Bug#604382: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 05:02:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604382: fixed in soqt 1.5.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604382, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: Bug#610777: fixed in mathgl 1.11.0.1-3

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 610777 Bug #610777 {Done: Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos } [src:mathgl] mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. > found 610777 1

Bug#610777: fixed in mathgl 1.11.0.1-3

2011-02-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
reopen 610777 found 610777 1.11.0.1-3 thanks Hi, | Changes: | mathgl (1.11.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=low | . |* Upload in unstable |* Change symbols files for pbuilder --distribution unstable (Closes: #610777) I'm not sure what that means, but your package still FTBFS on: i386, kfreeb

Bug#604290: kkbswitch removal

2011-02-12 Thread Roman Odaisky
> As the last upstream release was at 2005, and I believe there is a keyboard > indicator / switch utility, I'm fine with removing this package from > unstable/testing after the squeeze release. To the best of my knowledge, nothing other than kkbswitch provides per-layout keyboard shortcuts and l

Bug#608194: marked as done (lincredits: broken Depends after rebuild)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:38:51 +0100 with message-id <20110212233851.ga6...@jwilk.net> and subject line Re: Bug#608194: lincredits: broken Depends after rebuild has caused the Debian Bug report #608194, regarding lincredits: broken Depends after rebuild to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#610777: marked as done (mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:17:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#610777: fixed in mathgl 1.11.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #610777, regarding mathgl: FBTFS: broken symbols to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#604314: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 02:01:13 +0100 with message-id <4d572d59.4070...@debian.org> and subject line Bug#612882: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604314, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This m

Bug#604300: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:57:59 +0100 with message-id <4d572c97.5040...@debian.org> and subject line Bug#540211: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604300, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This m

Bug#604297: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:59:49 +0100 with message-id <4d572d05.9070...@debian.org> and subject line Bug#613032: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604297, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This m

Bug#604570: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:37:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#612820: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604570, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#613119: archivemount: uninstallable on kfreebsd

2011-02-12 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: archivemount Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: serious The archivemount package depends on fuse-utils, which is not available on kfreebsd. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#613118: asterisk-flite: uninstallable on kfreebsd

2011-02-12 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: asterisk-flite Version: 0.1~beta2-1 Severity: serious The asterisk-flite package depends on asterisk, which is not available on kfreebsd. It should probably not be built there until asterisk itself is available. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#613117: asterisk-espeak: uninstallable on kfreebsd

2011-02-12 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: asterisk-espeak Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious The asterisk-espeak package depends on asterisk, which is not available on kfreebsd. It should probably not be built there until asterisk itself is available. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#613085: marked as done (sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:58:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#613085: fixed in sobby 0.4.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #613085, regarding sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:21:41PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > If you know that this is the complete list, including 15 lines of > > "rm -f" and 31 lines of "rmdir ... 2> /dev/null || true" in > > depth-first order would seem best to me. Or

Bug#613098: Zero is unusable on amd64

2011-02-12 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: openjdk-6-jre-zero Version: 6b18-1.8.3-2 Severity: grave At least on amd64, all tests fail during build, and all non-trivial programs fail. Here's a stack trace from "javac -zero" compiling a trivial program: java.nio.BufferOverflowException at java.nio.charset.CoderResult.throw

Bug#613094: libatlas: Error in cblas_dgemm in ATLAS 3.8.3 in Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 32 bits

2011-02-12 Thread José Luis García Pallero
Package: libatlas3gf-base Version: 3.8.3-29 Severity: grave File: libatlas Justification: renders package unusable In Debian GNU/Linux all runs OK, but in the new Debian GNU/kFreeBSD an error with cblas_dgemm occurs (I don't know if the error affects to sgemm, cgemm and/or zgemm). If I try to mu

Processed: tagging 536376

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 536376 + pending Bug #536376 [evas] evas: Not suitable for testing yet Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 536376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536376 Deb

Bug#611722: marked as done (nbd: FTBFS: make check-TESTS failure)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:51:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#611722: fixed in nbd 1:2.9.20-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #611722, regarding nbd: FTBFS: make check-TESTS failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#613085: sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script

2011-02-12 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:44:08PM +0100, Dennis Keitzel wrote: > The sobby init-script is configured to create a default autosave.obby file, > if there isn't one yet. However, as the file is created by root, the file is > owned by root. Therefore, the sobby user is unable to write data to this fil

Bug#612618: [Pkg-chromium-maint] Bug#612618: FTBFS: chrome/common/metrics_helpers.cc:22:20: error: prtime.h: No such file or directory

2011-02-12 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Giuseppe Iuculano writes: > On 02/09/2011 04:42 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: >> chrome/common/metrics_helpers.cc:22:20: error: prtime.h: No such file or >> directory > > Have you installed libnspr4-dev? After setting VERBOSE ?= 1 in debian/rules I see g++ -g -O2 -g -O2 -Werror -

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > + rmdir /share/config2> /dev/null && rmdir /share 2> > /dev/null || true 2> /dev/null and || true reversed of course. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.

Processed: Re: Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 613083 + pending Bug #613083 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613083: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 613083 + pending thanks Hi, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:21:41PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > If you know that this is the complete list, including 15 lines of "rm > -f" and 31 lines of "rmdir ... 2> /dev/null || true" in depth-first > order would seem best to me. Or do I dont, it's the o

Bug#613085: sobby: Incorrect owner for created autosave.obby in init script

2011-02-12 Thread Dennis Keitzel
Package: sobby Version: 0.4.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The sobby init-script is configured to create a default autosave.obby file, if there isn't one yet. However, as the file is created by root, the file is owned by root. Therefore, the sobby user is unable to

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:28:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1:3.3.0-3"; then > > BTW, it would be good if you limited the cleanup to the cases where > the problematic version was actually i

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1:3.3.0-3"; then BTW, it would be good if you limited the cleanup to the cases where the problematic version was actually installed, i.e. don't clean

Bug#612333: please update for LibreOffice and share/extensions

2011-02-12 Thread Innocent De Marchi
>And even if not, closoing a bug when it's not fixed is nonsense, too. This is >not >just wishlist (which can be closed if you disagree, but as you agree you >should fix >it it's not to be closed), but a real bug. Ok. I sent an email to the upstream author explaining the situation. Then release

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:54:22PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > On Saturday 12 February 2011, you wrote: > > > And what do people store in /share and /user? > > > > /share is a common name for additional file systems (e.g. remote > > NFS sh

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:54:22PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Saturday 12 February 2011, you wrote: > > And what do people store in /share and /user? > > /share is a common name for additional file systems (e.g. remote NFS > shares). You cannot assume that just because a dir is not in the

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:47:22PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:43:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1:3.3.0-3"; then > > rm -rf /share > > rm -rf /user > > fi > > > > > > Are

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Saturday 12 February 2011, you wrote: > And what do people store in /share and /user? /share is a common name for additional file systems (e.g. remote NFS shares). You cannot assume that just because a dir is not in the FHS, people don't use it. > And you hopefully suggest an alternative wa

Processed: found 613083 in 1:3.3.1~rc1-1, notfound 613083 in 1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 613083 1:3.3.1~rc1-1 Bug #613083 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst Bug Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:3.3.1~rc1-1. > notfound 613083 1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1 Bug #613083 [libreoffice-common] libr

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:43:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1:3.3.0-3"; then > rm -rf /share > rm -rf /user > fi > > > Are you mad? You must nod delete arbitrary directories! Some people > store important in

Bug#613050: Sorry about this

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ it would actually help to send also the mail to the submitter and not only the buglog... ] On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:49:06AM -0800, Dave Beckett wrote: > This clearly shouldn't have been uploaded until raptor2 was accepted into > sid (1 month waiting), which is a dependency. That doesn't mat

Bug#613083: libreoffice-common: Deletes /share and /user in preinst

2011-02-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: libreoffice-common Version: 1:3a3.3.1~rc1-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss from preinst: if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1:3.3.0-3"; then rm -rf /share rm -rf /user fi Are you mad? You must nod delete arb

Processed: found 604825 in 0.47.0-2+b1

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 604825 0.47.0-2+b1 Bug #604825 [inkscape] please build against libwpg 0.2.0 Bug Marked as found in versions inkscape/0.47.0-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 604825: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Processed: serious

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 612331 serious Bug #612331 [docvert-openoffice.org] please update for LibreOffice and share/extensions Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 612332 serious Bug #612332 [openoffice.org-zemberek] please update for LibreOff

Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels

2011-02-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Cyril Brulebois , 2011-02-12, 16:29: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau that was recently uploaded to unstable requires a >= 2.6.34 kernel, but sid has only 2.6.32: […] That's documented, I was perfectly aware of that when writing this bug report. and not a bug in the package. I disagree. Als

Processed: Re: Bug#613075: kmix: Doesn't start

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 613075 important Bug #613075 [kmix] kmix: Doesn't start Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Bug#613075: kmix: Doesn't start

2011-02-12 Thread Modestas Vainius
severity 613075 important thanks Hello, On šeštadienis 12 Vasaris 2011 18:55:50 kakadu wrote: > Package: kmix > Version: 4:4.4.5-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I can start kmix. I can't see it in my tint2 tray kmix target is KDE desktop. The fact that tray ico

Bug#613075: kmix: Doesn't start

2011-02-12 Thread kakadu
Package: kmix Version: 4:4.4.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can start kmix. I can't see it in my tint2 tray. $ ps -e | grep kmix $ kmix Connecting to deprecated signal QDBusConnectionInterface::serviceOwnerChanged(QString,QString,QString) kmix(12435): _refcount alre

Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels

2011-02-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (12/02/2011): > That's documented, and not a bug in the package. Also, linux-2.6's > upload to sid is upcoming. For the record, I was writing up some doc about it when I received this bug report. That's now in the FAQ, with a pointer to the README.Debian files on git.d.o: http:/

Bug#611217: marked as done (CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:17:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#611217: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.1.1-P1-16 has caused the Debian Bug report #611217, regarding CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#611217: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#611217: CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message

2011-02-12 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:09:30PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 07:58:24 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers > > > as

Bug#613050: Sorry about this

2011-02-12 Thread Dave Beckett
This clearly shouldn't have been uploaded until raptor2 was accepted into sid (1 month waiting), which is a dependency. I built it against my own local copy. Not sure how to resolve it now. Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#613067: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:29:44 +0100 with message-id <20110212152944.gs8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels has caused the Debian Bug report #613067, regarding xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid ker

Bug#613067: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: doesn't work with sid kernels

2011-02-12 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.16+git20101210+8bb8231-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: sid wheezy xserver-xorg-video-nouveau that was recently uploaded to unstable requires a >= 2.6.34 kernel, but sid has only 2.6.32: $ rmadison linux-2.6 | grep

Bug#613066: deluge-gtk segfaults on start because of new libcairo2 in sid

2011-02-12 Thread Alex Dedul
Package: deluge Version: 1.3.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing new libcairo2_1.10.2-2 in sid deluge-gtk started to segfault on start. After downgrading to older libcairo2_1.8.10-6 deluge-gtk started to work okay as before. PS. Its similar to gentoo's b

Bug#612956: marked as done (Unmatched dependencies for nvidia-glx, xserver-xorg-core too new)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:09:34 +0100 with message-id <4d56a2ae.8070...@abeckmann.de> and subject line Re: Bug#612956: Unmatched dependencies for nvidia-glx, xserver-xorg-core too new has caused the Debian Bug report #612956, regarding Unmatched dependencies for nvidia-glx, xserver-xo

Processed: Re: uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 613050 librdf0-dev Bug #613050 [libdf0-dev] uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev Warning: Unknown package 'libdf0-dev' Bug reassigned from package 'libdf0-dev' to 'librdf0-dev'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 1.0.10-

Bug#613058: FTBFS: Error: OCAMLOPT: Not found

2011-02-12 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Source: ocaml-melt Version: 1.3.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: ftbfs Hi, ocaml-melt FTBFS on some architecture. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml-melt&suite=unstable https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ocaml-melt&arch=alpha&ver=1.3.0-1&stamp=1297447688&file=log&a

Bug#612723: marked as done (iodine overwrites /etc/default/iodine during upgrade with a sourced version of that file)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:33:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#612723: fixed in iodine 0.6.0~rc1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #612723, regarding iodine overwrites /etc/default/iodine during upgrade with a sourced version of that file to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#604347: marked as done (Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:32:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604347: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.23-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #604347, regarding Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#613050: uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 613050 librdf0-dev found 613050 1.0.10-3 thanks [ almost fullquoting for maintainers' mbox sake ] Hi, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 03:12:05PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Package: libdf0-dev Hrmpf. reassigning :) > Version: 1.0.10-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid > > Hi, > > how histo

Bug#613050: uninstallable in sid due to new librasqual3-dev

2011-02-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: libdf0-dev Version: 1.0.10-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, how history repeats itself... In a move the same as #500083 a new rasqual with librasqual3-dev was uploaded without updating redland with it. (I see a 1.0.12-1 in experimental, though, maybe that should be uploaded to sid)? A

Processed: Re: Bug#613013: luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 613013 important Bug #613013 [luatex] luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags 613013 + unreproducible Bug #613013 [luatex] luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf Ad

Bug#613013: luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf

2011-02-12 Thread Norbert Preining
severity 613013 important tags 613013 + unreproducible thanks Hi Lionel, thanks for the report, very strange On Sa, 12 Feb 2011, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Setting up luatex (0.60.2-1) ... > Building format(s) --byengine luatex. > This may take some time... > fmtutil-sys failed. Output h

Processed: closing 612883

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 612883 1:3.3.0-1 Bug#612883: Cannot install openoffice.org 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1:3.3.0-1, send any further explanations to Thilo Pfennig > thanks Stopping

Bug#613044: foo-yc20: generated files are not generated during build time

2011-02-12 Thread Torsten Werner
Package: foo-yc20 Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Hi, the files gen/*.cpp are generated from faust/*.dsp but they are not rebuilt. Please regenerate them with faust. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subjec

Bug#611217: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#611217: CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message

2011-02-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 07:58:24 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers as > > not-a-blocker, i.e. it doesn't hold back the release if not fixed, a fix > >

Bug#613022: marked as done (fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:47:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#613022: fixed in fcitx 1:4.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #613022, regarding fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#604299: Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries

2011-02-12 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 07:31:05PM +0100, Eckhart Wörner wrote: > Source: knutclient > Severity: wishlist > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qt3libs-removal kde3libs-removal > > > Dear maintainer, > > The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3 libraries from >

Bug#612033: Slightly different version of Segoon's patch

2011-02-12 Thread Nikolas Garofil
I already pushed a patch based on conky-tmp.diff that removes the temporary file immediately after warning Segoon but before before noticing that Segoon did the same thing with conky-tmp2.diff . It's pushed on conky's master branch as commit 70b6f35a846f7b85bd11e66c1f23feee6b369688 . The only diffe

Processed: Re: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#613022: fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 613022 + pending Bug #613022 [fcitx-data] fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 613022: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#613022: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#613022: fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx

2011-02-12 Thread Aron Xu
tags 613022 + pending thanks Will be fixed in next upload in a couple of hours. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#612964: /etc/pointercal

2011-02-12 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
lance...@contrees-du-reve.com writes: > My /etc/pointercal: > 557 38667 -4654632 -51172 121 46965312 65536 same here: 557 38667 -4654632 -51172 121 46965312 65536 > I don't thing I ever edited that file. By "calibration" above, I meant > the option that I've added in my xorg.conf. ah ok. -

Bug#612964: /etc/pointercal

2011-02-12 Thread lancelot
My /etc/pointercal: 557 38667 -4654632 -51172 121 46965312 65536 I don't thing I ever edited that file. By "calibration" above, I meant the option that I've added in my xorg.conf. -- Christophe TORDEUX 113 rue de la Barrière 19000 Tulle mob: +33-6-86-50-83-65 tel: +33-5-55-93-64-35 -- To UN

Bug#613022: fcitx-data: file conflict with older version of fcitx

2011-02-12 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Package: fcitx-data Version: 1:4.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 As fcitx-data contains a file that was previously contained in fcitx, it should Replace: fcitx. Selecting previously deselected package fcitx-data. Unpacking fcitx-data (from .../fcitx-data_1%3a4.0.1-2_all.deb) ...

Bug#613017: marked as done (rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not installable)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:05:31 + with message-id <1297505131.27877.2251.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#613017: rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not installable has caused the Debian Bug report #613017, regarding rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not insta

Processed: Re: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#612264: tk-tile and tk colliding dir

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 612264 normal Bug #612264 [tcl-dev] tk-tile and tk colliding dir Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 612264: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug#612264: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#612264: tk-tile and tk colliding dir

2011-02-12 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
severity 612264 normal thanks I'm reducing the severity of this bug because I tried to install/remove/reinstall in various order tk-tile and tk-dev without problems. So the issue could be due to some odd setup on the original box. While investigating the problem there, it is better changing the se

Processed: block 607372 with 610676

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 607372 with 610676 Bug #607372 [phpunit] phpunit: Tries to use nonexisting file Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 607372: 610676 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607372: ht

Bug#613017: rxvt-unicode-256color: Package not installable

2011-02-12 Thread Julien Rabier
Package: rxvt-unicode-256color Version: 9.09-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package is not installable. It is in conflict with rxvt-unicode, and then with itself as it provides rxvt- unicode. See attached output of apt-cache info rxvt-unicode-256color. -- System

Bug#612964: [pkg-fso-maint] fix

2011-02-12 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Lancelot du Lac writes: > Calibration is not perfect, I did it through trial and error. Did you write /etc/pointercal yourself? The one from pkg-fso has always been ok for me so I wonder if devices really vary that much. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#613013: luatex: fails to upgrade in absence of fmtutil.cnf

2011-02-12 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Package: luatex Version: 0.60.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 Setting up luatex (0.60.2-1) ... Building format(s) --byengine luatex. This may take some time... fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fmtutil.GqN8HXC0 Please include this file if you report a bug.

Processed: Now affects testing

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 606442 + wheezy Bug #606442 [vimhelp-de] vimhelp-de: Doesn't work with vim 7.3 Added tag(s) wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 606442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606

Bug#606442: Now affects testing

2011-02-12 Thread Sven Joachim
tags 606442 + wheezy thanks FYI, vim 7.3 migrated to testing when squeeze was released, so this bug affects testing now. Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#612964: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: touchscreen of Neo Freerunner unusable because touches are misplaced)

2011-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:10:16 +0100 with message-id <20110212081016.gj21...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#612964: fix has caused the Debian Bug report #612964, regarding xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: touchscreen of Neo Freerunner unusable because touches are misplaced to be marke