severity 494926 normal
tags 494926 unreproducible
thanks
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:39:42PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:03:28AM +0200, Olivier Delemar wrote:
> > Package: knetwalk
> > Version: 4:3.5.5-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 495604 pending
Bug#495604: postfix security upgrade is treated as a downgrade by dpkg
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
tags 495604 pending
thanks
On Monday 18 August 2008 23:17, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> The DSA 1629-1 upgrade of postfix is treated as a downgrade by dpkg and
> apt, and thus the upgrade won't happen unless the user takes unusual
> action (instructing them to proceed with a downgrade):
>
> dpk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Severity 479533 grave
Bug#479533: Cc: field in not filled in when replying or forwarding a message!
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> Notforwarded 479533
Bug#479533: Cc: field in not filled in when replying or forwarding a message!
Removed ann
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:28:26 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#495626: Acknowledgement (postfix security upgrade is
treated as a downgrade by dpkg)
has caused the Debian Bug report #495626,
regarding postfix security upgrade is treated as a downgra
First up, I'm not a DBus daemon developer.
I disagree that the DBus daemon should never be restarted because the
NetworkManager developers say so. This is a step towards the "dark
side" - rebooting your box after performing an upgrade is the M$ way of
doing things. Solid engineering can prevent
Package: postfix
Version: 2.3.8-2etch1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders a DSA ineffective
Tags: security
The DSA 1629-1 upgrade of postfix is treated as a downgrade by dpkg and
apt, and thus the upgrade won't happen unless the user takes unusual
action (instructing them to proceed with a dow
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:04:40AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> It would be an issue if building with sun java6 though
> [...]
> I didn't just "try to" hand select them, I tested all the sun based
> jre's in debian
that's what I meant by not scalable: your solution is valid at this
particular poin
generally speaking, the JDK the package is built with *is* relevant,
if only to avoid java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: for instance
your fix considers the JRE from sun-java5-jre to be acceptable, when
it definitely is not if the package is compiled with a JDK6 (which is
what will happen w
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:28:37AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> What JDK the package is built with is irrelevent. The problem is it
> doesn't work when RUN WITH gij.
generally speaking, the JDK the package is built with *is* relevant,
if only to avoid java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: for ins
Here's a debdiff that fixes #495514 by using openjdk-6-jdk as the
default JDK, while still giving a user the option to rebuild with any
JDK he likes,
What JDK the package is built with is irrelevent. The problem is it
doesn't work when RUN WITH gij.
Indeed the dependencies on your package do
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 495514 + patch
Bug#495514: azureus and openjdk
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
tag 495514 + patch
thanks
Here's a debdiff that fixes #495514 by using openjdk-6-jdk as the
default JDK, while still giving a user the option to rebuild with any
JDK he likes, without changing debian/{rules,control}.
I've just uploaded 3.1.1.0-3.0 to DELAYED/7, so feel free to take that
debdiff a
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493857: fixed in mga-vid 2.6.24-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #493857,
regarding mga-vid: Please update to 2.6.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 495514 +patch
Bug#495514: azureus and openjdk
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
tags 495514 +patch
thanks
patch is attatched.
note: while I have written a changlog entry explaining the changes I am
not a dd so I cannot upload the package
diff -ur azureus-3.1.1.0/debian/bin/azureus azureus-3.1.1.0.new/debian/bin/azureus
--- azureus-3.1.1.0/debian/bin/azureus 2008-08-19 00:0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 495585 normal
Bug#495585: vpnc: Does not work and ends my ethernet connection
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 495585 + upstream moreinfo
Bug#495585: vpnc: Does not work and ends my ethernet connection
There were no tags set.
Tags
severity 495585 normal
tags 495585 + upstream moreinfo
thanks
#include
* Patricio Rojo [Mon, Aug 18 2008, 02:53:34PM]:
> Package: vpnc
> Version: 0.5.1r334-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Not really, i.e. talk only for yourself.
> Hi, I tried to to connect to a C
I found some (char) casts where OpenArena expects to get signed chars,
and Evgeni Golov verified that the game works when compiling with
-fsigned-char. So it looks like this can be solved with a simple
Makefile tweak.
--
Peter De Wachter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> package simutrans-makeobj
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: simutrans-makeobj
> tags 493409 + pending
Bug#493409: simutrans-makeobj: [amd64] makeobj fails
Tags were: patch
Tags added:
I cannot find this package anyway, Maybe a typo?
cacao-oj6 is the source package name.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cacao-oj6.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I'm still pondering raising an RC issue on linux-2.6 for /proc/acpi
> to be back. I know that bugs have been reassigned to various
> packages when they were reported but I think I would then go up to
> CTTE as an attempt to revert to /proc/acpi suppor
Thijs Kinkhorst schrieb:
> Version: 2.3.8-2etch1
Ah, thank you.
>> Justification: introduces a security hole on systems where you install
>> the packages
>
> Huh? Have you read the author's announcement? It does no such thing on Debian
> systems - it only introduces a local security hole o
Package: postfix
Version: 2.3.8-2etch1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: renders a DSA ineffective
The DSA 1629-1 upgrade of postfix is treated as a downgrade by dpkg and
apt, and thus the upgrade won't happen unless the user takes unusual
action (instructing them to proceed with a dow
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 495603 critical
Bug#495603: daily netinst CD installation fails on a FSC Primergy RX300 with a
level 5 RAID
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
> retitle 495603 grub-installer fails on a FSC Primergy RX300 with a level 5
> RAID
Bug#4956
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:57:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this is fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #495581,
regarding Postfix local privilege escalation via hardlinked symlinks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 17:20 +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Michael Fernández M wrote:
> >
> > > Are you sure spammers don't use a stolen login/password?
> >
> > Ohhh, yea!, so much.
>
> I'm sorry to insist but are you *really* sure? Because here[*]
> th
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:55:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 3.11.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #492818,
regarding solfege_3.11.3-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc: NameError: global
name 'getcwd' is not defined
to be marked as done.
Thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 495581 - lenny sid
Bug#495581: Postfix local privilege escalation via hardlinked symlinks
Tags were: sid lenny etch fixed-upstream security patch
Tags removed: lenny, sid
> fixed 495581 2.5.2-2lenny1
Bug#495581: Postfix local privilege escalation
tags 495581 - lenny sid
fixed 495581 2.5.2-2lenny1
fixed 495581 2.5.4-1
thanks
--
Kevin Price
http://www.kevin-price.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Don't upload this yet. This is a bug in the lsb-base package. Many packages
besides "at" are affected. (Basically all packages whose init script has the
same base name as the daemon, which might be most.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.2-16
Severity: grave
This change in lsb-base 3.2-16
* Fix behavior of killproc and pidofproc when no pidfile is passed in.
breaks the stop action in many init scripts, as evidenced by bugs such as
#494268 and #495437 coming in now. The consensus appears to be tha
Package: vpnc
Version: 0.5.1r334-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi, I tried to to connect to a CISCO VPN unsuccessfully (I can connect using
CISCO VPNClient for Windows, so is not a authentification issue).
Furthermore, after executing vpnc, my machine is taken off
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> unarchive 490859
Bug 490859 [libaprutil1] libaprutil1 Depends libmysqlclient15off >= 5.0.27-1 is
wrong
Unarchived Bug 490859
> reopen 490859
Bug#490859: libaprutil1 Depends libmysql
On Monday 18 August 2008, Chris Horn wrote:
> Chris Horn wrote:
> > I'm not really a programmer (so this may be obvious from the
> > backtrace), but disabling the PHP5 module completely solves the
> > problem.
>
> Sorry for so much traffic, but I bring good news. I just upgraded
> all of my MySQL
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:52:56PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:21:54PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Quoting Brendan O'Dea in #479711, in the "Locale::Gettext problem"
> > context:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479711#120
> >
> > > One issue
Package: swfdec-mozilla
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: The package is not installable on systems which do not already
have the /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins directory
Hello,
When I try to install the "swfdec-mozilla" package to my Debian Sid system,
I get the following output:
=== 8
* Niko Tyni [Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:51:19 +0300]:
> > > Darn, it failed on all autobuilders because their sbuilds still suffer
> > > from #395271
> > > I suppose we need to do something else to fix libapache2-mod-perl2.
> > Any progress on this fix?
> As discussed in #494677, fixing the CGI.pm bug
>> I believe that the "mozilla-plugin-gnash" package should depend on a
>> package which provides the "/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins" directory.
>
> I am not sure if this is the correct fix. I suspect it is better to
> include the directory in the package itself.
Maybe I couldn't express my thoughts
Hi,
the problem on sparc is this:
(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/paraview-3.2.2/obj-sparc-linux-gnu/bin$ ./H5detect
/* Generated automatically by H5detect -- do not edit */
/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Copyright by the Board of Trustees of the Uni
Le Monday 18 August 2008 16:16:07 Tim Fairbank, vous avez écrit :
> aptitude -t experimental install kde4
>
> fails because kdebase-workspace cannot
> be installed. Aptitude is looking for
> version 4:4.1.0-2, but for i386, the
> highest version in experimental is still
> only 4:4.1.0-1.
>
> My opt
severity 495565 normal
tags 495565 + moreinfo
thanks
On 2008-08-18 20:44 +0200, Esben Stien wrote:
> Package: emacs22-nox
> Version: 22.2+2-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Hardly. You're the first to report this, and this package has been
installed successfully on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 495565 normal
Bug#495565: emacs22-nox: Missing Files :: Installation Fails on ARM
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 495565 + moreinfo
Bug#495565: emacs22-nox: Missing Files :: Installation Fails on ARM
There were no tags set.
Tags a
Hi Petter and Steve,
On Monday 18 August 2008 16:46:08 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Steve Langasek]
> > In this case, NFS...
>
> Right. So ext3 and NFS should be ok. :)
>
> > I can try against a different filesystem tomorrow if you like.
>
> If you happen to know what file system is used on t
Cdrecord worked first time, clearly wodim is very broken!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: emacs22-nox
Version: 22.2+2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to run apt-get install emacs22-nox, I get:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Suggested packages:
emacs22-common-non-dfsg
The following NEW pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 495562 important
Bug#495562: btrfs-tools: immature software not fit for stable release
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:46:08AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Steve Langasek]
> > In this case, NFS...
> Right. So ext3 and NFS should be ok. :)
> > I can try against a different filesystem tomorrow if you like.
> If you happen to know what file system is used on the autobuilder, or
>
Package: btrfs-tools
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
it would serve our users poorly to include support for a filesystem that does
not pretend to have a stable on-disc format yet.
please do not relase this as stable.
/andreas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: le
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Michael Fernández M wrote:
>
> > Are you sure spammers don't use a stolen login/password?
>
> Ohhh, yea!, so much.
I'm sorry to insist but are you *really* sure? Because here[*]
there was a similar question and upstream author said it's from a
regular us
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 16:36 +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:39:59AM -0400, Michael wrote:
> >
> > Imp4 allows spammer to inject email throught it with out login.
> >
> > this is an example:
> > 80.30.19.50 - - [11/Aug/2008:19:26:31 -0400] "GET /imp/expand.ph
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:39:59AM -0400, Michael wrote:
>
> Imp4 allows spammer to inject email throught it with out login.
>
> this is an example:
> 80.30.19.50 - - [11/Aug/2008:19:26:31 -0400] "GET /imp/expand.php
> HTTP/1.1" 200 243
> "http://mail.domain.tld/imp/compose.php?thismailb
aptitude -t experimental install kde4
fails because kdebase-workspace cannot
be installed. Aptitude is looking for
version 4:4.1.0-2, but for i386, the
highest version in experimental is still
only 4:4.1.0-1.
My options appear to be:
1. Build it myself, from the source package
2. Wait for 4:4.1.
Package: unicode
Version: 0.9
Severity: serious
This is weird: Normally /usr/share/doc//copyright tells,
where pristine source-code was downloaded from, but in this package it
is not said.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (1100, 'testing'), (
Package: imp4
Version: 4.1.3-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Imp4 allows spammer to inject email throught it with out login.
this is an example:
80.30.19.50 - - [11/Aug/2008:19:26:31 -0400] "GET /imp/expand.php
HTTP/1.1" 200 243
"http://mail.domain.tld/imp/comp
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:21:54PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> First, what happens here is that the 'old-prerm upgrade' invocation
> of gs-common invokes /usr/bin/defoma-app, which needs File::Copy from
> perl-modules. The new perl-modules and perl packages have been unpacked
> but not configured yet
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493899: fixed in directfb 1.0.1-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #493899,
regarding libdirectfb-1.0-0: DirectFB fails to start ("Could not initialize
'system' core!")
to be marked as don
Hi Christian,
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
severity 491396 serious
thanks
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
to release with a non-working ACPI support.
I should even ha
Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> severity 491396 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
> > to release with a non-working ACPI support.
> >
> > I should even have tagged the bug as
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#495122: fixed in drupal5 5.9-1.1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #495122,
regarding drupal5: Drupal Core - Multiple vulnerabilities - SA-2008-047
to be marked as done.
This means th
Having slept on it, I agree with Vincent and Dmitry.
I think there is no sane way to have a secure session dir for cgi apps
that might at any time need to be recreated with a unique name...
basically, imagine what happens when you have a heavily loaded server,
each of 100s of cgi scripts realising
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494415: fixed in aswiki 1.0.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #494415,
regarding aswiki: package is completely unusable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Package: evolution
Version: 2.22.3.1-1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
After investigation, this bug seems to be related to the fact the a stored
password was not correct. The server response seems to be the cause of the
segmentation fault. the used server was imap.clubinternet
Note however that vzaphfc als needs patching ;-).
Patch is based on the 1.2 version
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in email?
--- zaptel-base.c.orig 2008-08-18 12:55
Package: evolution
Version: 2.22.3.1-1
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Every time I try to run evolution, it craches with the following stack trace.
This makes it unusable. It used to work correctly before. I have 2 to 3 seconds
before it craches to stop it a
Package: blobandconquer
Version: 0.99-1
Severity: serious
The music and sounds in Blob and Conquer are taken from various "free"
online repositories, which allow distribution and non-commercial use at
the minimum, but not necessarily DFSG-free. Some sounds and music files
may be in the public doma
Package: kaya
Version: 0.4.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
0.4.2 contains a few data loss / data corruption bugs that are fixed
upstream in 0.4.3. The attached patch fixes these bugs, as well as a
compiler error where valid code would not compile. In o
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
>>> The bug is in acpid, right?
>>
>> Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
>> use /sys/class/power_supply/ instea
Package: exaile
Version: 0.2.11.1+debian-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
I am not sure if it is a bug that should be assigned to exaile ... but exaile
is crashing on start . with following error message :
exaile
failed 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
>> Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
>
> The bug is in acpid, right?
Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
use /sys/class/power_supply/ instead of /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ which has
been removed in recent kernels (2.6.26 i
block 494677 with 494679
block 480154 with 494679
thanks
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:41:08PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Niko Tyni [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:03:27 +0300]:
> > > Please allow the just-uploaded version 2.0.4-2 of libapache2-mod-perl2
> > > to migrate to lenny. The upload contains a f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 494677 with 494679
Bug#494679: perl: $ENV{TMPDIR} breaks CGI.pm in taint mode
Bug#494677: libapache2-mod-perl2: FTBFS: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build
dependencies: libcgi-pm-perl (>= 3.33)
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 494677 ad
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Bart Samwel wrote:
Agreed. Bart, can you handle that?
The bug is in acpid, right?
Why? /etc/acpi/power.sh is part of acpi-support and needs to be updated to
use /sys/class/power_supply/ instead of /proc/acpi/ac_adapter/ which has
been removed in rec
package: azureus
severity: serious
justification: policy 3.5
There were a number of rc bugs reported about azureus not working with
gij. Theese were closed with the justification that azureus could now be
used with openjdk. However no packaging changes were made to reflect this.
IMO the follo
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-08-15 10:00 +0200, Nigel Horne wrote:
Package: wodim
Version: 9:1.1.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
"wodim --devices" says:
wodim: No such file or directory.
Cannot open SCSI driver!
For possible targets try 'wodim --devices' or 'w
Hi Raphael,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
severity 491396 serious
thanks
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
Therefore, I think this deserves to be fixed for lenny, unless we want
to release with a non-working ACPI support.
I should even have tagged the bug as release critical, imho. Leavi
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#491505: fixed in varmon 1.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #491505,
regarding [package varmon] varmon segfaults on Etch i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
77 matches
Mail list logo
