Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 465573 grave
Bug#465573: education-logic-games : broken package
Bug#463838: education-astronomy doesn't install : missing directory
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> severity 463838 grave
Bug#463838: education-astronomy doesn't instal
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:21:54PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Package: tomcat5.5
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for tomcat5.5.
>
> CVE-2007-5333[0]:
> | Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:01:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mlt: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lsfx
has caused the Debian Bug report #465627,
regarding mlt: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lsfx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: kinfocenter
Severity: serious
Version:4:4.0.1-1
Tags: experimental
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
While installing kinfocenter, it fails to install with following error:
E: /var/cache/apt/archives/kinfocenter_4%3a4.0.1-1_i386.deb: trying to
overwrite `/usr/bin/kinfocen
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441537: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #441537,
regarding When gcc-default (4:4.3-20070902-0) is installed, the repackaging
cannot be done.
to be marked a
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441537: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #441537,
regarding libsigc++-2.0-dev: causes FTBFS: declaration changes meaning
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446333: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #446333,
regarding When gcc-default (4:4.3-20070902-0) is installed, the repackaging
cannot be done.
to be marked a
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446333: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #446333,
regarding ftbfs with g++-4.3/gcc-snapshot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456971: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456971,
regarding ftbfs with g++-4.3/gcc-snapshot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456971: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456971,
regarding libsigc++-2.0-dev: causes FTBFS: declaration changes meaning
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446333: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #446333,
regarding libsigc++-2.0-dev: causes FTBFS: declaration changes meaning
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441537: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #441537,
regarding ftbfs with g++-4.3/gcc-snapshot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456971: fixed in libsigc++-2.0 2.0.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456971,
regarding When gcc-default (4:4.3-20070902-0) is installed, the repackaging
cannot be done.
to be marked a
Package: digikam
Version: 2:0.9.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the current version of digikam in unstable crashes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> digikam
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Exiv2::Error'
what(): MakerTagInfo registry full
Aborted (core dumped
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> package libsigc++-2.0-dev
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libsigc++-2.0-dev
> reassign 456971 libsigc++-2.0
Bug#456971: libsigc++-2.0-dev: causes FTBFS: declaration changes meaning
B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> package libsigc++-2.0
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libsigc++-2.0
> forcemerge 441537 446333
Bug#441537: ftbfs with g++-4.3/gcc-snapshot
Bug#446333: When gcc-default (4:4.3-2007090
Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465607: fixed in muscle 3.70+fix1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #465607,
regarding muscle: please declare Conflicts: muscle-doc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:56:45AM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit :
>
> Could muscle please declare "Conflicts: muscle-doc"? As it stands, it
> merely declares "Provides: muscle-doc", which, while harmless and even
> informative, serves little practical purpose given that muscle-doc's
> only revers
[Aaron M. Ucko]
> Could you please restore the /usr/share/doc/libsvn-ruby ->
> libsvn-ruby1.8 symlink it used to contain
Sure, next upload. There was a dangling reference in debian/rules to a
variable I'd removed. The only reason it didn't FTBFS is that it's
legal to send a single filename argu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 465609 pending
Bug#465609: libsvn-ruby: lost (trivial) content, confusing apt/dpkg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Op 13-02-08 17:18, schreef Lucas Nussbaum:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
> Seems that the parallel build stuff still has problems...
Doh! Thanks for running this package again on your grid. I'm so honoured!
I'll try my best to track down
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#46: fixed in adtool 1.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #46,
regarding adtool: ldap_get_values() implicitly converted to pointer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Package: python-netcdf
Version: 2.4.11-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
python-netcdf evidently depends on ${Source-Version} of the arch-all
python-scientific package; as such, binNMUs, as just occurred for the
libnetcdf transition, make it uninstallable
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465567: fixed in cacti 0.8.7b-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #465567,
regarding please apply various patches from cacti.net
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463413: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463413,
regarding mkvmerge fails with symbol lookup error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463413: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463413,
regarding gnome-system-monitor fail to start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464974: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #464974,
regarding mkvtoolnix: fails to start with current libpcrecpp0 from unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463170: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463170,
regarding gnome-system-monitor fail to start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463413: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463413,
regarding gnome-system-monitor: Does not start.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464974: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #464974,
regarding mkvmerge fails with symbol lookup error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463413: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463413,
regarding mkvtoolnix: fails to start with current libpcrecpp0 from unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you
sean finney wrote:
> hiya,
Hi
Dropping security team (and members) and weasel from the recipients...
>>> the etch and lenny/sid versions both have explicit checks for a mounted
>>> /proc in debian/rules (test -d /proc/1), yes.
>> This check indeed fails very reliably on the s390 experimental bui
hiya,
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 10:58:36 pm Luk Claes wrote:
> For the etch version check_procs doesn't seem to be included in
> nagios-plugins and nagios-plugins-standard, but it's included for
> nagios-plugins-basic. For the sarge version it's only missing in the
> i386 version.
the former
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463266: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463266,
regarding gnome-system-monitor fail to start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463266: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463266,
regarding mkvmerge fails with symbol lookup error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464974: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #464974,
regarding gnome-system-monitor fail to start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463170: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463170,
regarding mkvtoolnix: fails to start with current libpcrecpp0 from unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you
found 462762 0.12.1-1
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> aria2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Still happens.
>* New upstream release (Closes: #455282, #462762)
And please next time a b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 462762 0.12.1-1
Bug#462762: file conflicts, includes locale-alias??
Bug marked as found in version 0.12.1-1 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463170: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463170,
regarding gnome-system-monitor: Does not start.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463170: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463170,
regarding mkvmerge fails with symbol lookup error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464974: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #464974,
regarding gnome-system-monitor: Does not start.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463266: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463266,
regarding gnome-system-monitor: Does not start.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#454212: fixed in megahal 9.1.1a-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #454212,
regarding megahal segfaults as soon as it's launched
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463266: fixed in pcre3 7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #463266,
regarding mkvtoolnix: fails to start with current libpcrecpp0 from unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: librmagick-ruby
Version: 1.15.11-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080213 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ruby1.8 -I /build/user/librmag
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>>> okay, it looks like the problem was that the person who did the security
>>> upload built the package in a sarge chroot without /proc mounted (i can
>>> duplicate the problem unmounting /proc in my pbuilder chroot).
>>>
>>> so, my question is what
Package: miro
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080213 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwr
Package: libjson-ruby
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080213 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/libj
Package: gnat-4.3
Version: 4.3-20080202-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080213 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> (cd ../gcc/ada/rts-shared-zcx; mkdir obj;
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415651: fixed in rtai 3.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #415651,
regarding requires unavailable kernel-patch-adeos
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
sean finney wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2008 07:54:04 pm Luk Claes wrote:
>> sean finney wrote:
>>> hi everyone,
>> Hi
>>
>>> okay, it looks like the problem was that the person who did the security
>>> upload built the package in a sarge chroot without /proc mounted (i can
>>> duplicate the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 465625 + confirmed upstream
Bug#465625: libmail-field-received-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00%
okay. 3/18 subtests failed, 83.33% okay.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465631: fixed in gimp-plugin-registry 0.5.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #465631,
regarding gimp-plugin-registry: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency:
libglew1.4-dev
to be marked as d
tag 46 +patch
thanks
the submitter included a patch, tag as patch to mark as such.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 46 +patch
Bug#46: adtool: ldap_get_values() implicitly converted to pointer
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 465625 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=33233
Bug#465625: libmail-field-received-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00%
okay. 3/18 subtests failed, 83.33% okay.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://rt.
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:02:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465626: fixed in libdevel-repl-perl 1.001000-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #465626,
regarding libdevel-repl-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/6
subtests failed, 83.33
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:02:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465629: fixed in geneweb 5.01-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #465629,
regarding geneweb: FTBFS: rm: missing operand
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462762: fixed in aria2 0.12.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #462762,
regarding file conflicts, includes locale-alias??
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
tag 465620 pending
thanks
On 13/02/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Build-Depends: autotools-dev, debhelper (>= 5), dpatch, dpkg-dev (>=
> 1.14.6), freeglut3-dev, libboost-dev, libglew1.4-dev | libglew-dev,
> liblcms1-dev, libplot-dev, libtiff
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 465620 pending
Bug#465620: enblend: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libglew1.4-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Luk Claes wrote:
> > okay, it looks like the problem was that the person who did the security
> > upload built the package in a sarge chroot without /proc mounted (i can
> > duplicate the problem unmounting /proc in my pbuilder chroot).
> >
> > so, my question is what are the next steps? can th
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:38:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#465644: tomcat5.5: CVE-2007-5342 unauthorized
modification of information
has caused the Debian Bug report #465644,
regarding tomcat5.5: CVE-2007-5342 unauthorized modification of infor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 465631 pending
Bug#465631: gimp-plugin-registry: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency:
libglew1.4-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: geneweb
> Version: 5.01-4
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080212 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Confirm
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465636: fixed in bsc 2.27-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #465636,
regarding bsc: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/mkspecs/default/qmake.conf', needed by `Ma
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445021: fixed in kanjidic 2008.02.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #445021,
regarding edict & kanjidic: License discrepancy between the Debian package and
upstream, upstream's license
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 425943 serious
Bug#425943: copyright question
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> retitle 425943 ms-sys contains MBRs which are copyrighted by Microsoft
Bug#425943: copyright question
Changed Bug title to `ms-sys contains MBRs which are
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445021: fixed in kanjidic 2008.02.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #445021,
regarding edict & kanjidic: License discrepancy between the Debian package and
upstream, upstream's license
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 465530 465557
Bug#465530: nagios-plugins 1.4-6sarge1 lacks check_procs
Bug#465557: nagios-plugins: check_swap no longer present !
Forcibly Merged 465530 465557.
> retitle 465530 nagios-plugins 1.4-6sarge1 lacks check_procs, check_swap and
>
I just reinstalled icedove and icedove-dbg using "apt-get remove
icedove" and "apt-get install icedove icedove-dbg" and now it works. I'm
sorry, I don't know why I didn't try that earlier. But I guess I have
never experienced any problems like that before when doing an APT
upgrade so was a bit
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465634: fixed in gnutls13 2.0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #465634,
regarding gnutls13 ftfbs: missing makeinfo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465634: fixed in gnutls13 2.0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #465634,
regarding gnutls13: FTBFS: /build/user/gnutls13-2.0.4/build-aux/missing: line
54: makeinfo: command not found
to
tag 465626 patch
thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:58:58PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: libdevel-repl-perl
> > Version: 1.001000-2
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080212 qa-ftbfs
>
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445020: fixed in edict 2008.02.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #445020,
regarding edict & kanjidic: License discrepancy between the Debian package and
upstream, upstream's license bei
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 465626 patch
Bug#465626: libdevel-repl-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/6
subtests failed, 83.33% okay.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Hi,
I've looked at this fairly heavily (though I'm no expert developer). It
isn't a trivial task. A lot of it is a 1-1 move to freetype2 but I have
no idea what to do with the FACE_PROPERTIES stuff.
Even talking to a couple of people at freetype.org, they couldn't help.
Thanks,
Barry deF
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 07:54:04 pm Luk Claes wrote:
> sean finney wrote:
> > hi everyone,
>
> Hi
>
> > okay, it looks like the problem was that the person who did the security
> > upload built the package in a sarge chroot without /proc mounted (i can
> > duplicate the problem unmounting /pr
sean finney wrote:
> hi everyone,
Hi
> okay, it looks like the problem was that the person who did the security
> upload built the package in a sarge chroot without /proc mounted (i can
> duplicate the problem unmounting /proc in my pbuilder chroot).
>
> so, my question is what are the next st
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465630: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-mysql 4.3.9-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #465630,
regarding libapache-mod-auth-mysql: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target
`distclean'. Stop
hi everyone,
okay, it looks like the problem was that the person who did the security
upload built the package in a sarge chroot without /proc mounted (i can
duplicate the problem unmounting /proc in my pbuilder chroot).
so, my question is what are the next steps? can the security team just
t
On 2008-02-13 07:39:42 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> If you select bibtex2html and press "d", do its dependencies show up
> as "broken"?
I get:
i --\ bibtex2html1.90-1 1.90-2
--\ Depends
--- ocaml-base-nox-3.10.1 (UNSATISFIED)
--- perl
--- texlive-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13~bpo40+1
> forcemerge 465634 465571
Bug#465634: gnutls13: FTBFS: /build/user/gnutls13-2.0.4/build-aux/missing: line
54: makeinfo: command not found
Bug#465571: gnutls13 ftfbs: missing
Package: k3b
Version: 1.0.4-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
k3b: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libk3b.so.3: undefined symbol: stat64
Buggy build, in the ktorrent the same, rebuild from deb-src solves
problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefer
forwarded 465626 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=32940
thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: libdevel-repl-perl
> Version: 1.001000-2
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080212 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBF
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 465626 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=32940
Bug#465626: libdevel-repl-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/6
subtests failed, 83.33% okay.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://rt.cpan.org/P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 465643 1.96.3-1
Bug#465643: tintin++: CVE-2008-067[1-3] multiple vulnerabilities
Bug marked as found in version 1.96.3-1.
> found 465643 1.97.8-1
Bug#465643: tintin++: CVE-2008-067[1-3] multiple vulnerabilities
Bug marked as found in version 1.97
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#465583: fixed in glibc 2.7-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #465583,
regarding libc6: svn fails on some repositories after ugrade to 2.7-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
found 465643 1.96.3-1
found 465643 1.97.8-1
thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:00:52PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Package: tintin++
> Version: 1.97.9-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were
> published for tintin++.
>
> CVE-20
Package: kcemirror
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080212 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link g+
Package: tomcat5.5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for tomcat5.5.
CVE-2007-5333[0]:
| Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25, and 4.1.0
| through 4.1.36 does not properly handle (1) double quote (")
| cha
Package: tomcat5.5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for tomcat5.5.
CVE-2007-6286[0]:
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.11 through 5.5.25 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.15, when the
| native APR connector is used, does not properly handle an empty
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462701: fixed in grub 0.97-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #462701,
regarding update-grub: savedefault can cause problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393079: fixed in grub 0.97-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #393079,
regarding update-grub: savedefault can cause problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Package: tintin++
Version: 1.97.9-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were
published for tintin++.
CVE-2008-0673[0]:
| TinTin++ 1.97.9 and WinTin++ 1.97.9 open files on the basis of an
| inbound file-transfer request, before the user has
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462844: fixed in cpu 1.4.3-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #462844,
regarding cpu_1.4.3-9.1: FTBFS: uses deprecated ldap_get_values()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462701: fixed in grub 0.97-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #462701,
regarding grub: savedefault menu.lst option results in unbootable system
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438177: fixed in grub 0.97-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #438177,
regarding grub: debian/copyright is incomplete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393079: fixed in grub 0.97-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #393079,
regarding grub: savedefault menu.lst option results in unbootable system
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
