Bug#605292: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#605292: mono-gac: lenny to squeeze upgraded system problems with monobasic system installation

Hello Micro, the output gdb --args mono /usr/lib/mono/2.0/gacutil.exe GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0.1-debian Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. The

Bug#572606: update

Hi! It seems this bug crept back in with the latest upload, so I have re-opened it. I didn't see anything new in the copyright file about it. deb...@dopio:~$ tar xfz /data/debian/pool/main/b/bind9/bind9_9.7.2.dfsg.P3.orig.tar.gz deb...@dopio:~$ grep -i copyright bind9-9.7.2.dfsg.P3/contrib/zkt

Bug#542915: This is worth a severity bump

tag 542915 -moreinfo severity 542915 grave thanks tl;dr: Data loss == grave Yes, it's only (apparently) hit one person in the wild, but I think the fact that significant data loss can *ever* occur warrants the severity. I am, however, working on a fix now, so at least it's presence (regardless o

Processed: This is worth a severity bump

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 542915 -moreinfo Bug #542915 [pbuilder] pbuilder: removes data from bind-mounted directories Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > severity 542915 grave Bug #542915 [pbuilder] pbuilder: removes data from bind-mounted directories Severity set to 'grave' f

Bug#606950: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: USB drives not recognized anymore (sd_mod: Unknown symbol blk_queue_physical_block_size_fixed))

Your message dated Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:15:03 + with message-id <1292307303.3136.570.ca...@localhost> and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: USB drives not recognized anymore (sd_mod: Unknown symbol blk_queue_physical_block_size_fixed) has caused the Debian Bug report #606950, rega

Bug#607032: FTBFS [hppa,mips]: cannot stat `./javadoc/stylesheet.css': No such file or directory

Source: openvrml Version: 0.18.6-1 Severity: serious openvrml fails to build on hppa and mips. Complete build logs are available here: https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=openvrml&dist=unstable >From a recent build attempt: [...] /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./manual/*.css ./manual/*.html ./m

Bug#605731: rsync client can no longer handle rsync:// targets

severity 605731 wishlist thanks On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:19:39PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > That said, I agree that it's not nice that rsync has changed what it > accepts as an argument. On the other hand I don't think that a change > that enforces the documented syntax more strongly, such t

Processed: Re: Bug#605731: rsync client can no longer handle rsync:// targets

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 605731 wishlist Bug #605731 [rsync] rsync client can no longer handle rsync:// targets Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 605731: http://bugs.debia

Bug#606296: marked as done (libnokogiri-ruby: FTBFS: test fails)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:47:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#606296: fixed in libnokogiri-ruby 1.4.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #606296, regarding libnokogiri-ruby: FTBFS: test fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: tagging 604049, tagging 601184

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604049 + moreinfo Bug #604049 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: data corruption with promise stex driver and use of device-mapper layers (lvm/dm-crypt/..) Added tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 601184 + moreinfo Bug #601184 [linux-2.6] linux-im

Bug#603048: rails: Gives dangerous advice regarding log permissions

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:02:10PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Adam Majer dijo [Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 01:53:48PM -0600]: > > Do you happen to have access to git.debian.org? If you do, can you > > apply your patch? The procedure is basically, > > (...) > > Done. Thanks! OK, are one of you going to

Bug#604049: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: data corruption with promise stex driver and use of device-mapper layers (lvm/dm-crypt/..)

On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 20:26 +0100, Markus Schulz wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-27 > Severity: critical > Tags: d-i upstream > Justification: causes serious data loss > > any use of the stex.ko promise hw-raid controller driver with a > device-mapper layer produces data corruption (

Bug#592417: [a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Re: Bug#606911: unblock: mgltools-utpackages/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1.1]

- Forwarded message from "Adam D. Barratt" - Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:41:55 + From: "Adam D. Barratt" To: "Steve M. Robbins" , 606...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#606911: unblock: mgltools-utpackages/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1.1 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 16:45

Bug#603308: potential fix for Debian build failures

I think the following patch might fix the build failures on Debian. The idea is to kill the test before the build process kills the whole build. Let me know if you'd like me to prepare an upload of 0.5+this-patch. >From a060745745d82dc9531ed456428420f26ad2833b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dav

Bug#605167: Less hacking patch

There is like nothing left from the original patch. pgp8Cse4YPebW.pgp Description: PGP signature === modified file 'debian/changelog' --- gnome-schedule-2.1.1-3/debian/changelog 2010-01-29 11:37:55 + +++ gnome-schedule-2.1.1-3.1/debian/changelog 2010-12-14 01:31:21 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@

Processed: Re: Bug#599239: gauche-gtk: FTBFS against gdk-pixbuf 2.22.0-1 (experimental)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 599239 wishlist Bug #599239 [gauche-gtk] gauche-gtk: FTBFS against gdk-pixbuf 2.22.0-1 (experimental) Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' > tags 599239 experimental Bug #599239 [gauche-gtk] gauche-gtk: FTBFS against gdk-pixbuf 2.2

Bug#607024: FTBFS: mv: target `debian/salome/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/salome/' is not a directory

Source: salome Version: 5.1.3-12 Severity: serious salome fails to build on alpha, hppa, ia64, powerpc, s390, and sparc. Complete build logs are available here: https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=salome&dist=unstable >From a recent build attempt: [...] touch build-indep-stamp install-inde

Processed: limit package to pdftk, tagging 607018, fixed 607018 in 1.44-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit package pdftk Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'pdftk' Limit currently set to 'package':'pdftk' > tags 607018 + confirmed pending Bug #607018 [pdftk] generates random owner password if only user password is s

Bug#607018: generates random owner password if only user password is set

Package: pdftk Version: 1.41+dfsg-9 Severity: serious Tags: patch The command pdftk file.pdf output file-encrypted.pdf user_pw thePassword sets not only a user password, but a random owner password. Therefore the encryption pdf file is not usable for further usage by pdftk or other pdf tools due

Processed: reassign 595828 to src:netsurf, block 595828 with 576272, merging 574299 595828

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 595828 src:netsurf Bug #595828 [netsurf] netsurf: FTBFS in squeeze: css/css.c:1524: error: 'LBRACE' undeclared (first use in this function) Bug reassigned from package 'netsurf' to 'src:netsurf'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#597057: marked as done (live-manual is outdated for squeeze)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:34:32 +0100 with message-id <4d06bb98.7060...@debian.org> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #597057, regarding live-manual is outdated for squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#603450: Patch not possible with pytho 2.4 compatibility

Was just pointed to this bug. The fix would probably work, however only under python >= 2.6. ssl_wrapper calls ssl.wrap() under 2.6, but socket.ssl() under Python 2.4 and 2.5. And socket.ssl does not take these parameters: cert_reqs=..., ca_certs=... So either we have to give up python 2.5 compat

Bug#601977: cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg: file conflict during upgrade from lenny

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:14:50PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > > I'd be interested to know if anyone has a recommendation on how to > > handle this. The two packages in question are -dbg packages that are > > creat

Bug#605292: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#605292: mono-gac: lenny to squeeze upgraded system problems with monobasic system installation

On 12/07/2010 11:40 PM, Jochen wrote: > Hello Mirco, > fast answer > > (1) dpkg -i libmono0-dbg mono-runtime-dbg > # FAILED so i do > (2) aptitude install libmono0-dbg mono-runtime-dbg > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zusätzlich installiert: > libmono-corlib2.0-cil{a} libmono-i18n-west2.0-c

Bug#606756: [PATCH dash/debian-sid] debian/preinst: Do not error out if files are missing

On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 22:26 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > -- 8< -- > Subject: debian/preinst: Do not error out if files are missing > > Even if /bin/sh or its manpage is missing, "dpkg -i dash.deb" needs to > succeed. Currently it errors out because cp exits with nonzero status > when the file

Bug#605167: Less hacking patch

Jakub Wilk writes: > * Dmitrijs Ledkovs , 2010-12-11, 18:47: >>-Architecture: any >>+Architecture: all > > I'm not sure if the release team will be happy with the above change... > >> --- gnome-schedule-2.0.2~/Makefile.am2007-12-21 08:30:24.0 >> -0500 >> +++ gnome-schedule-2.0.2/

Bug#555711: Reopening

* Dhaval Giani wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, MT wrote: > > Hi, > > I installed cgroup-bin on my system (Ubuntu 10.10, kernel 2.6.36), and > > experienced similar problems as the original bug reporter, so I'm > > reopening this bug. My system would suspend fine, but would not be able >

Processed: tagging 147832

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 147832 - patch Bug #147832 [xchat] xchat: loses server list if disk fills up Bug #527638 [xchat] xchat: server list file ~/.xchat2/servlist_.conf written non-atomically Bug #605003 [xchat] loss of data Removed tag(s) patch. Removed tag(s) pa

Processed: update

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 572606 Bug #572606 {Done: LaMont Jones } [bind9] Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D Unarchived Bug 572606 > found 572606 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1 Bug #572606 {Done: LaMont Jones } [bind9] Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I

Bug#607002: libdb5.1-sql-dev and libdb5.0-sql-dev: error when trying to install together

Package: libdb5.0-sql-dev,libdb5.1-sql-dev Version: libdb5.0-sql-dev/5.0.26-3 Version: libdb5.1-sql-dev/5.1.19-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2010-12-13 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share

Bug#598838: marked as done (scilab: FTBFS: [javac] 9 errors)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:05:54 +0100 with message-id <1292274354.14315.11.ca...@losinj.inria.fr> and subject line fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #598838, regarding scilab: FTBFS: [javac] 9 errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#597404: marked as done (scilab: FTBFS: Could not find or use the Java package/jar jlatexmath-fop used by LaTex Rendering - FOP plugin)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:05:54 +0100 with message-id <1292274354.14315.11.ca...@losinj.inria.fr> and subject line fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #597404, regarding scilab: FTBFS: Could not find or use the Java package/jar jlatexmath-fop used by LaTex Rendering - FOP plugin to

Processed: Re: lvm2: fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 603036 + patch Bug #603036 [lvm2] lvm2: fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 603036: http://bugs.debian.org/

Bug#603036: lvm2: fails to install due to incorrect dependencies in init.d LSB header

tags 603036 + patch thanks There are two ways to fix this issue. One is to change the package dependencies of lvm2 to depend on udev, the other is to change the init.d script dependency on udev from a hard to a soft dependency. Hard dependencies are required when the package is installed, while

Bug#605136: python-apt: diff for NMU version 0.7.100+nmu1

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for python-apt (versioned as 0.7.100+nmu1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. > > People forget things, so remind people. Directly doing an NMU o

Processed: cloning 606370, reassign -1 to perl-modules

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 606370 -1 Bug#606370: CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411 Bug 606370 cloned as bug 606995. > reassign -1 perl-modules 5.10.0-19lenny2 Bug #606995 [libcgi-pm-perl] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410 CVE-2010-4411 Bug reassigned from package '

Processed: tagging 555668

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 555668 + squeeze-ignore Bug #555668 [elfsign] elfsign uses MD5 Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 555668: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555668 Debi

Bug#606993: subdownloader: always fail to download selected subs

Package: subdownloader Version: 2.0.14-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When launched from commandline, this message appears for all selected subtitle Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/subdownloader/gui/main.py", line 1043, in onButtonDownload des

Bug#606802: Fwd: Bug#606802: bacula-director-pgsql: make_catalog_backup is broken

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:09:38 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > Now the question is how to proceed: Some more investigation: > - Apply a similar patch like fix_scripts.sed again; I have to admit > that the magic in the old debian/rules seems a bit complicated :) If we go this way the affected sc

Bug#606952: lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc]

Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-12-13 18:18: > It's better than not having the option to have grub and lilo both > installed at the same time at all, IMHO. The fact that iff lilo.conf > is present lilo will be executed can be documented proberly with an > according warning in for example the long de

Processed: Re: dpkg: Hang when unpacking a package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 595927 606966 Bug#595927: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: task dpkg blocked for more than 120 seconds Bug#606966: dpkg: Hang when unpacking a package Bug#600075: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Problem with usb Forcibly Merged 595927 600075 60

Bug#606952: lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc]

* Joachim Wiedorn [Mon Dec 13, 2010 at 05:53:48PM +0100]: > Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-12-13 16:36: > > update-grub just generates the grub.cfg, the lilo package doesn't > > execute lilo (and therefore doesn't touch MBR) as long as there's no > > /etc/lilo.conf. So both packages can and do co-

Bug#606952: lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc]

Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-12-13 16:36: > update-grub just generates the grub.cfg, the lilo package doesn't > execute lilo (and therefore doesn't touch MBR) as long as there's no > /etc/lilo.conf. So both packages can and do co-exist. Thank for more information - and also thanks to Colin. I o

Bug#606238: OBJECTION

Hello, On sekmadienis 12 Gruodis 2010 07:30:24 Hideki Yamane wrote: If k3b version 2 is sufficiently stable, why isn't it part of the backports? FWIW, k3b 2 cannot be backported because it's based on KDE 4 Platform which is way too outdated in lenny. I was unaware that KDE 4 i

Processed: [bts-link] source package kdenetwork

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdenetwork > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debia

Processed: Re: [pkg-cli-apps-team] Bug#606393: gnome-do: crashes on start with Unhandled Exception: System.TypeLoadException

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 606393 important Bug #606393 [gnome-do] gnome-do: crashes on start with Unhandled Exception: System.TypeLoadException Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags 606393 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug #606393 [gnome-do] gnome-do: cras

Bug#606393: [pkg-cli-apps-team] Bug#606393: gnome-do: crashes on start with Unhandled Exception: System.TypeLoadException

severity 606393 important tags 606393 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Hi, On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:25:25PM +0100, Stefan Muthers wrote: Package: gnome-do Version: 0.8.3.1+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I installed gnome-do and wanted to have a look at the sof

Bug#606959: logrotate script should set correct owner/group

Le Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:26:20 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit : > Sorry, but I fail to see no problem here. > > The directory /var/log/asterisk is owned by asterisk (permissions set > in postinst script). > > After log rotation, asterisk is ordered 'logger reload', which reopens > log files (and g

Bug#606952: lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 04:00:04PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-12-13 11:11: > > Now version 1:22.8-9 introduces: > > > > Conflicts: grub-legacy, grub-pc > > > > I don't see any reason why this should be enforced, actually this > > avoids deployments of systems

Bug#606952: lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc]

* Joachim Wiedorn [Mon Dec 13, 2010 at 04:00:04PM +0100]: > Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-12-13 11:11: > > Now version 1:22.8-9 introduces: > > Conflicts: grub-legacy, grub-pc > > I don't see any reason why this should be enforced, actually this > > avoids deployments of systems where users c

Bug#606952: lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc]

Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-12-13 11:11: > Now version 1:22.8-9 introduces: > > Conflicts: grub-legacy, grub-pc > > I don't see any reason why this should be enforced, actually this > avoids deployments of systems where users can choose between lilo > and grub as bootloader as both can't be

Bug#606537: marked as done (youtube-dl: new upstream version)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:47:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#606537: fixed in youtube-dl 2010.12.09-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #606537, regarding youtube-dl: new upstream version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#606959: logrotate script should set correct owner/group

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:33:51PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Package: asterisk > Severity: serious > Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2 > > Hi, > > It looks like the logrotate script is not setting owner/group on the > log files. > > This causes nothing to be logged at all and/or prevent the daemon f

Bug#606371: severity

Hi Modestas Some update within the last days seems to resolve the problem. May be the kernel-update? Now I can open the settings dialog without any problem. So I think, you can close these bug. Cheers Andreas 2010/12/10 Andreas Jacob : > Hi Modestas > > You are right. Grave might be a little bit

Bug#606940: r-cran-vr: not installable in sid

Hi Ralf, On 13 December 2010 at 10:07, Ralf Treinen wrote: | Package: r-cran-vr | Version: 7.3-0-2 | Tags: sid | Severity: grave | User: trei...@debian.org | Usertags: edos-uninstallable | | Hi, r-cran-vr is uninstallable in sid on all architectures since: | | r-cran-vr (= 7.3-0-2) depends on o

Processed: Not desktop-base related

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 606639 normal Bug #606639 [desktop-base] X mouse event problems after updating squeeze on 2010-12-09 Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 606639: http://

Bug#606639: Not desktop-base related

severity 606639 normal thanks Please report bugs using reportbug tool, which will provide the needed information, instead of sending 1M mail which won't make it to the recipient. Anyway, this has nothing to do with desktop-base, which only provide artwork for Debian systems. I have no idea which

Bug#606959: logrotate script should set correct owner/group

Package: asterisk Severity: serious Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2 Hi, It looks like the logrotate script is not setting owner/group on the log files. This causes nothing to be logged at all and/or prevent the daemon from restarting. Cheers Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-

Processed: this is fixed in unstable

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 604211 606692 Bug#604211: ipppd: installation fails Bug#606692: ipppd: installation fails on testing. Bug#604216: ibod: installation fails Forcibly Merged 604211 604216 606692. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Bug#606298: deal.ii: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../common/Make.global_options'. Stop.

On 13/12/10 at 09:27 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > tag 606298 + unreproducible > > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:07:54AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: deal.ii > > Version: 6.3.1-1 > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > I also can't reproduce this failure in a fresh squeeze ch

Processed: correct version info

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 606952 1:22.8-7 Bug #606952 [lilo] lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc] Bug No longer marked as found in versions lilo/1:22.8-7. > found 606952 1:22.8-9 Bug #606952 [lilo] lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc] Bug Marked as found in versions lilo/1:22

Processed: Re: Bug#606692: ibod: installation fails

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 606692 ipppd Bug #606692 [ibod] ibod: installation fails Bug reassigned from package 'ibod' to 'ipppd'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions ibod/1.5.0-4. > retitle 606692 ipppd: installation fails on testing. Bug #606692 [ipppd] ibo

Bug#606692: ibod: installation fails

reassign 606692 ipppd retitle 606692 ipppd: installation fails on testing. thanks On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:29:33AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [...] > > Setting up ipppd (1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4) ... > > Note: running MAKEDEV to create ISDN devices in /dev... > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/ipppd.postin

Bug#606952: lilo: conflicts with grub[-pc]

Package: lilo Version: 1:22.8-7 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 5.6.10 Previous versions of lilo (e.g. 1:22.8-8.3) used to have the following conflicts: Conflicts: manpages (<< 1.29-3) Now version 1:22.8-9 introduces: Conflicts: grub-legacy, grub-pc I don't see any reason why thi

Bug#606298: deal.ii: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../common/Make.global_options'. Stop.

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:36:58AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > The original bugreport said "sid". Did you try to rebuild in sid? (not > sure if it will make a difference here, but who knows :)) The original report was incorrect, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606298#10 carn

Bug#606951: nsca: starts under user nobody instead of nagios

Package: nsca Version: 2.7.2+nmu1 Severity: critical nsca 2.7.2+nmu1 is starting under user nobody, as --chuid nobody is set in /etc/init.d/nsca: SSD_START="start-stop-daemon --start --chuid nobody --oknodo -S $SSD_STARTOPTS --exec $DAEMON" When this option is set, the nsca_user option in /etc

Bug#606950: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: USB drives not recognized anymore (sd_mod: Unknown symbol blk_queue_physical_block_size_fixed)

Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood Version: 2.6.32-29 Severity: grave This is a SheevaPlug computer running Squeeze. This morning's upgrade brought version 2.6.32-29 of linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood (+ firmware-linux-free, linux-base and linux-libc-dev), and a reboot leaves me without acces

Bug#606298: deal.ii: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../common/Make.global_options'. Stop.

On 12/13/2010 10:27 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > tag 606298 + unreproducible > > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:07:54AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Source: deal.ii Version: 6.3.1-1 Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > I also can't reproduce this failure in a fresh squeeze chroot. Lucas,

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#606298: deal.ii: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../common/Make.global_options'. Stop.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 606298 + unreproducible Bug #606298 [src:deal.ii] deal.ii: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../common/Make.global_options'. Stop. Added tag(s) unreproducible. > Hi, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > On Wed,

Bug#606298: deal.ii: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../common/Make.global_options'. Stop.

tag 606298 + unreproducible Hi, On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:07:54AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: deal.ii > Version: 6.3.1-1 > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 I also can't reproduce this failure in a fresh squeeze chroot. Lucas, is it OK to close this bug? -- Jonathan Wiltshire

Bug#605136: python-apt: diff for NMU version 0.7.100+nmu1

On Sa, 2010-12-11 at 21:59 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > tags 605136 + patch > tags 605136 + pending > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for python-apt (versioned as 0.7.100+nmu1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Peopl

Bug#606940: r-cran-vr: not installable in sid

Package: r-cran-vr Version: 7.3-0-2 Tags: sid Severity: grave User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, r-cran-vr is uninstallable in sid on all architectures since: r-cran-vr (= 7.3-0-2) depends on one of: - r-cran-mass (= 7.3-9-1) r-cran-vr (= 7.3-0-2) and r-cran-mass (= 7.3-9-

Processed: Re: Bug#606685: evince segfaults in ppdFindChoice () from /usr/lib/libcups.so.2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 606685 important Bug #606685 [evince] evince segfaults in ppdFindChoice () from /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 606685: htt

Bug#606685: evince segfaults in ppdFindChoice () from /usr/lib/libcups.so.2

severity 606685 important thanks Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 à 23:25 +0100, Damien Couroussé a écrit : > Package: evince > Version: 2.22.2-4~lenny1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Hello, evince segfaults when trying to print PDF files on a network > printer. >

Bug#606292: test done in squeeze, not sid

On 12/12/10 at 23:56 -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote: > tags 606292 +unreproducible > kthxbye > > Hi, i cannot reproduce this in a clean squeeze cowbuilder. Is there > something strange with /tmp when using sbuild? Not really, besides the fact that the whole build happens on tmpfs in my setup. - Luc

Processed: Re: Bug#606292: test done in squeeze, not sid

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 606292 +unreproducible Bug #606292 [src:ypsilon] ypsilon: FTBFS: error in delete-file: Directory not empty (39) Added tag(s) unreproducible. > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 606292: http://bu

Bug#606292: test done in squeeze, not sid

tags 606292 +unreproducible kthxbye Hi, i cannot reproduce this in a clean squeeze cowbuilder. Is there something strange with /tmp when using sbuild? Daniel -- Daniel Moerner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont