Dear Release Team,
I have just uploaded a fix for an RC bug (#494760). It is a new
upstream release (even when the package is "native"), but the changes
are pretty contained. You can see the full diff in the bug report.
Please allow it to migrate to testing.
Thanks, Tincho.
-- Forwarded
Your message dated Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:32:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#494760: fixed in kernel-patch-nfs-ngroups 4.58+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #494760,
regarding kernel-patch-nfs-ngroups: Doesn't apply against Lenny kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
I'm about to upload to DELAYED with the changes proposed by Frank.
Frank: if you prefer to NMU yourself, please go ahead.
diff -Naur oss-compat-0.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog oss-compat-0.0.4+nmu2/debian/changelog
--- oss-compat-0.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog 2008-07-22 04:43:41.0 -0300
+++ oss
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:10:30 -0600
with message-id <18763.7862.450270.742...@ron.nulle.part>
and subject line forwarded message from Debian Installer
has caused the Debian Bug report #508998,
regarding python-rpy: Does not work with current R in debian. No module named
_rpy2081
to
Your message dated Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:17:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#446405: fixed in ardour 1:2.7.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #446405,
regarding ardour: Embeds too many libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reassign 494058 epiphany-gecko
Bug#494058: epiphany-browser: Download window is broken
Bug reassigned from package `epiphany-browser' to `epiphany-gecko'.
> forcemerge 494058
Please check if my binNMUs fixed the problem if I forget about it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
so here is an update on the djvulibre-plugin segfault.
Using only the upstream patch, the segfault remained for me, the plugin
segfaulting at the first line changed in the patch. There seems to be
some race condition: sprinkling a few fprintf's for debugging makes the
segfault go away, as does
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 502751 lenny-ignore
Bug#502751: clamav-getfiles: piuparts test fails: eicar.com md5sum mismatch,
file needs downloading
Tags were: patch
Tags added: lenny-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I got it during an upgrade, and I get it consistently
on attempts to flashplugin-nonfree-update --install:
md5sum rejected install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz
Does anything need updating?
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 508480 important
Bug#508480: iodbc: Segfaults when asking for the available DSNs
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Package: libiodbc2
Version: 3.52.6-2
Followup-For: Bug #508480
I can reproduce this bug with the current version on unstable, using the
odbc.ini file from the OP:
$ iodbctest
iODBC Demonstration program
This program shows an interactive SQL processor
Driver Manager: 03.52.0607.1008
Enter ODBC c
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:55:49 +0100
with message-id <20081218205549.gg29...@suiko.acc.umu.se>
and subject line lirc-modules-source FTBFS with 2.6.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #509081,
regarding lirc-modules-source FTBFS with 2.6.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Pity the fix did not make it into
http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r6/
Cheers,
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.d
Hi there,
iODBC Maintainer wrote:
> > Justification: renders package unusable
[...]
> If you fix that typo, iodbctest will work fine. I will fix the
> underlying problem in the code so this core dump will not occur in the
> next release, however with this improper section header it would mean
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 07:49:17PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> I'm going to upload a second revision, it will have less embedded
> libs:
>
> /usr/lib/ardour2/engines/libclearlooks.so
> /usr/lib/ardour2/libardour_cp.so
> /usr/lib/ardour2/libardour.so
> /usr/lib/ardour2/libgtkmm2ext.so
> /usr/lib
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 509129 normal
Bug#509129: evolution-exchange: Evolution-exchange stopped working suddenly
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
severity 509129 normal
thanks
On jeu, 2008-12-18 at 15:53 +0100, emanoil wrote:
> Evolution is unusable for me. It depends on gnome-keyring and down't
> want to work without the keyring manager installed. Thus this
> dependency should be incorporated in the installer package or removed
> from evol
Hi Felipe,
|--==> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:03:56 -0300, Felipe Sateler
said:
FS> package ardour
FS> found 446405 1:2.7.1-1
FS> thanks
FS> This upload doesn't actually fix this, there is a typo in debian/rules:
FS> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
FS> index c57613c..b20eafa 10
Hi,
> Justification: renders package unusable
One feature of app broken != whole package is unusable.
> reinstalling rdesktop from Etch on Lenny does not help.
This would suggest the problem is somewhere else than in
rdesktop perhaps some changes in networking setup with
your virtual machine?
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.22.3.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Evolution is unusable for me. It depends on gnome-keyring and down't want to
work without the keyring manager installed. Thus this
dependency should be incorporated in the installer package
Hi KDE Team,
it seems bug #500711 still needs to be fixed for Lenny. The submitter
reported it against the wrong version (4:3.5.5-5 instead of 4:3.5.9-4),
which is understandable since reportbug puts in the wrong version if the
one the bug _actually_ applies to is so buggy that upgrading to it is
Hi there,
"Edward Z. Yang" wrote:
> > I assume this has been forwarded upstream?
>
> I was attempting to check out the fenix website to find out whether or
> not the fenix developers were handling the issue on their bugtracker,
> and I get a generic "your webserver has been configured correctly
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Yes. That helps.
>
> The two scripts provide a similar function, but python-dkim only does DKIM
> signing/verification. It does not implement the policy component, so it's
> dkimverify can't provide a complete equivalent of the one in dkimproxy.
>
> I do think their p
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 05:37:50PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Only images for 2.6.27, you'd need to build 2.6.28-rcX kernels
> yourself.
I think this may have regressed slightly from rc7 to rc8.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Yes. That helps.
The two scripts provide a similar function, but python-dkim only does DKIM
signing/verification. It does not implement the policy component, so it's
dkimverify can't provide a complete equivalent of the one in dkimproxy.
I do think their purposes are slightly different. The
Hello,
> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1
That seems to fix the problem.
-- John Lindgren
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:32:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#482503: fixed in gtk2hs 0.9.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #482503,
regarding gtkrsync - FTBFS: undefined reference to
`gtkzm0zi9zi11_GraphicsziUIziGtkziMultilineziTextBuffer_zdwtextBufferMoveMark_entr
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:32:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#482503: fixed in gtk2hs 0.9.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #482503,
regarding gtkrsync - FTBFS: undefined reference to
`gtkzm0zi9zi12zi1_GraphicsziUIziGtkziWindowsziMessageDialog_a4_entry '
to be marke
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package amanda-server
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: amanda-server
> # reportbug uses wrong version if upgrading fails :-/
> notfound 488010 1:2.5.1p1-2.1
Bug#488010: amanda-server fails to upgrade (etch -> lenny)
Bug#476583: amanda-server: File
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:28:13 +0100
with message-id <20081218142813.ga7...@faerie>
and subject line flashplugin-nonfree-lastminute fixed by Bart Martens
has caused the Debian Bug report #509098,
regarding Security update for flashplugin-nonfree for bpo and new download URL
to be mar
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:02:41 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 à 09:19 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
> > > But after I upgraded librsvg2-2 to the version from exp (2.22.3-1),
> > > everything is fine.
> >
> > Josselin and GNOME people,do you know something ab
Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw that you made an upload for bug #503532 and #508032 to
> experimental. Now I wonder if you plan to make an upload to unstable
> suitable for lenny?
Just some pointers:
Fedora did an upload for their stable distribution, and they were burnt heavily
[1], s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 509098 confirmed
Bug#509098: Security update for flashplugin-nonfree for bpo and new download URL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Thomas Goirand 12/18/08 1:49 AM >>>
>
>Now, would it be easy for you to rename dkimverify to something else? I
>have put the upstream author (Jason) of dkimproxy as a copy of his email
>so he can tell what kind of problems we might find if we rename
dkimverify.
I don't know the full context
Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 à 09:19 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
> > But after I upgraded librsvg2-2 to the version from exp (2.22.3-1),
> > everything is fine.
>
> Josselin and GNOME people,do you know something about this (#508443), please?
> Do you agree if I reassign it to librsvg?
I’
Hi,
I saw that you made an upload for bug #503532 and #508032 to
experimental. Now I wonder if you plan to make an upload to unstable
suitable for lenny?
Best Regards,
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 509081 + moreinfo
Bug#509081: lirc-modules-source FTBFS with 2.6.26
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tags 509081 + unreproducible
Bug#509081: lirc-modules-source FTBFS with 2.6.26
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible
tags 509081 + moreinfo
tags 509081 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi
On Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008, David Weinehall wrote:
> Package: lirc-modules-source
> Version: 0.8.3-3
> Severity: grave
>
> Rationale for severity: FTBFS with 2.6.26 kernel (at least using
> module-assistant), build log:
>
> /us
Hi Evgeni!
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:36:12 -0200 Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
>> Are you also able to test it with imagemagick from experimental
>> (7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1), please?
>
> Funny,
> upgrading IM to the version from exp did not help, se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 509088 1.0.0-1
Bug#509088: This version of Kino doesn't work on PowerPC
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.0.0-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
reopen 509053
severity important 509053
Thanks
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 21:33:40 +, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse
Version: 1:12.5.1-4
Severity: grave
File: vmmouse
Justification: renders package unusable
no
yes.
.
Hello
I tried inst
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 509053
Bug#509053: vmmouse: vmmouse unloads
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity important 509053
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 509053 important
Bug#509053: vmmouse: vmmouse unloads
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
On jeu, 2008-12-18 at 07:24 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> reassign 509030 xserver-xorg-video-neomagic
> thanks
> On mer, 2008-12-17 at 21:25 -0600, john.lindg...@tds.net wrote:
> >
> > I just tried the VESA driver, and Terminal works correctly with that.
> > Based on that, I'm guessing it's ei
Package: kernel-patch-openvz
Version: 028.18.1+etch6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Applying the patch on post DSA-1687-1 kernel source gives to errors:
Testing whether "OpenVZ kernel patch for virtual server support" patch
for 2.6.18 applies (dry run):
1 out of 2 hunks FA
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:1.4~bpo40+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
This is refering to flashplugin-nonfree via bpo.
The flashplugin-nonfree-lastminute script currently contains:
DOWNLOADFILE="install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz"
DOWNLOADURL="http://fpd
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:08:18 +0100
with message-id <20081218110818.gb15...@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#509053: vmmouse: vmmouse unloads
has caused the Debian Bug report #509053,
regarding vmmouse: vmmouse unloads
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:36:15 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #464585,
regarding still depends on xmms
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:35:06 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #456694,
regarding shermans-aquarium: Should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Adam D. Barratt, le Thu 18 Dec 2008 07:03:57 +, a écrit :
> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 00:29 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Neil Williams, le Tue 09 Dec 2008 23:50:14 +, a écrit :
> > > The original bug report was tagged as found in a version of gpm and
> > > this wasn't changed when the bug
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:36:12 -0200 Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Are you also able to test it with imagemagick from experimental
> (7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1), please?
Funny,
upgrading IM to the version from exp did not help, see attached traces
(no IM debug symbols, sorry, no time to recompile that bie
52 matches
Mail list logo
