Bug#653725: cyrus-sasl2: diff for NMU version 2.1.25.dfsg1-2.1

Thomas, I'll be uploading -3 with your fix right now. No need to search sponsor for NMU. Thanks for your patch, it helped a lot. Ondrej 2012/1/18 Thomas Preud'homme : > tags 653725 + patch > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for cyrus-sasl2 (versioned as 2.1.25.dfsg1-2.1) but

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 655935 by 656188 Bug #655935 [activiz.net] activiz.net: Please use debians default csharp compiler Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 655935: 656188 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Processed: Re: Processed: unarchiving 625367, reopening 625367, user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com, usertagging 625367

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 625367 normal Bug #625367 [libomxil-bellagio] libomxil-bellagio: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625367: http://bugs.deb

Bug#656278: t1lib: [PATCH] fixes for remaining CVEs

On mar., 2012-01-17 at 17:38 -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > Package: t1lib > Version: 5.1.2-3.4 > Severity: grave > Tags: patch security > Justification: user security hole > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > In Ubuntu, t

Bug#654906: marked as done (adobereader-enu: Bash completion script breaks completion for many other commands)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:46:01 +0100 with message-id <8762g94ifq@luthien.mhp> and subject line Re: Bug#654906: adobereader-enu: Bash completion script breaks completion for many other commands has caused the Debian Bug report #654906, regarding adobereader-enu: Bash completion sc

Bug#653966: marked as done (yaws cross site scripting)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:18:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653966: fixed in yaws 1.92-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #653966, regarding yaws cross site scripting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#651246: vice: "Illegal Instruction"

This patch fixed it: After patching it compiles flavless. -- Gruss von Joerg Schiermeier Joerg Schiermeier * staatl. gepr. Informatiker und IT-Trainer Schiermeier-IT * Beratung, Software-Entwicklung und Schulung -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#656294: pyformex: FTBFS when only building -lib package

Source: pyformex Version: 0.8.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of pyformex (as on the autobuilders) only covering its architecture-dependent -lib package are failing: make[1]: Entering directory `/.../pyformex-0.8.6' dh_python2 # Replace embedded Javasc

Bug#656040: root source of problem found

I believe I discovered the root cause after downloading and building ACE and TAO libraries from the upstream sources, an experience that has caused me to appreciate Even More the work of Debian ACE+TAO maintainers. In the process, I discovered another minor issue identified at the bottom of th

Processed: affects 655918

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 655918 splix Bug #655918 [printer-driver-splix] splix: fails to upgrade from testing - trying to overwrite ... Added indication that 655918 affects splix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 65

Processed: reassign 655918 to printer-driver-splix, affects 656291

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 655918 printer-driver-splix 2.0.0+svn300-1 Bug #655918 [src:printer-driver-splix] splix: fails to upgrade from testing - trying to overwrite ... Warning: Unknown package 'src:printer-driver-splix' Bug reassigned from package 'src:printer

Bug#656289: snort 2.9.1-1 is uninstallable and unbuildable in unstable due to dependency on libdaq0 and build-dependency on libdaq-dev which are only in experimental

package: snort version: 2.9.2-1 severity: grave as the title states this package is in unstable but it has (build)-dependencies that are only satisfiable in experimental. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Bug#648705: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

Ok, I've spent the full night to try to debug this. Here is what I've done. Created a VBox kfreebsd-i386 machine with debian 6.0.3. Added some packages: apt-get install build-essential libxext-dev libxext6 libqt4-dev zlib1g-dev Download the FreeDiams 0.6.2 sources, unpack, going into fr

Processed: user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 646111, found 646111 in fso-config-gta01/20090224-1 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was deb...@abeckmann.de). > usertags 646111 + piuparts Bug#646111: fso-frameworkd and fso-config-gta01: error when trying to install together Usertags were: piuparts.d.o

Bug#655969: [Pkg-lirc-maint] Bug#655969: lirc: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user

Hi On Tuesday 17 January 2012, Holger Levsen wrote: > Package: lirc > Version: 0.9.0~pre1-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts > upgrade > test because dpkg detected a c

Processed: plib: diff for NMU version 1.8.5-5.2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 656261 + patch Bug #656261 {Done: Luk Claes } [src:plib] plib: FTBFS: dh_install: usr/lib/*.la exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere Added tag(s) patch. > tags 656261 + pending Bug #656261 {Done: Luk Claes } [src:plib] plib:

Bug#656261: plib: diff for NMU version 1.8.5-5.2

tags 656261 + patch tags 656261 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for plib (versioned as 1.8.5-5.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Still a bit puzzled how the uploaded source package was not updated with the -X .la Cheers Luk diff -u plib-1.8.5/debian/rules plib-1.8.5/debi

Bug#656280: uwsgi FTBFS on several architectures, confusion between debian architecture names and java architecture names and "strict aliasing" problem in python code

Hi Peter, This issue has been addressed in packaging [0]. After resolving a few other issues, regarding new upstream release, it will be uploaded. Thanks for submitting the bug report, Janos [0] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/uwsgi.git;a=commit;h=c8518303b95d6fad820c91023ef8fa

Bug#656261: marked as done (plib: FTBFS: dh_install: usr/lib/*.la exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:03:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656261: fixed in plib 1.8.5-5.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #656261, regarding plib: FTBFS: dh_install: usr/lib/*.la exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere to be marked as done. This means

Bug#656280: uwsgi FTBFS on several architectures, confusion between debian architecture names and java architecture names and "strict aliasing" problem in python code

package: uwsgi version: 0.9.8.3-2 severity: serious tags: patch x-debbugs-cc: ja...@resenje.org Unfortunately the patch submitted for 640347 was incorrect. The architecture in the "openjdk-6-" part of the path needs to be the debian architecture name not the java architecture name (which is am

Bug#650185: marked as done (util-linux: FTBFS on !linux-any)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:49:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#650185: fixed in util-linux 2.20.1-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #650185, regarding util-linux: FTBFS on !linux-any to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#656262: argyll: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to `linux_usbfs_backend'

Christoph Egger writes: > Package: src:argyll > Version: 1.3.5-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid wheezy > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Hi! > >

Bug#656278: t1lib: [PATCH] fixes for remaining CVEs

Package: t1lib Version: 5.1.2-3.4 Severity: grave Tags: patch security Justification: user security hole User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * SECURITY UPDATE: fix

Bug#653725: cyrus-sasl2: diff for NMU version 2.1.25.dfsg1-2.1

tags 653725 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for cyrus-sasl2 (versioned as 2.1.25.dfsg1-2.1) but did not upload it to DELAYED yet as I'm not a DD. However I will seek a sponsor for this if I don't get any news from you in the next days. Please feel free to tell me not to if yo

Bug#656274: collectd ftbfs on armhf and armel

package: collectd severity: serious version: 4.10.4-1 collectd currently fails to configure on armhf because it's mapping table from debian architectures to java architectures is incomplete. The attatched patch takes the minimally invasive approach to fixing this and simply adds the mapping f

Processed: Bug#655793: problem clarification

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 655793 pyzmq 2.1.10-2 Bug #655793 [python3.2] pyzmq: FTBFS: test_queue (zmq.tests.test_monqueue.TestMonitoredQueue) ... Assertion failed: !inpipe && !outpipe (pair.cpp:49) Bug reassigned from package 'python3.2' to 'pyzmq'. Bug No longe

Bug#655862: fixed in git

This was caused by qhull/wxwidgets preprocessor conflict. I have fixed it in git by using push/pop preprocessor pragmas. However, I am waiting for an upload to happen. I'll ping debian-science again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

On Ma, 17 ian 12, 23:11:48, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > [ TL;DR: would you object re-licensing www.d.o content under dual > MIT/Expat + GPL-2 ? ] ... > What do you think? Not sure I understand: if this goes through will all material be dual-licensed or it's just that everybody chooses one of t

Bug#655548: marked as done (bnd: FTBFS: Errors during Eclipse Path inspection)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:32:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655548: fixed in bnd 1.50.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #655548, regarding bnd: FTBFS: Errors during Eclipse Path inspection to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#656208: asterisk: postinst script doesn't quote directories for chown

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:27:43 Pocos System Administrator wrote: > When asterisk is upgraded, and some of the directories it chowns > contain spaces, the package remains unconfigured. Pocos, Thanks for the patch. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

[ TL;DR: would you object re-licensing www.d.o content under dual MIT/Expat + GPL-2 ? ] Hi everybody, as you might have noticed the webmasters have recently restarted [1] the discussion on how to fix this and its "colleague" bug report, #388141. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#656184: marked as done (libav: FTBFS on armel)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:03:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656184: fixed in libav 4:0.8~beta2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #656184, regarding libav: FTBFS on armel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#656264: mailutils: Uses no-longer-existing /etc/cups/mime.types, breaks mimeview

Package: mailutils Version: 1:2.2+dfsg1-4+b1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Apparently, /etc/cups/mime.types no longer exists. As with #435496, /etc/mime.types causes syntax errors. Combined, this breaks other packages that use mimeview. -- System Information: Debi

Bug#656263: libwv-dev: must depend on all needed -dev packages

Source: libwv-dev Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 libwv-dev must depend on all -dev packages that it uses. Specifically it uses libjeg-dev but does not depend on it. - Jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Processed: forcibly merging 595951 656262

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 595951 656262 Bug#595951: argyll: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: undefined reference to `linux_usbfs_backend' Bug#656262: argyll: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to `linux_usbfs_backend' Forcibly Merged 595951 656262. > thanks Stopping pr

Bug#656262: argyll: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to `linux_usbfs_backend'

Package: src:argyll Version: 1.3.5-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-*

Bug#656261: plib: FTBFS: dh_install: usr/lib/*.la exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere

Package: src:plib Version: 1.8.5-5.1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: dh_install --fail-missing dh_install: usr/lib/libplibul.la exists in debian/tmp but is not insta

Bug#655935:

blocked 655935 by 656188 thanks I cannot build activiz.net; fails with: dh_makeclilibs: Warning! No Build-Depends(-Indep) on cli-common-dev (>= 0.8~)! dh_installcligac -O--parallel dh_clideps -O--parallel Global symbol "$exclude_pattern" requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/dh_clideps

Processed: 656247 phpmyadmin: Local File Inclusion via XXE-injection (CVE-2011-4107)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656247 critical Bug #656247 [phpmyadmin] phpmyadmin: Local File Inclusion via XXE-injection (CVE-2011-4107) Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 656247 to the same value. > tags 656247 + security Bug #656247 [phpmyadmin] phpmyadmin

Bug#655793: problem clarification

the buildlog above shows skips as ERROR's due to the missing nose. Those are *not* the problem. real issue which occurs in my clean chroot looks like the following and occurs in 2/3 of my builds: test_monitor (zmq.tests.test_monqueue.TestMonitoredQueue) ... FAIL test_monitor_subscribe (zmq.tests.t

Processed: security bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 656247 critical Bug #656247 [phpmyadmin] phpmyadmin: Local File Inclusion via XXE-injection (CVE-2011-4107) Severity set to 'critical' from 'normal' > tags 656247 security Bug #656247 [phpmyadmin] phpmyadmin: Local File Inclusion via XX

Bug#656252: libabiword-2.9-dev: must depend on all needed -dev packages

Package: libabiword-2.9-dev Version: 2.9.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 libabiword-2.9-dev must depend on other -dev packages that it uses. This seems to be the relevant packages: libfribidi-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgsf-1-dev, libwv-dev, libenchant-dev, libgoffice-0.8-dev, libguc

Bug#654829: enigmail: Menu not present and verifying decrypting not working

On 2012-01-17 12:05, Julien Patriarca wrote: > Package: enigmail > Version: 2:1.3.4-1 > Followup-For: Bug #654829 > > Dear Maintainer, > > The enigmail package is not working properly in Icedove 8.0.2. > Indeed the menu does not appear in the main toolbar, and the verifying and > decrypting funct

Bug#654785: marked as done (CVE-2011-4620: Buffer overflow)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:49:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654785: fixed in plib 1.8.5-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #654785, regarding CVE-2011-4620: Buffer overflow to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#622919: marked as done (libjifty-dbi-perl: security SQL injection)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:47:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#622919: fixed in libjifty-dbi-perl 0.60-1+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #622919, regarding libjifty-dbi-perl: security SQL injection to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 19:49 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:14:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > >I've reached Yves on IRC and he was kind enough to take another look > > >at the patches and provided a new minimal one. [...] > > >I propose to upload the version from the

Bug#654568: marked as done (change mongodb-dev build-dep)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:18:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654568: fixed in pdns 3.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #654568, regarding change mongodb-dev build-dep to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:14:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >I've reached Yves on IRC and he was kind enough to take another look > >at the patches and provided a new minimal one. > It's still not /that/ minimal. :) Right, it doesn't fullfill all definitions of 'minimal' :) > >I propose to upl

Processed: unarchiving 625367, reopening 625367, user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com, usertagging 625367

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 625367 Bug #625367 {Done: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) } [libomxil-bellagio] libomxil-bellagio: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Unarchived Bug 625367 > reopen 625367 Bug #625367 {Done: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) } [libomxil-bellagio] libomxil-bella

Bug#656213: xine-ui: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) violating FHS (policy 9.1) too

reassign 656213 libxine1-bin 1.1.20.1-1 thanks I demand that Andreas Beckmann may or may not have written... [snip] > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on > the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8: > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/c

Bug#654829: enigmail: Menu not present and verifying decrypting not working

Package: enigmail Version: 2:1.3.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #654829 Dear Maintainer, The enigmail package is not working properly in Icedove 8.0.2. Indeed the menu does not appear in the main toolbar, and the verifying and decrypting functions do not work. I mean when I receive a signed-message, nothi

Bug#637234: marked as done (linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen (also affects ext3 as of linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 et al))

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#637234: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.32-1um-4+41 has caused the Debian Bug report #637234, regarding linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen (also affects ext3 as of linux-image-3.1.0-1-am

Bug#645760: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#645760: Dynamically linking to bind (bugs #643569 and #645760)

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:21:29PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > tag 645670 patch > thanks > > Hi, > > Here is a patch that fixes these two issues. It dynamically links to > bind and removes the embedded code (note that it would be more ideal > to repackage the upstream source without bind, bu

Bug#656106: marked as done (xul-ext-personasplus: fails to install due to Breaks: iceweasel (>= 8.0.+))

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:17:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656106: fixed in personasplus 1.6.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #656106, regarding xul-ext-personasplus: fails to install due to Breaks: iceweasel (>= 8.0.+) to be marked as done. This means that you c

Processed: imhangul-status-applet: needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638093 ftp.debian.org Bug #638093 [imhangul-status-applet] imhangul-status-applet: needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface Bug reassigned from package 'imhangul-status-applet' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Bug No longer marked as found in

Bug#656205: yhsm-yubikey-ksm: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) violating FHS (policy 9.1) too

On 2012-01-17 14:42, Fredrik Thulin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > ... >> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on >> the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8: > > Hi > > Thank you for taking the time to provi

Bug#638093: imhangul-status-applet: needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface

reassign 638093 ftp.debian.org retitle 638093 RM: imhangul-status-applet -- RoQA; RC buggy, dead upstream thanks > This package can be removed. > > There's no replacement. But because imhangul and nabi are getting used > less and less, this package is not useful much. There's no upstream > suppor

Processed: buildbot: diff for NMU version 0.8.5-1.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 648384 + pending Bug #648384 [buildbot] buildbot: FTBFS due to missing build-dependency on python-twisted-words Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 648384: http://bugs.debia

Bug#648384: buildbot: diff for NMU version 0.8.5-1.1

tags 648384 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for buildbot (versioned as 0.8.5-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Deb

Processed: pomodoro-applet: needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 638098 ftp.debian.org Bug #638098 [pomodoro-applet] pomodoro-applet: needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface Bug reassigned from package 'pomodoro-applet' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions pomodoro-app

Bug#638098: pomodoro-applet: needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface

reassign 638098 ftp.debian.org retitle 638098 RM: pomodoro-applet -- RoQA; RC buggy, unmaintained thanks Since there has not been any activity on this bug for almost half a year and I couldn't find any upstream activity either, I think that pomodoro-applet should be removed from the archive. It h

Bug#641873: xpdf doesn't display text in many PDF files

Package: xpdf Version: 3.03-7 Forgot to mention, that with the self-compiled xpdf 3.03 the file http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air-ban/doc/list_en.pdf seemed to be correctly displayed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#641873: xpdf doesn't display text in many PDF files

Package: xpdf Version: 3.03-7 Using one of the already mentioned example files http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air-ban/doc/list_en.pdf and comparing the output when using the option "-cmd" for the self-compiled original xpdf 3.03 and xpdf from the debian package the following differences occur:

Bug#653332: [DRE-maint] Bug#653332: thin is unmaintained

On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 02:57:38AM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 09:15:23AM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote: > > > > I will look at what needs to be done for uploading it tonight. > > > > Just to keep the bug report updated, I began work on this in the > pkg-ruby-extras git reposi

Processed: tagging 652322

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 652322 + fixed-upstream Bug #652322 [faust] faust: FTBFS on almost all arches, error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope Bug #654250 [faust] faust: FTBFS on almost all arches, error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope Bug #655943 [fau

Bug#652322: Proposed patch to fix faust

Hi Adrian and Mario, Thanks for the patch. I have updated the git repository accordingly. Again many thanks for packaging Faust ! Cheers Yann On 16/01/2012 12:14, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi! Please find attached the proposed patch against current faust release that will (hopefully) fix the bui

Bug#648705: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

Le 17 janv. 2012 à 10:56, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit : > Hi! > > Am 16.01.2012 19:18, schrieb Andreas Tille: >> Why not enabling others having the experience to have >> fixed a bug on freebsd? The package is team maintained. > > To cite you in the mail which started this thread: > >> an

Bug#656213: xine-ui: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) violating FHS (policy 9.1) too

Package: xine-ui Version: 0.99.6-1.1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintaine

Processed: block

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 624671 by 656189 Bug #624671 [slepc] FTBFS on sparc Was blocked by: 656189 Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #624671 to the same blocks previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#656205: yhsm-yubikey-ksm: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) violating FHS (policy 9.1) too

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: ... > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on > the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8: Hi Thank you for taking the time to provide references and good suggestions. I too had noticed the

Bug#656208: asterisk: postinst script doesn't quote directories for chown

Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze4 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable When asterisk is upgraded, and some of the directories it chowns contain spaces, the package remains unconfigured. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stabl

Bug#656205: yhsm-yubikey-ksm: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8) violating FHS (policy 9.1) too

Package: yhsm-yubikey-ksm Version: 1.0.3c-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-ma

Processed: tagging 636823

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not obsolete in squeeze > tags 636823 + wheezy sid Bug #636823 {Done: Michael Biebl } [sshmenu-gnome] sshmenu-gnome: Dependency to obsoleted packages Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On 06.01.2012 15:33, gregor herrmann wrote: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:35:07 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: Quick attempt (I looked at the diff in upstream 0.67 -> 0.68 and ripped out the parts from the original patch that had no equivalent in the upstream diff). Reviews still appreciated. I've r

Processed: block

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 624671 by 656189 Bug #624671 [slepc] FTBFS on sparc Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 624671: 656189 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 624671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#614619: marked as done (psyco: FTBFS with Python 2.7: error: 'JUMP_IF_FALSE' undeclared here (not in a function))

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:26:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#639347: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #614619, regarding psyco: FTBFS with Python 2.7: error: 'JUMP_IF_FALSE' undeclared here (not in a function) to be marked as done. This

Bug#654829: enigmail: Enigmail activates but doesn't work

On 2012-01-17 11:28, Raphael Rigo wrote: > Package: enigmail > Version: 2:1.3.4-1 > Followup-For: Bug #654829 > > Hello, > the new version of enigmail is effectively active, but when trying to > access the preferences, a chrome error is displayed : > > XML Parsing Error: undefined entity > Locati

Bug#652146: hwinfo: diff for NMU version 16.0-2.2

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Michael Prokop wrote: tags 652146 + pending forwarded 652146 snw...@suse.de thanks Cc-ing Steffen Winterfeldt as being upstream of hwinfo, he might be interested in this issue + patch as well. Dear Steffen, full details are available in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#656188: marked as done (dh_clideps: Syntax errors causing FTBFS in every depending package)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:17:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656188: fixed in cli-common 0.8.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #656188, regarding dh_clideps: Syntax errors causing FTBFS in every depending package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#654829: enigmail: Enigmail activates but doesn't work

Package: enigmail Version: 2:1.3.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #654829 Hello, the new version of enigmail is effectively active, but when trying to access the preferences, a chrome error is displayed : XML Parsing Error: undefined entity Location: chrome://enigmail/content/pref-enigmail.xul Line Number 1

Bug#656188: dh_clideps: Syntax errors causing FTBFS in every depending package

Package: cli-common-dev Version: 0.8 Severity: grave When building a package using dh_clideps 0.8 , | dh_clideps | Global symbol "$exclude_pattern" requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/dh_clideps line 662. | Global symbol "$exclude_pattern" requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/d

Bug#648705: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

Hi! Am 16.01.2012 19:18, schrieb Andreas Tille: > Why not enabling others having the experience to have > fixed a bug on freebsd? The package is team maintained. To cite you in the mail which started this thread: > any hint, how to fix this problem? And the previous mail you claimed you can't

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 655935 pending Bug #655935 [activiz.net] activiz.net: Please use debians default csharp compiler Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 655935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/

Bug#655935:

tags 655935 pending thanks I'll wait until vasks comes back to do the upload. I'd like to commit my local change to svn first. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#656184: libav: FTBFS on armel

Package: libav Version: 4:0.8~beta2-2 Severity: Serious On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:08 PM, wrote: > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > commit 7415b3bd0fdb7188c7c5cc8802f92aeb7890a0d3 > Author: Fabian Greffrath > Date:   Fri Jan 13 17:07:53 2012 +0100 > >    Properly set

Bug#655666: marked as done (python-django: FTBFS: test_week_view_allow_future fails)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:50:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655666: fixed in python-django 1.3.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #655666, regarding python-django: FTBFS: test_week_view_allow_future fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#634471: marked as done (fts: uninstallable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:47:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#634471: fixed in fts 1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634471, regarding fts: uninstallable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de