Bug#468429: marked as done (slime: Error on startup)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468087: fixed in slime 1:20080223-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #468087, regarding slime: Error on startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#468878: marked as done (missing 'swank-loader:unique-directory-name' function)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468087: fixed in slime 1:20080223-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #468087, regarding missing 'swank-loader:unique-directory-name' function to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#468087: marked as done (cl-swank: does not load)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#468087: fixed in slime 1:20080223-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #468087, regarding cl-swank: does not load to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#461306: fails to install while trying to overwrite kcolorchooser.png which is also in package kcoloredit

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 04:35:51AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote: > Version: 4:4.0.2-1 > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:21:53PM +0530, Manish Sharma wrote: > > Package: kcolorchooser > > Version: 4:4.0.0-1 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > > > > > -- System Infor

Bug#470347: marked as done (blam: FTBFS: Application.cs(13,1): error CS0246: The type or namespace name `Gnome' could not be found. Are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470347: fixed in blam 1.8.4-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #470347, regarding blam: FTBFS: Application.cs(13,1): error CS0246: The type or namespace name `Gnome' could not be found. Are

Bug#461306: marked as done (fails to install while trying to overwrite kcolorchooser.png which is also in package kcoloredit)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:35:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#461306: fails to install while trying to overwrite kcolorchooser.png which is also in package kcoloredit has caused the Debian Bug report #461306, regarding fails to install while tryin

Bug#471000: cvstrac: aborts on init

Package: cvstrac Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On initialization of database, and invalid pointer it reported and the program aborts. The following message is printed: vstrac init /home/jplejacq/tmp sysadm *** glibc detected *** cvstrac: free(): invalid

Bug#470627: marked as done (sendmail-base: exit status 128 while upgrading sendmail)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:15:35 -0700 (PDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#470627: sendmail-base: exit status 128 while upgrading sendmail has caused the Debian Bug report #470627, regarding sendmail-base: exit status 128 while upgrading sendmail to be m

Bug#470640: intent to NMU

Hi, attached is a patch for an NMU fixing this issue. It will be also archived on: http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/horde3-3.1.6-1_3.1.6-1.1.patch Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-r

Bug#421278: Crash trying to open a gaim log

The problem seems to be that beagle/mono doesn't look for the file /usr/lib/cli/galago-sharp-1.0/galago-sharp.dll.config. looking at the debug output from beagle (MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug beagle-search) and moving the file to ~/.mono/assemblies/galago-sharp/galago-sharp.config confirms that. /Erik

Bug#435983: libata PATA transition

On Mar 14, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09.10.1409 +0200]: > > I will do it ASAP. Please do not do this by yourself because the udev > > rules files need to be renamed first (or else I would need to add > > conflicts and you would ne

Processed: Retitling wrongly titled WNPP bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 470885 RFA: doclifter -- Convert troff to DocBook Bug#470885: RFA: doclifter Changed Bug title to `RFA: doclifter -- Convert troff to DocBook' from `RFA: doclifter'. > # no description, so let's set it to foo > retitle 468255 ITP: cl-usocket -

Bug#470941: marked as done (loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.))

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470941: fixed in loop-aes-utils 2.13.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #470941, regarding loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.) to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#470320: marked as done (cl-pg: FTBFS: make: dh_lisp: Command not found)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470320: fixed in cl-pg 1:20061216-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #470320, regarding cl-pg: FTBFS: make: dh_lisp: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processed: Re: Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 470941 - unreproducible Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.) Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > tags 470941 + confirmed pending Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automo

Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.)

tags 470941 - unreproducible tags 470941 + confirmed pending thanks On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:41:11PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > Just guessing as to what the problem could be - > > > > If the mount package is an old version that predates > > the switch to using mount.nfs, it could be that

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 379754 pending Bug#379754: clean rule doesn't remove debian/files There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 451055 pending Bug#451055: gmanedit: lintian error, debian-files-list-in-

Bug#457717: marked as done (gxine: Segfault on start)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:40:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: gxine: Segfault on start has caused the Debian Bug report #457717, regarding gxine: Segfault on start to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processed: severity of 469015 is critical

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > severity 469015 critical Bug#469015: sbcl hangs during compilation of lisp programs Severity set to `critical' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#452772: marked as done (wireshark: strptime() implicitly converted to pointer)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:02:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#452772: fixed in wireshark 0.99.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #452772, regarding wireshark: strptime() implicitly converted to pointer to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: severity of 470447 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > severity 470447 normal Bug#470447: cmucl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [all] Error 133 Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#433393: liferea doesn't update any feeds after migration to new format

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:33:54AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: >> >> And the migration of *that* is done by a simple copying over of the >> file to the new .liferea_1.4 dir. Which pretty much rules out an error >> there. Still, just to make sure, please take a lo

Bug#470447: cmucl: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [all] Error 133

Hi, On a real i386 rebuilding cmucl works. So I'm a bit confused as to why you see the problem. My guess is that the reason is that you are building on an AMD64 machine. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is di

Processed: severity of 470381 is critical

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > severity 470381 critical Bug#470381: cl-asdf: installation fails Severity set to `critical' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: tagging 469896

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > tags 469896 + help Bug#469896: cl-geodesics - FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: help > E

Bug#469896: cl-geodesics - FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Can you describe how you build this package? I've tried to reproduce the problem with "debuild binary-indep", but it nor "debuild binary-arch" produce the problem. Groetjes, Peter - -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejourna

Processed: reassign 468255 to wnpp

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > reassign 468255 wnpp Bug#468255: need to package cl-usocket Bug reassigned from package `cl-irc' to `wnpp'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Processed: retitle 468255 to need to package cl-usocket

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 > retitle 468255 need to package cl-usocket Bug#468255: cl-irc: depends on unavailable cl-usocket package Changed Bug title to `need to package cl-usocket' from `cl-irc: depends on

Bug#469379: marked as done (FTBFS on sparc)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:02:18 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#469379: fixed in strace 4.5.15-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #469379, regarding FTBFS on sparc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processed: FTBFS bug is RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package bioperl Ignoring bugs not assigned to: bioperl > severity 453923 serious Bug#453923: bioperl: Misses Build-depends-(indep?): libio-string-perl Severity set to `serious' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#470968: libdumb: Builds broken package from source: Invalid tail usage

Package: libdumb Version: 1:0.9.3-5 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... cc -Wl,-soname,libdumb.so.1 -shared `sed -ne '/^CORE_MODULES :=/,/c$/p' < Makefile | sed -e 's, ,,' -e 's,.*/\\(.*\\)\\.c,obj/unix/release/\\1.o,' | tail +2` -o debian/libdumb1/usr/lib/libdumb.so.1.0.0 -lm

Bug#470243: kuake: FTBFS: kuake.cpp:(.text+0x8b): undefined reference to `KParts::MainWindow::qt_emit(int, QUObject*)'

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 09:52:20AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: kuake > Version: 0.3-5.2 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080308 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build

Bug#461422: getting gtk2hs to build on amd64

Hi, Am Freitag, den 14.03.2008, 12:54 -0400 schrieb Matthew Danish: > gtk2hs packages currently do not have up-to-date versions in unstable > for amd64 because of a very small issue: they attempt to force the > usage of gcc-4.1 which will not work with GHC 6.8 on amd64. I have > successfully modi

Bug#470962: Incompatible with post-DSA-1428 kernel source

Package: kernel-patch-openvz Version: 028.18.1etch5 Severity: grave One of the patches for CVE-2007-3104 in DSA-1428-1 (incorrectly called 1481-1 in its subject), uploaded in linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5 introduced an incompatibility with the openvz patch. Attached is a patch which makes the p

Processed: Tagging new bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # gnome-rdp > tags 470820 confirmed pending Bug#470820: FTBFS with glib-sharp 2.12 There were no tags set. Bug#470340: gnome-rdp: FTBFS: ./ProcessCaller.cs(75,27): error CS0246: The type or namespace name `Process' could not be found. Are you missing a

Bug#470441: patch to fix this bug

Zitat von Varun Hiremath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Please find attached a patch to fix FTBFS bugs in packages using the OBEX_CLIENT variable. In the latest cvs version of libopenobex OBEX_CLIENT and OBEX_SERVER variables in openobex/obex_const.h have been renamed to OBEX_MODE_CLIENT and OBE

Bug#391203: Return of 391203?

We're noticing what looks like the same bug when upgrading to snmpd 5.2.3-7etch2 . Could there have been a regression? I have reproduced the bug on a system which seemed to be running fine by running "dpkg-reconfigure snmpd" (ps -ef --forest): root 23011 22986 0 12:08 pts/000:00:0

Bug#470740: marked as done (nrss can't fetch anything)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:02:18 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470740: fixed in nrss 0.3.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #470740, regarding nrss can't fetch anything to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Processed: Debian Bugs #470820 and #470821

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 470340 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#470340: gnome-rdp: FTBFS: ./ProcessCaller.cs(75,27): error CS0246: The type or namespace name `Process' could not be found. Are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference? Bug#470820: FTBFS with glib-

Bug#470340: Debian Bugs #470820 and #470821

forwarded 470340 [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded 470820 [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded 470821 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Hi Félix, gnome-rdp 0.2.2 fails to build on Debian i386 (#470820). A user provided a patch to fix this. Please include it in 0.2.2.5 ;) Also, libvte2.0-cil will be removed from Debian,

Processed: Debian Bugs #470820 and #470821

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 470340 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#470340: gnome-rdp: FTBFS: ./ProcessCaller.cs(75,27): error CS0246: The type or namespace name `Process' could not be found. Are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference? Bug#470820: FTBFS with glib-

Processed: Re: Bug#470820: FTBFS with glib-sharp 2.12

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 470340 470820 Bug#470340: gnome-rdp: FTBFS: ./ProcessCaller.cs(75,27): error CS0246: The type or namespace name `Process' could not be found. Are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference? Bug#470820: FTBFS with glib-sharp 2.12

Processed: Re: Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 470941 + unreproducible Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.) There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.)

tags 470941 + unreproducible thanks Hello Marc, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:27:02PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > after installing loop-aes-utils, automount failed to be able to mount nfs > volumes, and indeed, mount no longer is able to do nfs mounts: > ># mount 10.0.0.5:/ /mnt >mount: wr

Bug#406485: marked as done (file conflicts between dcc-milter and synce-dccm )

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#406485: fixed in synce-dccm 0.9.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #406485, regarding file conflicts between dcc-milter and synce-dccm to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#470941: loop-aes-utils: breaks nfs mounts (and thus automount etc.)

Package: loop-aes-utils Version: 2.13.1-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software after installing loop-aes-utils, automount failed to be able to mount nfs volumes, and indeed, mount no longer is able to do nfs mounts: # mount 10.0.0.5:/ /mnt mount: wrong fs type, bad o

Bug#469221: apt-listchanges: How about a viable solution from a user's point of view?

Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.82 Followup-For: Bug #469221 OK, while you're all apparently busy debating responsibilities, here's something for those bothered by 'bsddb.db.DBRunRecoveryError' messages: sudo aptitude purge apt-listchanges sudo aptitude install apt-listchange

Processed: patch to fix this bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 470441 +patch Bug#470441: libopensync-plugin-irmc: FTBFS: irmc_obex.c:74: error: 'OBEX_CLIENT' undeclared (first use in this function) There were no tags set. Bug#470444: multisync: FTBFS: irmc_obex.c:73: error: 'OBEX_CLIENT' undeclared (first us

Bug#470444: patch to fix this bug

tags 470441 +patch thanks Hi, Please find attached a patch to fix FTBFS bugs in packages using the OBEX_CLIENT variable. In the latest cvs version of libopenobex OBEX_CLIENT and OBEX_SERVER variables in openobex/obex_const.h have been renamed to OBEX_MODE_CLIENT and OBEX_MODE_SERVER res

Bug#470440: marked as done (python-django: FTBFS: MD5SUM mismatch for .diff.gz)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:49:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line invalid bug report has caused the Debian Bug report #470440, regarding python-django: FTBFS: MD5SUM mismatch for .diff.gz to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#470000: marked as done (gromacs: spurious libxml build-dep)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#47: fixed in gromacs 3.3.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #47, regarding gromacs: spurious libxml build-dep to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#462268: popcon: stay out of lenny for a while

[Bill Allombert] > Package: popularity-contest > Version: 1.43 > Severity: serious > Justification: in the maintainer opinion. > > I would like to keep popularity-contest out of testing for > 1) See how many people use sid versus testing > 2) give us a chance to address the DOS issue in a better

Bug#435983: libata PATA transition

Hi, On Wednesday 12 March 2008 13:14, martin f krafft wrote: > Marco has not responded. I wonder if there's someone else who can > implement this? I don't have the time to read up on it and I would > have to learn udev first. Quoting #435983: also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09

Processed: Re: tags 470266 patch thanks

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 470266 patch fixed-upstream upstream Bug#470266: pciaccess check should use >= 0.10 instead of 0.10.0 Tags were: patch fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream, upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#470082: Fwd: Regarding fonts in Hannah

Tags 470082 +pending Tags 470079 +pending Thanks This is the message from upstream author of Hannah, saying that he will fix the font situation and make a new release. If he failed to do it the next days, I'll apply the fix (which boils down to "add the license statements") and upload a new debia

Processed: Fwd: Regarding fonts in Hannah

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 470082 +pending Bug#470082: hannah-data: contains second non-free font There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > Tags 470079 +pending Bug#470079: hannah-data: contains non-free font There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > Thanks Stoppin

Processed: re: pciaccess check should use >= 0.10 instead of 0.10.0 - patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 470266 patch Bug#470266: pciaccess check should use >= 0.10 instead of 0.10.0 Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#470266: pciaccess check should use >= 0.10 instead of 0.10.0 - patch

tags 470266 patch thanks I've made a patch that fixes the version number in the configure and the configure.ac file. Package now builds correctly with pbuilder. Bye, Emilio --- xserver-xorg-video-i810.orig/configure.ac2008-03-14 14:09:35.0 +0100 +++ xserver-xorg-video-i810/configure

Bug#332782: I wanted to lose my inhibitions.

Lengthen and thicken your tool with this safe and permanent herbal enhancement product http://coleirg.com/

Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server

severity 470904 important thanks Max Alekseyev wrote: >> And it's not "grave" either because if it happened for loads of people >> it would have been reported ealier. > > The "grave" description does not say anything about the minimum number of > people required to report the bug of this severit

Processed: Re: Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 470904 important Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Processed: Re: Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 470904 grave Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: Re: Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 470904 important Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tag 470904 + unreproducible Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg serve

Bug#470904: regression?

Hi, Max Alekseyev wrote: > I've just recalled that in 2006 I observed somewhat similar problem with > accessing menu in OpenOffice. But it was not that severe. Freeze != Crash... But it might be related, yes... > Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395354 for > details.

Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server

severity 470904 important tag 470904 + unreproducible tag 470904 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Max Alekseyev wrote: > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 1:2.4.0~rc4-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss No. Read the bug severities again. How does it break your whole system? Ri

Bug#446299: marked as done (eclipse: Crashes on startup)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:38:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug unreproducible with the latest version 3.2.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #446299, regarding eclipse: Crashes on startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#470859: marked as done (r-cran-lme4: load fails without libRblas.so)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470859: fixed in lme4 0.99875-9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #470859, regarding r-cran-lme4: load fails without libRblas.so to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#470904: regression?

I've just recalled that in 2006 I observed somewhat similar problem with accessing menu in OpenOffice. But it was not that severe. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395354 for details. Maybe, they are related (that bug was about inappropriate signal handling, afair).

Bug#470897: marked as done (dict-foldoc: dictionary is installed empty)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#470897: fixed in dict-foldoc 20070526-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #470897, regarding dict-foldoc: dictionary is installed empty to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#470882: gpm freezes and makes other applications freeze/segfault

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:45:35AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Since yesterdays update of gpm in testing from 1.19.6-25 to > 1.20.3~pre3-3 gpm regulary froze on me, making at least w3m, aptitude > and pdmenu freeze or even segfault - not even ctrl-c was possible > anymore when they froze. I h

Bug#470904: openoffice.org: Accessing menu in OpenOffice crashes Xorg server

Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:2.4.0~rc4-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Attempt to access a menu item in OpenOffice (in particular, "File" menu item in OOo Impress) causes a crash of the whole Xorg server with the following backtrace (from Xorg.0.log): Backtra

Bug#470859: r-cran-lme4: load fails without libRblas.so

On 13 March 2008 at 20:46, Andreas Michlmayr wrote: | Package: r-cran-lme4 | Version: 0.99875-9-1 | Severity: grave | Justification: renders package unusable | | > library(lme4) | [snip] | unable to load shared library '/usr/lib/R/site-library/lme4/libs/lme4.so': | libRblas.so: cannot open sh

Bug#470897: dict-foldoc: dictionary is installed empty

Package: dict-foldoc Version: 20070526-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The dictionary is installed empty, due to a small bug in the source package. Just $ chmod +x debian/condense and the package builds again nicely. N.B.: I don't know if debian policy allows having ot

Processed (with 1 errors): quicksynergy: worthless

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Package: quicksynergy Ignoring bugs not assigned to: quicksynergy > Version: 0.6-1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > # this bug makes quicksynergy seriousely worthless since it can't be > # used in any way on the machines it happens

Bug#424403: quicksynergy: worthless

Package: quicksynergy Version: 0.6-1 # this bug makes quicksynergy seriousely worthless since it can't be # used in any way on the machines it happens # also, 10 months for solving a bug which is a regression is highly # questionable severity 424403 serious thanks --- Please enter the report

Bug#470882: gpm freezes and makes other applications freeze/segfault

Package: gpm Version: 1.20.3~pre3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! Since yesterdays update of gpm in testing from 1.19.6-25 to 1.20.3~pre3-3 gpm regulary froze on me, making at least w3m, aptitude and pdmenu freeze or even segfault - not even ctrl-c was possi

Bug#470473: Epiphany crashing

Thanks for the tip Erich, I already downgraded I could not live without epiphany ;) Thanks, Marc El vie, 14-03-2008 a las 00:26 +0100, Erich Schubert escribió: > Hi Marc, > Another way of solving the epiphany issue with libglib is to just > downgrade to the 'unstable' version. The ad blocking in

Bug#470840: debian-installer: Fails to install Grub on a RAID5 system

reopen 470840 reassign 470840 partman-md severity 470840 wishlist retitle 470840 Should warn when /boot is on some types of RAID thanks On Friday 14 March 2008, you wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:14:19 +0100 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Grub does not support RAID5, only RAID1 and RAID

Bug#470872: erlang FTBFS on UltraSPARC III

Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-sparc64-smp Severity: serious Hi! Appears that erlang package FTBFS on sparc buildd for several months (see [1]). And the bug is triggered only on lebrun which is UltraSPARC III. Since Mikael Pettersson confirmed in [2] that Solaris on US III works fine, and Bernd Ze

Processed: severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 470854 important Bug#470854: mysql-server: wrong results with GROUP BY ... ORDER BY Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato