On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 06:52:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> LTOPTIONS_VERSION is in ltoptions.m4, not libtool.m4. You'll need to
> copy over all of ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4, and
> lt~obsolete.m4 as well as libtool.m4.
The proper way to do that is using libtoolize.
Kurt
Package: udev
Version: 0.141-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.12
"The version number of a package. The format is:
[epoch:]upstream_version[-debian_revision]"
http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/
Please use the proper versioning system.
-- System Information:
Debi
Hi peter,
thanks for the patch. I just changed the O bug to an ITA, so I will
handle creating and getting uploaded a version that fixes this in the
next day or so.
Cheers,
Ryan
--
_
Ryan Niebur
ryanrya...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package python-ropemacs
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: python-ropemacs
> tags 527164 - patch
Bug#527164: [python-ropemacs] error during upgrade (6.2.3 was not corectly
configured)
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> severity 527164 grave
Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 527004 pending
Bug#527004: php5-dev: needs phpize update for libtool 2.x
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
tag 527004 pending
thanks
Date: Wed May 6 00:32:26 2009 -0500
Author: Raphael Geissert
Commit ID: fca8ff093069f74e60b03ea216634f3d828e8f02
Commit URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-php/php.git;a=commitdiff;h=fca8ff093069f74e60b03ea216634f3d828e8f02
Patch URL:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-php/php
Your message dated Wed, 06 May 2009 04:02:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#526012: fixed in fusecompress 2.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #526012,
regarding fusecompress: FTBFS: endian.hpp:214: error: expected `;' before ')'
token
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > /usr/include/boost/serialization/set.hpp:117: error: redefinition of
> > 'struct boost::serialization::implementation_level > std::less, std::allocator > >'
> > /usr/include/boost/serialization/set.hpp:117: error: previous definition
Package: flute-openoffice.org
Version: 1.3.0-OOo31-1
Severity: serious
It looks like build depends are missing from this package... I think it
is missing ant and java-gcj-compat-dev but I am not certain if those are
the two proper depends it needs or not, adding those two did however
allow it to b
Hello.
Any news about this?
This is a blocker for the new Nautilus, while the new Nautilus
doesn't enter Testing, Testing will remain without automounting services.
There is some problem with the local mime database of the user (look
at the other reports merged with this one), who is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 527004 php5-dev/5.2.9.dfsg.1-2
Bug#527004: php5-dev: needs phpize update for libtool 2.x
Bug marked as found in version php5-dev/5.2.9.dfsg.1-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
This appears to be php5-dev breakage as near as I can tell. It looks
like phpize is only copying over libtool.m4 and not all of the other
supporting libtool M4 files as required for the libtool 2.x.
I've reassigned the bug to php5-dev.
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> Source: remctl
> Version: 2.13-3
> S
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 527004 php5-dev
Bug#527004: remctl: FTBFS: LTOPTIONS_VERSION is m4_require'd but not m4_defun'd
Bug reassigned from package `remctl' to `php5-dev'.
> retitle 527004 php5-dev: needs phpize update for libtool 2.x
Bug#527004: remctl: FTBFS:
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 20:56:35 -0400
with message-id <4a00e043.7030...@gmail.com>
and subject line Close
has caused the Debian Bug report #527145,
regarding libc6: pop3d and imapd creates segfault in libc-2.9.so
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Wed, 06 May 2009 00:02:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#526571: fixed in gastables 0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #526571,
regarding gastables: FTBFS: can't open file 'setup.py'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 22:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524864: fixed in sdcc 2.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #524864,
regarding sdcc: Replaces/Conflicts missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 22:32:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#526206: fixed in python-django-debug-toolbar
0+git200904211406-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #526206,
regarding python-django-debug-toolbar still FTBFS because of the missing
dependency on python-setupt
Package: sasl2-bin
Version: 2.1.22.dfsg1-23+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
tools from the sasl2-bin package are unusable due to segfaulting after
upgrading to 2.1.22.dfsg1-23+b1
example:
# sasldblistusers2
DB->get: method not permitted before handle's open method
: Su
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 21:18:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#521997: fixed in dhcp-probe 1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #521997,
regarding Fails to install with "insserv: Service syslog has to be enabled to
start service dhcp-probe"
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 21:18:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524771: fixed in dhcp-probe 1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #524771,
regarding dhcp-probe: Build-Depends on libc6-dev (>= 2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 21:18:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#521765: fixed in dhcp-probe 1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #521765,
regarding dhcp-probe: postinst fails: mktemp: cannot create temp file
/tmp/dhcp-probe: Invalid argument
to be marked as done.
Thi
SOLVED:
saslauthd was not started during an upgrade error.
see: http://www.open-xchange.com/forum/showthread.php?t=690
for details
> From: joa...@hotmail.com
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: libc6: pop3d and imapd creates segfault in libc-2.9.so
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 22:53:07 +0200
>
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 21:18:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524975: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.6+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #524975,
regarding Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
hi,
thanx libclamav5 stays installed, so havp still start's up, even with an
error messages about using an old version.
greetings
thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Petr Pudlak wrote:
> The problem is that if pbuilder is invoked with --binary-arch, it still tries
> to build the whole project, including the documentation (indep). It looks to
> me as if the problem
> is with pbuilder (or with the tools it's invoking), but of course
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 18:47:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#526553: fixed in jclassinfo 0.19.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #526553,
regarding jclassinfo: FTBFS: libtool error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 18:47:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#526441: fixed in openocd 0.0+r1606-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #526441,
regarding openocd: FTBFS: command.c:786: error: comparison between signed and
unsigned
to be marked as done.
This means that you
You were selected for the sum of £1,500,000,000.00 GBP . Verify this mail
immediately by sending in your information. This will include your
name,address, age, phone number etc to claimslogisticdirec...@googlemail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 18:17:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#527091: fixed in libvoikko 2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #527091,
regarding libvoikko1: Does not work with voikko-fi version 1.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 19:01:41 +0200, Petr Pudlak wrote:
> Hi, I was trying to attend a reported bug (#521918) of a recently uploaded
> package 'eprover', but unfortunately I didn't know what to do about it. I've
> already asked on debian-mentors, but nobody replied.
>
> The problem is that if
Hi, I was trying to attend a reported bug (#521918) of a recently uploaded
package 'eprover', but unfortunately I didn't know what to do about it. I've
already asked on debian-mentors, but nobody replied.
The problem is that if pbuilder is invoked with --binary-arch, it still tries
to build the wh
On mar, 2009-05-05 at 12:40 -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> Any news from upstream on this? I was under the impression that the fix
> had been committed immediately upstream since the bug can have the
> effect of preventing the plugin from running at all.
Looking at the bug, yes, it seems they ha
Any news from upstream on this? I was under the impression that the fix
had been committed immediately upstream since the bug can have the
effect of preventing the plugin from running at all.
DW
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Source: evolution-rss
Version: 0.1.3~git20090505-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Start Time: 20090505-1335
[...]
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), dpkg-dev (>= 1.14.16), autotools-dev,
> evolution-dev (>= 2.26), intlto
Source: webkit
Version: 1.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of webkit_1.1.6-1 on excelsior by sbuild/amd64 98
> Build started at 20090505-0604
[...]
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.1
On mar, 2009-05-05 at 16:51 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> >
> > A new directory, created from Thunar, will have permission 777,
> > bypassing umask value.
>
> I can not reproduce this with a freshly installed thunar,
> directories get created with 0755 here.
> Can you provide any further informatio
Hi,
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2009-05-05 18:23]:
> On mar, 2009-05-05 at 16:51 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > A new directory, created from Thunar, will have permission 777,
> > > bypassing umask value.
> >
> > I can not reproduce this with a freshly installed thunar,
> > directories get created with
Package: libvoikko1
Version: 2.1-2
Severity: grave
The location for morphological data files has changed in version 2.1 of
libvoikko. voikko-fi version 1.3-1 still places the data files in the
old location. Therefore upgrading libvoikko from 2.0-2 to 2.1-2 makes
the library fail with the following
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 15:39:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#485550: fixed in xjig 2.4-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #485550,
regarding xjig: FTBFS: Using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Luca Bruno writes:
> Simon Josefsson scrisse:
>
>> Hi! This old bug is back again:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393373
>>
>> I guess you'll have to remove these files:
>>
>> gtk-gnutella-0.96.6/doc/gnutella/draft-nielsen-dime-02.txt
>> gtk-gnutella-0.96.6/doc/oth
Hi,
* Thomas Constans [2009-05-04 16:41]:
> Package: thunar
> Version: 1.0.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> A new directory, created from Thunar, will have permission 777,
> bypassing umask value.
I can not reproduce this with a freshly installed
Simon Josefsson scrisse:
> Hi! This old bug is back again:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393373
>
> I guess you'll have to remove these files:
>
> gtk-gnutella-0.96.6/doc/gnutella/draft-nielsen-dime-02.txt
> gtk-gnutella-0.96.6/doc/other/rfc3548.txt
>
> In the old r
package python-ropemacs
found 519382 0.6c2-4
thanks
On 27-Apr-2009, Jamie Norrish wrote:
> It is not possible to upgrade this package to 0.6c2-4 due to this
> issue with the missing Python-Version field. On trying to upgrade
> from 0.6c2-3, I get the following:
[…]
On 26-Apr-2009, David Spreen wr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package python-ropemacs
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: python-ropemacs
> found 519382 0.6c2-4
Bug#519382: dpkg: error processing python-ropemacs (--configure)
Bug marked as found in version 0.6c2-4 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 526084 -1
Bug#526084: [SA34927] libmodplug "PATinst()" Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Bug 526084 cloned as bug 527077.
> reassign -1 gst-plugins-bad0.10
Bug#527077: [SA34927] libmodplug "PATinst()" Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Bug reassigne
Package: gst-plugins-bad0.10
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for gst-plugins-bad0.10.
CVE-2009-1438[0]:
| Integer overflow in the CSoundFile::ReadMed function
| (src/load_med.cpp) in libmodplug before 0.8.6, as used
Source: libmodplug
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for libmodplug.
CVE-2009-1438[0]:
| Integer overflow in the CSoundFile::ReadMed function
| (src/load_med.cpp) in libmodplug before 0.8.6, as used in
| gstreamer-plug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 527076 526657
Bug#526657: CVE-2009-1438: libmodplug "CSoundFile::ReadMed()" Integer Overflow
Vulnerability
Bug#527076: libmodplug: CVE-2009-1438 integer overflow in CSoundFile::ReadMed()
Merged 526657 527076.
>
End of message, stopping pro
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 13:32:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#527057: fixed in console-setup 1.34
has caused the Debian Bug report #527057,
regarding console-setup: insecure tempfile handling
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
* Rafael Laboissiere [2009-05-02 17:42]:
> * Luk Claes [2009-05-02 14:19]:
>
> > There is only one of them really stalled on the buildd, the others just
> > did not get retried. It being stalled is to debug the problem and it's
> > kind of waiting on your input how to debug it AFAIK.
>
> I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 498260 wontfix
Bug#498260: Pinyin module unavailable
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
package scim-python
tag 498270 wontfix
thanks
mark this bug as wontfix, summary of reason
1. build pinyin module need download a file, and the downloaded file
has no clear license.
2. we already have a pinyin input method in scim-pinyin
3. scim-python is still useful even without the pinyin modul
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 12:49:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#517306: fixed in scim-python 0.1.13~rc1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #517306,
regarding scim-python: generates incorrect package with python-support from
experimental
to be marked as done.
This means t
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This source package contains the following files from the
> IETF under non-free license terms:
Erlang source tarball is already repackaged to remove non-free RFCs,
so I'll remove these also.
Thanks for the report!
Cheers!
--
Serg
Hi Sylvestre,
Sylvestre Ledru schrieb am Di, 05. Mai 2009, um 11:23:53 +0200:
> If I understand correctly, if I add these libraries to the
> dependencies of libalberta2-dev, this will fix your problem?
I didn't carefully check the list of dependencies I gave. But if you
install libalberta2-dev w
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.216~r2772-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8
and 10.7.3:
http
Package: nagios-nrpe-server
Version: 2.12-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debi
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20090317-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/
Package: desktop-profiles
Version: 1.4.15
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/
Package: shared-mime-info
Version: 0.60-2
Found: 0.30-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
http://w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.3-8
Severity: serious
gcc-4.3 failed to build from source on all buildds, including the 64bit one.
(It will from now on only try on the 64bit one, though.)
It fails when trying to build stuff for spu support (see below).
On Tuesday 28 Apr 2009 22:26:11 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> This error is seen on all 64 bit arches.
I have a New Upstream Release upload pending. Hopefully, that might fix the
problem.
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
signat
reassign 527058 xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.2-10.lenny1
tag 527058 lenny help
kthxbye
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 13:12:45 +0200, Martin Lemmen wrote:
> X does not start, upon trying it states:
> " Fatal server error:
> Cannot run in framebuffer mode. Please specify BusIDs for all ramebuffer
> devices"
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 527058 xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.2-10.lenny1
Bug#527058: X "cannot run in framebuffer mode"
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-sunffb' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> tag 527058 lenny help
Bug#527058: X "cannot run in framebuffer mo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 525586 + help
Bug#525586: fusecompress: FTBFS: set.hpp:117: error: redefinition of 'struct
boost::serialization::implementation_level
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 526012 +patch pending
Bug#526012: fusecompress: FTBFS: endian.hpp:214: error: expected `;' before ')'
token
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
tags 526012 +patch pending
thanks
On Tuesday 28 Apr 2009 22:31:52 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> In file included from ./boost/archive/portable_binary_iarchive.hpp:53,
> from Compress.cpp:21:
> ./boost/integer/endian.hpp: In membe
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:21:13PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:08:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Anton, I'm filing this bug rather than just correcting it because I'm
> > not sure what you want to achieve here. Was it just code you committed
> > by accident, or do
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:08:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Anton, I'm filing this bug rather than just correcting it because I'm
> not sure what you want to achieve here. Was it just code you committed
> by accident, or do you explicitly want to have extra logging in the
> package? If the l
Build failure seen on some 64Bit archs. Was seen on PowerPC64 also.
See Debian BTS #526012
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Raj Sarraf
---
src/boost/integer/endian.hpp |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/boost/integer/endian.hpp b/src/boost/integer/endian.hpp
index
Package: xserver-xorg-video-sunffb
Version: 1:1.1.0-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X does not start, upon trying it states:
" Fatal server error:
Cannot run in framebuffer mode. Please specify BusIDs for all ramebuffer
devices"
see also this thread on debian-sparc ma
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.33
Severity: grave
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic
While merging console-setup 1.33 into Ubuntu, I happened to notice that
debian/config.proto contains a few instances of code like this:
echo unsupported_layout=$unsu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 526806 fixed-upstream pending
Bug#526806: mdadm 3 fails to boot, hangs in initrd
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
tags 526806 fixed-upstream pending
thanks
also sprach martin f krafft [2009.05.05.0930 +0200]:
> This happens with kernel 2.6.29 as well as 2.6.30-rc4.
It seems to work with the devel-3.0 tip [2800528] now.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer
Severity: serious
Package: erlang
Version: 1:13.b-dfsg-2
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc
Hi!
This source package contains the following files from the
IETF under non-free license terms:
+ otp_src_R13B/lib/inets/doc/archive/rfc959.txt
+ otp_src_R13B/lib/inets/doc
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 10:19:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#526556: fixed in munge 0.5.8-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #526556,
regarding munge: FTBFS: storage size of 'cred' isn't known
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:37:38AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Package: ispell
> Severity: serious
> Version 3.1.20.0-4.4
>
> It seems like textutils is no longer in the archive, maybe you should
> go with the trend and update the build-dep to be coreutils?
I have an NMU ready for this. diff
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:27:12PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Package: pdfsam
> Version: 1.1.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> $ pdfsam-console
> : Missing required file: /usr/share/pdfsam/lib//pdfsam-console-2.0.1e.jar
I'm just a pdfsam (newbie) user, but I ca
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 18:29 -0400 schrieb Arnaud Soyez (Weboide):
> Package: libgstreamer0.10-0
> Version: 0.10.22-3
> Severity: grave
> File: gstreamer0.10
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> In Ubuntu Karmic, this package FTBFS.
> As a reference, see these build l
Your message dated Tue, 05 May 2009 09:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#503367: fixed in plink 1.06-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #503367,
regarding plink: file conflict with putty-tools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
* Martin Michlmayr [2009-05-05 11:19]:
> * Thomas Weber [2009-05-05 11:10]:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Just for the record, I see the same problem on an amd64 system (Intel
> > > EM64T chip).
> >
> > Is this a normal installation or as part of a
Hello Sven,
Le mardi 05 mai 2009 à 11:06 +0200, Sven Marnach a écrit :
> Package: libalberta2-dev
> Version: 2.0.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Doesn't depend on packages which are required for the package
> to be of any use
>
> It is impossible to statically link against this package w
* Thomas Weber [2009-05-05 11:10]:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Just for the record, I see the same problem on an amd64 system (Intel
> > EM64T chip).
>
> Is this a normal installation or as part of a build process?
build process. It installs fine in m
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Just for the record, I see the same problem on an amd64 system (Intel
> EM64T chip).
Is this a normal installation or as part of a build process?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.
Package: libalberta2-dev
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Doesn't depend on packages which are required for the package to
be of any use
It is impossible to statically link against this package without
libgl1-dev, libx11-dev and libblas3gf installed.
Cheers,
Sven
-- System
Your message dated Tue, 5 May 2009 10:41:41 +0200
with message-id <20090505104141.710b8...@rincewind.suse.cz>
and subject line Re: Bug#526605: wammu: fails to start (no module "gammu")
has caused the Debian Bug report #526605,
regarding wammu: fails to start (no module "gammu")
to be marked as don
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:25:57AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hello
>
> Dne Tue, 5 May 2009 10:15:18 +0200
> Johannes Rohr napsal(a):
>
> > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gammu/__init__.py
> > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gammu/__init__.pyc
> > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gammu/__in
Hello
Dne Tue, 5 May 2009 10:15:18 +0200
Johannes Rohr napsal(a):
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gammu/__init__.py
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gammu/__init__.pyc
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gammu/__init__.py
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gammu/__init__.pyc
Okay, here is p
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:10:34AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
>
> This one also looks okay. Didn't you by chance install also
> python-gammu manually?
no.
> Maybe finding all instances of gammu will help:
>
> locate gammu/__init__.py
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.4/gammu/__init__.py
/usr/lib/pymo
Dne Tue, 5 May 2009 10:05:19 +0200
Johannes Rohr napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:52:55AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Hmm, this looks good. And what is Python search path?
> >
> > python -c 'import sys; print sys.path'
> >
> ['', '/usr/lib/python2.5', '/usr/lib/python2.5
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:52:55AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
[...]
> Hmm, this looks good. And what is Python search path?
>
> python -c 'import sys; print sys.path'
>
['', '/usr/lib/python2.5', '/usr/lib/python2.5/plat-linux2',
'/usr/lib/python2.5/lib-tk', '/usr/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload',
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 526546 important
Bug#526546: FTBFS: #error "unsupported architecture"
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Hi Peter,
thanks for the patch. I already have the new package ready and was
waiting for upstream validation.
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:21:44PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> tags 526556 +patch sid squeeze
> thanks
>
> This bug does not affect lenny but it does affect both sid and
This happens with kernel 2.6.29 as well as 2.6.30-rc4.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than
95 matches
Mail list logo
