On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:36:07PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Package: releaseforge
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: normal
Asheesh,
I have prepared packages of the new upstream release (1.3) of
ReleaseForge. Would it be possible for you to test them
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:33:32PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> Iceweasel 3.0.1-1 also crashes on startup on Alpha. First noted when
> version 3.0~rc2-2 came through into Lenny and problem persists into
> 3.0.1-1. Indeed, Epiphany Web Browser (2.22.3-1) also crashes on
> startup!
A backtrac
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:52:20PM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 3.0.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> The first time I start iceweasel, everything seems to work fine. The
> next time I try to start it (and subsequent times after that), I get either:
> Error: in (function
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:36:07PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Package: releaseforge
> Version: 1.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
Asheesh,
I have prepared packages of the new upstream release (1.3) of
ReleaseForge. Would it be possible for you to test them out for me?
You can obtain them here: http
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 493096 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16957
Bug#493096: xserver-xorg-video-intel: [855GM] External monitor unusable
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16957.
> thank
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 492243 serious
Bug#492243: unbound: fails to install/configure
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
tag 493210 patch
thanks
The problem is caused by the if condition in the following code:
if (arg_list)
message = g_strdup_vprintf (format, arg_list);
else
message = g_strdup (format);
It should be safe to remove this check unless there are cases w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 489077 patch
Bug#489077: wxwidgets2.8: FTBFS:
../../../../contrib/src/mmedia/../../include/wx/mmedia/vidbase.h:19: 23: error:
calling fdopen: Bad file descriptor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Howdy,
Section 4.9 of the policy manual doesn't mention anything about the
binary target removing files. It does mention that the clean target
should undo the effects of the build and binary targets, but it
already does so (at least on my system). In particular, the "make
maintainer-clean" comma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 493210 patch
Bug#493210: brasero - FTBFS: missuse of va_list
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Bug#493211: brasero: FTBFS on alpha
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
tag 489077 patch
thanks
The problem is that wxwidgets2.8 uses the name of the build directory
to determine if it's supposed to build a special flavour of packages.
Since the changelog also has to be modified, the attached patch makes
debian/rules extract the flavour from there instead, making the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 472800 -1
Bug#472800: gnome-power-manager: fails to act when battery power critically low
Bug 472800 cloned as bug 493318.
> retitle -1 gnome-power-manager does not act upon battery low nor button press
Bug#493318: gnome-power-manager: fails to a
Your message dated Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493210: fixed in brasero 0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493210,
regarding brasero - FTBFS: missuse of va_list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
clone 472800 -1
retitle -1 gnome-power-manager does not act upon battery low nor button press
submitter -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity -1 important
tag -1 unreproducible
close 472800 2.22.1-1
thanks
Le mardi 22 juillet 2008 à 18:59 +0200, alberto maurizi a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:27:10
Your message dated Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493210: fixed in brasero 0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493210,
regarding brasero: FTBFS on alpha
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493217: fixed in libnfsidmap 0.21-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493217,
regarding libnfsidmap2: rpc.idmapd broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
>There is no relation between the 95% in splashy and the 99 in the S99timidity
>AFAIK.
well i removed the S99timidity and reboot, next reboot everything was fine
the relation is that 99 is the last service to start and splashy calculated it
to be the 95%.
>Do you have timidity enabled as system w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> forwarded 493210 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545138
Bug#493210: brasero - FTBFS: missuse of va_list
Bug#493211: brasero: FTBFS on alpha
Noted your statement that Bug ha
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
forwarded 493210 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545138
# fixed in http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/brasero?view=revision&revision=1039
tags 493210 fixed-upstream
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
tag 491097 + patch
quit
Hi,
These three bugs are all caused by the same buggy if statement:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491655
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491097
http://bugzilla.atheme.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Skotlex's patch (attached at the Atheme report
Package: qcad
Version: 2.0.5.0-1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
Given that qcad presumably still needs its architecture-independent
data, it should depend on the new qcad-data package that now contains
them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
* Flavio Stanchina [Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:11:16 +0200]:
> Package: fatresize
> Version: 1.0.2-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello, Flavio.
> After running fatresize on my iPod nano, it refused to boot. The
> firmware partition disappeared from the partition tabl
Package: rubygems1.9
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
Unpacking rubygems1.9 (from .../rubygems1.9_1.2.0-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/rubygems1.9_1.2.0-1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ruby
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:47:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#487435: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-85
has caused the Debian Bug report #487435,
regarding gcl: FTBFS [amd64]: cannot trap sbrk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Package: iceweasel
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: grave
The first time I start iceweasel, everything seems to work fine. The
next time I try to start it (and subsequent times after that), I get either:
Error: in (function call): procedure or syntax required but got: Error:
fatal: looped fatal erro
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:47:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469178: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-85
has caused the Debian Bug report #469178,
regarding gclcvs 2.7.0-84 uninstallable: requires exact obsolete version of
binutils-dev
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:47:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#467474: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-85
has caused the Debian Bug report #467474,
regarding gcl: Builds broken package with gcc-4.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Log is attached
--
Olleg Samoylov
2008/08/02 03:06:16.239 0:00.131 ekiga-gtkonly ekiga-gtkonly Version 2.0.12 by on Unix Linux (2.6.25-2-amd64-x86_64) at 2008/8/2 3:06:16.239
2008/08/02 03:06:16.239 0:00.131 ekiga-gtkonly Detected audio plugins: ALSA
2008/08/02 03:06:16.2
Your message dated Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:06:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dom4j: BFS: Entirely normal build-dependency: openjdk-6-jdk
has caused the Debian Bug report #487036,
regarding dom4j: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: openjdk-6-jdk
to be marked as done.
Th
"Kevin Coffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Kevin Coffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
>>> that, but from what I saw, when you install in /usr/lo
I am able to reproduce this issue. I rebuild libpam-devperm with
debug symbols and ran 'valgrind atd -d' to get more details on the
crash, and this is the report:
==21819== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
==21819==at 0x0: ???
==21819==by 0x403339A: pam_sm_open_session
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:23:42PM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> /usr/lib32 is a compliant location. The multiarch directory too but,
/usr/lib32 is a symlink to /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib. There are at least
two reasons why this means I can't ship files there. Furthermore, I
don't believe th
upstream 492870 http://bugs.xine-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139
thanks
I've submitted this issue to the upstream bugzilla,
http://bugs.xine-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139>.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Your message dated Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:12:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #488815,
regarding hdbc-sqlite3 - FTBFS: error: redefinition of 'struct TAG_finalizeonce'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Hi. I rebuild cfengine 2 with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip to get debug
information included in the binaries. Are you able to rerun your test
with valgrind using these binaries (or binaries you build yourself
using the above environment variable)? It hopefully will provide more
information on where
Source: blobandconquer
Version: 0.99-1
Severity: grave
Justification: makes package unusable
Tags: patch
blobandconquer, installed on i386, segfaults after spewing some
apparently-corrupt debug text.
blobandconquer, installed on amd64, works fine.
Recompiled on i386 and with the rebuilt blobandc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unarchive 444986
Unarchived Bug 444986
> forcemerge 444986 486875
Bug#444986: snmpd: argument parsing causes segfaults
Bug#486875: snmplib: PATCH: 1806336: fix -LS option parsing
Forcibly Merged 444986 486875.
> archive 444986
Bug#444986: snmpd: argum
retitle 491697 FTBFS (ia64/experimental): error: LWP_SP undeclared
thanks
Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The complete failure message is (it got truncated by my mail scripts):
>
>> + gcc -g -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -G0
>> -I/build/buildd/openafs-1.5.50.dfsg1/src/config -I. -I.
>> -I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 491697 FTBFS (ia64/experimental): error: LWP_SP undeclared
Bug#491697: openafs_1.5.50.dfsg1-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: error: 'LWP_SP'
undeclared
Changed Bug title to `FTBFS (ia64/experimental): error: LWP_SP undeclared' from
`openafs_1.5.50.dfs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 493096 serious
Bug#493096: xserver-xorg-video-intel: [855GM] External monitor unusable
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:32:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#479024: fixed in xmms2tray 0.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #479024,
regarding package contains compiled python code
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380540 grave
Bug#380540: sort: Warning: "+number" syntax is deprecated, please use "-k
number"
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Friday 01 August 2008 19:21:55 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> Package: timidity
> Version: 2.13.2-19
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> splashy just works really fine if i don't have timidity
> installed, if so it hangs and don't show kde
> the pogressbar stucks at 95
If by any means I can help, please let me know. I was about to start
debugging it today...
Fabio Pugliese Ornellas
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 6516089
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://ornellas.apanela.com/
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 14:40, Luis Mondesi <[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:22:09PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 01, Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It turned out that the code for another usage of '-s' is there but it
> > isn't in the options passed to getopt_long, so we can safely keep the
> > compat code. Possible patch
Package: bugzilla3
Version: 3.0.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When upgrading bugzilla I get this:
> COMMANDS TO INSTALL:
>
> Template-GD: /usr/bin/perl -MCPAN -e 'install
> "Template::Plugin::GD::Image"'
> Email-Reply: /usr/bin/perl -MCPAN -e 'install "E
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reassign 493271 gunroar
Bug#493271: [powerpc] segfaults immediately
Warning: Unknown package 'gunroat'
Bug reassigned from package `gunroat' to `gunroar'.
>
End of message, stopping
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:23:25AM +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> Can you try the following:
>
> - install debugging symbols for gpm
It's not like there is a -dbg package.
> - install gdb
> - start console-screen
> - start gpm in non forking mode (-D) and run it under gdb
Those 2 need to be
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#483324: fixed in babel 1.2.0.dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #483324,
regarding libsidl-dev must depend on libparsifal-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 492055 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10
Bug#492055: [powerpc] segfaults immediately
Bug 492055 cloned as bugs 493270-493279.
> reassign -1 a7xpg
Bug#493270: [powerpc] segfaults immediately
Bug reassigned from package `torus-trooper' to `a7xpg'.
>
On Aug 1, 2008, at 11:55 AM, "Fabio Pugliese Ornellas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I had a look at uswsusp suspend command (called from within initrd)
and saw that it do interact with the framebuffer and makes some
splash-related initialization. Would'nt that be messing up with
splashy?
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to support the upgrade we need to:
> udev:
> * hack in enough support for -s so we can update udev without
> updating multipath-tools - this can probably be done by just
> implementing -s as -d and simply doing a
Package: gdc-4.1
Followup-For: Bug #473167
I think the attached patch should fix this. This hasn't actually been
tested on powerpc yet, as I don't have access to such a machine and my
qemu instance isn't stable enough to compile gdc. But it works fine on
amd64 :)
#! /bin/sh -e
# gdc-array-concat.
Package: timidity
Version: 2.13.2-19
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
splashy just works really fine if i don't have timidity
installed, if so it hangs and don't show kde
the pogressbar stucks at 95% why?
cause S99timidity is there but i don't know what to
do in order to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 485909 grave
Bug#485909: fuse-source fails to build with linux-source-2.6.25
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> severity 488696 grave
Bug#488696: comedi-source build fails (m-a a-i comedi)
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Package: ov511-source
Version: Obsolete package?
Severity: serious
ov511 hasn't been uploaded since 2006-11-01 and there's a bug report that
it fails to compile with 2.6.19 and 2.6.22. (And very likely with current
kernels, but I haven't tried it myself)
I'm filing this bug since ov511 has been m
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492300: fixed in nant 0.85.dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #492300,
regarding nant: FTBFS: cannot find metadata file /usr/lib/ndoc/NDoc.Core.dll
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:44:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #492093,
regarding util-vserver: FTBFS: /bin/sh: ./configure: Permission denied
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
I had a look at uswsusp suspend command (called from within initrd) and saw
that it do interact with the framebuffer and makes some splash-related
initialization. Would'nt that be messing up with splashy? Shouldn't its code
get reviewed? Or you are sure the issue is splashy related only?
Fabi
Package: mozilla-traybiff
Version: 1.2.3-4.1
Severity: serious
armel buildlog:
g++ -L/usr/lib/iceape -lxpcom -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl
-lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0
-lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0
-Wl,-
OK, I'll update the code and put out a -0.22 ASAP, but it might not be
for a few days.
BTW, this is the kind of comments I was looking for since putting the
beta out in April, but received none. I guess I was asking in the
wrong places. :-/
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL P
Package: gnome-mplayer
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Marked as serious since this is a lenny release goal.
See following excerpt from the build log:
dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to gnome-mplayer-0.6.3/po/tr.gmo:
binary file contents changed
dpkg-source: er
Package: python-ecore
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of python-ecore_0.2.1-2 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20080801-0347
Greetings, and thanks for the feedback! WOuld you mind excerpting the
C routines corresponding to the two 'no' results below, compile with
-g and run under gdb to let me know where they fail? I am surprised
at the failure.
Specifically, what is wrong with
void gprof_cleanup() {};
int main(int
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#491914: fixed in shoes 0.r396-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #491914,
regarding shoes: depends on non-existent package libgems-ruby1.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493132: fixed in auth2db 0.2.5-2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #493132,
regarding [auth2db] Unnecessary sql updates make lossy performance
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:32:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489111: fixed in libhtml-wikiconverter-mediawiki-perl
0.55-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #489111,
regarding libhtml-wikiconverter-mediawiki-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/6 test scripts.
1/119
On Aug 1, 2008, at 12:47 AM, "Fabio Pugliese Ornellas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hello,
I have just tested the newer 0.3.11 version asn my Asus EEE PC 900
still "freezes" if I use uswsusp + splashy, the bug still exists.
If I find time on the following days, I'll post here my findings
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> severity 493197 normal
Bug#493197: cmake: Missed assertion leading to Abandon
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
"Kevin Coffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
> that, but from what I saw, when you install in /usr/local/lib, libtool
> knows better. If anyone has the answer on that, let me know.
The convention on Debian seems to be to insta
Your message dated Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:30:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line already fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #493227,
regarding libgemplugin-ruby1.8: depends on non-existent package libgems-ruby1.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi John,
You closed the bug with pygopherd on May 1st, but apparently the RFC was not
actually removed. Do you think you can fix this soon?
cheers,
Thijs
pgpOzHxLNEXzw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the right thing to force
that, but from what I saw, when you install in /usr/local/lib, libtool
knows better. If anyone has the answer on that, let me know.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 493216 important
Bug#493216: labeled mounts break with recent udev
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 493216 important
thanks
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 08:24:38AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:13:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 01, Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Reason is that findfs and friends query /etc/blkid.tab to find the
> > >
Package: libgruff-ruby1.8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The libgruff-ruby1.8 package depends on libgems-ruby1.8 which has been
renamed to rubygems1.8. Please update the package to make it depend on
rubygems1.8 | libgems-ruby1.8 for transitional reasons.
Regards,
Paul
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> found 492317 4:4.0.98-1
Bug#492317: update breaks grub boot (MBR) "Grub Error 28: Selected item can not
fit into memory"
Bug marked as found in version 4:4.0.98-1.
>
End of message
Package: libgemplugin-ruby1.8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The libgemplugin-ruby1.8 package depends on libgems-ruby1.8 which has been
renamed to rubygems1.8. Please update the package to make it depend on
rubygems1.8 | libgems-ruby1.8 for transitional reasons.
Regards,
On Aug 01, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you someone explain to me what the heck the /dev/.static/dev/hda7
> hack is all about?
udev used to make the underlying static /dev available as
/dev/.static/dev/, using a bind mount.
I removed this in 0.124-1, since it caused way more probl
Hi Marco,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:13:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[..snip..]
> > * put code into e2fsprogs that updates /etc/blkid.tag and let udev
> >conflict on older than that versions of e2fsprogs.
> This is a bug which needs to be fixed, we generally do not conflict
> with packages
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:13:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 01, Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Reason is that findfs and friends query /etc/blkid.tab to find the
> > device matching the UUID. Since blkid.tab has things like
> > /dev/.static/dev/hda7 (no idea why blkid pi
El dv 01 de 08 de 2008 a les 10:13 +, en/na Clint Adams va escriure:
> What are these ways?
/usr/lib32 is a compliant location. The multiarch directory too but,
while it does work, it isn't the current direction. You should ask the
ia32 libs maintainers for further advice.
> > In that case, i
On Aug 01, Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It turned out that the code for another usage of '-s' is there but it
> isn't in the options passed to getopt_long, so we can safely keep the
> compat code. Possible patch attached.
WTF? You cannot just remove the code, -s is not used but --sg-
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 22:32:01 +0200, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>> This is a toolchain issue on alpha; Please link using -Wl,--no-relax.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a better place to ask for help than the
>> buildd contact address.
>>
>
> jfsutils didn't build on alph
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:41:04PM -0400, Kevin Coffman wrote:
>A new version of libnfsidmap is now available from
>http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/libnfsidmap/libnfsidmap-0.21.tar.gz
>
>Changes since libnfsidmap-0.20:
>
> - The main library has been changed to load "plugin" librarie
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 483324 babel
Bug#483324: illuminator: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libparsifal.la' is not
a valid libtool archive
Bug reassigned from package `illuminator' to `babel'.
> retitle 483324 libsidl-dev must depend on libparsifal-dev
Bug#483324:
reassign 483324 babel
retitle 483324 libsidl-dev must depend on libparsifal-dev
thanks
For libtool to link with libsidl.la, libparsifal.la must be there.
With this change, illuminator will build.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consultin
reassign 493216 e2fsprogs
thanks
On Aug 01, Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reason is that findfs and friends query /etc/blkid.tab to find the
> device matching the UUID. Since blkid.tab has things like
> /dev/.static/dev/hda7 (no idea why blkid picked that one in favour of
> /dev/hda7
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 493216 e2fsprogs
Bug#493216: labeled mounts break with recent udev
Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `e2fsprogs'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Your message dated Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:03:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#492991: griffith does not start
has caused the Debian Bug report #492991,
regarding griffith does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:34:36 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489964: fixed in graphviz 2.20.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #489964,
regarding libgv-php5: graphviz php class gv not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:39:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#484185: fixed in xtel 3.3.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #484185,
regarding xtel: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: xlibs-data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:39:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492088: fixed in samba4 4.0.0~alpha4~20080727-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #492088,
regarding samba4-common should conflict with samba-common
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:35:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#491967: fixed in kdebase 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #491967,
regarding ksmserver package should have dependence on x11-utils package
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:39:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#491072: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.216~r2750-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #491072,
regarding util-vserver: removes init.d script symlinks for rsyslog making lenny
vservers unusable
to
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:39:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419015: fixed in xtel 3.3.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #419015,
regarding xtel: build-depends on transitional package xlibs-data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:39:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492818: fixed in solfege 3.11.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #492818,
regarding solfege_3.11.3-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc: NameError: global
name 'getcwd' is not defined
to be
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:33:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#486654: fixed in adonthell 0.3.4.cvs.20080529-1+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486654,
regarding adonthell: FTBFS on arm and armel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Package: udev
Version: 0.125
Severity: grave
Hi,
the removal of the /dev/.static/dev/ hack in 0.124-1 breaks labeled
mounts (via LABEL=...) and might leave people with an unbootable system.
Reason is that findfs and friends query /etc/blkid.tab to find the
device matching the UUID. Since blkid.ta
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
