Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#610513: fixed in toppler 1.1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #610513,
regarding toppler crashes when selecting the default mission
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # RoarAudio/Tiger (void pointer deref)
> tag 610254 + pending
Bug #610254 [src:roaraudio] roaraudio: FTBFS: hash_tiger.c:786: error: invalid
use of void expression
Added tag(s) pending.
> # DECnet (dnet-common recommends)
> tag 608807 + pending f
Package: libgoogle-perftools-dev
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Two different systems, two different programs under profiling. Seem latest
package in testing is broken
#0 0x7fa937cd9df2 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libunwind.so.7
#1 0x7fa937cd7d46 in
Hello Agustin Martin
> Typical problems with those chained '&&' appear when 'set -e' is used, but
> amavisd-milter init script does not use it.
Ah ok thanks will keep this info in mind.
> When there are more that two elements in the chain, I usually find these
> if-clauses way more readable an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # probably caused by new x11proto-video
> tags 610635 + sid
Bug #610635 [src:xine-lib] xine-lib: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of
function 'XvMCFlushSurface'
Added tag(s) sid.
> # looks like new x11proto-render
> tags 610655 + sid
Bug #61065
* Paul Piscuc [2011-01-20 14:25]:
> Package: postfixadmin
I don't see such a package in Debian. Do you know where you got it
from? What does
dpkg -p postfixadmin | grep Maintainer:
say?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 21:17:31 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Salut Julien,
>
> I will upload this evening. I just received the OK of the upstream
> maintainer.
> I plan to apply another (small) patch to fix 608979 if you do not mind.
>
Sounds good to me.
Merci,
Julien
signature.asc
Descr
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:37:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:00:01 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > diff -ru toppler-1.1.4/level.cc toppler-1.1.4.n1/level.cc
> > --- toppler-1.1.4/level.cc 2009-10-11 01:46:06.0 +0200
> > +++ toppler-1.1.4.n1
Source: swi-prolog
Version: 5.10.1-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
gcc -c -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -I.
-I/tmp/buildd/swi-prolog-5.10.1/packages/xpce/src -I/usr/include
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -fPIC -fPIC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
x11/xcommon.c -o x11/xcommon
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Not squeeze-specific
> tag 610651 - squeeze
Bug #610651 [src:m68k-vme-tftplilo] m68k-vme-tftplilo: b-d uninstallable in
squeeze
Removed tag(s) squeeze.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
610651: ht
# Not squeeze-specific
tag 610651 - squeeze
thanks
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 20:48 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> m68k-vme-tftplilo build-depends on "gcc-m68k-linux [!m68k],
> binutils-m68k-linux [!m68k]". However, no such packages exist in
> sid/squeeze. As a consequence, this package can be rebuilt on
Source: m68k-vme-tftplilo
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
m68k-vme-tftplilo build-depends on "gcc-m68k-linux [!m68k],
binutils-m68k-linux [!m68k]". However, no such packages exist in
sid/squeeze. As a consequence, this package can be rebuilt only on m68k,
which is not a releas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package pdftk
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'pdftk'
Limit currently set to 'package':'pdftk'
> reopen 610394
Bug #610394 {Done: Johann Felix Soden } [pdftk] Missing
dependency on libbcprov-java
'reopen' may be
Source: xine-lib
Version: 1.1.19-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
/bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../include -I../.. -I../../include -I../../include
-I../../src -I../../src/xine-engine -I../../src/xine-engine
-
Hi Bill,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:00:01 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> diff -ru toppler-1.1.4/level.cc toppler-1.1.4.n1/level.cc
> --- toppler-1.1.4/level.cc2009-10-11 01:46:06.0 +0200
> +++ toppler-1.1.4.n1/level.cc 2011-01-16 17:50:52.0 +0100
> @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 600945 important
Bug #600945 [deluge] deluge: Client dies on start up
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags 600945 unreproducible
Bug #600945 [deluge] deluge: Client dies on start up
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> On Thu, 20 Ja
severity 600945 important
tags 600945 unreproducible
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:48:52 -0400
David Prévot wrote:
> Le 20/01/2011 10:33, Cristian Greco a écrit :
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> > are you still able to reproduce this bug?
>
> The problem is the same with deluge 1.3.1-1 on my machine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 20/01/2011 10:33, Cristian Greco a écrit :
> Hi,
Hi Christian,
> are you still able to reproduce this bug?
The problem is the same with deluge 1.3.1-1 on my machine. Please note
that I'm not able to reproduce it on any other machine (amd64 or i
Hi,
are you still able to reproduce this bug? I still have no idea about
how to track down your problem.
Thanks,
--
Cristian Greco
GPG key ID: 0xCF4D32E4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606268 squeeze-can-defer
tag 606268 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 22:51:41 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 13.01.2011 22:22, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > [Summary: NetworkManager doesn't properly transition away from
> > /etc/netw
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 606268 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#606268: Ignores wireless interfaces configured by d-i
There were no usertags set.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 610530 important
Bug #610530 [linux-2.6] ocfs2-tools: BUG at fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:2226!
invalid opcode
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
610
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:02:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#610288: fixed in thin 1.2.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610288,
regarding thin: ActiveRecord session store doesn't work with Rails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:28:06AM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> Dear Teodor Micu
>
> thanks for looking at my patch and thanks for your mail, could you please give
> me an example how the && sequences may fail as I've done some tests with it
> and
> it seems it catches all normal configurations,
Package: postfixadmin
Version: 2.3.2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
After enabling the mailbox_postdeletion_script, and copying the script from
examples, one might try to test the script if it is able to run properly from
the command line. Running the script with no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 608724 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696677
Bug #608724 [gwibber] gwibber bypasses certificate checking when providing the
login/password for OAuth
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696677'.
> thanks
Sto
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:34:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#608454: fixed in ppl 0.11-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #608454,
regarding file conflict in libppl0.11-dev and libppl0.10-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Package: calendarserver
Severity: normal
There is a version typo. There is no version "2.4.dfsg-4.1". The latest tested
version is "2.4.dfsg-5".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.7
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-a
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:32:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#608801: fixed in u-boot 2010.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #608801,
regarding Fails to build on i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
29 matches
Mail list logo
