Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.9-3
Followup-For: Bug #461981
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-powerpc
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462254 mono-1.0-devel
Bug#462254: boo: Builds uninstallable packages from source
Bug reassigned from package `boo' to `mono-1.0-devel'.
> forcemerge 460513 462254
Bug#460513: mono-1.0-devel doesn't create alternatives
Bug#462254: boo: Builds u
reassign 462254 mono-1.0-devel
forcemerge 460513 462254
thanks
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 23 Jan, 2008 at 08:22:02AM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: boo
> Version: 0.8.0.2730-5
> Severity: serious
>
> If I build boo using pbuilder (on amd64), the resulting packages fail to
> install with:
>
>
reassign 462256 mono-1.0-devel
forcemerge 460513 462256
thanks
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 23 Jan, 2008 at 08:24:52AM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libflickrnet
> Version: 25277-6
> Severity: serious
>
> If I build libflickrnet using pbuilder (on amd64), the resulting package
> fails to instal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462256 mono-1.0-devel
Bug#462256: libflickrnet: Builds uninstallable package from source
Bug reassigned from package `libflickrnet' to `mono-1.0-devel'.
> forcemerge 460513 462256
Bug#460513: mono-1.0-devel doesn't create alternatives
Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 461236 + pending
Bug#461236: boost vulnerabilities
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> # downgraded to allow testing migration.
> severity 461992 important
Bug#461992: john: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message,
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
# downgraded to allow testing migration.
severity 461992 important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23/01/08 at 21:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/01/08 at 11:11 -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:15:29PM +0100, you wrote:
> >> On 23/01/08 at 11:06 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >>> Package: coreutils
> >>> Version: 6.10-1
> >>> Severity: serious
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409473: fixed in anon-proxy 00.05.38+20080123-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461991: fixed in anon-proxy 00.05.38+20080123-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461993: fixed in anon-proxy 00.05.38+20080123-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424601: fixed in anon-proxy 00.05.38+20080123-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 462258 serious
Bug#462258: build test failure on m68k
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 06:13:14PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
Maybe you could modify the build rules to cat the test logs in case of
failure?
Turning on debug for everything would create *HUGE* log files.
Probably too big for routine use. That is why it is off by default.
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:30:51 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line coreutils: FTBFS on PPC in seq test suite
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
severity 462106 important
tag 462106 +pending
thanks
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:03:20PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: python-xapian
> Version: 1.0.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Renders the package unusable
Sorry, while there's definitely a problem here, the package clearly
i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 462106 important
Bug#462106: python-xapian: Laxist Depends: on libxapian15
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tag 462106 +pending
Bug#462106: python-xapian: Laxist Depends: on libxapian15
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
Ben Pfaff wrote:
In bug #262021, Norman Ramsey reported that the "autoreconf"
script provided by the autoconf package runs automake. Since
at the time autoconf merely recommended automaken, instead of
depending on it, this could fail.
To fix the bug, I changed the recommendation to a dependency
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462334: fixed in openbios-sparc 1.0~alpha2+20080106-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Maybe you could modify the build rules to cat the test logs in case of
> failure?
Turning on debug for everything would create *HUGE* log files.
Probably too big for routine use. That is why it is off by default.
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Package: openbios-sparc
Version: 1.0~alpha2+20080106-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Subject says it all. Previous version of the package was working
fine. On upgrade I cannot boot qemu-system-sparc any more (the processor
halts very early and qemu dumps registers). Downl
Package: glib2.0
Version: 2.15.3-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of glib2.0_2.15.3-1 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
> Build started at 20080123-0216
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:32:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462227: fixed in kdebase-runtime 4:4.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: blas
Version: 1.2-1.2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of blas_1.2-1.2 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
> Build started at 20080120-0231
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 461453 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#461453: gnumail.app: GNUMail close and said "read failed" on startup
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 290726
Unarchived Bug 290726
> submitter 290726 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290726: mozilla-enigmail is uninstallable; requires Mozilla 1.7.3 but
unstable has 1.7.5
Changed Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 275277
Unarchived Bug 275277
> submitter 275277 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#275277: /usr/share/nickle/examples/rijndael.5c non-free; circle.5c has
unknown license status
Change
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 239674
Unarchived Bug 239674
> submitter 239674 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239674: lgc-pg should be in contrib
Changed Bug submitter from Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 262196
Unarchived Bug 262196
> submitter 262196 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262196: mpkg-j2se should be in contrib
Warning: Unknown package 'mpkg-j2se'
Changed Bug submitter fro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 263549
Unarchived Bug 263549
> submitter 263549 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263549: floatflt is non-free
Changed Bug submitter from Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 239673
Unarchived Bug 239673
> submitter 239673 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239673: LGeneral should be in contrib
Changed Bug submitter from Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 268565
Unarchived Bug 268565
> submitter 268565 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#268565: graphviz-dev should be in "non-free/devel"; copyright file is
misleading
Changed Bug submitt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 273079
Unarchived Bug 273079
> submitter 273079 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#273079: xmame-tools should be in section "non-free/games", not "games"
Changed Bug submitter from Jos
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 289750
Unarchived Bug 289750
> submitter 289750 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289750: widelands-data contains non-free font Knights.ttf
Changed Bug submitter from Josh Triplett <[
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 298600
Unarchived Bug 298600
> submitter 298600 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298600: copyright file refers to LGPL 2.1, but points to LGPL-2 file
Changed Bug submitter from Josh
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 17:19:15 -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:11:23PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Do you even care looking at the build logs or do you really want to be
>> pointed at them? They are available as usual on buildd.debian.org...
>
> Sorry, I meant "test log"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 254283
Unarchived Bug 254283
> submitter 254283 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254283: Includes non-free firmware ISAR.BIN
Changed Bug submitter from Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 293210
Unarchived Bug 293210
> submitter 293210 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293210: bluez-bcm203x firmware loader depends on non-free firmware
Changed Bug submitter from Josh Tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> unarchive 241894
Unarchived Bug 241894
> submitter 241894 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241894: Enigma contains non-free fonts
Changed Bug submitter from Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> t
This has been reported already upstream at
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6433. Unfortunately both patches
(yours and the one on that ticket) have slightly interesting bugs...
For example, the patch on that ticket would parse 8.3RC3 -> [8, 33]
which is (clearly) wrong.
Yours has an issue th
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459769: fixed in gnustep-make 2.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:11:23PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Do you even care looking at the build logs or do you really want to be
pointed at them? They are available as usual on buildd.debian.org...
Sorry, I meant "test log" rather than "build log". The details about why
the test failed are le
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:04:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Note that the mipsel buildd failed in the exact same way.
>
> Yeah, same theory holds. Until it can be duplicated with a manual build
> or we get the build logs it ain't gonna be easy to fix. It's obviously
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> severity 455806 important
Bug#455806: evolution: crash on startup
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> severity 444692 important
Bug#444692: Spurious output fills disk space
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:04:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Note that the mipsel buildd failed in the exact same way.
Yeah, same theory holds. Until it can be duplicated with a manual build
or we get the build logs it ain't gonna be easy to fix. It's obviously
trivial to special case mips
Package: evolution
Followup-For: Bug #455806
Hi,
evolution works for me on at least three unstable/amd64 systems. Maybe you
could try with a more recent version?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 06:17:15PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:07:48PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Package: libaudio-flac-header-perl
> > Version: 1.9-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> > Since the architectures where testsuite f
Package: evolution
Followup-For: Bug #444692
Hi,
I can't reproduce this on at least three unstable/amd64 systems.
Can you try to upgrade or maybe test with a fresh user?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstabl
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
Lucas Nussbaum told:
> On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
> > Lucas Nussbaum told:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see
> > > http://buildd.de
Hello,
I have problems finding out why omniorb4 fails to build on arm[1].
Having a look at the crash with gdb I can't spot anything obvious.
Could someone with an arm knowledge have a look at this please?
Thanks,
Thomas
[1] bugs.debian.org/460419
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Package: googleearth-package
Version: 0.4.3
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I can confirm this using the versions below. Error-Message is:
snip -
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot read debian/control: No such file or
directory
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot read debian/cont
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:52:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#437148: fixed in scponly 4.6-1etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 23/01/08 at 11:11 -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:15:29PM +0100, you wrote:
>> On 23/01/08 at 11:06 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> Package: coreutils
>>> Version: 6.10-1
>>> Severity: serious
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> coreutils 6.10-1 failed to build on mips:
>>>
>>> > Makin
On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
> Lucas Nussbaum told:
>
> [...]
> > Hi,
> >
> > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579
> > And I
Package: php5
Version: 5.2.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
From my pbuilder build log:
...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libaprutil1-dev: Depends: libdb4.6-dev which is a virtual package.
Resolving dependencies...
...
So the Build-Depends on libdb4.4-dev is conflicting with t
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of
Lucas Nussbaum told:
[...]
> Hi,
>
> coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579
> And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on
> bruckner.d.o
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:29:03PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> We are currently in the process of trying to remove wx2.4 from the
> archive, hence the serious severity of this bug. There are 5 packages
> packages remaining depending on 2.4 and 3 of those are pending patches
> and/or uploads.
Hello Jonas,
I am wanting to close bug 461640...
The debian/control file contains:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5), binutils (>= 2.17), libc6-dev-i386
[amd64], rsync [amd64]
Is that not good enough? or do I need to put "(>= 2.17.50.0.14)" ???
whole string (version value)?
-Nigel
I foun
http://beekeeni.com/
Now I'm so hard, and so long, my sex life has completely changed for the better
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 461157
Bug#461157: gaphor: FTBFS in sbuild
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
reopen 461157
thanks
I need sleep. Sorry again (wrong bug number)
--
:wq!
pgpePTthxqr0j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:39:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#462261: init.d script doesn't
terminate (laptop doesn't shutdown)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:32:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian/watch file updated in 0.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447961: fixed in nut 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: ezmlm-browse
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
* Hasn't been uploaded since Feb. 2006
* Seriously out of date
Package: gsoap
Version: 2.7.9b-1.1
Followup-For: Bug #442280
Hi,
I forwared this question on upstream tracker :
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=468024&aid=1868310&group_id=52781
Quoting Robert van Engelen (engelen) :
> The wsdl2h tool is also available under GPL and I pres
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:08:47 -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I am torn between the two possibilities. On one hand, Debian
> policy is clear that packages should have full dependencies on
> all the programs that they may invoke.
I disagree with that. Quoting policy 7.2:
The `Depends' fiel
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440672: fixed in postman 2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439404: fixed in postman 2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
In bug #262021, Norman Ramsey reported that the "autoreconf"
script provided by the autoconf package runs automake. Since
at the time autoconf merely recommended automaken, instead of
depending on it, this could fail.
To fix the bug, I changed the recommendation to a dependency.
In response, Ral
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:33:10PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:09:02PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/07/2007):
> > > > Severity: serious
> > > > Tags: patch
> >
> > A related note: when trying to build it in a clean sid chroot, I
Em Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:57:57 +0100
Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
Hi Philipp,
> You do not use shlibs, which results in uninstallability on alpha and
> ia64, because libc6 is named differently there. You might not use
> yada for your package, but fix your package to use debhelper
Hallo nochmal
also der neue online TV Sender ist auf http://www.doenertreff.de
echt super .. mario barth michael mittermeier.. usw und hammer musik
die single seite wo ich gesagt habe ist auf
http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/g869222-pmo
oder auf http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p409433
einf
Hallo nochmal
also der neue online TV Sender ist auf http://www.doenertreff.de
echt super .. mario barth michael mittermeier.. usw und hammer musik
die single seite wo ich gesagt habe ist auf
http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/g869222-pmo
oder auf http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p409433
einf
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:07:48PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Package: libaudio-flac-header-perl
> Version: 1.9-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> Since the architectures where testsuite fails have little in common,
> it could be that this bug is a bug in the t
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:44:59PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> It won't be removed from testing. Instead the new version will not
> propagate to testing and testing will stay with 1.42 and sid will have
> 1.43 so it will be easy to discriminate systems running testing from
> system running sid,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:15:29PM +0100, you wrote:
On 23/01/08 at 11:06 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: coreutils
Version: 6.10-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
coreutils 6.10-1 failed to build on mips:
> Making check in rm
> make[3]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/coreutils-6.10/build-tre
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:23:22PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:49:39PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > I would like to keep popularity-contest out of testing for
> > 1) See how many people use sid versus testing
> > 2) give us a chance to address the DOS issue in a b
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:49:39PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I would like to keep popularity-contest out of testing for
> 1) See how many people use sid versus testing
> 2) give us a chance to address the DOS issue in a better way.
Removing the package from testing doesn't mean that the pac
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#450469: fixed in adun.app 0.8.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457723: fixed in adun.app 0.8.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#450469: fixed in adun.app 0.8.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.43
Severity: serious
Justification: in the maintainer opinion.
I would like to keep popularity-contest out of testing for
1) See how many people use sid versus testing
2) give us a chance to address the DOS issue in a better way.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL P
Package: network-manager
Version: 0.6.5-4
Severity: critical
the initscript doesn't work properly. This means that the laptop doesn't
shutdown anymore properly.
If you really want to stop the network manager you'll have to enter the
command twice: First you'll have to cancel it after a while wit
reassign 462243 xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.1~git20080118-1
severity 462243 important
kthxbye
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 13:09:47 +0100, Andre Woebbeking wrote:
> Package: x11-xkb-utils
> Version: 7.3+1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi,
>
> when I call setxkbmap (KDE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462243 xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.1~git20080118-1
Bug#462243: x11-xkb-utils: calling setxkbmap crashes X server
Bug reassigned from package `x11-xkb-utils' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> severity 462243 important
Bug#462243: x11-xkb-utils: calling set
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460873: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.51-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: libflickrnet
Version: 25277-6
Severity: serious
If I build libflickrnet using pbuilder (on amd64), the resulting package
fails to install with:
...
Setting up libflickrnet2.1.5-cil (25277-6+pb1) ...
! Assembly
/usr/share/cli-common/policies.d/libflickrnet2.1.5-cil/policy.2.1.FlickrNet.d
Package: boo
Version: 0.8.0.2730-5
Severity: serious
If I build boo using pbuilder (on amd64), the resulting packages fail to
install with:
...
Setting up libboo2.0-cil (0.8.0.2730-5+pb1) ...
! Assembly
/usr/share/cli-common/policies.d/libboo2.0-cil/policy.1.0.Boo.Lang.Useful.dll
does not exis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12
> close 446218 4.3-20071124-1
Bug#446218: libgcc1-dbg: dependency on libgcc1 lacks epoch
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in
Package: libaudio-flac-header-perl
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Since the architectures where testsuite fails have little in common,
it could be that this bug is a bug in the testsuite rather than
testsuite exposing bugs in libaudio-flac-header-perl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 462008 =fixed-upstream
Bug#462008: pypy: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: expects got
Tags were: upstream
Tags set to: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 462008 +upstream
Bug#462008: pypy: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: expects got
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 462008 https://codespeak.net/issue/pypy-dev/issue353
Bug#462008: pypy: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: expects got
Noted you
tag 462008 +upstream
forwarded 462008 https://codespeak.net/issue/pypy-dev/issue353
thanks
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:03:27PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: pypy
> Version: 1.0.0-svn50146-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build on the 64 bit arches with this erro
tag 462008 =fixed-upstream
thanks
After discussing the issue with upstream, it seems that it has recently
been fixed in subversion. I don't have the time to update the package to
use a more recent subversion branch right now, but I'll do so next week.
Thanks for your patience.
--
Alexandre Fa
Package: hgsvn
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
hgpullsvn command depends on python-elementtree package.
Without it, hgpullsvn produces the following error:
$ hgpullsvn
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/hgpullsvn", line 5, in ?
from pkg_resources
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Upstream's CHANGELOG[1] says:
>
> 0.8.8
> - Make it work for current Xorg-GIT
>
> However, no version 0.8.8 has been released yet. Maybe we can ask upstream
> for a
> patch in the mean time?
sure!!! will do.
Thanka
Package: x11-xkb-utils
Version: 7.3+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
when I call setxkbmap (KDE does this for me) the X server crashes.
FYI, I'm using Nvidia's drivers.
If I'm not totaly wrong I've this problem since I updated on 19th of
Janury.
Cheers,
André
--
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
