I can't compile the src package from Experemental in Debian Lenny AMD64
- some tests after compiling fails:
Test Summary
PASS: Printer 'Test1' correctly produced 55 page(s).
PASS: Printer 'Test2' correctly produced 23 page(s).
PASS: 154 requests processed.
PASS: 0 emergency messages.
PASS: 0 al
If I change by hands the test strings for skiping this errors, all
install and works good for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op zondag 31-08-2008 om 18:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Gerfried
Fuchs:
> * Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-28 16:53:41 CEST]:
> > Op donderdag 28-08-2008 om 16:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Tomas
> > Hoger:
> > > You probably wanted to use:
> > > TMPFILE=`mktemp -t`
> > > ins
$0.03 for each ad.
On Aug 29, 10:57 am, gpcgy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Click
> onhttp://groups.google.com/group/BronxPower/web/get-paid-0-03-for-posti...
> - or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
> work.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
severity 495954 normal
tags 487211 -moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:56:16PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 31/08/2008 alle 11.08 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 04:09:19PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> [...]
> > > I found the very same bug t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 495954 normal
Bug#495954: slapd: Upgrade to Lenny failed: libldap_r-2.3.so.0 missing
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
> tags 487211 -moreinfo
Bug#487211: slapd: upgrade from 2.3.35 fails looking for ldif
Tags were: pending moreinfo
Tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 335916 O: netmon-applet -- GNOME2 Network Load Applet
Bug#335916: ITA: netmon-applet -- GNOME2 Network Load Applet
Changed Bug title to `O: netmon-applet -- GNOME2 Network Load Applet' from
`ITA: netmon-applet -- GNOME2 Network Load Applet'.
>
Dear Sirs,
is there any progress regarding the unionfs upload for 2.6.26 kernels.
We have missed unionfs for very long time.
Best Regards
Mike Kranidis
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= QUOTE =
on Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:53:53 +0200
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
there will not be
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 00:43 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 août 2008 à 15:43 -0300, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
> > Are you interested in adopting this package? Do you know potential adopters?
> > If so, please could you forward them this mail, Ccing the BTS and me?
> >
> > If the
Package: gdm
Version: 2.20.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I'm unsure that this is actually a gdm problem, but it does seem
relevant.
The situation I have found is that I have two users who switch between
VT7 and VT8. Since changing to Lenny, I have found that VT7
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496436: fixed in gpsdrive 2.10~pre4-6.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496436,
regarding The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#497115: fixed in gpsdrive 2.10~pre4-6.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #497115,
regarding gpsdrive: possibly non-free file scripts/gpsfetchmap.pl
to be marked as done.
This means tha
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 03:21:46 Nico Golde wrote:
> why did you remove it instead of just fixing it? Now people
> who already installed this stay vulnerable which I don't
> really consider to be good.
I'm not sure what you mean: removing and fixing an unused script have
precisely the same the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> found 496436 2.09-2sarge1
Bug#496436: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
Bug marked as found in version 2.09-2sarge1.
>
End of message, sto
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:26:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496394: fixed in qemu 0.9.1+svn20080825-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496394,
regarding The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
to be marked as don
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:26:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496394: fixed in qemu 0.9.1+svn20080826-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496394,
regarding The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
to be marked as don
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:05:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#474547: fixed in ion3-scripts 20070515.debian-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #474547,
regarding ion3-scripts: io3-scripts is in main but depends on non-free ion3
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#491270: fixed in pulseaudio 0.9.10-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #491270,
regarding pulseaudio: PulseAudio freezes the boot process in some situations
to be marked as done.
This mean
Package: python-lxml
Severity: serious
Version: 2.1.1-1
When the python-stats package is installed, attempting to use
lxml.etree results in an AttributeError being thrown:
ng:~# python -c 'import lxml.etree'
ng:~# apt-get install -qq python-stats
Selecting previously deselected package python-sta
I am also getting this bug on my x86-64 system but not on my similar x86 system.
Is anyone having success running iceweasel on x86-64 or the next release of
Debian is going to ship with an iceweasel that does not run on x86-64 systems?
Ahora también puedes acceder a tu correo Terra desde el móv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 491270 + patch pending
Bug#491270: pulseaudio: PulseAudio freezes the boot process in some situations
Tags were: fixed-upstream pending patch
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
tags 491270 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
The following is the diff for my pulseaudio 0.9.10-2.1 NMU.
Kind regards
T.
reverted:
--- pulseaudio-0.9.10/debian/libpulse-mainloop-glib0-dbg.debhelper.log
+++ pulseaudio-0.9.10.orig/debian/libpulse-mainloop-glib0-dbg.debhelper.log
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-dh_list
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:17:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495703: fixed in ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #495703,
regarding gs-common: upgrade from Etch fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496032: fixed in exiftags 1.01-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #496032,
regarding exiftags_1.01-2(sparc/unstable): make: Nothing to be done for
`binary-arch'!
to be marked as done.
This
Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> I'm not able to provide tested gnarwl packages anymore. Sorry. I'm fine
> with getting it removed from lenny.
removal hint added.
Cheers
Luk
> Am 31.08.2008 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> gnarwl has an RC bug (#457279) about non-DFSG files (open for 8
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:33:43PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> What are the permissions on the files under ~/.mozilla/firefox?
The permissions are all fine - owned by me, user-readable, user-writable,
etc. .mozilla is 700, .mozilla/iceweasel is a symlink to .mozilla/firefox,
and .mozilla/firefox
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 495703 + patch pending
Bug#495703: gs-common: upgrade from Etch fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
tags 495703 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
The following is the diff for my ghostscript 8.62.dfsg.1-3.1 NMU.
Kind regards
T.
diff -u ghostscript-8.62.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
ghostscript-8.62.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
--- ghostscript-8.62.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
+++ ghostscript-8.62.dfsg.1/debian/ch
Hmm, I see my previous description was a bit terse, so here in detail:
read-only branch: "some_path/sub_path"
read-write branch: empty or some_path, but NOT sub_path
==> union: some_path/sub_path
Creating a new file in the union directory "some_path/subpath" will now fail
without the bugfix, s
I'm not able to provide tested gnarwl packages anymore. Sorry. I'm
fine with getting it removed from lenny.
Cheers,
Cajus
Am 31.08.2008 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
Hi,
gnarwl has an RC bug (#457279) about non-DFSG files (open for 8
months,
set to serious for >=1 month). gnarwl seems
Also see 497313. When splashy was installed running under my
custom kernel, initramfs for the stock kernel was not
rebuilt due to that bug.
So when I booted under the stock kernel, splashy never
loaded until after I unlocked the encrypted drives and
normal boot began.
Resume from hibernation wor
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.10-2
Followup-For: Bug #486400
I also encounter the same problem using either the stock kernel
for 2.6.26 or my own custom kernel when resuming from hibernation.
The normal boot-up splash screen works fine and prompts me for
the passwords to the encrypted partit
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#483918: fixed in alsa-driver 1.0.17.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #483918,
regarding alsa-driver - binary only code
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> severity 495954 critical
> thanks
>
> This bug "makes unrelated software on the system break". Well,
> aptitude is a package manager, so most of its bugs do...
>
> Are you interested in a dpkg.log or
On Saturday 30 August 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> - First test
>
> Partition disk:
> http://sd6.iuculano.it/dmraid-testing/partman1-1.png
>
> Choose free space and create a new partition:
> http://sd6.iuculano.it/dmraid-testing/partman1-2.png
> http://sd6.iuculano.it/dmraid-testing/partman1-3.
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> apparently, #495214: CVE-2008-3651: memory leak is fixed in unstable by
> virtue of the new upstream release without the maintainer knowing /
> noting it in the changelog.
>
> The new upstream release has a largish diff to the version in testing,
> does the releas
Package: dvr
Version: 3.2-9.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 497296 important
Bug#497296: btrfs-source - error: version.h: No such file or directory
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 497296 +pending
Bug#497296: btrfs-source - error: version.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags
found 497131 1.9-1
thanks
this bug also affects the version currently in testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 497131 1.9-1
Bug#497131: [jcc] Please add ${python:Depends} to Depends field
Bug marked as found in version 1.9-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:18:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495484: fixed in blobwars 1.08-dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #495484,
regarding blobwars: Contains non-free sound and music
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 495320 wishlist
tag 495320 wontfix
thanks
Hi Matijs,
Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> You may chalk it up to user error, but I like to purge packages that have
> completely vanished from debian: No need to keep configuration around that
> I'm nev
Package: xfce4
Version: 4.4.2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If you install the xfce task, you can't start xfce4 because gdm depends on
gnome-session which pulls in gnome-settings-manager, which block mcs and
therefore xfce4 can't start.
-- System Information:
Debian
Hi,
gnarwl has an RC bug (#457279) about non-DFSG files (open for 8 months,
set to serious for >=1 month). gnarwl seems to seriously lack maintainer
attention: #334873 is a segfault bug almost three years old without
maintainer response. The last maintainer upload was more than three
years ago, i.
Package: btrfs-source
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: serious
btrfs fails to build against 2.6.26:
| make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.26-1-powerpc64'
| LD /tmp/source/btrfs-0.16/built-in.o
| CC [M] /tmp/source/btrfs-0.16/super.o
| /tmp/source/btrfs-0.16/super.c:48:21: erro
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496383: fixed in xastir 1.9.2-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496383,
regarding The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496061: fixed in grub2 1.96+20080831-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496061,
regarding unifont: Hangul glyphs use fonts with ambiguous licensing
to be marked as done.
This mean
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-31 18:06:54 CEST]:
> I'm currently building an NMU to fix this problem (find attached the
> interdiff for it). Furthermore, the TMPFILE never gets removed, is there
> a particular reason to not do so?
Uploaded, one further question, did you actually
* Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-28 16:53:41 CEST]:
> Op donderdag 28-08-2008 om 16:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Tomas
> Hoger:
> > You probably wanted to use:
> > TMPFILE=`mktemp -t`
> > instead of
> > TMPFILE = 'mktemp -t'
> > in your patch for #496383, right?
>
> Ouch, wil
Package: kde-i18n
Version: 4:3.5.9-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
debian/copyright seems to need a makeover.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 496060 important
Bug#496060: am-utils: fails to work with kernels 2.6.25+
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tag 496060 +confirmed
Bug#496060: am-utils: fails to work with kernels 2.6.25+
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reopen 496383
Bug#496383: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you ma
Package: bacula-director-pgsql
Version: 2.4.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #496174
This seems to be a duplicate of bug #493092. I cannot reproduce the
removal of the bacula-dir.conf file, but I'm having perl 5.10 from lenny
not 5.8.8 from etch.
piti:~# apt-get install --reinstall bacula-director-
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Bug#496869 is a release blocker. We don't want to produce d-i images
> that do not work on some machines.
agreed, but that's not the point. to fulfil the license /for that
specific version/ of syslinux embedded in debian-cd, you need to include
the sources of /that specific
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 05:01:30PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> unblock 497270 by 496869
> thanks
>
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > At least the embedded copy works on all machines. The version in the
> > archive has problems with QEMU and Intel Macs (see bug#496869).
>
> ...which is an entirely di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 497270 by 496869
Bug#496869: Syslinux pauses for a long time at "press any key to"
Bug#497270: debian-cd: includes embedded copies of bootloaders
Was blocked by: 496869
Blocking bugs of 497270 removed: 496869
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
unblock 497270 by 496869
thanks
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> At least the embedded copy works on all machines. The version in the
> archive has problems with QEMU and Intel Macs (see bug#496869).
...which is an entirely different problem and has nothing to do with the
legal promplem to comply with the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 497225 normal
Bug#497225: gnome-alsamixer: Dead upstream package without maintainer bug fixes
is security risk
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
severity 497225 normal
thanks
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Severity: grave
I lowered the severity to "normal". Nothing prevents the package to be
in a stable release.
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
Ahem. Where is the security hole?
> I am filing this bug to d
I attached a patch with a fix for this bug.
--
Patryk Cisek
diff --git debian/patches/02_tmp_creation.patch debian/patches/02_tmp_creation.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..2c9859b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/02_tmp_creation.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+--- /usr/bin/asciiview 2006-04-24
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 496422 patch
Bug#496422: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
Tags were: security confirmed
Tags added: patch
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Could you give me some details of in what sense am-utils 6.1.5-10 does
not work with 2.6.25 kernels? It seems to work absolutely fine for me:
1) This is a Lenny machine:
16:09:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version
lenny/sid
2) It's running a 2.6.25 kernel:
16:16:24 [EMAIL PROTECT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 497270 by 496869
Bug#496869: Syslinux pauses for a long time at "press any key to"
Bug#497270: debian-cd: includes embedded copies of bootloaders
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 497270 added: 496869
> thanks
Stopping processing here
block 497270 by 496869
thanks
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:51:20PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: debian-cd
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> debian-cd includes (at least) syslinux binaries without source.
>
> debian-cd should take the syslinux binaries out of the archive when
> building i
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:11:04AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> based on the maintainer's comments in the bug log, it seems dubious
> whether the bug #495968 (insecure /tmp file vulnerability) is fixed in
> time for lenny. Given that it has never been released with Debian
> before, it would be b
Package: debian-cd
Severity: serious
Hi,
debian-cd includes (at least) syslinux binaries without source.
debian-cd should take the syslinux binaries out of the archive when
building images.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 482248 -1
Bug#482248: kwave: FTBFS: help_de.docbook:1743: element itemizedlist: validity
error
Bug 482248 cloned as bug 497269.
> reassign -1 wnpp
Bug#497269: kwave: FTBFS: help_de.docbook:1743: element itemizedlist: validity
error
Bug reassign
Hi Mert,
the 2.6.26-4 openvz amd64 version was updated 30/08/08 and still the
same. Juste have to send the pin code like
echo 'at+cpin=' >/dev/ttyUSB0
and get the mess :-( Here is the output
[ 949.048786] Call Trace:
[ 949.048786][] warn_on_slowpath+0x51/0x7a
[ 949.048786] [] dma
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: tangogps: Contains glade-generated files without source
has caused the Debian Bug report #497117,
regarding tangogps: Contains glade-generated files without source
to be marked as done.
Thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # no security bug by itself
> tags 497225 - security
Bug#497225: gnome-alsamixer: Dead upstream package without maintainer bug fixes
is security risk
Tags were: security
Tags remove
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# no security bug by itself
tags 497225 - security
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had a look into the code and the fix for the /tmp file issue would be
a simple mkstemp call. But i'd also suggest to remove gpicview from the
release, as the quaility of the code is simply not good enough to be
released anytime soon.
There some possible buffer overflows, multiple hacks, TODO co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> block 497130 with 497170 497263
Bug#497170: libpar-perl: File::Temp is in perl-modules
Bug#497263: please remove version from libfile-temp-perl dependency
Bug#497130: Obsolet
block 497130 497170 497263
thanks
> While there's probably no need to have a newer File::Temp as a separate
> package, both svk and libpar-perl need to be changed first and I don't
> think this should be considered release critical.
I think it would be desirable to fix this issue before lenny. On
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> tags 497175 + pending
Bug#497175: apticron: please check whether /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates exists
before grepping in it or redirect stderr to /dev/null
Tags were: patch
Tags added
Tags: patch
Hi,
I made a patch.
Regars,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
diff -urd flashplugin-nonfree-1.7~/debian/dirs
flashplugin-nonfree-1.7/debian/dirs
--- flashplugin-nonfree-1.7~/debian/dirs2008-08-30 19:44:38.0
+0900
+++ flashplugin-nonfree-1.7/debian/dirs 2008-08-31 19:28:30.00
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:30:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#494930: gnash_0.8.3-5(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc
has caused the Debian Bug report #494930,
regarding gnash_0.8.3-5(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#497250: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 1:1.7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #497250,
regarding flashplugin-nonfree: unable to make
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so.dpkg-tmp a sym
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:32:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#497216: fixed in wordpress 2.5.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #497216,
regarding wordpress: CVE-2008-3747 information leak, does not always force ssl
to be marked as done.
This means
> I've made a new wordpress package [1] to fix cve-2008-3747. Could you
> please upload it?
uploaded, thanks!
Thijs
pgp7EOXLo2v9n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:1.7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Bart,
I have issues installing 1.7 from scratch:
Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (1:1.7) ...
update-alternatives: unable to make
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink to
/e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Sun Aug 31 08:03:08 UTC 2008
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: scalemail
> tags 377089 + pending
Bug number 377089 not found. (Is it archived?)
> #
clone 482248
reassign -1 wnpp
retitle -1 O: kwave -- sound editor for KDE
severity -1 normal
thanks
On 31/08/08 at 09:36 +0200, forwarded by www.sneakemail.com wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum lucas-at-lucas-nussbaum.net |Kwave-Debian-Bugrequests| wrote:
>> [...]
>> That might be specific to the Debian pac
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:41:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Copyright updated, HTML doc available
has caused the Debian Bug report #497064,
regarding python-django: copyright information lacking
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi
I've made a new wordpress package [1] to fix cve-2008-3747. Could you
please upload it?
[1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wordpress
Thank you very much.
Cheers
Andrea De Iacovo
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
85 matches
Mail list logo
