Subject: enigmail: Enigmail can't decrypt after upgrade from etch to lenny
Package: enigmail
Version: 2:0.95.0+1-3.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I have used enigmail extensively under etch. Today I upgaded to Lenny.
When
Random comments about bugs 505071 and 505271.
Group utmp was introduced so terminal emulators could be setgid instead
of needing setuid root, to prevent bugs in them to escalate to root
access. Terminal emulators are generally not written with security in
mind, being the "more features the better"
Package: geda-gnetlist
Version: 1.4.0-2
Tags: patch
Severity: critical
Here a a security patch from fedora (
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc//devel/geda-gnetlist/geda-gnetlist-CVE-mktemp.patch?view=markup):
--- scripts/sch2eaglepos.sh 2008-05-16 06:20:10.0 +0200
+++ scripts/sch2e
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:33:07AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> severity 504283 serious
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't see a possibility to exploit this specific vulnerability in
> egroupware, because it is triggered when using the Sendmail backend, and
> there is no way to set this backend.
>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:27:21AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> severity 505929 grave
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> If the package doesn't work with PHP 5.2.6 then that is a grave bug, since
> that is the version we're shipping with Lenny.
I'm attaching the dsc and diff.gz from my proposed update. Thi
2008/11/22 Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> fixed 496411 20060918-3
> thanks
You didn't send a copy of the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], nothing was done.
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geisser
fixed 496411 20060918-3
thanks
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:23:13AM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed.
> > Please stop blindly closing this report and *do
Hello,
On Thursday 20 November 2008 03:25:41 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I have found all of the reported issues in BOTH versions marked as fixed.
> Please stop blindly closing this report and *do verify* everything is
> fixed.
I believe you have read the reason why this bug was closed. If you disa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 496411 -patch
Bug#496411: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
Tags were: patch confirmed security
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 506323 important
Bug#506323: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686-bigmem: HP Proliant DL380G5 stops working
after a few days without any error-logs
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> Package: quassel
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Quassel version in Debian is vulnerable to IRC command injection as described
> in http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2008/3164
> Upd
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 03:51:09PM +0200, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
>
> I can confirm the bug as described above. I can't test the patch,
> because my knowledge isn't sufficient to understand it.
>
> I want to ad, that cdfs-src was IMHO the only way of playing audio cds
> with LTSP-Thin-Clients (see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Let reassign it where it belongs
> reassign 490999 libqt3-mt 3:3.3.8b-5
Bug#490999: kicker: crashes on startup
Bug reassigned from package `kicker' to `libqt3-mt'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Remove outdated claims
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> tag 496954 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unknown tag/s: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
Please fix for etch also. Please issue DSA.
Please alert other Linux distros, they are also affected.
Since you claim this issue is fixed, surely (?!) there is no harm
in making the exploit public. Should (may) I do that now?
Cheers, Paul
Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.ed
Hello,
Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>> I think that http://alioth.debian.org/~pusling-guest/phonon_4:4.2.0-2/
>>> packages can solve it. Can any of you confirm? then I will upload and
>>> try to get it included for lenny
>> That fixes only one half of the problem. Now, Qt4 finds phonon
>> plugins,
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325689: fixed in xloadimage 4.1-16.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #325689,
regarding xsetbg keeps opening X clients without closing the old
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Hi Peter,
I'm not sure why we have the urgent desire to release with stuff that
"is quite mature and has been in production use for years, the
documentation is currently not good enough to support use by the general
public" per the package description, but if we're going to keep it and
the maintai
I have made a patch to fix this bug, I attach it.
This bug is now closed.
This bug was fixed in Ubuntu launchpad (LP #257797).
I have made a NMU fixing this and other bugs.
--
Francisco M. García Claramonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: public key ID 556ABA51
03-fix_segfault.dpatch
Description:
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-11-22 18:22 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The weird thing is that it looks like that only dpkg 1.14.23
causes you trouble and not 1.14.22. But the code that deals with
lonely Triggers-Awaited dates back to Mon Aug 11 (commit
587b8d8696cb92a4a18901085db033d44bfe6f32)
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
Just did that but still dpkg complains of the same problem albeit for a
different package (libhtml-format-perl this time), so I do not think it
is a problem with one specific mis-behaving package.
Will it be too invasive i
tags 325689 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
here is the diff for the xloadimage NMU (versioned as 4.1-16.1) I'm
uploading.
Kind Regards
T.
diff -u xloadimage-4.1/debian/patches/00list
xloadimage-4.1/debian/patches/00list
--- xloadimage-4.1/debian/patches/00list
+++ xloadimage-4.1/debian/patches/00
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 325689 + patch pending
Bug#325689: xsetbg keeps opening X clients without closing the old
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-11-22 18:22 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > The weird thing is that it looks like that only dpkg 1.14.23
> > causes you trouble and not 1.14.22. But the code that deals with
> > lonely Triggers-Awaited dates back to Mon Aug 11 (commit
> > 587b
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#505271: fixed in shadow 1:4.1.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #505271,
regarding symlink attack in login leading to arbitrary file ownership
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:39:33 +0100]:
> On 2008-11-20, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2008-11-18, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Also, please give back apertium 3.0.7+1-2 on ia64, now that flex has been
> > fixed.
>
On 2008-11-22 18:22 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The weird thing is that it looks like that only dpkg 1.14.23
> causes you trouble and not 1.14.22. But the code that deals with
> lonely Triggers-Awaited dates back to Mon Aug 11 (commit
> 587b8d8696cb92a4a18901085db033d44bfe6f32) and dpkg 1.14.2
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
> Just did that but still dpkg complains of the same problem albeit for a
> different package (libhtml-format-perl this time), so I do not think it
> is a problem with one specific mis-behaving package.
>
> Will it be too invasive if I remove all th
[resending this with hopefully less broken CC, apologies]
Hi,
I am not quite sure whether I can agree with Will Drewry's analysis[1]
accompanying ocert advisory 2008-008[1]. Looking at item 1A, which Will
says is fixed in 1.1.5, attached .mov seems to fit the case description
and will still corru
* Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 19:33:19 CET]:
> It is: now you at least get a connexion, and get rejected.
Hmm, alright.
> The pdmenu segfault is due to another bug, see my mail dated 11th
> October.
Ah, right. And aptitude does behave false here too (last two lines from
str
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#506537: fixed in soprano 2.1.1+dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #506537,
regarding FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/qt4/doc/qt4.tag': No such file or
directory
to be marked as do
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#498573: fixed in phonon 4:4.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #498573,
regarding phonon does not find its backends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#486354: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486354,
regarding iceweasel: Iceweasel rc2 does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#486334: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486334,
regarding iceweasel: crashes on startup (x64)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#482415: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #482415,
regarding iceweasel: crashes on startup (x64)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 506544 important
Bug#506544: random crashes
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492488: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #492488,
regarding iceweasel: Iceweasel rc2 does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#486334: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486334,
regarding iceweasel: Iceweasel rc2 does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
severity 506546 important
tag 506546 + moreinfo
thanks
Le samedi 22 novembre 2008 à 07:51 -0600, Pol a écrit :
> Synopsis: random crashes
So that’s all? Without a description of how the bug appears and a full
backtrace with debugging symbols, how do you expect anyone to fix the
bug?
> #4 0xb787
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#486354: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486354,
regarding iceweasel and epiphany crash on starting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 506546 important
Bug#506546: random crashes
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tag 506546 + moreinfo
Bug#506546: random crashes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Actually the problem lies within quassel-core (same source package), stupid
me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492488: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #492488,
regarding iceweasel: crashes on startup (x64)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
severity 506544 important
thanks
Le samedi 22 novembre 2008 à 07:50 -0600, Pol a écrit :
> Thread 1 (Thread -1223944512 (LWP 4696)):
> #0 0xb7f6c410 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #1 0xbf870228 in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #2 0x in ?? ()
> No symbol table i
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#482415: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #482415,
regarding iceweasel and epiphany crash on starting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492488: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #492488,
regarding iceweasel and epiphany crash on starting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#486354: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486354,
regarding iceweasel: crashes on startup (x64)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495311: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #495311,
regarding iceweasel: ~/.mozilla folder has permision drwx-- root root
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#486334: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486334,
regarding iceweasel and epiphany crash on starting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495311: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #495311,
regarding iceweasel silently fails if permissions on .mozilla are wrong
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#482415: fixed in xulrunner 1.9.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #482415,
regarding iceweasel: Iceweasel rc2 does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Package: quassel
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Quassel version in Debian is vulnerable to IRC command injection as described
in http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2008/3164
Updated packages are already available at http://quassel.irc.org/ , according
to q
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#506527: fixed in ijs 0.35-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #506527,
regarding ijs ftbfs with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel>=2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Distribution: Debian 4.0
Package: gnome-applets
Severity: critical
Version: GNOME2.14.3 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: Debian
Synopsis: random crashes
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-applets
Bugzilla-Component: battery
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.14.1)
Description:
Descripti
Distribution: Debian 4.0
Package: gnome-panel
Severity: critical
Version: GNOME2.14.3 2.14.x
Gnome-Distributor: Debian
Synopsis: random crashes
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-panel
Bugzilla-Component: clock
Bugzilla-Version: 2.14.x
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.14.1)
Description:
Description of the crash:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 506539 normal
Bug#506539: kooka does not display the Scan and Preview buttons making it
impossible to aquire an image
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> retitle 506539 kooka GUI might not fit to screen under small resolutions
Bug#506539:
severity 506539 normal
retitle 506539 kooka GUI might not fit to screen under small resolutions
thanks
šeštadienis 22 Lapkritis 2008, Fernando J. Rodríguez rašė:
> Hi. I'm sorry to report a bug of this severity, but as the attached
> snapshot of kooka's window shows, the Scan and Preview buttons o
Package: twidge
Version: 0.99.3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/twidge-0.99.3'
ghc -package Cabal Setup.lhs -o setup
./setup configure
Configuring twidge-0.99.3...
setup: At least the following dependencie
severity 506058 normal
tag 506058 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 02:46, Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gkrellmd doesn't start even with a manual /etc/init.d/gkrellmd start
> after install is reported to be successful. Running gkrellmd manually
> once with
>
> gkrellm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 506058 normal
Bug#506058: Fails to start after install probably due to missing
/var/run/gkrellmd.pid
Bug#506059: /etc/init.d/gkrellmd start fails if gkrellmd already started
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tag 506058 unreproducible
Package: soprano
Version: 2.1+dfsg.1
Severity: serious
The end of the log is below:
[ 99%] Building CXX object test/CMakeFiles/tstringtest.dir/tstringtest.o
cd /tmp/buildd/soprano-2.1+dfsg.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/test &&
/usr/l
Dear Moritz,
Yes, Nicolas's patch does fix the problem. But please note:
(1) It is my patch, not Nicolas's, was first proposed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505071#15
(2) There is no such patch, nobody has made a "diff" file,
much less a compiled/built package to try.
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#505714: fixed in imlib2 1.4.0-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #505714,
regarding Crash on loading XPM file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Package: verlihub
Severity: grave
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
An exploit[0] has been published for verlihub:
> Verlihub does not sanitize user input passed to the shell via its
> "trigger"
> mechanism. Furthermore, the Verlihub daemon can optionally be
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 08:33:43PM +1100, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Dear Nekral,
>
> Long ago you wrote:
>
> >> ... Should I attempt to write an exploit/demo?
> > That would be nice to check if it would be possible to chown
> > /etc/shadow by cheating utmp.
>
> Done, I now have a working PoC/demo/expl
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Just for debian's info: you definitely want the man-pages page. The
> pthreads pages that I have been recently adding to man-pages are far
> better than the ancient glibc pages.
Ack. I've opened Bug#506515 requesting this.
Regards,
Joey
--
No question is too
Adam Borowski wrote:
> The fun thing is, glibc-doc consists of... just the LinuxThreads libpthread
> docs! Everything else is in glibc-doc-reference (non-free).
>
> The changelog is worth keeping, but congratulations, you just obsoleted the
> last bit of glibc-doc.
Haha.
Regards,
Joey
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 506479 3.05-1
Bug#506479: manpages-dev: tries to overwrite
/usr/share/man/man3/pthread_attr_setschedpolicy.3.gz from glibc-doc
Bug no longer marked as found in version 3.05-1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> thanks
Stopp
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3
> weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2
> from lenny?
I had sent the following reply to the list (but no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 506524 important
Bug#506524: gedit-latex-plugin: Error when enabling plugin; does not build
documents
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
severity 506524 important
thanks
After I have restarted gedit, the plugin works fine. So this bug appears
to only occur after the user has enabled the plugin, but before they
launch gedit again. :)
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219
tags 505714 + patch pending
thanks
Hi Laurance,
Here is the NMU for imlib2 (versioned as 1.4.0-1.2) and to be uploaded.
Kind regards
T.
diff -u imlib2-1.4.0/debian/control imlib2-1.4.0/debian/control
--- imlib2-1.4.0/debian/control
+++ imlib2-1.4.0/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: libs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 505714 + patch pending
Bug#505714: Crash on loading XPM file
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Package: ijs
Version: 0.35-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty
build-stamp is lacking a dependency on configure-stamp
seen at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ijs/0.35-5/+build/759741
which is configured to build with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=2 by
defa
Package: gedit-latex-plugin
Version: 0.1.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I enabled the latex plugin for gedit, the following traceback was printed
to the console:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/gedit-2/plugins/LaTeXPlugin/__init__.py", line
Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#506479: fixed in manpages 3.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #506479,
regarding manpages-dev: tries to overwrite
/usr/share/man/man3/pthread_attr_setschedpolicy.3.gz from glibc-doc
to
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3
> weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2
> from lenny?
I'll have a look at fixing it.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi,
given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3
weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2
from lenny?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
78 matches
Mail list logo
