

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 655701 pending Bug #655701 {Done: Hideki Yamane } [fonts-komatuna] fonts-komatuna: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ... Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #655701 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping proces

Bug#656562: marked as done (libusb2-dev: Compilation errors from libusb.h include)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:32:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656562: fixed in freebsd-libs 8.3~svn229725-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #656562, regarding libusb2-dev: Compilation errors from libusb.h include to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: tagging 648989

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # doesnt fail in squeeze > tags 648989 + wheezy sid Bug #648989 {Done: A Mennucc1 } [src:freevo] freevo: FTBFS in debian Sid Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 648989: ht

Bug#646598: Patch that helps

2012-01-20 Thread Troy Telford
The following patch appears to work for me; all I'm doing is changing the script so it looks for the python2.6 binary, then the python2.5 binary. (the default would also check the 'python' binary, which is a link to python2.7 - and it's the use of python2.7 that is breaking things. --- caldavd

Bug#653051: marked as done (FTBFS with libmozjs 9.0)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:47:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653051: fixed in gjs 1.30.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #653051, regarding FTBFS with libmozjs 9.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#654610: marked as done (gjs: FTBFS on armhf, reproduced on sid amd64: error: invalid operands to binary == (have 'jsval' and 'jsval'))

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:47:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653051: fixed in gjs 1.30.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #653051, regarding gjs: FTBFS on armhf, reproduced on sid amd64: error: invalid operands to binary == (have 'jsval' and 'jsval') to be marked as d

Bug#646598: A temporary patch

2012-01-20 Thread Troy Telford
A patch that "works for me" is the following; I'm basically making it so it doesn’t try to use /usr/bin/python (which is Python 2.7), and instead having it try /usr/bin/python2.6 first (which works). First, for /usr/bin/caldavd --- caldavd 2012-01-20 15:48:11.287759928 -0700 +++ /usr/bin/cal

Processed: block 648775 with 656690

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 648775 with 656690 Bug #648775 [release.debian.org] transition: mono 2.10 Was blocked by: 649339 Added blocking bug(s) of 648775: 656690 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 648775: http://bugs.de

Bug#656690: Rebuild for Mono transition

2012-01-20 Thread Iain Lane
Package: src:coco-cs Version: 20110419-4 Severity: serious Hi, A Mono transition is underway. Every source package needs to be rebuilt to compile against CLR 4.0 instead of CLR 2.0. Please upload coco-cs for this change. You can check it worked if, after rebuilding, coco-cs has a dependency on li

Processed: severity increase

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 622302 serious Bug #622302 [dvi2ps] Small fix to make dvi2ps build on GNU/Hurd Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622302: http://bugs.debian.org/cg

Bug#656581: usbmuxd: buffer overflow introduced in 1.0.7 (CVE-2012-0065)

2012-01-20 Thread Julien Lavergne
Le 01/20/2012 10:51 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit : > Package: usbmuxd > Version: 1.0.7-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: security patch upstream > Justification: user security hole > > Hi, > > a buffer overflow was introduced in usbmuxd 1.0.7. More information can > be found on various sources: > > http

Bug#652598: aboot FTBFS in unstable

2012-01-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Michael Cree wrote: > And that's a fundamental problem. None of us Alpha porters working on > the Alpha port at Debian-Ports are DDs, nevertheless we have over 95% of > the unstable distribution built, and would like to start work on getting > aboot fixed and updated. > > So what are the possible

Bug#610933: [Pkg-vsquare-devel] Bug#610933: libvdeplug3 declares a conflict with libvdeplug2

2012-01-20 Thread Ludovico Gardenghi
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 13:58:01 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Oh, that seems reasonable. This seems to have been discussed recently > on the debian-policy list (search for "I don't think there's much gain > in relaxing this"): > > http://bugs.debian.org/556015#141 > http://bugs.debian.org/5

Bug#652598: aboot FTBFS in unstable

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Cree
On 21/01/12 08:47, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:24:49PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: >> For the purposes of this RC bug I guess I should try the patch on aboot, >> build it on a PC and see if that is capable of making a working boot >> disc for an Alpha. It may be a few days bef

Bug#654783: marked as done (python2.7: FTBFS(kfreebsd): testsuite hang)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
ython language (v2.7) python2.7-minimal - Minimal subset of the Python language (version 2.7) Closes: 654783 656118 Changes: python2.7 (2.7.2-13) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to 20120120, taken from the 2.7 branch. * Remove patch integrated upstream (issue9054.diff). * Backport Issu

Processed: nodejs

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 639636 65 Bug#639636: nodejs: FTBFS/armel - testsuite fails Bug#65: nodejs uninstallable on armel Forcibly Merged 639636 65. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 639636: http://bugs.

Bug#656562: patch for libusb2-dev

2012-01-20 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
tags 656562 +patch Here is a patch for /usr/include/libusb.h This bug is blocking the compilation of my package libccid on kfreebsd https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pcsc-lite&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1.8.2-1&stamp=1327085304 Thanks -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau --- /usr/include/libusb.h

Processed: radare: diff for NMU version 1:1.5.2-4.1

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 654497 + patch Bug #654497 [radare] Doesn't contain source for waf binary code Added tag(s) patch. > tags 654497 + pending Bug #654497 [radare] Doesn't contain source for waf binary code Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#656346: Bug fixed

2012-01-20 Thread gdstew
Package: cryptmount Version: 4.1-2 Problem is not related to Debian package. It was caused by lack of documentation on how partitions should be configured and used by the OS before attempting to configure and use them for cryptmount. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.

Processed: Re: Bug#656629: enigmail: OpenPGP menu does not appear in Icedove 8.0.2

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656629 important Bug #656629 [enigmail] enigmail: OpenPGP menu does not appear in Icedove 8.0.2 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656629: http://bug

Bug#656629: enigmail: OpenPGP menu does not appear in Icedove 8.0.2

2012-01-20 Thread Willi Mann
severity 656629 important thanks Hi! On 2012-01-20 14:33, Julien Patriarca wrote: > Package: enigmail > Version: 2:1.3.4-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > After installing enigmail the main menu does not appear in Icedove 8.0.2. > But it is p

Bug#652598: aboot FTBFS in unstable

2012-01-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:24:49PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: > For the purposes of this RC bug I guess I should try the patch on aboot, > build it on a PC and see if that is capable of making a working boot > disc for an Alpha. It may be a few days before I can do that. Note that the source packa

Bug#653893: ideviceinstaller: diff for NMU version 1.0.0-1.1

2012-01-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
tags 653893 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ideviceinstaller (versioned as 1.0.0-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru ideviceinstaller-1.0.0/debian/changelog ideviceinstaller-1.0.0/debian/change

Processed: ideviceinstaller: diff for NMU version 1.0.0-1.1

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 653893 + pending Bug #653893 [src:ideviceinstaller] ideviceinstaller: ftbfs against libzip-0.10 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Processed: severity of 656204 is grave

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656204 grave Bug #656204 [libcapi20-dev] libcapi20-dev: conflict when overwriting `/usr/lib/libcapi20.so` during upgrade Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Bug#643050: marked as done (autodir: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b autodir-0.99.9 gave error exit status 2)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:32:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643050: fixed in autodir 0.99.9-7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #643050, regarding autodir: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b autodir-0.99.9 gave error exit status 2 to be marked as done. T

Bug#655375: marked as done (autodir: FTBFS: dpkg-souce's behavior has changed)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:32:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643050: fixed in autodir 0.99.9-7.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #643050, regarding autodir: FTBFS: dpkg-souce's behavior has changed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#638093: marked as done (RM: imhangul-status-applet -- RoQA; RC buggy, dead upstream)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:54:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638093: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #638093, regarding RM: imhangul-status-applet -- RoQA; RC buggy, dead upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

2012-01-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:51:55 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:42:05PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > However, I think you should clarify what you mean by "dual-licensing". > > > > "Dual-licensing" is usually intended to mean that both licenses are > > being offered a

Bug#638098: marked as done (RM: pomodoro-applet -- RoQA; RC buggy, unmaintained)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:50:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638098: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #638098, regarding RM: pomodoro-applet -- RoQA; RC buggy, unmaintained to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#629067: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, On 20.01.2012 18:00, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > I have prepared security upload for this regression with patch > as provided by Felix. > > It's available at deb http://ppa.sury.org/debian squeeze main > > Could you please test it and ACK that it fixes this issue? > I'll ping the security team a

Bug#629067: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2012-01-20 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: libactionpack-ruby Version: 2.3.5-1.2+squeeze1 Severity: normal Hi, I have prepared security upload for this regression with patch as provided by Felix. It's available at deb http://ppa.sury.org/debian squeeze main Could you please test it and ACK that it fixes this issue? I'll ping th

Bug#655817: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: ruby-memcache-client (>= 1.7.4~), ruby-tzinfo (>= 0.3.12~)

2012-01-20 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: ruby-activesupport-2.3 Severity: normal Hi, it seems more like a bug in sbuild... since the package has correct build dependency alternatives: ruby-memcache-client (>= 1.7.4~) | libmemcache-client-ruby (>= 1.7.4) ruby-tzinfo (>= 0.3.12~) | libtzinfo-ruby (>= 0.3.12~) O. -- System Inf

Bug#656600: [broadcom-sta-source] doesn't compile on latest kernel

2012-01-20 Thread Filipe Gomes
> /usr/src/modules/broadcom-sta/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.c:390:2: error: unknown > field > ‘ndo_set_multicast_list’ specif$ According to [1], that file just needs a small fix: 390c390 < .ndo_set_multicast_list = wl_set_multicast_list, --- > .ndo_set_rx_mode = wl_set_multicast_list, [1] ht

Bug#652598: aboot FTBFS in unstable

2012-01-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Michael Cree wrote: >> Looks like the cause is that isolib.h #include-s from >> linux-libc-dev which conflicts in namespace with sys/stat from glibc. >> So in the spirit of >> >>       aboot (1.0~pre20040408-2) unstable; urgency=low >> >>         * Include userspa

Bug#656596: marked as done (asterisk: SRTP Video Remote Crash Vulnerability)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:32:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656596: fixed in asterisk 1:1.8.8.2~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #656596, regarding asterisk: SRTP Video Remote Crash Vulnerability to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processed: Re: [Pkg-citadel-devel] Bug#655835: citadel-server: doesnt use invoke-rc.d

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 655835 important Bug #655835 [citadel-server] citadel-server: doesnt use invoke-rc.d Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > retitle 655835 postinst thinks server is not running although it is Bug #655835 [citadel-server] citadel-se

Bug#655835: [Pkg-citadel-devel] Bug#655835: citadel-server: doesnt use invoke-rc.d

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Meskes
severity 655835 important retitle 655835 postinst thinks server is not running although it is thanks > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package starts processes where it > shouldnt. This is very probably due to not using invoke-rc.d as mandated by > policy 9.3.3.2. This is seriously di

Processed: tag wheezy sid

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # libav* 4:0.5.4-1 is still available in squeeze. > tag 656502 + wheezy sid Bug #656502 [src:blender] blender: [FTBFS] Does not build with libav 0.8~beta2 Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#656629: enigmail: OpenPGP menu does not appear in Icedove 8.0.2

2012-01-20 Thread Julien Patriarca
Package: enigmail Version: 2:1.3.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After installing enigmail the main menu does not appear in Icedove 8.0.2. But it is present when I write an email. An XML error appears when clicking on key management inside this menu.

Bug#655799: marked as done (grass: FTBFS: configure: error: wxWidgets is required.)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:49:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655799: fixed in grass 6.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #655799, regarding grass: FTBFS: configure: error: wxWidgets is required. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: Re: Bug#656618: open-vm-tools: FTBFS w/ Linux 3.2

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 656618 pending Bug #656618 [open-vm-tools] open-vm-tools: FTBFS w/ Linux 3.2 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=65661

Bug#656618: open-vm-tools: FTBFS w/ Linux 3.2

2012-01-20 Thread Daniel Baumann
tag 656618 pending thanks new upstream snapshot release will fix this, eta rsn. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#656618: open-vm-tools: FTBFS w/ Linux 3.2

2012-01-20 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: open-vm-tools Version: 2:8.8.0+2011.12.20-562307-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Today I installed the Linux 3.2 kernel, rebooted into it and tried to compile the open-vm-tools for that kernel. The build failed, the relevant erro

Processed: jaxml: diff for NMU version 3.01-6.1

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 590822 + pending Bug #590822 [python-jaxml] python-jaxml: cannot be bytecompiled with Python 2.7: SyntaxError: cannot assign to __debug__ Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#590822: jaxml: diff for NMU version 3.01-6.1

2012-01-20 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 590822 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for jaxml (versioned as 3.01-6.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian

Processed: severity of 656610 is serious

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656610 serious Bug #656610 [dragonegg] cc1: error: Cannot load plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5/plugin/dragonegg.so Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: reassign 656610 to dragonegg

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 656610 dragonegg 3.0-1 Bug #656610 [llvm-gcc-4.5] cc1: error: Cannot load plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5/plugin/dragonegg.so Bug reassigned from package 'llvm-gcc-4.5' to 'dragonegg'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions d

Bug#656610: cc1: error: Cannot load plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5/plugin/dragonegg.so

2012-01-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reassign 656610 dragonegg 3.0-1 severity 656610 serious thanks since the problem is due to the upgrade to dragonegg 3.0-1. On 2012-01-20 13:41:04 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: llvm-gcc-4.5 > Version: 2.9-2build1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > llvm-gcc

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug #641242: cp2k: FTBFS anywhere but (linux-)i386

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 641242 2.1.637-2.1 Bug #641242 [src:cp2k] cp2k: FTBFS anywhere but (linux-)i386 Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #641242 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Processed: Re: Bug #641242: cp2k: FTBFS anywhere but (linux-)i386

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 641242 Bug #641242 {Done: Aron Xu } [src:cp2k] cp2k: FTBFS anywhere but (linux-)i386 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. > thanks Stopping processin

Bug#641242: Bug #641242: cp2k: FTBFS anywhere but (linux-)i386

2012-01-20 Thread Aron Xu
reopen 641242 thanks The package with modified build-depends built fine on my amd64 machine, within pbuilder. But when uploading to the archive it returns no luck on i386. Reopening the bug report. I am building the package for i386 in pbuilder, will upload as bin-nmu if got succeeded (very likel

Bug#656610: cc1: error: Cannot load plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5/plugin/dragonegg.so

2012-01-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: llvm-gcc-4.5 Version: 2.9-2build1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable llvm-gcc no longer works: $ llvm-gcc min.c cc1: error: Cannot load plugin /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5/plugin/dragonegg.so /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.5/plugin/dragonegg.so: cannot open sh

Processed: limit source to asterisk, tagging 656596, tagging 653944

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #asterisk (1:1.8.8.2~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=high > # > # * New upstream release (Closes: #656596). > # * Use CFLAGS and LDFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (Closes: #653944). > # > limit source asterisk Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containin

Processed: tagging 594447

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 594447 + wheezy sid Bug #594447 [libogg-vorbis-header-perl] Proposed-RM for squeeze+1: libogg-vorbis-header-perl -- RoM; dead upstream, alternatives exist Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#641242: marked as done (cp2k: FTBFS anywhere but (linux-)i386)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:47:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641242: fixed in cp2k 2.1.637-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #641242, regarding cp2k: FTBFS anywhere but (linux-)i386 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#606959: logrotate script should set correct owner/group

2012-01-20 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi, > So if for some reasons the file is missing or has bad permissions > asterisk will not (re)start and nothing will fix the permissions. This issue should be fixed before the weekly log rotation. I would actually be quite surprized to find ownership explicitly set in the log rotation configura

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#656441: binutils FTBFS on armel, powerpc, s390 and s390x buildds

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656441 normal Bug #656441 [binutils] binutils FTBFS on armel, powerpc, s390 and s390x buildds Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > make sure that 2.22-3 is installed on the buildds and give it back. not Unknown command or malformed

Bug#656441: binutils FTBFS on armel, powerpc, s390 and s390x buildds

2012-01-20 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 656441 normal make sure that 2.22-3 is installed on the buildds and give it back. not reproducible in testing. On 19.01.2012 13:06, peter green wrote: package: binutils version: 2.22-4 serverity: serious armel appeared to fail with a compiler error. Unfortunately we can't see why th

Bug#656600: [broadcom-sta-source] doesn't compile on latest kernel

2012-01-20 Thread Valerio Passini
Package: broadcom-sta-source Version: 5.100.82.112-4 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I have tried to compile the module with module-assistant on both my 3.2.1 custom and 3.2 debian kernel, and the module refuses to compile with this error: CC [M] /usr/src/mod

Bug#656166: marked as done (firmware-b43legacy-installer: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8))

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:47:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656166: fixed in b43-fwcutter 1:015-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #656166, regarding firmware-b43legacy-installer: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#653009: marked as done (every firmware postrm scripts deletes files that were not installed by the package)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:47:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653009: fixed in b43-fwcutter 1:015-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #653009, regarding every firmware postrm scripts deletes files that were not installed by the package to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#656596: asterisk: SRTP Video Remote Crash Vulnerability

2012-01-20 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.8.8.0~dfsg-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch upstream Justification: causes non-serious data loss http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2012-001.html (No CVE set yet, AFAIK) An attacker attempting to negotiate a secure video stream can crash Asterisk i

Bug#656313: marked as done (Iceweasel FTBFS)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:50:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656313: fixed in iceweasel 10.0~b5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #656313, regarding Iceweasel FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#656427: marked as done (hdf5-helpers collides with hdf5-tools at upgrade time)

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:48:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656427: fixed in hdf5 1.8.8-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #656427, regarding hdf5-helpers collides with hdf5-tools at upgrade time to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#652598: aboot FTBFS in unstable

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Cree
> Looks like the cause is that isolib.h #include-s from > linux-libc-dev which conflicts in namespace with sys/stat from glibc. > So in the spirit of > > aboot (1.0~pre20040408-2) unstable; urgency=low > > * Include userspace headers from lib/isolib.c instead of kernel > he

Bug#656581: usbmuxd: buffer overflow introduced in 1.0.7 (CVE-2012-0065)

2012-01-20 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: usbmuxd Version: 1.0.7-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch upstream Justification: user security hole Hi, a buffer overflow was introduced in usbmuxd 1.0.7. More information can be found on various sources: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/19/25 https://secunia.com/advi

Processed: severity of 656166 is serious

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656166 serious Bug #656166 [firmware-b43legacy-installer] firmware-b43legacy-installer: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#655616: Acetoniso: build-depends not satisfiable by sbuild

2012-01-20 Thread Nick Andrik
I already have a new package on mentors looking for sponsorship that also fixes a couple of other issues: http://mentors.debian.net/package/acetoneiso I have included also your "unrelated change" :) Could we arrange for the package to be sponsored? Thanks, Nick -- =Do- N.AND -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#654641: marked as done (libcups2: cups-1.4.4-7 package build failed on 'reverting patch manpage-translations')

2012-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:02:06 +0100 with message-id <20120120090205.ga3...@piware.de> and subject line Re: Bug#654641: libcups2: cups-1.4.4-7 package build failed on 'reverting patch manpage-translations' has caused the Debian Bug report #654641, regarding libcups2: cups-1.4.4-7 pac