Bug#456104: patch to fix the GCC 4.3 FTBS

tags 456104 + patch stop I went through the cheesetracker source: There was a name clash between std::vector and a variable vector. Also lots of string.h and stdlib includes were missing. The attached patch fixes the problem / cheesetracker compiles and starts up. Another thing, scons completely

Bug#474951: lighttpd: Extremely high load with HTTPS sites after update

Package: lighttpd Version: 1.4.13-4etch7 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After upgrading lighttpd from 1.4.13-4etch6 to 1.4.13-4etch7 I got the following error messages in error.log when opening a HTTPS site with a self-signed SSL certificate: 2008-04-08 08:38:05: (conne

Processed: patch to fix the GCC 4.3 FTBS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 456104 + patch Bug#456104: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: declaration of... changes meaning of... Tags were: fixed-upstream Tags added: patch > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#473341: Processed: severity of 473341 is serious

> And djview in etch provides /usr/bin/djview as a regular file. Gotcha. But djview3 and djview4 should conflict: with djview (<< xxx) so it seems like that should not happen. At least, that was my intent. Did I make some mistake in this regard? And if so, can you think of a good way to fix it

Bug#456091: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:25:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Argh has caused the Debian Bug report #456091, regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#474923: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#474923: hal: palm treo 680 is disconneted when sincronize button is pressed

Il giorno mar, 08/04/2008 alle 00.23 +0200, Michael Biebl ha scritto: > don Paolo Benvenuto schrieb: > > Package: hal > > Version: 0.5.11~rc2-1 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > > > About 3 weeks ago I could sincronize my palm treo 680 for the last time. > >

Bug#474947: MMap, again; and won't be denied this time

Package: apt Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable, conventional workaround doesn't work Well, it's everyone's favorite bug with apt-get: Reading package lists... Error! E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room E: Error occurred while processing rt73-modules-2.6.24-

Bug#474925: xulrunner_1.9~b4-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: cast from 'char*' to 'nsVoidArray::Impl*' increases required alignment of target type

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Package: xulrunner > Version: 1.9~b4-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > your package failed to build from source. > > | ../../../dist/include/xpcom/nsVoidArray.h: In member function 'void > nsAutoVoidArray::ResetToAutoBuffer()'

Bug#474779: marked as done (twitux: missing dependency on gnome-keyring)

Your message dated Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#474779: fixed in twitux 0.61-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #474779, regarding twitux: missing dependency on gnome-keyring to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#474115: aptitude: Got SIGABRT, dying..

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:06:50PM +0400, Aleksey Midenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Package: aptitude > Version: 0.4.11.1-1 > Severity: grave > > The program get terminated at very start. I don't think it's grave for aptitude to break when its database is corrupt, so I'm downgra

Processed: setting package to aptitude, severity of 474115 is important ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.21 > package aptitude Ignoring bugs not assigned to: aptitude > severity 474115 important Bug#474115: aptitude: Got SIGABRT, dying.. Severity set to `important' from `grave' > retitle 4

Bug#473341: Processed: severity of 473341 is serious

07.04.2008 в 21:56:11 +0100 Barak A. Pearlmutter написал(а): > Sorry, I don't understand the issue. > Both djview3 and djview4 provide /usr/bin/djview via the > update-alternatives mechanism. And djview in etch provides /usr/bin/djview as a regular file. If I am not mistaken, update-alternatives -

Bug#474803: marked as done (golly: FTBFS: bigint.cpp:71: error: 'atol' was not declared in this scope)

ty: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is now the default on most architectur

Bug#474405: closed by Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#474405: fixed in vips 7.14.1-4)

Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please describe why you use > | g++ -shared -nostdlib > /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.3.1/../../../../lib/crti.o > /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.3.1/crtbeginS.o > to link libs. That's a good question. (Of course "I" don't do thisit came that way f

Bug#474756: xerces-c_3.0.0~b1-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: xercesc_messages_3_0_dat.o: No such file or directory

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: xerces-c > Version: 3.0.0~b1-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > your package failed to build from source. Seems you're renaming the file > in question and then later try to use it under its old name. . . . Thanks. How can I look at the build

Processed: severity of 468793 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.23 > severity 468793 serious Bug#468793: tokyocabinet - FTBFS: pthread_mutex_lock.c:71: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed. Severity set to `serious' fro

Bug#474898: (no subject)

tags 474898 +patch thanks The appended patch is enough to fix the FTBFS on mips. I belive it will fix all other architectures as well. Thiemo --- kdeartwork-3.5.9.original/debian/kscreensaver-xsavers.install 2008-04-08 01:02:39.0 +0100 +++ kdeartwork-3.5.9/debian/kscreensaver-xs

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 474898 +patch Bug#474898: kdeartwork: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/share/applnk/System/ScreenSavers/ant.desktop': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#474808: marked as done (attal: FTBFS: attalCommon.cpp:99: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope)

Version: 1.0~rc1+cvs20080318-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is

Bug#471051: marked as done (rsyslog shuts down too early during upgrade)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:32:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#471051: fixed in rsyslog 3.14.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #471051, regarding rsyslog shuts down too early during upgrade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Processed: Re: Bug#474891: asc: FTBFS: libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libspeex.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/lib/libspeex.la'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 474891 libspeex-dev Bug#474891: asc: FTBFS: libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libspeex.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/lib/libspeex.la' Bug reassigned from package `asc' to `libspeex-dev'. > retitle 474891 libspeex-dev does not

Bug#474932: sun-java6-plugin: Dependency on non-existent package xulrunner-1.9

Package: sun-java6-plugin Version: 6-05-1 Severity: serious Justification: makes package uninstallable Hi, The package has a dependency on a package xulrunner-1.9 which ist not available in the archive. Also neither incoming nor NEW seems to have a package with this name. Michael P.S: sun-java5

Bug#474343: Sorry, might not be the same

Hi, and sorry about noise, Just for the record, and to alleviate confusion, it turns out what I have might not be the same bug after all. I just submitted a new bug report with the same (and more) info. Sami signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#474900: marked as done (evolution-sharp: FTBFS: evolution-data-server is too new for this evolution-sharp)

-sharp Version: 0.14.0.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is now the defa

Bug#474880: yaskkserv: FTBFS: !!! Fatal : G++ is too old. You need version 3.3 or newer.

hi, On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > i386. > Relevant part: > > /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean > > dh_testdir > > # Add here commands to configure the package. > > .

Bug#470980: marked as done (btanks: FTBFS with g++-4.3: Missing includes)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:47:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470980: fixed in btanks 0.7.5800-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #470980, regarding btanks: FTBFS with g++-4.3: Missing includes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#474683: marked as done (Should be updated for new evolution-data-server)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#474683: fixed in evolution-sharp 0.16.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #474683, regarding Should be updated for new evolution-data-server to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#474343: grub: update-grub ends with exit code 139

Hi, > On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:33:40AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > (gdb) run -t device / > > Starting program: /usr/sbin/grub-probe -t device / > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > 0x0041f66c in grub_lvm_scan_device (name=0x6350c0 "hd0,4") at > > /tmp/g

Bug#474799: marked as done (gmult: FTBFS: DigitChooser.cpp:49: error: 'strlen' was not declared in this scope)

: 5.3-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is now the default on most archit

Bug#474839: marked as done (videolink: FTBFS: vob_list.cpp:57: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'auto_ptr' with no type)

ckage: videolink Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is no

Bug#474504: [qingy] changing to a virtual console kills X-session

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:00:07AM +0200, David Andel wrote: >> What do you mean with "last upgrade"? Last qingy upload is dated back to >> december 2007, four months ago. > > Well, it happens since a few days. I am upgrading every day. so, perhaps, it's not entirely my fault! great! :) Any idea a

Bug#474924: Further info: crashes when making NTSC menus

It only crashes if the menus are set to NTSC format. If they're set to PAL format it appears to work. With menus set to NTSC format it appears to crash perfectly consistently with this error: Output #0, dvd, to '/home/bitsy/dvd/dvd/menu1-0.mpg_bg.mpg': Stream #0.0: Video: mpeg2video, yuv41

Bug#474925: xulrunner_1.9~b4-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: cast from 'char*' to 'nsVoidArray::Impl*' increases required alignment of target type

Package: xulrunner Version: 1.9~b4-1 Severity: serious Hi, your package failed to build from source. | Automatic build of xulrunner_1.9~b4-1 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm | Build started at 20080407-0514

Bug#472630: audacious-crossfade: audacious segfaults

Rebuilding audacious-crossfade without modifying the source doesn't work for me. Although rebuilding fixes segfault, audacious hangs when I choose Crossfade Plugin as the output plugin. Adding --disable-oss to ./configure of audacious-crossfade fixes all problems. (I use OSS Output plugin of auda

Bug#474923: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#474923: hal: palm treo 680 is disconneted when sincronize button is pressed

don Paolo Benvenuto schrieb: > Package: hal > Version: 0.5.11~rc2-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > About 3 weeks ago I could sincronize my palm treo 680 for the last time. > > After that, every time I connect my palm to the usb cable, a new usb device > is cr

Bug#474910: marked as done (licq: FTBFS: configure: error: You need to have the libstdc++ headers installed)

oblems --- Begin Message --- Package: licq Version: 1.3.5-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of g

Bug#474924: dvdstyler: Crashes

Package: dvdstyler Version: 1:1.6.0.2-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Crashes with a segmentation fault during DVD burning. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686

Processed: Re: Bug#474870: libnet-cups-perl: FTBFS: CUPS.xs:15:23: error: cups/i18n.h: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 474870 -1 Bug#474870: libnet-cups-perl: FTBFS: CUPS.xs:15:23: error: cups/i18n.h: No such file or directory Bug 474870 cloned as bug 474922. > reassign -1 libcupsys2-dev 1.3.7-1 Bug#474922: libnet-cups-perl: FTBFS: CUPS.xs:15:23: error: cups/i18

Bug#462243: Ticket Number:008795727498

Microsoft Award Team 20 Craven Park, Harlesden London NW10, United Kingdom. Dear Lucky Winner, The prestigious Microsoft and AOL has set out and successfully organize the Sweepstakes, marking the end of year anniversary we rolled out over GBP1,000,000.00 (One Million Great Britain Pounds). Parti

Bug#474870: libnet-cups-perl: FTBFS: CUPS.xs:15:23: error: cups/i18n.h: No such file or directory

clone 474870 -1 reassign -1 libcupsys2-dev 1.3.7-1 retitle -1 Please include i18n.h in libcupsys2-dev again block 474870 with -1 thanks On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:54:43 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Relevant part: > > cc -c -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN > > -fno-strict-a

Bug#474923: hal: palm treo 680 is disconneted when sincronize button is pressed

Package: hal Version: 0.5.11~rc2-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss About 3 weeks ago I could sincronize my palm treo 680 for the last time. After that, every time I connect my palm to the usb cable, a new usb device is created (ok), and the gnome-pilot preferences are

Processed: Re: Bug#474817: mtools: FTBFS: cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m486"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package mtools Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mtools > tags 474817 + pending Bug#474817: mtools: FTBFS: cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m486" There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#473022: marked as done (gitosis doesn't work without python-setuptools package)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:17:49 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#473022: fixed in gitosis 0.2+20080319-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #473022, regarding gitosis doesn't work without python-setuptools package to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#474840: marked as done (littlewizard: FTBFS: value.cc:38: error: 'strcmp' was not declared in this scope)

lewizard Version: 1.2.0~rc2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is no

Bug#474800: marked as done (gmod: FTBFS: Sequencer.C:489: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope)

everity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is now the default on most architectur

Bug#473574: marked as done (gitosis: Gitosis destroys all permissions in /var/cache/git)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:17:49 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#473574: fixed in gitosis 0.2+20080319-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #473574, regarding gitosis: Gitosis destroys all permissions in /var/cache/git to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#473648: marked as done (etpan-ng: ldap_init, ldap_get_values implicitly converted to pointer)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:17:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#473648: fixed in etpan-ng 0.7.1-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #473648, regarding etpan-ng: ldap_init, ldap_get_values implicitly converted to pointer to be marked as done. This means

Bug#474468: confirm

On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:29:25 +0200 Riccardo Magliocchetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:05:52 +0200 "Leo \"costela\" Antunes" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Can you please try to replicate this bug after a dist-upgrade? I > > can't reproduce it here, but I have

Processed: merging 474854 474892

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > merge 474854 474892 Bug#474854: mlview: FTBFS: mlview-validator.cc:173: error: 'auto_ptr' was not declared in this scope Bug#474892: mlview: FTBFS: mlview-validator.cc:173: error:

Bug#420033: marked as done (yaird: initrd generation fails, Template.cfg refers to)

Your message dated Mon, 7 Apr 2008 23:12:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: [Yaird-devel] Bug#420033: Serious issue still exists in Lenny has caused the Debian Bug report #420033, regarding yaird: initrd generation fails, Template.cfg refers to to be marked as done.

Processed (with 1 errors): forcemerge!

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 474419 474885 Bug#474419: tntnet - FTBFS: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined Bug#474885: tntnet: FTBFS: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined Bug#474421: tntnet: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined Forcibly

Bug#474717: lokalize: package contains man page for cervisia

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:17:13PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Package: lokalize > Version: 4:4.0.66+svn791114-1 > Severity: serious > > The package conflicts with cervisia due to inclusion of the man page > for cervisia: > > ~$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/lokalize_4%3a4.0.66+svn791114-1_i3

Bug#474890: java-access-bridge: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: openjdk-6-jdk

Hi, On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > E: Couldn't find package openjdk-6-jdk I plan to upload openjdk-6 tomorrow but I do not mind keeping a RC bug open until openjdk is in unstable. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#474905: pam-mysql: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/libpam-mysql/lib/security/pam_mysql.la': No such file or directory

Package: pam-mysql Version: 0.6.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474910: licq: FTBFS: configure: error: You need to have the libstdc++ headers installed

Package: licq Version: 1.3.5-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is

Bug#474916: bayonne: FTBFS: /usr/bin/strip: debian/bayonne/usr/lib/bayonne-2.3/bayonne.jar: File format not recognized

Package: bayonne Version: 2.3.2-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474899: hylafax: FTBFS: Missing C++ runtime support for g++ (/usr/bin/g++)

Package: hylafax Version: 2:4.4.4-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474893: mysql-dfsg-5.0: FTBFS: tests failed (caused by gcc 4.3?)

Package: mysql-dfsg-5.0 Version: 5.0.51a-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2

Bug#474915: ripperx: FTBFS: configure: error: libid3 not found

Package: ripperx Version: 2.7.2-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474909: maxima: FTBFS: /bin/sh: ./maxima: No such file or directory

Package: maxima Version: 5.13.0-3.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474889: sdlgfx: FTBFS

Package: sdlgfx Version: 2.0.13-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474908: cdk: FTBFS: NomParserTokenManager cannot be resolved to a type

Package: cdk Version: 1:1.0.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474914: gnutls26: FTBFS: inline.h:220: multiple definition of `scm_array_handle_ref'

Package: gnutls26 Version: 2.2.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474895: gst-plugins-good0.10: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libspeex.la' is not a valid libtool archive

Package: gst-plugins-good0.10 Version: 0.10.7-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2

Bug#474897: openhpi: FTBFS: checking gcc >= 3.2.0... configure: error: !

Package: openhpi Version: 2.8.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474906: haskell-hspread: FTBFS: Could not find module `Data.Binary.Put'

Package: haskell-hspread Version: 0.3-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because

Bug#474896: noteedit: FTBFS: ERROR: TSE3 found but unable to link a simple TSE3 example!

Package: noteedit Version: 2.8.1-2.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474898: kdeartwork: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/share/applnk/System/ScreenSavers/ant.desktop': No such file or directory

Package: kdeartwork Version: 4:3.5.9-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because

Bug#474901: gettext: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/gettext/usr/share/gettext/gettext.jar': No such file or directory

Package: gettext Version: 0.17-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/gettext-0

Bug#474917: sendmail: FTBFS: debian/rules:135: *** target file `patch' has both : and :: entries. Stop.

Package: sendmail Version: 8.14.2-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474904: setools: FTBFS: /tmp/ccWhOZwR.s:10562: Error: symbol `stat64' is already defined

Package: setools Version: 3.3.4.ds-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474903: kid3: FTBFS: configure: error: libid3 not found.

Package: kid3 Version: 0.10-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is

Bug#474912: openmsx-catapult: FTBFS: libs not found

Package: openmsx-catapult Version: 0.6.3-R1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2

Bug#474918: etherboot: FTBFS: arch/i386/drivers/net/undi.c:425: Error: symbol `rm_undi_call_end' is already defined

Package: etherboot Version: 5.4.2-1.2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474902: gnumach: FTBFS: bad_user_access_length

Package: gnumach Version: 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070809-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc

Bug#474892: mlview: FTBFS: mlview-validator.cc:173: error: 'auto_ptr' was not declared in this scope

Package: mlview Version: 0.9.0-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474911: kwave: FTBFS: Looking for C++ include id3/globals.h - not found

Package: kwave Version: 0.7.10-1.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474890: java-access-bridge: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: openjdk-6-jdk

Package: java-access-bridge Version: 1.22.0-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2

Bug#474900: evolution-sharp: FTBFS: evolution-data-server is too new for this evolution-sharp

Package: evolution-sharp Version: 0.14.0.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2

Bug#474894: newlib: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: binutils-spu

Package: newlib Version: 1.16.0-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474883: tcc: FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 1: 1581 Segmentation fault ./tcctest.ref >test.ref

Package: tcc Version: 0.9.24~cvs20070502-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2

Bug#474886: wifi-radar: FTBFS: debian/rules:27: *** target file `unpatch' has both : and :: entries. Stop.

Package: wifi-radar Version: 1.9.8-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474884: zzuf: FTBFS: *** 64 tests failed out of 231 ***

Package: zzuf Version: 0.9-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is

Bug#474887: rxtx: FTBFS: make[1]: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.3-1.5.0.0/bin/javac: Command not found

Package: rxtx Version: 2.1.7r2-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Processed: Re: No more FTBFS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 463470 Bug#463470: xgraph: FTBFS: configure.in:3: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.10.1, Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#474888: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison failure!

Package: gnat-4.3 Version: 4.3.0-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#463470: No more FTBFS

reopen 463470 thanks On 18/03/08 at 10:59 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 17/03/08 at 16:11 +0100, Luca Bruno wrote: > > This builds fine in my current (sid) pbuilder. > > Works here too, closing. Failed again today, so I'm reopening this. Is it possible that this is caused by me building wi

Bug#474881: sqwebmail-de: FTBFS: patching fails

Package: sqwebmail-de Version: 5.1.6-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because

Bug#473341: Processed: severity of 473341 is serious

Sorry, I don't understand the issue. Both djview3 and djview4 provide /usr/bin/djview via the update-alternatives mechanism. --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#474885: tntnet: FTBFS: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined

Package: tntnet Version: 1.6.1.2-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474882: xscavenger: FTBFS: scav.c:561: internal compiler error: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3116

Package: xscavenger Version: 1.4.4-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474880: yaskkserv: FTBFS: !!! Fatal : G++ is too old. You need version 3.3 or newer.

Package: yaskkserv Version: 0.3.8-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc

Bug#474734: [pkg-nvidia-devel] Bug#474734: nvidia-kernel-source: X server doesn't recognize the correct version

Out of interest, how did you install the 16.09 version? do you have two nvidia.ko under /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-amd64/ ? I'll try to reproduce this later tonight. -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECT

Processed: Re: Bug#474808: attal: FTBFS: attalCommon.cpp:99: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 474808 patch Bug#474808: attal: FTBFS: attalCommon.cpp:99: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#474799: gmult: FTBFS: DigitChooser.cpp:49: error: 'strlen' was not declared in this scope

tag 474799 patch thanks On 07/04/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..-I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4 > > -I/usr/lib/gtkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 > > -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4 > > -I/usr/lib/gdkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/pan

Bug#474808: attal: FTBFS: attalCommon.cpp:99: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope

tag 474808 patch thanks On 07/04/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > attalCommon.cpp: In function 'int parseArgs(int, char**, > > AttalCommon::AttalProgramType)': > > attalCommon.cpp:99: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope > > attalCommon.cpp: In function 'void useTheme()': > > attalCommon.c

Processed: Re: Bug#474799: gmult: FTBFS: DigitChooser.cpp:49: error: 'strlen' was not declared in this scope

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 474799 patch Bug#474799: gmult: FTBFS: DigitChooser.cpp:49: error: 'strlen' was not declared in this scope There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#459281: marked as done (libjfreechart-java does not work with free JVMs)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:29:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#459281: Cannot reproduce the issue has caused the Debian Bug report #459281, regarding libjfreechart-java does not work with free JVMs to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#474871: pekwm: FTBFS: CfgParser.hh:78: error: 'strcasecmp' was not declared in this scope

Package: pekwm Version: 0.1.5-1.3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

Bug#474855: pearpc: FTBFS: x86asm.h:387: error: multiple parameters named 'hint1'

Package: pearpc Version: 0.4.0-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3

  1   2   3   4   >