Package: ivtv-source
Severity: serious
Hi,
ivtv fails to build with l-m-contrib-2.6 on 2.6.24:
---snip---
[...]
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.gen build_i386
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/linux-modules-contrib-2.6'
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules.real build MAJOR='2.6'
MODULESOURCE='ivtv-
Your message dated Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464075: fixed in update-inetd 4.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 464105 update-inetd
Bug#464105: samba: lenny/sid install script fails (leaving unresolvable
configuration)
Bug reassigned from package `samba' to `update-inetd'.
> found 464105 4.28
Bug#464105: samba: lenny/sid install script fails (leaving u
Your message dated Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:16:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line loop-aes-modules-2.6-amd64: unsatisfied dependency on
linux-latest-modules-2.6.23-1-amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 463594 + pending
Bug#463594: squashfs-modules-2.6.24-1-686: kernel module is missing!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Your message dated Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463930: fixed in syslinux 2:3.61+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> severity 464075 important
Bug#464075: update-inetd: Syntax error on line 104
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Hi Brice,
> tags 400632 +wontfix
> thank you
> We are not going to remove the SUID bit because of this. The actual
> problem here is: why do you need x11-common installed on this system?
> Probably because of complex dependencies between all X packages? The
> upcoming xbase-clients split might ma
Package: poster
Version: 1:19990428-8
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Poster for KDE 3.5 (2008) can be a drop-in fix from the source code
found at ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/printing/poster-20050907.tar.bz2
"Works for me."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 463389 + pending
Bug#463389: Missing dependency on adanaxisgpl-data
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
On mar, 2008-02-05 at 06:25 +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb, 2008 at 08:39:42PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > * gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 20:19]:
> > [...]
> > > Whatever has changed in 0.19.0-1 -- breaking other packages' core
> > > functionality is not
On CTAN, there's the dtx and ins file and a pbox.pdf, which seems to
I updated pbox in TL; now pbox.pdf is included.
Thanks,
karl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462559: fixed in gnucash 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 464075 grave
Bug#464075: update-inetd: Syntax error on line 104
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Hi Carlo,
Carlo Wood wrote:
I can't help but sense a political reason not to
support flash, just because it's "non-free", the
maintainers of debian WANT it to be broken, almost,
and certainly don't look hard for a way to give
As a Debian user, but someone who isn't related to how Debian i
Your message dated Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463881: fixed in libauthen-dechpwd-perl 2.002-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463879: fixed in libcrypt-eksblowfish-perl 0.003-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi,
On Mon, 04 Feb, 2008 at 08:39:42PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 20:19]:
> [...]
> > Whatever has changed in 0.19.0-1 -- breaking other packages' core
> > functionality is not very nice :)
>
> Oh no, not again. C'mon you can't break newsbeu
I reported it against php5-tidy as #464074 which now contains a more
simplified reproducable example.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> package libglu1-xorg libglu1-xorg-dev x11-common xbase-clients xlibmesa-gl
> xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu xlibs-data xlibs-static-dev xorg xorg-dev
> xserver-xorg xserver-xorg-inpu
I'm not sure, but i would say the php extension needs recompiling. so
that would be the logical place to file the bug.
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 00:52 +0100, Markus Fischer wrote:
> I think this sounds very reasonable. I don't know why the debian PHP5 package
> version crashes, because when I compile
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> tags 463790 + pending
Bug#463790: python-openal: undefined symbol: alutExit
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
I think this sounds very reasonable. I don't know why the debian PHP5 package
version crashes, because when I compile 5.2.4 and 5.2.5 from clean php.net
from source, the tidy extension works.
The PHP package tidy version exhibits this problem reproduceable on different
machines for me.
Shoul
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:53:35PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Severity: serious
> tags 400632 -wontfix
>
> Greetings,
>
> The setuid usr/bin/X binary should not be shipped with x11-common
> because it's not *needed* for X11 clients. That by itself is a good
> enough reas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 195509 pending
Bug#195509: Please support Fortran 90 using new gfortran
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 383579 pending
Bug#383579: New upstream fork available - libburn.pykix.org
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463871: fixed in dpkg-www 2.54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.12.2.dfsg-1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #463961
This is the same bug as http://bugs.debian.org/366841
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.
* James Westby [Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:42:07 +]:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:24 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * James Westby [Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:35:33 +]:
> > > I would vote for making python-apt a
> > > Depends. What is the argument for not doing so?
> > That we ship a couple modules th
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458881: fixed in imlib 1.9.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: mplayer
Version: 1.0~rc1-12
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Two vulnerabilities have been found in mplayer. See
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487501/30/0/threaded
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487500/30/0/threaded
for details and patch
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445914: fixed in imlib 1.9.15-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367831 +pending
Bug#367831: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: fusebirth segfaults
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tags 367831 +pending
thanks
--
hi,
well, i got to reproduce this bug on my 'new' powerpc machine.
but, mmh, i still haven't found a way around it though.
the problem seems to lie somewhere in topo_sort, a recursive function,
when it reaches the end of graph branches, hitting NULL pointer there.
Hi,
I've commited a patch from Ubuntu in squashfs.git[0] which makes lzma
not default. Once this version gets uploaded, this bug can be lowered to
important.
Regards,
Daniel
[0]
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/squashfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a217ceda081c6093464ff48f994b28e4dc9a39c
--
Addres
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:47:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463628: fixed in squashfs 1:3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
libtidy-ruby had a similar issue: segfault caused by internal API
changes in latest libtidy-0.99.0 (in particular, TidyBuffer struct was
changed since 20051018-1, see #462325).
It is quite possible that PHP bindings for libtidy need a similar
update to bring it up to date with Tidy CVS.
--
Dmitr
Here my workaround:
i downgraded the libpam-ldap package from 184-2+b1 to 180-1.7. Now everything
works fine again.
Here is the link to the file that I used for the downgrade:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-ldap/libpam-ldap_180-1.7_i386.deb
Regards
--
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Po
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460513: fixed in mono 1.2.6+dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Source: xen-unstable
Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for xen-unstable.
CVE-2007-3919[0]:
| (1) xenbaked and (2) xenmon.py in Xen 3.1 and earlier allow local
| users to truncate arbitrary fil
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460513: fixed in mono 1.2.6+dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460513: fixed in mono 1.2.6+dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Feb 4, 2008 8:39 PM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh no, not again. C'mon you can't break newsbeuter with
> nearly every upload. Please either check the diff between
> the upstream versions or tell the upstream author something
> about ABI compatibility.
We can provide a more strict
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 461052 RM: libapache-filter-perl -- RoQA; apache1 only
Bug#461052: libapache-filter-perl: please update/request removal of your package
Changed Bug title to `RM: libapache-filter-perl -- RoQA; apache1 only' from
`libapache-filter-perl: please u
retitle 461052 RM: libapache-filter-perl -- RoQA; apache1 only
reassign 461052 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Either fix this with making the package work with apache2 or request
> removal of it from the pool.
As you haven't responded wi
On lun, 2008-02-04 at 19:33 +0100, Pierre Bauduin wrote:
> And, again, all I get when I choose "Microsoft Exchange" is the
> Username field. The Forward button is greyed, even after typing an
> Username.
>
> Very puzzling.
> Did you try creating a new user, login as that user, than start up
> evol
Le lundi 4 février 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
> tags 463871 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008, Kevin Baradon wrote:
> > After upgrade to version 2.53, dpkg-www doesn't display package list
> > anymore. Here is text transcript of the web page shown :
>
> The enclosed patc
Hi,
* gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 20:19]:
[...]
> Whatever has changed in 0.19.0-1 -- breaking other packages' core
> functionality is not very nice :)
Oh no, not again. C'mon you can't break newsbeuter with
nearly every upload. Please either check the diff between
the upstre
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461599: fixed in hdbc-postgresql 1.1.4.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:30:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430320: fixed in wvstreams 4.4.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> merge 462959 462967
Bug#462959: evolution: Accessing IMAP via SSL stopped working
Bug#462967: evolution does not work with tls or ssl enabled
Merged 462959 462967.
>
End of message,
Hi Carlo,
one link:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Documentation/Etch/HowTo/Administration#head-136bb7e75e07e8b6463e6b30761ac51776c5c27d
Using backports.org is easy. And supporting this particular piece of nonfree
in Debian stable is not. This is why the maintainer decided to support it
(and
Package: libmrss0
Version: 0.19.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was a little surprised today when I saw that newsbeuter didn't show
me any new blog post, although they existed on the feeds' pages.
A quick look into /var/l
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:09:21 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 1.0.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:13:44 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460377: fixed in washngo 2.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Carlo Wood wrote:
> I'm sorry, but it doesn't seem to make much sense
> to let the debian users of stable and testing suffer
> like this. It's not like Adobe is going to be like
> "Oh My God!" and change their ways. They clearly don't
> give a damn.
That's why we are shipping it in etch-backports
A commit relevant to this bug has occurred.
Revision: 99d01871b72cb930811c2c9f3742d70b1aefe80e
changeset: 46:99d01871b72cb930811c2c9f3742d70b1aefe80e
user:John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
date:Mon Feb 04 12:37:58 2008 -0600
description:
First step of conversion to GHC 6.8.2.
gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:41:36 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>> This source package contains the following files from the
>> IETF under non-free license terms:
>> Net-SFTP-Foreign-1.34/rfc/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-02.txt
>> Net-SFTP-Foreign-1.34/r
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428939: fixed in missingpy 0.9.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429709: fixed in missingpy 0.9.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443748: fixed in listlike 1.0.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:31:13 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed in 1.0.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Hi there,
Well I just did a fresh install of evolution and evolution-exchange on a
freshly installed machine.
The version of evolution-exchange is 2.12.2.dfsg-1+b1
And, again, all I get when I choose "Microsoft Exchange" is the Username
field. The Forward button is greyed, even after typing an Us
tags 462875 pending
thanks
A commit relevant to this bug has occurred.
Revision: 209
Mon Feb 4 12:15:17 CST 2008 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Rename LDAP_PROXY_AUTHZ_FAILURE to LDAP_X_PROXY_AUTHZ_FAILURE
fixes deb#462875
More details are available at:
http://software.complete.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 462875 pending
Bug#462875: ldap-haskell_0.6.3.0: FTBFS: 'LDAP_PROXY_AUTHZ_FAILURE' undeclared
(first use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Bug#462852: ldap-haskell - FTBFS: error: 'LDAP_PROXY_AUTHZ_FAILURE' undeclared
(first use in this f
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:12:30 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:09:28 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464013: libghc6-missingh-dev: Fails to install.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400632 serious
Bug#400632: x11-common: should not ship a SUID root binary
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
ted at 20080204-1437
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading package lists...
| Building dependency tree...
| Reading state information...
| Need to get 4154kB of source archives.
| Get:
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460793: fixed in pimppa 0.5.8-0.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: libghc6-missingh-dev
Version: 1.0.0.0
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to install with the following error:
Setting up libghc6-missingh-dev (1.0.0.0) ...
Reading package info from
"/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/MissingH-1.0.0/installed-pkg-config" ...
done.
ghc-pkg: d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> package libnet-sftp-foreign-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libnet-sftp-foreign-perl
> tags 463934 + pending
Bug#463934: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D
There were
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:41:36 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> This source package contains the following files from the
> IETF under non-free license terms:
> Net-SFTP-Foreign-1.34/rfc/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-02.txt
> Net-SFTP-Foreign-1.34/rfc/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-12.txt
Thanks for spot
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my pimppa 0.5.8-0.3 NMU.
diff -u pimppa-0.5.8/debian/control pimppa-0.5.8/debian/control
--- pimppa-0.5.8/debian/control
+++ pimppa-0.5.8/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
Source: pimppa
-Section: gnome
+Section: net
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Grzegorz Prokopski (D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> package pimppa
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: pimppa
> tags 460793 + pending
Bug#460793: pimppa: your package depends from gnome-libs that is scheduled for
removal
Tags were: lenny
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 460777 ftp.debian.org
Bug#460777: gpgp: your package depends from gnome-libs that is scheduled for
removal
Bug reassigned from package `gpgp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 460777 normal
Bug#460777: gpgp: your package depends from gnome-libs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 461128 ftp.debian.org
Bug#461128: python-gnome: your package depends from python-gnome that is
scheduled for removal
Bug reassigned from package `python-gnome' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 461128 normal
Bug#461128: python-gnome: your packa
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-03 16:32]:
> To the best of my knowledge, none of these configurations achieve that goal.
> While there's lore among Debian developers to the effect that
> "Conflicts/Replaces" will trigger the package manager to pull in the new
> package automatically
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#451415: fixed in emile 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 456433 pending
Bug#456433: freewheeling: license information insufficient
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 455697 ftp.debian.org
Bug#455697: cronosii: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `cronosii' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 455697 normal
Bug#455697: cronosii: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' fro
I'm sorry, but it doesn't seem to make much sense
to let the debian users of stable and testing suffer
like this. It's not like Adobe is going to be like
"Oh My God!" and change their ways. They clearly don't
give a damn.
I can't help but sense a political reason not to
support flash, just because
I think it's due to a missing dependency :
liblua5.1-filesystem0
Problem solved for me by installing this package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:55:07 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464001: FTBFS: hardcodes architecture-specific path to
rep's rules.mk
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
[...]
% wordgrinder
Lua error: /usr/share/wordgrinder/main.lua:16: module 'lfs' not found:
Yes, indeed --- incompetence on my part, I'm afraid, I put the
appropriate dependencies in Build-Depends instead of Depends.
Workaround: install liblua5.1-filesystem0 and it s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 405895 ftp.debian.org
Bug#405895: pydict: Please remove, orphan, or upload
Bug#461129: pydict: your package depends from python-gnome that is scheduled
for removal
Bug reassigned from package `pydict' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 405895 no
Version: 1:1.3.2+debian-1
> >From
> >http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sawfish;ver=1%3A1.3.2-1;arch=amd64;stamp=1202040828
> > :
>
> [...]
> > /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> > dh_testdir
> > dh_testroot
> > rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
> > [ ! -f Makefile ] || /usr/bin/make d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> package nethack nethack-common nethack-console nethack-lisp nethack-qt
> nethack-x11
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: nethack nethack-qt nethack-common
nethack-console nethack-x11 ne
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my nethack 3.4.3-10.3 NMU.
uploaded in DELAYED/2
diff -u nethack-3.4.3/debian/rules nethack-3.4.3/debian/rules
--- nethack-3.4.3/debian/rules
+++ nethack-3.4.3/debian/rules
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
export CFLAGS = $(optimize) -I../include -g -Wall -DGCC_WARN
-TARGETS
Package: wordgrinder
Version: 0.2-1
Severity: grave
% wordgrinder
Lua error: /usr/share/wordgrinder/main.lua:16: module 'lfs' not found:
no field package.preload['lfs']
no file './lfs.lua'
no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/lfs.lua'
no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 456685 normal
Bug#456685: gnomp3: Should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 456685 ftp.debian.org
Bug#456685: gnomp3: Should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `gnomp3' to `ftp.debian.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> close 460770
Bug#460770: gfontview: your package depends from gnome-libs that is scheduled
for removal
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 460773 ftp.debian.org
Bug#460773: gtoaster: your package depends from gnome-libs that is scheduled
for removal
Bug reassigned from package `gtoaster' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 460773 normal
Bug#460773: gtoaster: your package depends fro
Package: sawfish
Version: 1:1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
>From
>http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sawfish;ver=1%3A1.3.2-1;arch=amd64;stamp=1202040828
> :
[...]
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 405894 ftp.debian.org
Bug#405894: sql-editor: Consider removing this package?
Bug#368521: libgtk1.2 is obsolete, please port to gnome-python
Bug reassigned from package `sql-editor' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 405894 normal
Bug#405894: sql
Package: beagle
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
>From
>http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=beagle;ver=0.3.3-1;arch=amd64;stamp=1202041284
> :
[...]
> checking for EVO... yes
> checking for GSF_SHARP... yes
> checking for WV1... yes
> checking for
I'm delaying a fix for this. The reason is that bug #458881 is causing
an FTBFS as well, so this is really hard to test. I'll try to fix it by
porting the whole thing to gtk+-2. This is also a good idea, because
gtk+-1.2 is getting really old, and it's probably a good idea to remove
it at some p
ing build-dep
> to me.
>
> | Automatic build of ntop_3:3.3-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
> | Build started at 20080204-1437
> |
> **
> | Checking available source versions...
> | Fetching source files
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign #456855 scons 0.97.0d20071212-3
Bug#456855: skim: FTBFS: TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer,
list found
Bug reassigned from package `skim' to `scons'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Your message dated Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:29:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394239: fixed in testresources 0.1-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
