Processed: Re: gitolite: /usr/share/gitolite/sshkeys-lint line 142: Unsuccessful stat (ERROR)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 653994 + pending fixed-upstream Bug #653994 [gitolite] gitolite: /usr/share/gitolite/sshkeys-lint line 142: Unsuccessful stat (ERROR) Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#653994: gitolite: /usr/share/gitolite/sshkeys-lint line 142: Unsuccessful stat (ERROR)

tags 653994 + pending fixed-upstream thanks 2012-01-04 02:44 Sitaram Chamarty : | This was fixed by this commit: > | ab9d0d2 7 weeks ago a couple of very minor oopsies > | (It's caused by not parsing a blank line in the authkeys file properly) > | Jari: I do not know what debian's standards are

Bug#649702: marked as done (ifeffit: Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common.)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:35:00 -0600 (CST) with message-id and subject line RE: ifeffit: Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. has caused the Debian Bug report #649702, regarding ifeffit: Please Build-Depend on ghostscript, not gs-common. to be marked as done. This means

Bug#634826: marked as done (Please package the last version)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:49:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#634826: fixed in trac-git 0.12.0.5+722342e-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634826, regarding Please package the last version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: tagging 653520

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # builds on squeeze > tags 653520 + wheezy sid Bug #653520 {Done: Miguel Landaeta } [src:oscache] oscache: FTBFS: package org.jgroups does not exist Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Processed: tagging 654482

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 654482 + upstream Bug #654482 [ldb] Doesn't contain source for waf binary code Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Processed: tagging 654500

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 654500 + upstream Bug #654500 [samba4] Doesn't contain source for waf binary code Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Processed: tagging 654508

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 654508 + upstream Bug #654508 [talloc] Doesn't contain source for waf binary code Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654508: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Processed: tagging 654509

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 654509 + upstream Bug #654509 [tdb] Doesn't contain source for waf binary code Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654509: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Processed: Re: [alsa-base] after feb 22, 2011 Squeeze "upgrade," alsa will not load my sound module (echo mia). NO sound.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 614610 https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=5282 Bug #614610 [alsa-base] [alsa-base] after feb 22, 2011 Squeeze "upgrade," alsa will not load my sound module (echo mia). NO sound. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http

Bug#652649: jasper: Fix for CVE-2011-4516 and CVE-2011-4517

Attached is a patch for a planned NMU for this bug. It is essentially the same as the original patch Mark sent along. I see you've marked this bug as pending, so I'll wait a couple days before pushing the NMU if you'd like to push your particular changes instead. Best wishes, Mike diff -Nru jasp

Bug#654538: gtk-gnutella FTBFS on armel and armhf. undefined reference to __fpclassify

package: gtk-gnutella version: 0.98.2-1 severity: serious tags: patch gtk-gnutella fails to build on armel and armhf with the following error. libshared.a(str.o): In function `str_fcat_safe': /build/buildd-gtk-gnutella_0.98.2-1-armhf-NS4sjD/gtk-gnutella-0.98.2/src/lib/str.c:1229: undefined refe

Processed: Fwd: libav: multiple security issues

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 654534 patch Bug #654534 [libav] libav: multiple security issues Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654534: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654534 Debian Bug T

Bug#654534: libav: multiple security issues

tag 654534 patch thanks Note patches are available on the CVE pages for these issues: http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Bug#654534: libav: multiple security issues

Package: libav Version: 4:0.7.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were published for libav. CVE-2011-3892[0]: | Double free vulnerability in the Theora decoder in Google Chrome | before 15.0.874.120 allows remote attackers to cause a

Bug#653962: libv8 predictable hash collisions

On 01/01/2012 23:50, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Package: libv8 > Severity: serious > Tags: security > > Hi, > > It was reported that V8 is affected by the predictable hash collisions attack > that made its rounds around the net this week. This is tracked at > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tra

Bug#652287: marked as done (python-webcolors: missing dependency on python)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:35:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652287: fixed in webcolors 1.3.1+hg~2c8ac6e0a03d-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #652287, regarding python-webcolors: missing dependency on python to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#651203: procps: SONAME breakage

procps-ng upstream have been busy getting the library into some initial state plus a whole lot of other additions and fixes. I expect it will be released soon which will solve the libprocps library issue. The other thing to point out is the API of the library will change in the next from this rele

Bug#654491: waf & wscript unused

The problematic file waf in the minidjvu sources is not used during the debian build process: waf and wscript can be deleted, or replaced by files containing something random, and the package will build fine. Any recommended course of action? I don't understand the point of mechanically transform

Bug#654524: wmaker FTBFS on all architectures when building only arch packages

Source: wmaker Severity: serious Version: 0.95.0+20111028-1 thanks FTBFS on this line in debian/rules: # Fix perms for /usr/share/WindowMaker/*sh chmod +x debian/wmaker-common/usr/share/WindowMaker/autostart.sh chmod: cannot access `debian/wmaker-common/usr/share/WindowMaker/autostart.sh': No such

Bug#653963: marked as done (ruby-rack predictable hash collisions)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:09:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653963: fixed in ruby-rack 1.4.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #653963, regarding ruby-rack predictable hash collisions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Processed: retitle 654462 to Doesn't contain source for waf binary code ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 654462 Doesn't contain source for waf binary code Bug #654462 [a2jmidid] postler: doesn't contain source for waf binary code Changed Bug title to 'Doesn't contain source for waf binary code' from 'postler: doesn't contain source for waf b

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:35:07 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > Looking at the diff again (attached for reference), it's quite long > > and also includes documentation fixes. > > I guess we have to look a bit to trim it down to the relevant parts. > Quick attempt (I looked at the diff in upstream 0

Bug#654520: Should this package be removed?

Source: collectd Severity: serious collectd hasn't had a maintainer upload since 15 months, has low popcon and accumulated 5 RC bugs so far. I propose to remove it. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Ar

Bug#653771: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#653771: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* due to -Wformat-security

I think the below is a more correct fix. Could you check whether it works for you? --- a/ntpd/refclock_oncore.c +++ b/ntpd/refclock_oncore.c @@ -4058,7 +4058,7 @@ oncore_log ( snprintf(Msg, sizeof(Msg), "ONCORE[%d]: %s", instance->unit, msg); - syslog(log_level, M

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: waf binary code not DFSG compliant

On mar., 2012-01-03 at 22:12 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > user ftpmas...@debian.org > reopen 645191 > > usertags 645190 + waf-unpack > clone 645190 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 -17 -18 > -19 -20 -21 -22 -23 -24 -25 -26 -27 -28 -29 -30 -31 -32 -33 -34 -35 -36

Bug#652072: marked as done (Scala installs lib/jline.jar blob from upstream)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:37:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652072: fixed in scala 2.9.1.dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #652072, regarding Scala installs lib/jline.jar blob from upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: waf binary code not DFSG compliant

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user ftpmas...@debian.org Setting user to ftpmas...@debian.org (was toli...@debian.org). > reopen 645191 Bug #645191 {Done: Yves-Alexis Perez } [midori] midori: doesn't contain source for waf binary code > usertags 645190 + waf-unpack Bug#645190:

Bug#645190: waf binary code not DFSG compliant

user ftpmas...@debian.org reopen 645191 usertags 645190 + waf-unpack clone 645190 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 -17 -18 -19 -20 -21 -22 -23 -24 -25 -26 -27 -28 -29 -30 -31 -32 -33 -34 -35 -36 -37 -38 -39 -40 -41 -42 -43 -44 -45 -46 -47 -48 -49 -50 -51 -52 reassign -1 a2

Bug#654459: Doesn't compile with 3.x kernels

Source: drbd8 Severity: serious drbd8 fails to compile, since apparently the check doesn't cope with Linux version numbers now starting with 3.: config.status: creating user/config.h config.status: user/config.h is unchanged dh_testdir make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jmm/scratch/drbd8-8.3

Bug#641488: marked as done (bup: FTBFS on sparc (bus error in bloom test))

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:20:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641488: fixed in bup 0.25~git2011.11.04-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #641488, regarding bup: FTBFS on sparc (bus error in bloom test) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#652252: marked as done (ust: FTBFS: tracepoint_benchmark.h:27: undefined reference to `unlikely')

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:07:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652252: fixed in ust 0.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652252, regarding ust: FTBFS: tracepoint_benchmark.h:27: undefined reference to `unlikely' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#650961: marked as done (libsqlite3-tcl: pkgIndex.tcl is empty and can not be generated)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:07:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#650961: fixed in sqlite3 3.7.9-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #650961, regarding libsqlite3-tcl: pkgIndex.tcl is empty and can not be generated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#654433: marked as done (libhtp1: new symbols but unversioned .shlibs)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:05:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654433: fixed in libhtp 0.2.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #654433, regarding libhtp1: new symbols but unversioned .shlibs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: unarchiving 645191

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 645191 Bug #645191 {Done: Yves-Alexis Perez } [midori] midori: doesn't contain source for waf binary code Unarchived Bug 645191 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 645191: http://bu

Bug#654456: gdebi-kde isn't working (possibly passing a wrong command).

Package: gdebi-kde Version: 0.8.3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, gdebi-kde simply can't install anything probably because it passes a wrong command. For example the picture at http://en.zimagez.com/zimage/snapshot517.php shows the command [kdesu] '/usr/b

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:14:23 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > Looking at the diff again (attached for reference), it's quite long > and also includes documentation fixes. > I guess we have to look a bit to trim it down to the relevant parts. Quick attempt (I looked at the diff in upstream 0.67 ->

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:14:23 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > Looking at the diff again (attached for reference), it's quite long > and also includes documentation fixes. 2nd attempt gr -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:54:12 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:48:35 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > > As this about SQL injection weaknesses, should the severity be raised > > > to grave, as security bug? > > > > Hm, probably yes. > > > > Upstream Changes h

Bug#635541: ark: Directory traversal

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 06:01:08PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Dear maintainer, > > Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed > this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security > Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the

Bug#622919: Raise severity?

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:34:35PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > severity 622919 serious > thanks > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:48:35 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > As this about SQL injection weaknesses, should the severity be raised > > to grave, as security bug? > > Hm, probably yes.

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

* gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:11:34 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: > > > > I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > > should delay it longer. > > Would you mind delaying this one day longer? I'm ri

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:11:34 -0500, Jon Bernard wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. > Would you mind delaying this one day longer? I'm right now working on the new > upstream

Bug#652252: ust: diff for NMU version 0.15-3.1

* gregor herrmann wrote: > tags 652252 + pending > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for ust (versioned as 0.15-3.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Would you mind delaying this one day longer? I'm right now working o

Bug#652700: haildb ftbfs if libcloog-ppl0 is not installed

On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:43:32 +, peter green wrote: > >Hm, builds fine here as-is (i386 sid cowbuilder chroot). > The issue was initially seen on the armhf and s390x buildds. I > then reproduced it locally on amd64. I have now reproduced it > locally on i386 as well. > I wonder why it works for

Bug#388141: Handling the copyright mess of the website

Hi, Since this year began with the website being free of the old charset mess, I wonder if we could continue, and try to address as much as we can of the copyright/license mess, starting with the copyright. Talking on IRC with Rhonda and others, we came to the conclusion that even if we'll have t

Bug#651996: (no subject)

We already fixed this in Ubuntu, using an upstream unreleased patch. I just tested this out with the Debian version of the package and it fixes the failure there too. Here's the diff. -Barry === modified file 'debian/changelog' --- debian/changelog2011-09-20 10:35:03 + +++ debian/change

Bug#634401: extundelete: FTBFS: extundelete.cc:963:47: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct opaque_ext2_group_desc'

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:54:46AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > > I just investigated on this FTBFS issue. > > > > The problem is that extundelete doesn't compile against e2fslibs-dev > > versions >=1.42. Therefore extundelete was just removed from > > Debian/testing, so if this bug can't be

Bug#654380: #654380 (was: nsis: The zmemcpy patch breaks NSISdl::download (at least).)

Hi Odyx, >> This seems to correspond to RedHat's [RH#734905] and to NSIS's >> [NSIS#3406350]. >> > It works indeed. And the patch is shipped since multiple releases in Fedora, > so I pushed it to nsis' packaging repository: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/nsis.git;a=commit;h=f

Bug#654440: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D

Severity: serious Package: udt Version: 4.10-1 User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc Hi! This source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: draft-gg-udt-xx.txt The file contains the follow copyright notice: Copyright (c) 20

Bug#654438: manual fix

After running apt-get install linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx the reported problem occurs (missing initramfs). Manually creating it fixes the problem: update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx flash-kernel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Processed: severity of 649151 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 649151 serious Bug #649151 [cdbs] cdbs: documentation missing Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649151: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Processed: Re: git test failures.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 654422 git/1:1.7.7-1 Bug #654422 {Done: Jonathan Nieder } [src:git] git test failures. Bug Marked as found in versions git/1:1.7.7-1. > tags 654422 = upstream fixed-upstream Bug #654422 {Done: Jonathan Nieder } [src:git] git test failures.

Bug#634401: extundelete: FTBFS: extundelete.cc:963:47: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct opaque_ext2_group_desc'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/31/11 6:23 AM, Michael Prokop wrote: > Hi, > > (original bugreport at the end of the mail, fullquote by intention) > > I just investigated on this FTBFS issue. > > The problem is that extundelete doesn't compile against e2fslibs-dev > versions

Bug#556678: wmaloader: diff for NMU version 0.1-5.1

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 07:29:21PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >tags 556678 + patch >tags 556678 + pending >thanks > >Hi Steve, > >I've prepared an NMU for wmaloader (versioned as 0.1-5.1) and >uploaded it to DELAYED/2. > >Cheers, >Julien Awesome, thanks. :-) I'd forgotten all about this despite

Bug#654438: [Possible SPAM]-linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx is missing

Package: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-ixp4xx Version: 2.6.39-3~bpo60+1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable Note: this is the kernel image for ixp4xx in the squeeze-backports repository -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (5

Processed: updating bug 654162

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 654162 normal Bug #654162 [arduino-core] arduino-core: Unable to compile or upload Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > tags 654162 upstream patch Bug #654162 [arduino-core] arduino-core: Unable to compile or upload Added tag(s) upstr

Bug#654162: Arduino 1.0 and MJO Makefile

Hi Martin, I got a bug on Debian about using the files from 1.0 with your makefile. He included a breakdown of what doesn't work with 1.0 and a patch for the makefile. If you reply, could you keep the debian bug in the CC: please (this way we log it there so others can see it). @Andrea: The Make

Bug#654408: marked as done (whiptail crashes)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:18:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654408: fixed in newt 0.52.14-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #654408, regarding whiptail crashes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#654436: tcc: [amd64] wrong size of size_t

Package: tcc Version: 0.9.25-11 Severity: serious Justification: makes the package violate the amd64 psABI tg@zigo:~/m/mksh $ cat t.c; tcc -run t.c; uname -a; dpkg-query -W tcc #include #include int main(void) { printf("%zu, %zu\n", sizeof(size_t), sizeof(ssize_t)); } 4, 8 Linux zigo.mirbsd.org

Bug#654433: libhtp1: new symbols but unversioned .shlibs

Package: libhtp1 Version: 0.2.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6.3 libhtp1 versions add new symbols but do not provide a minimal version in .shlibs. For instance, I can build a binary with 0.2.6-1 that uses htp_config_register_request_uri_normalize, but that binary will not run wit

Bug#654432: bml: FTBFS(any-i386): No rule to make target `BuzzMachineLoader.dll', needed by `all-am'. Stop.

Package: src:bml Version: 0.6.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: make[4]: *** No rule to make target `BuzzMachineLoader.dll', needed by `all-am'. Stop. Full buil

Bug#654430: vips: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: linux/types.h: No such file or directory

Package: src:vips Version: 7.26.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* b

Bug#654428: blender: FTBFS:

Package: src:blender Version: 2.61-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: [100%] Building CXX object extern/libmv/CMakeFiles/extern_libmv.dir/third_party/glog/src/signal

Processed: Re: Processed: relevant bugs for libav transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 654237 by 654230 641508 651625 652763 652061 Bug #654237 [release.debian.org] transition: libav 0.8 Was blocked by: 654215 654183 654230 654220 641508 654219 654213 654233 654223 654212 651625 654232 652763 654229 653887 654221 654224 652

Bug#556068: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:36:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#556068: fixed in poldi 0.4.1-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #556068, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#556068: NMU diff

attached Cheers, -- Steve McIntyresteve.mcint...@linaro.org Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs diff -u poldi-0.4.1/debian/rules poldi-0.4.1/debian/rules --- poldi-0.4.1/debian/rules +++ poldi-0.4.1/debian/rules @@ -22,8 +22,9 @@

Bug#653941: marked as done (tcc: fail to execute compiled binaries)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:18:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653941: fixed in tcc 0.9.25-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #653941, regarding tcc: fail to execute compiled binaries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#638198: marked as done (CVE-2011-2910: Missing return checks)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:02:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638198: fixed in ax25-tools 0.0.8-13.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #638198, regarding CVE-2011-2910: Missing return checks to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#654408: whiptail crashes

Package: whiptail Version: 0.52.14-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This version of whiptail crashes very often: $ whiptail --yesno 10 40 === Backtrace: = /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(+0x6aa81)[0xf7574a81] /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov

Bug#652700: haildb ftbfs if libcloog-ppl0 is not installed

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:35:15 +, peter green wrote: > haildb ftbfs in wheezy and sid with the following error > > "sorry, unimplemented: Graphite loop optimizations can only be used > if the libcloog-ppl0 package is installed" Hm, builds fine here as-is (i386 sid cowbuilder chroot). Cheers,

Bug#516394: [please]

Dear Security Team, Could you please try to forge my DNS cache, the address is: 127.0.0.1, or ::1, if you prefer to attack it through IPv6. Serge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#654406: orig.tar.gz as shipped contains staging/garbage

Source: id3v2 Version: 0.1.12-2 Severity: serious Here's the complete listing of .orig.tar.gz as of version 0.1.12: drwxr-xr-x nagilo/nagilo 0 2010-03-27 02:29 id3v2-0.1.12/ -rw-r--r-- nagilo/nagilo 19552 2010-03-27 02:28 id3v2-0.1.12/list.o -rw-r--r-- nagilo/nagilo 6012 2010-03-27 02:26 id3

Processed: affects 654380

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 654380 win32-loader Bug #654380 [nsis] nsis: build with recent mingw breaks NSISdl plugin Added indication that 654380 affects win32-loader > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654380: http://bu

Processed: Re: Bug#654380: #654380 (was: nsis: The zmemcpy patch breaks NSISdl::download (at least).)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 654380 + pending Bug #654380 [nsis] nsis: build with recent mingw breaks NSISdl plugin Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654380: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#654380: #654380 (was: nsis: The zmemcpy patch breaks NSISdl::download (at least).)

tags 654380 + pending thanks > Le mardi, 3 janvier 2012 11.00:10, Didier Raboud a écrit : > > This seems to correspond to RedHat's [RH#734905] and to NSIS's > [NSIS#3406350]. > > I'm currently trying a build with the attached patch and will report back > if it works or not. It works indeed. And

Processed: correct bug number

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 640688 patch Bug #640688 [src:slxfig] slxfig: FTBFS: configure: error: unable to find the slang library and header file slang.h Added tag(s) patch. > user debian-d...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-d...@lists.debian.org (was randoma

Bug#654319: sarg: FTBFS: Can't exec "cmake": No such file or directory

Hi! Luigi Gangitano writes: > I cannot reproduce this bug, can you please check the debhelper > version on the box? Since sarg uses debhelper for all of its building, > this should definitely be a debhelper bug, not a sarg one. As sarg fails on all 13 buildds I strongly doubt it is a buildd pr

Bug#653321: marked as done (fabric: Missing dependency on python-paramiko)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:02:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#653321: fixed in fabric 1.3.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #653321, regarding fabric: Missing dependency on python-paramiko to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: slxfig: FTBFS: configure: error: unable to find the slang library and header file slang.h

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 622051 patch Bug #622051 [src:isakmpd] isakmpd: FTBFS: (.text+0x4f): undefined reference to `inflateEnd' Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #622051 to the same tags previously set > user debian-d...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian

Bug#640688: slxfig: FTBFS: configure: error: unable to find the slang library and header file slang.h

tags 622051 patch user debian-d...@lists.debian.org usertags 622051 multiarch thanks Hello, here's a patch from Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slxfig/0.2.0~.35-1ubuntu1 diff -u slxfig-0.2.0~.35/debian/rules slxfig-0.2.0~.35/debian/rules --- slxfig-0.2.0~.35/debian/rules +++ slxfig-0

Processed: Re: Bug#653321: fabric: Missing dependency on python-paramiko

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 653321 + pending Bug #653321 [fabric] fabric: Missing dependency on python-paramiko Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#653321: fabric: Missing dependency on python-paramiko

tags 653321 + pending thanks > * Add python-paramiko to build dependencies (fixes FTBFS) > - update debian/control Thanks for the patch; pending upload. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- signature.asc Description: PGP signa

Bug#627152: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#627152: alsa-source: problem exists with i868 also (linux-headers-2.6.38-2-686)

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Can that "soon" be "now"? I'm extremely busy until the 22nd, but I can try my best. If that doesn't work out, I'll have a look at the end of the month. -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jo...@

Bug#652257: marked as done (frama-c: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot find OcamlGraph in the current directory.)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:32:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652257: fixed in frama-c 20111001+nitrogen+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652257, regarding frama-c: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot find OcamlGraph in the current directory. to be marked as done. T

Processed: More information on #635321 required

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 635321 important Bug #635321 [libsoundtouch0] memory corruption when using bpmdetect Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags 635321 moreinfo Bug #635321 [libsoundtouch0] memory corruption when using bpmdetect Added tag(s) moreinf

Bug#635321: More information on #635321 required

severity 635321 important tags 635321 moreinfo tags 635321 - confirmed thanks Hi, I cannot reproduce this anymore. I set a lower severity for now as we're waiting for more information from the reporter. Regards, -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | al

Processed: #654380 (was: nsis: The zmemcpy patch breaks NSISdl::download (at least).)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 654380 nsis: build with recent mingw breaks NSISdl plugin Bug #654380 [nsis] nsis: The zmemcpy patch breaks NSISdl::download (at least). Changed Bug title to 'nsis: build with recent mingw breaks NSISdl plugin' from 'nsis: The zmemcpy pat

Bug#654380: #654380 (was: nsis: The zmemcpy patch breaks NSISdl::download (at least).)

retitle 654380 nsis: build with recent mingw breaks NSISdl plugin tags 654380 + upstream thanks Le mardi, 3 janvier 2012 11.00:10, Didier Raboud a écrit : > Package: nsis > Version: 2.46-6 > Severity: serious > Justification: Breaks win32-loader > > Hi Thomas, > > it seems that the zmemcpy patch

Bug#649900: marked as done (CVE-2011-4344: XSS)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:16:45 + with message-id <4f02d58d.4080...@ubuntu.com> and subject line RE: CVE-2011-4344: XSS has caused the Debian Bug report #649900, regarding CVE-2011-4344: XSS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#649900: CVE-2011-4344: XSS

This XSS issue was resolved/released in 0.9.10-jenkins-29 so the package in Debian already contains the fix for this security issue. Apologies - I should have detailed this in the changelog entry. Cheers James -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-r

Bug#644501: marked as done (libeventmachine-ruby: not installable in sid, needs to be upgraded to newer libeventmachine-ruby1.8)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Jan 2012 11:05:59 +0100 with message-id <20120103100559.gd5...@density.luon.net> and subject line Closed by upload has caused the Debian Bug report #644501, regarding libeventmachine-ruby: not installable in sid, needs to be upgraded to newer libeventmachine-ruby1.8 to be

Processed: Forwarded

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 654341 https://launchpad.net/bugs/911146 Bug #654341 [inkscape] inkscape reads .eps files from /tmp instead of the current directory Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://launchpad.net/bugs/911146'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#654380: nsis: The zmemcpy patch breaks NSISdl::download (at least).

Package: nsis Version: 2.46-6 Severity: serious Justification: Breaks win32-loader Hi Thomas, it seems that the zmemcpy patch currently breaks the win32-loader build by making NSISdl::download fail. To reproduce that: try win32-loader 0.7.4.2 as built with nsis 2.46-5 [0] and try (works with wi

Bug#516394: [CVE-2008-4392]

Dear Sergiusz, it seems my reply to your private email didn't convince you, so replying again on behalf of the Security Team. > Dear Security Team, > > CVE-2008-4392 has "Candidate" status and is being reviewed for almost > three years now, and still must accepted by the CVE Editorial > Board[

Processed: reassign 654355 to src:ggz-client-libs, reassign 654365 to src:libggz

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 654355 src:ggz-client-libs 0.0.14.1-1.1 Bug #654355 [ggz-client-libs] RM: ggz-client-libs -- RoM/RoQA; unmaintained Bug reassigned from package 'ggz-client-libs' to 'src:ggz-client-libs'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 0.0.14.1

Processed: Re: Bug#651688: [pkg-ggz-maintainers] Should ggz-server be orphaned or removed from Debian?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 651688 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 Bug#651688: Should ggz-server be orphaned or removed from Debian? Bug 651688 cloned as bugs 654355-654367. > # removing ggz-client-libs breaks freeciv, kdegames, lordsawar, widelands > reas

Bug#651688: [pkg-ggz-maintainers] Should ggz-server be orphaned or removed from Debian?

clone 651688 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 # removing ggz-client-libs breaks freeciv, kdegames, lordsawar, widelands reassign -1 ggz-client-libs 0.0.14.1-1.1 retitle -1 RM: ggz-client-libs -- RoM/RoQA; unmaintained reassign -2 ftp.debian.org retitle -2 RM: ggz-docs -- RoM/RoQA; unmain

Processed: Downgrading/untagging

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 627503 important Bug #627503 [tinyproxy] CVE-2011-1843 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tag 627503 - security Bug #627503 [tinyproxy] CVE-2011-1843 Removed tag(s) security. > retitle 627503 Validate Port directive value Bug #62

Bug#627503: Downgrading/untagging

severity 627503 important tag 627503 - security retitle 627503 Validate Port directive value thanks A small summary of what's going on with this: - The Debian security team does not consider this to be a security issue as tinyproxy's configuration file is under the control of the admin, and a

  1   2   >