Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Tue Jan 18 07:03:25 UTC 2011 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: u-boot > tags 608801 + pending Bug #608801 [u-boot] Fails to build on i386 Added

Bug#610338: only checked testing/unstable

2011-01-17 Thread Mike O'Connor
found 610338 0.15~svn3447 thanks > Have you seen updated packages? No, I only looked at the version in testint/unstable. Marking the bug accordingly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#610370: python3.2-dev: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/python3.2mu-config', which is also in package python3.2 3.2~b2-1

2011-01-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: python3.2-dev Version: 3.2~rc1-1 Severity: serious There's a file conflict between python3.2-dev 3.2~rc1-1 and python3.2 3.2~b2-1: | Preparing to replace python3.2-dev 3.2~b2-1 (using .../python3.2-dev_3.2~rc1-1_i386.deb) ... | Unpacking replacement python3.2-dev ... | dpkg: error proc

Bug#610280: marked as done (rhythmbox: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'RB_DISPLAY_PAGE_GROUP_DEVICES' undeclared)

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:47:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#610280: fixed in rhythmbox 0.13.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #610280, regarding rhythmbox: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'RB_DISPLAY_PAGE_GROUP_DEVICES' undeclared to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#610293: marked as done (file conflict with gnome-media 2.30.0-1)

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:47:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#610293: fixed in libgnome-media-profiles 2.91.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #610293, regarding file conflict with gnome-media 2.30.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#610248: arrayprobe

2011-01-17 Thread Szymon Janc
Hello All, Since upstream seams to be no longer active on this one I went ahead and did some maintenance work on arrayprobe. I don't use arrayprobe and looked at it because it is RC for Squeeze so please review (it's not one-liner) and (if brave enough:) test it. Instead of just fix reported i

Bug#609428: marked as done (boinc: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory)

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:17:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#609428: fixed in boinc 6.12.8+dfsg-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #609428, regarding boinc: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This

Bug#610248: Assertion error on squeeze/i386

2011-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 18:34 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > we're running arrayprobe on spohr.debian.org. After upgrading to > squeeze it no longer works at all: > > weasel@spohr:~$ sudo arrayprobe > arrayprobe: malloc.c:3097: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) > (((char *) &((av)->bi

Bug#607903: Fails to build kernel module: missing dependency on libc6-dev

2011-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 10:00 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Julien Cristau writes: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 17:54:47 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> This is fixed in Git. I'm working with upstream to coordinate a security > >> release which should be out within the next week, so will upload th

Processed: Re: Bug#609886: libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 609886 normal Bug #609886 [libapache2-mod-jk] libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#609886: libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats

2011-01-17 Thread Miguel Landaeta
severity 609886 normal thanks On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26:15AM +0100, eyck wrote: > This was detected on soon-to-become-production server, and then reproduced > by using clean template, performing upgrade of libapache2_mod_jk, and then > downgrade fixes the problem. Both machines came from the

Processed: Re: Bug#610280: rhythmbox: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'RB_DISPLAY_PAGE_GROUP_DEVICES' undeclared

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 610280 + pending upstream Bug #610280 [src:rhythmbox] rhythmbox: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'RB_DISPLAY_PAGE_GROUP_DEVICES' undeclared Added tag(s) upstream and pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Bug#610280: rhythmbox: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: error: 'RB_DISPLAY_PAGE_GROUP_DEVICES' undeclared

2011-01-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
tags 610280 + pending upstream thanks Heya, On 17/01/11 00:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*: > | libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. > -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"Rhythmbox\" -I../.. > -I../../backends -I../../li

Bug#609559: usertag: can-defer → Re: Bug#609559: psimedia: uninstallable on kfreebsd-i386

2011-01-17 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Axel Beckert (10/01/2011): > > psmedia is currently uninstallable on kfreebsd-i386 as there is no > > gstreamer0.10-alsa on that architecture. > > could you please check the attached patch looks sane? It seems to do > the job here. I'm going to NMU if you confirm. H

Processed: Re: Bug#610296: Cannot build new version of pixelmed package

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > tag 610296 + squeeze-ignore Bug #610296 [pixelmed] Cannot build new version of pixelmed package Added tag(s) sque

Bug#610296: Cannot build new version of pixelmed package

2011-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
user release.debian@packages.debian.org tag 610296 + squeeze-ignore usertag 610296 + squeeze-can-defer thanks On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:28 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: pixelmed > Version: 20101204 > Severity: serious > Tags: upstream > Justification: fails to build from source >

Bug#597933:

2011-01-17 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The packages at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sdcc look good to me. AFAIK this bug is present in older versions of Debian as well, it surely is in 2.8.0. Philipp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment:

Bug#610327: marked as done (shorewall6-lite: init script: [: 20: missing ])

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:17:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#610327: fixed in shorewall6-lite 4.4.11.6-1+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610327, regarding shorewall6-lite: init script: [: 20: missing ] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#610314: marked as done (shorewall-lite: init script: [: 20: missing ])

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:17:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#610314: fixed in shorewall-lite 4.4.11.6-1+squeeze1 has caused the Debian Bug report #610314, regarding shorewall-lite: init script: [: 20: missing ] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#609753: missing dependencies

2011-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 22:05 -0500, Christopher Lunsford wrote: > > This package wasn't in Lenny, has relatively low popcon, no reverse > > dependencies and has only ever been uploaded twice. I'll look at > > removing it from Squeeze over the weekend if this hasn't been resolved > > before then. >

Bug#610327: Pre-approval for t-p-u upload of {shorewall,shorewall6}-lite

2011-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:18 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:31:46PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > Please disregard the second diff, as it is already part of the package > > in squeeze (just a bit of forgetfulness on my part, not remembering it > > was already th

Bug#610257: forwarded to ubuntu

2011-01-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
Various debian people have forwarded the issue to ubuntu. https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/141763 I think they have got enough requests by now. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#610333: unattended-upgrades: delaying hibernation until crob job finishes is unacceptable

2011-01-17 Thread Michael Vogt
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:30:38PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Package: unattended-upgrades > Version: 0.62.2 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The hook /etc/pm/sleep.d/10_unattended-upgrades-hibernate deliberate

Bug#610327: Pre-approval for t-p-u upload of {shorewall,shorewall6}-lite

2011-01-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:31:46PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Please disregard the second diff, as it is already part of the package > in squeeze (just a bit of forgetfulness on my part, not remembering it > was already there). So, I only require approval for the init script > change. > I

Processed: tagging 610314, tagging 610327

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 610314 + confirmed Bug #610314 [shorewall-lite] shorewall-lite: init script: [: 20: missing ] Added tag(s) confirmed. > tags 610327 + confirmed Bug #610327 [shorewal

Bug#610314: Pre-approval for t-p-u upload of {shorewall,shorewall6}-lite

2011-01-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:35:49AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Release Team, > > It has just recently been reported that the shorewall-lite package in > testing (and likewise, the shorewall6-lite package in testing) contains > a bug which renders the package largely unusable. The associate

Bug#610338: psi-plus: contains non-free icons; inadequate copyright file

2011-01-17 Thread Boris Pek
Have you seen updated packages? http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/psi-plus http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/psi-plus/current/changelog.html http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/psi-plus/current/copyright -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ.

Bug#609515: Please unblock radiusclient-ng_0.5.6-1.1 NMU for #609515

2011-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 01:03 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (14/01/2011): > > Julien Cristau (10/01/2011): > > > Thanks. libradiusclient-ng-dev is missing 'Conflicts: > > > radiusclient1', as far as I can tell. > > > > Looks about right. Maintainers, shall I NMU with that added

Bug#610257: dropbox: multiple license violations

2011-01-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:44:20 +0300, Ivan Borzenkov wrote: > > >I do not care what is written in the file "copyright". > > > > Fair enough. > > Granted, if you are more concerned with, then be without a program. > > Who does not interfere with religious prejudices, mantras Stallman, horror

Bug#610257: dropbox: multiple license violations

2011-01-17 Thread Ivan Borzenkov
> >I do not care what is written in the file "copyright". > > Fair enough. Granted, if you are more concerned with, then be without a program. Who does not interfere with religious prejudices, mantras Stallman, horror stories about bugs and stuff ubuntu - please use this PPA: https://launchpad

Bug#610338: psi-plus: contains non-free icons; inadequate copyright file

2011-01-17 Thread Mike O'Connor
Source: psi-plus Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1, Policy 12.5 There are many files which are LGPL-2.1+ and many files which are GPL2+, your debian/copyight is not accurate about this saying only that the software is LGPL-2+ and pointing to GPL instead of the LGPL -- I noticed that

Bug#610333: unattended-upgrades: delaying hibernation until crob job finishes is unacceptable

2011-01-17 Thread Bjørn Mork
Package: unattended-upgrades Version: 0.62.2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The hook /etc/pm/sleep.d/10_unattended-upgrades-hibernate deliberately breaks pm-utils by preventing the system from hibernating while unattended-

Bug#610332: /etc/pm/sleep.d/60aiccu hook may cause unacceptable resume delays

2011-01-17 Thread Bjørn Mork
Package: aiccu Version: 20070115-14 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The /etc/pm/sleep.d/60aiccu pm-utils hook may cause extremely slow resume from sleep. aiccu should not need to touch anything on resume. If it does, the

Processed: found 609277 in 2.21.4+is.2.21.3-1~bpo50+2

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 609277 2.21.4+is.2.21.3-1~bpo50+2 Bug #609277 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [pygobject] pygobject: FTBFS with older version of glib There is no source info for the package 'pygobject' at version '2.21.4+is.2.21.3-1~bpo50+2' with architec

Bug#610327: Pre-approval for t-p-u upload of {shorewall,shorewall6}-lite

2011-01-17 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
Release Team, It has just recently been reported that the shorewall-lite package in testing (and likewise, the shorewall6-lite package in testing) contains a bug which renders the package largely unusable. The associated bugs, are #610314 (shorewall-lite) and #610327 (shorewall6-lite) and are sev

Processed: found 610327 in 4.4.11.6-1

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > found 610327 4.4.11.6-1 Bug #610327 [shorewall6-lite] shorewall6-lite: init script: [: 20: missing ] Bug Marked as found in versions shorewall6-lite/4.4.11.6-1. > End of

Processed: severity of 610314 is grave, cloning 610314, reassign -1 to shorewall6-lite ...

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > severity 610314 grave Bug #610314 [shorewall-lite] shorewall-lite: init script: [: 20: missing ] Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > clone 610314 -1 Bug#610314: shor

Bug#604134: ppc: after debian installation MacOS 9.2 won't recognize disk anymore

2011-01-17 Thread Mathias Wittau
Hi Sebastian, > thanks for the report you've written after you have had so many troubles > with your PowerMac G4. No problem, I am interrested in a well working Debian ;) > It is interesting that > connecting HDDs with a higher capacity and restricting their disk space > usable to a maximum of

Bug#609863: marked as done (xpaint: Copyright file missing copyright holders and licenses)

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:02:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#609863: fixed in xpaint 2.9.1.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #609863, regarding xpaint: Copyright file missing copyright holders and licenses to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: Re: Bug#610320: FTBFS: jug-2.0.0-1 with ant-1.8.1-1 from experimental

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 610320 important Bug #610320 [jug] FTBFS: jug-2.0.0-1 with ant-1.8.1-1 from experimental Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610320: http://bugs.deb

Bug#610320: FTBFS: jug-2.0.0-1 with ant-1.8.1-1 from experimental

2011-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 610320 important thanks On Mon, January 17, 2011 14:53, Tom Ellis wrote: > Package: jug > Version: 2.0.0-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > This bug has been forwarded from Ubuntu > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jug/+bug/687979), but also >

Processed: Patch to fix cpqarrayd FTBFS

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 543064 FTBFS: "You need to have the SmartArray driver in the kernel." Bug #543064 [cpqarrayd] cpqarrayd: FTBFS: "You have not yet configured your kernel!" Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS: "You need to have the SmartArray driver in the kernel

Bug#543064: Patch to fix cpqarrayd FTBFS

2011-01-17 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
retitle 543064 FTBFS: "You need to have the SmartArray driver in the kernel." tags 543064 +patch thanks Hi, The original title didn't accurately describe what the cause of failure was. The message about the kernel not being configured was always there and not a problem. The problem is this: ch

Bug#610320: FTBFS: jug-2.0.0-1 with ant-1.8.1-1 from experimental

2011-01-17 Thread Tom Ellis
Including build logs here. dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: warning: using a gain-root-command while being root dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: export CPPFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): dpkg-b

Bug#610320: FTBFS: jug-2.0.0-1 with ant-1.8.1-1 from experimental

2011-01-17 Thread Tom Ellis
Package: jug Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source This bug has been forwarded from Ubuntu (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jug/+bug/687979), but also tested on latest debian sid with ant packages from experimental. jug-2.0.0-1 fails to build fro

Bug#609761: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] Processed: severity of 609761 is serious, tagging 609761

2011-01-17 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:22:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:42:20 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > >> Le Monday 17 January 2011 10:00:08 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : >> > Rescheduling Didier's upload would probably be a good idea. I can >> > change ur

Bug#606995: marked as done (CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411)

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:57:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#606995: fixed in perl 5.10.0-19lenny3 has caused the Debian Bug report #606995, regarding CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#609761: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] Processed: severity of 609761 is serious, tagging 609761

2011-01-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:42:20 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le Monday 17 January 2011 10:00:08 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : > > Rescheduling Didier's upload would probably be a good idea. I can > > change urgency afterwards. > > That's now done; to 0-day: > > > reschedule foo2zjs

Bug#588276: fixed 588276 in 0.7.0-2

2011-01-17 Thread Marc Dequènes (Duck)
Coin, On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 16:07:39 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: As you said you could not reproduce, i tested again with 0.5.0-2, and could not reproduce either (but with a machine in unstable and experimental xorg). So i'll try with a cleaner configuration (which is don't have acces

Bug#610257: marked as done (dropbox: multiple license violations)

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:52:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#610300: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #610257, regarding dropbox: multiple license violations to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#609761: marked as done (foo2zjs depends on dc to work)

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:47:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#609761: fixed in foo2zjs 20090908dfsg-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #609761, regarding foo2zjs depends on dc to work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#609761: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] Processed: severity of 609761 is serious, tagging 609761

2011-01-17 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le Monday 17 January 2011 10:00:08 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : > Rescheduling Didier's upload would probably be a good idea. I can > change urgency afterwards. That's now done; to 0-day: > reschedule foo2zjs_20090908dfsg-5.1_amd64.changes 0-day foo2zjs_20090908dfsg-5.1_amd64.changes moved

Bug#608220: RFS: hugs98 (NMU, RC bugfix)

2011-01-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:12:18 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Felix Geyer (17/01/2011): > > I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself. > > Attaching it now. > > Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the > first place, too. > Unblocked. Cheers

Bug#610257: dropbox: multiple license violations

2011-01-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
clone 610257 -1 reassign -1 ftp.debian.org severity -1 normal retitle -1 RM: dropbox -- RoQA; unredistributable; non-free; NPOASR thanks * Ivan Borzenkov , 2011-01-17, 09:41: I do not care what is written in the file "copyright". Fair enough. -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#610030: marked as done (gnome-shell doesn't start (missing depedency?))

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:14:54 +0100 with message-id <4d3424ae.4070...@szluug.org> and subject line Re: Bug#610030: gnome-shell doesn't start (missing depedency?) has caused the Debian Bug report #610030, regarding gnome-shell doesn't start (missing depedency?) to be marked as done.

Processed: Re: Bug#610257: dropbox: multiple license violations

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 610257 -1 Bug#610257: dropbox: multiple license violations Bug 610257 cloned as bug 610300. > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #610300 [src:dropbox] dropbox: multiple license violations Bug reassigned from package 'src:dropbox' to 'ftp.debian

Bug#604134: ppc: after debian installation MacOS 9.2 won't recognize disk anymore

2011-01-17 Thread Sebastian Schroeer
Hi Mathias, thanks for the report you've written after you have had so many troubles with your PowerMac G4. Of course, it is crucial to either use hard disk drives supported by your early G4 Power Mac's internal PATA controller (i.e. devices featuring a capacity of up to 128GB in early Power

Processed: your mail

2011-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 610296 by 610295 Bug #610296 [pixelmed] Cannot build new version of pixelmed package Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 610296: 610295 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#610296: Cannot build new version of pixelmed package

2011-01-17 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Package: pixelmed Version: 20101204 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source Newer version of pixelmed package require newever version of libcommons-net (2.2). Otherwise it fails with: javac -O -target 1.5 -encoding "UTF8" -Xlint:deprecation -classpath ../../.

Bug#559620: Current valkyrie version (2.0.0) fixes these issues

2011-01-17 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Hello, Currently the upstream version of valkyrie is 2.0.0, released on the 21st of October 2010. http://valgrind.org/downloads/current.html it was released in the same day as valgrind 3.6.0 and, as the description says, this version is "Qt4-based GUI for the Valgrind 3.6.x series", which means

Bug#610293: file conflict with gnome-media 2.30.0-1

2011-01-17 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Package: gnome-media-profiles Version: 2.91.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Transcript: # aptitude install gnome-media-profiles ... Unpacking gnome-media-profiles (from .../gnome-media-profiles_2.91.2-1_amd64.deb) ... Replacing files in old package gnome-media-common ... dpkg: error pro

Bug#609761: [Foo2zjs-maintainer] Processed: severity of 609761 is serious, tagging 609761

2011-01-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:41:48 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi Julien! > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:45:04 +0100, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >> severity 609761 serious > > Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work > > Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical' > > > >> tags 60976