Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:54:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586833: fixed in spyder 1.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #586833,
regarding spyder: broken maintainer address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:54:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586833: fixed in spyder 1.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #586833,
regarding Broken maintainer address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:54:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586824: fixed in spyder 1.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #586824,
regarding uninstallable with python2.6 set as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
On 06/03/2010 08:41 PM, sean finney wrote:
> and here is a slightly updated patch. there is no functional change in the
> code, i have only reformatted the whitespace etc so that the code matches
> with the style of the surrounding code.
>
> i have also tested this now on my primary testing system
Jonas, it works now! More below.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:46:39 +0200
Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hey Clayton,
>
> On 28/06/2010 Clayton wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:35:31 +0200
> > Jonas Meurer wrote:
> >
> > > On 27/06/2010 Clayton wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:32:02 +0200
> > > >
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587342: fixed in vtun 3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #587342,
regarding vtun: Support tmpfs for /var/lock
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Stefano,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 19:33, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> We thought you may be interested. Some of those issues are pretty
> small, and the gcc-warnings patch looks just hides bugs, but the init
> script status feature would probably be useful to Debian.
I' m not too sure about the gcc
Stefano,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 20:21, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Sorry, that was premature, have an additional patch.
Thanks for the report and patch!
I had forgotten about the OpenSSL issue, and last time I checked, I
couldn't find the actual exception. Now I saw it, silly me :)
Thanks again
--
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:27:19 +0200
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #582742,
regarding paraview: FTBFS on ia64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=paraview&arch=ia64&ver=3.6.2-4&stamp=1277263379&file=log&as=raw
paraview builds fine on ia64 closing bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 579424 important
Bug #579424 [g++-4.4] FTBFS [hppa]: Assertion `y.isApprox(m*x)' failed.
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
579424: http://bugs.deb
severity 579424 important
thanks
On 29.06.2010 02:29, Sune Vuorela wrote:
severity 579424 serious
thanks
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 01:48:15 Matthias Klose wrote:
severity 579424 important
tag 579424 + moreinfo
thanks
the bug report mentions a workaround, lowering severity.
Hi
I don't see i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 579424 serious
Bug #579424 [g++-4.4] FTBFS [hppa]: Assertion `y.isApprox(m*x)' failed.
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
579424: http://bugs.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 579424 important
Bug #579424 [g++-4.4] FTBFS [hppa]: Assertion `y.isApprox(m*x)' failed.
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tag 579424 + moreinfo
Bug #579424 [g++-4.4] FTBFS [hppa]: Assertion `y.isApprox(m*x)' failed.
Added tag
severity 579424 important
tag 579424 + moreinfo
thanks
the bug report mentions a workaround, lowering severity. Information about
gcc-4.5/gcc-snapshot is missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Package: gdm-themes
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: serious
Distribution: stable
Section: main
Hello,
This package includes several modified versions of the Debian open logo
with "Debian" which the license is not compliant with the Debian policy.
The license of the Debian open logo with "Debian" says
Package: syscp
Version: 1.4.2.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please package the newly released 1.4.2.2 version of SysCP. It is a
security update release which patches a severe security hole. See this:
http://www.syscp-forum.org/index.php?topic=4981.0
-- Syste
> I'll fix this right away!
ping :)
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:48:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586835: fixed in xmms2 0.7DrNo-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #586835,
regarding xmms2: FTBFS on multi-core CPUs: thread.error: can't start new thread
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hello,
I've tryed to reproduce this bug using Parted 2.2-7 and it works fine.
Can you check if you can still reproduce it?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:28:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#565755: fixed in haveged 0.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #565755,
regarding [haveged] claims to fail starting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:21:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586978: fixed in eclipse 3.5.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #586978,
regarding eclipse: Fix strict version constrains for sat4j
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 576694 0.1.1-2
Bug #576694 {Done: Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals }
[python-pyclamd] Exception fails with python2.6
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #576694 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Serafeim Zanikolas said:
>Dear maintainer,
>
>I've prepared an NMU for haveged (versioned as 0.9-2.1) and uploaded it to
>DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
I've just uploaded 0.9-3
--
Steve Kostecke
Public Key at gopher://kostecke.net or `finger st...@kostecke
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:47:55PM -0400, Steve Kostecke wrote:
> Serafeim Zanikolas said:
>
> >Dear maintainer,
> >
> >I've prepared an NMU for haveged (versioned as 0.9-2.1) and uploaded it to
> >DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
>
> I've just uploaded 0.9-3
O
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 13:56:15 +0200, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> > this test failure seems to have disappeared in the current version,
> > 3.1.3-2, doesn't it?
> >
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=source-highlight;ver=3.1.3-2;arch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 565755 pending
Bug #565755 [haveged] [haveged] claims to fail starting
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
565755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565755
Deb
tags 565755 pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for haveged (versioned as 0.9-2.1) and uploaded it to
DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Cheers,
Serafeim
diff -ru haveged-0.9.orig//debian/changelog haveged-0.9/debian/changelog
--- haveged-0.9.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 583603 + pending
Bug #583603 [cuneiform] cuneiform: unclear copyright/license of
cuneiform_src/Kern/rout/wtypes.h
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
583603: http://bugs.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 575420 + pending
Bug #575420 [cuneiform] [cuneiform] Depends on version of libmagick not in
unstable
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
575420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:20:58PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> this is basically a followup bug to #550160. I haven't updated much on
> the box since then (except grub2 itself of course and replaced
> 2.6.30-1 by 2.6.31-1) and the box is still offline since I only can
> boot it from CD over serial
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 584539 normal
Bug #584539 [fookb-wmaker] fookb-wmaker doesn't switch to other layout
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
584539: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 584564 grub-pc 1.98+20100602-1
Bug #584564 [src:grub2] updating grub 1.98+20100602-1, unable to boot, "error:
out of partition"
Bug reassigned from package 'src:grub2' to 'grub-pc'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions grub2/1.98+20
reassign 584564 grub-pc 1.98+20100602-1
forcemerge 584426 584564
thanks
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 09:09:56AM -0700, Michael wrote:
> After updating grub, the new grub.cfg is generated. Upon rebooting,
> Grub starts, but is unable to boot any of my selected entries.
>
> Commenting out the "search --
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 584564 - experimental
Bug #584564 [src:grub2] updating grub 1.98+20100602-1, unable to boot, "error:
out of partition"
Removed tag(s) experimental.
>
End of message
Julien,
Can you open a new bug report for the POM issue and include the build logs?
Thanks,
Ludovic
Le 28/06/2010 22:14, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
Hi,
antlr3 (3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Clean up build dependencies. (Clo
Package: libforks-perl
Version: 0.34-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
This package is not migrating to testint as it fails to build on armel
architecture [1].
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=libforks-perl&ver=0.34-1&arch=armel&stamp=1276645425&file=log
It fails with:
#
#
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
Hi,
> antlr3 (3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Clean up build dependencies. (Closes: #587401)
And, third time's the charm, indeed. Except for kfreebsd-* where the
build fails with an XML exception - looks like the POM may be
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:08:42PM -0700, Kenyon Ralph wrote:
> This bug is also present when doing netboot squeeze installs right now
> from the US http mirrors. I think it is also causing the installer to
> fail to detect my hard drive, which already has several ext4
> partitions.
Probably would
Hi,
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:05 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> At this point, opensync is not ready for release.
Is this still the case?
opensync is involved in the transition to using python2.6 by default
(via python-opensync, which depends on "python << 2.6" in testing) so we
will either need t
Source: openmotif
Version: 2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: implicit-pointer-conversion
Tags: patch
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that is likely to
cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a
pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:17:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587401: fixed in antlr3 3.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #587401,
regarding antlr3: FTBFS everywhere; build-deps need adjusting?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 583648 587438
Bug#583648: package removed, processes still running
Bug#587438: package removed, processes still running
Merged 583648 587438.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
587438: http://b
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 19:32:28 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Do you know how to mangle name ? upstream whish to get a list of clear
> name symbol
>
*sigh* I don't really have time for c++ 101 and libraries 101.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 587124 + confirmed
Bug #587124 [saytime] saytime: looks in /users/mag/games/sounds/audio/
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
587124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
tags 587124 + confirmed
thanks
Hi Ariel,
thanks for the bugreport. Will upload a fixed package soon.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le Sunday 20 June 2010 12:54:32 Jordi Mallach, vous avez écrit :
> Hi Benoit,
Hello,
> Three months have passed since "this week". If the only problem is
> getting a sponsor for the package, I'm sure at least a dozen Debian
> developers are monitoring this bug report. Just post an URL to a source
Package: w3m
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
several applications fail to correct SSL certificates properly
and w3m is among them:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/06/14/4
This has been assigned CVE-2010-2074.
The impact of this bug doesn't warrant a DSA, but you can still
fix
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 18:45:31 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 16:14:23 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >
> >> upstream does not seems how to use libtools in order to create a publi
> >> private list of symbo
Hi,
the build failure is caused by a spelling error of n_properies (missing a
"t"). The attached patch fixes this.
I'm not a DD yet so some other DD will have to upload it.
Ideally my fix to #580106 could be evaluated at the same time.
Heiko
From 110f2372c9dbce795c601406525b9b3a4857c7e0 Mon Se
Package: sbcl-doc
Version: 1:1.0.39.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per
definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a
release, thus the se
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:52:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586907: fixed in mercurial 1.5.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #586907,
regarding Mercurial 1.5.4-1 doesn't make pull/push with Python>=2.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 16:14:23 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
>> upstream does not seems how to use libtools in order to create a publi
>> private list of symbols using the procedure described in
>> http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 583465 + patch
Bug #583465 [src:clutter-1.0] clutter-1.0: FTBFS: ERROR in annotation: can't
find parameter n_properies referenced by parameter values of 'animatev'
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Package: ibus-clutter
Version: 0.0+git20090728.a936bacf-1
Severity: grave
ibus-clutter is not installable because libibus1 is not available in
unstable. Please rebuild it with the new libibus-dev.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'uns
Package: ibus-array
Version: 0.0.2-2
Severity: grave
ibus-array is not installable because libibus1 is not available in
unstable. Please rebuild it with the new libibus-dev.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimen
severity #586978 serious
thanks
Hello,
I am raising the severity to serious, because sat4j has been uploaded
and contains a breaks: eclipse (some version).
So it is not installable in sid anymore.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity #586978 serious
Bug #586978 [eclipse] eclipse: Fix strict version constrains for sat4j
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586978: http://bugs.debian
Package: libaudiomask
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Automatic builds of libaudiomask are failing with a cascade of errors
stemming from
AudioMasker.H:24:26: error: mffm/realFFT.H: No such file or directory
Could yo
Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi,
>> I'd suggest a binary-arch-only build in pbuilder or similar before the
>> next upload so we don't have to go through this again :)
>
> I've done a successful cowbuilder ... -B build before uploading. I'll
> check it again later but feel free to attach a patch.
If yo
Hi,
On 28/06/10 11:50, Chris Lamb wrote:
Looks like libghc6-pango-dev doesn't provide Graphics.UI.Gtk.Pango.Font,
it's renamed to Graphics.Rendering.Pango.Layout.
Sigh. Well I guess that's more correct, but it's a bit of a pain from a
backwards-compatibility perspective. I can probably just c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 580106 + patch
Bug #580106 [libclutter-1.0-0] empathy: fails to start on armel
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
580106: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5801
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:25:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587282: fixed in strongswan 4.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #587282,
regarding plugins missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Prosposed workaround in #585524 also fixed my issue with all printers
(HP Laserjet).
Thanks,
-Pascal
--
Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu)
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)
COMunité/LACIME: École de technologie supérieure (http://www.comunite.ca)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
Hi all,
I took the liberty to create a patch that fixes the runtime error on armel.
This costs us the one arm optimization but makes the library usable on all
supported arm systems.
As I'm not a DD I'm not able to do an NMU, so if someone could review the
patch and act accordingly I would be ve
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 16:14:23 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> upstream does not seems how to use libtools in order to create a publi
> private list of symbols using the procedure described in
> http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12841
>
Oh and fwiw libtool does n
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 16:14:23 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Dear julian
>
> upstream does not seems how to use libtools in order to create a publi
> private list of symbols using the procedure described in
> http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12841
>
> I could
Dear julian
upstream does not seems how to use libtools in order to create a publi
private list of symbols using the procedure described in
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12841
I could not post a patch until a month (overwork) so if you beat me,
it will be really
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 587402 serious
Bug #587402 [python-uno] RuntimeError: pyuno.getClass: expecting one string
argument with python 2.5
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
>
E
Hello,
I have just uploaded coriander 2.0.1-1. I have included some return value
checks that prevent crashes when libdc1394 cannot find any cameras or cannot
allocate resources for them. I do not know if that helps with the segfaults,
please let me know what your experiences are.
--
Met vriendel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Julien,
Yes, you are right, I had zlib from experimental.
I've downgraded it back to the sid version and I managed this way to
install texlive.
Thanks and regards
Jean-Luc
Le 28/06/2010 15:20, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> reassign 587412 luatex 0.
On 28/06/2010 15:23, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> On 28/06/2010 14:58, maximilian attems wrote:
>>> hmm checking the root mail account, I see lots of mails telling me to:
>>> evolution --force-shutdown
>>> why can't that be done by
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:18:37PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 28/06/2010 14:58, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hmm checking the root mail account, I see lots of mails telling me to:
> > evolution --force-shutdown
> > why can't that be done by hand,
>
> As said on irc, we can't kill an user
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 587412 luatex 0.60.1-1
Bug #587412 [texlive-base] texlive-base: Uninstalable
Bug reassigned from package 'texlive-base' to 'luatex'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions texlive-base/2009-10.
Bug #587412 [luatex] texlive-base: Uninst
reassign 587412 luatex 0.60.1-1
retitle 587412 luatex: broken zlib version check
kthxbye
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 14:25:15 +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex luatex.ini'
> ...
> PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (zlib
On 28/06/2010 14:58, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 02:59:28PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> On 28/06/2010 14:25, maximilian attems wrote:
>>> Preparing to replace evolution 2.22.3.1-1 (using
>>> .../evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb) ...
>>> Evolution is still running, abo
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 02:59:28PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 28/06/2010 14:25, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Preparing to replace evolution 2.22.3.1-1 (using
> > .../evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb) ...
> > Evolution is still running, aborting...
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /var/ca
On 28/06/2010 14:25, maximilian attems wrote:
> Preparing to replace evolution 2.22.3.1-1 (using
> .../evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb) ...
> Evolution is still running, aborting...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): subprocess
> new p
Package: evolution
Version: 2.22.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace evolution 2.22.3.1-1 (using
.../evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb) ...
Evolution is still running, aborting...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/evolution_2.30.1.2-3_amd64.deb
(--unpack): subprocess new pr
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2009-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I tried (needed for a build dependancy) to install texlive-generic-recommended
and texlive-latex-base
The following packages were downloaded as well
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:18:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#580110: fixed in gnuvd 1.0.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #580110,
regarding gnuvd: No longer works
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:00:21PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Package: grub-pc
> Version: 1.98+20100617-1
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> I think the main issue is the following message
> Paramétrage de grub-pc (1.98+20100617-1) ...
> /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: ca
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:44:18 +0100
with message-id <20100628114418.gc12...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#587388: d-i: fails to install grub-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #587388,
regarding d-i: fails to install grub-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.3-2
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/update-manager
Justification: renders package unusable
update-manager cstalls right after the GUI says "Downloading list of changes".
There is a message on the commalnd line:
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 587132 + upstream
Bug #587132 [src:bustle] bustle: FTBFS: Could not find module
`Graphics.UI.Gtk.Pango.Font':
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
587132: http://bugs.de
tags 587132 + upstream
thanks
Hi Will,
Looks like libghc6-pango-dev doesn't provide Graphics.UI.Gtk.Pango.Font,
it's renamed to Graphics.Rendering.Pango.Layout.
However, simply adjusting the import lines (and adding pango to cabal
Build-Depends) doesn't work:
* Bustle.hs:237:14:
Ambiguous
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:45:29 +0200
with message-id <4c287d49.6030...@iuculano.it>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-chromium-maint] Bug#581265: Bug#581265: release
blocking bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #581265,
regarding release blocking bug
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Am 28.06.2010 12:26, schrieb Julien BLACHE:
> I'd suggest a binary-arch-only build in pbuilder or similar before the
> next upload so we don't have to go through this again :)
I've done a successful cowbuilder ... -B build before uploading. I'll
check it again later but feel free to attach a patch
2010/6/23 Goswin von Brederlow :
> That would complicate things when using
>
> deb [keyring=debian-lenny.gpg] http://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main
>
> The idea of specifying a specific keyring is so that one compromised key
> will not endanger all sources.list entries to attacks.
In theory you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 587401 antlr3: FTBFS everywhere; build-deps need adjusting?
Bug #587401 [src:antlr3] antlr3: FTBFS everwhere; build-deps need adjusting?
Changed Bug title to 'antlr3: FTBFS everywhere; build-deps need adjusting?'
from 'antlr3: FTBFS everw
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 587307 with 587401
Bug #587307 [libantlr3c-3.2-0] libantlr3c: [dummy] do not migrate to testing
before antlr3 3.2
Was blocked by: 587306
Added blocking bug(s) of 587307: 587401
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
On 28/06/2010 12:14, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not sure what happened, a ..pyc cache or something, but
> with that patch applied today I'm getting again a "authorization
> failed" message :-/
>
> I've to go back to my botched patch on the shebang.
I'm uploading the package with the p
Source: antlr3
Version: 3.2-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
antlr3 3.2-2 failed to build everywhere again; I guess most of the
build-deps in Build-Depends-Indep need to be promoted to Build-Depends
to build antlr3-gcj.
I'd suggest a binary-arch-only build in pbuilder or similar before the
next upload so
Sorry, I'm not sure what happened, a ..pyc cache or something, but
with that patch applied today I'm getting again a "authorization
failed" message :-/
I've to go back to my botched patch on the shebang.
I'll try to look if upstream has registered the bug.
--
__ ___ _ _
\ \/ (_) |_(_
I have open a new bug about the reccurent problem.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587393
Please add comment on upstream forum.
Bastien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:02:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587138: fixed in fabric 0.9.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #587138,
regarding fabric: FTBFS: dh_installchangelogs fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 567241 serious
Bug #567241 [libbuffy-perl] fails after binnmu
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
567241: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 587393 http://tinyurl.com/27kkfqz
Bug #587393 [src:imagemagick] Imagemagick should use libtool in order to create
a public/private abi
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://tinyurl.com/27kkfqz'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:36:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#587366: fixed in rpm 4.8.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #587366,
regarding rpm: FTBFS on kfreebsd-* ("cp: cannot stat
`debian/tmp/usr/lib/rpm/platform': No such file or directory")
to be marked as done.
package: src:imagemagick
severity: grave
Upstream break a lot the ABI removing or changing the definition of the symbols
In order to improve the situation they should define a proper private
public abi.
Libtool could help here:
The best answer in this case is to make use of its feature to hide
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
