Processed: Re: Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 456262 gcc-4.2 Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Bug reassigned from package `cpp-4.2' to `gcc-4.2'. > reassign 456264 gcc-4.2 Bug#456264: gcj: non-free man page included Bug reassigned from package `gcj' to `gcc-4.2'. > reassig

Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included

reassign 442445 gcc-4.2 forcemerge 442445 456262 forcemerge 442445 456265 forcemerge 442445 456266 thanks before going wild, please check the existing bug reports. kthxbye. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#456264: Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included

forcemerge 442445 456264 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 442445 gcc-4.2 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.2' to `gcc-4.2'. > forcemerge 442445 456262 Bug#442445: includes non-free manpages Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included Mismatch - only Bugs in

Bug#426224: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#426224: shutdown patches - the choices

Hi, On Thursday 13 December 2007 17:35:20 Artur Szymiec wrote: > Kel Modderman pisze: > > Package: sysvinit > > Version: 2.86.ds1-38.1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm following up on this ticket, since I've not received any response > > for the > > > best part of 6 months. > > > > The patch I proposed her

Bug#456266: gij-4.2: non-free man pages included

Package: gij-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man pages gcj-dbtool-4.2.1 and gij-4.2.1 are both licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFSG modifiability requirements. Bo

Bug#456265: gcj-4.2: non-free man pages included

Package: gcj-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man pages gc-analyze-4.2.1, gcj-4.2.1, jcf-dump-4.2.1 and jv-convert-4.2.1 are all licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFS

Bug#456264: gcj: non-free man page included

Package: gcj Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man page grmic-4.2.1 is licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFSG modifiability requirements. The text is fairly short so it s

Bug#456262: cpp-4.2: non-free man page included

Package: cpp-4.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The man page cpp-4.2.1 is licensed under the GNU Fre Documentation License with front- and back-cover texts. According to Debian vote 1 of 2006 this is a violation of the DFSG modifiability requirements. Other non-free man pages in p

Bug#450549: Regression?

Did 3.5.7 work? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#439567: abraca - FTBFS: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory

Hello Simon, On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother > asking for a sponsored-NMU of a known-broken package in the hope that it's > xmms2's fault, should I add the Recommends, should I file a separate

Bug#451348: gnash-tools: [patch] missing library or dependency

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > (I'm a new maintainer doing RC bug squashing; Michael Koch, Cc'd, is my AM.) > > > > I attach a proposed NMU interdiff for this bug, and for a FTBFS with recent > > dpkg-shlibdeps which I discovered while fixing it. I haven't buil

Bug#454796: marked as done (jd: GPL incompatible with OpenSSL License)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454796: fixed in jd 1:1.9.8~beta071210-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: fixed upstream in mono 1.2.6, not RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 452585 important Bug#452585: mono: SIGABRT invoking GetFields on emitted type Severity set to `important' from `serious' > tags 452585 + fixed-upstream upstream pending Bug#452585: mono: SIGABRT invoking GetFields on emitted type Tags were: si

Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work

reassign 455017 kde severity 455017 important thanks Hi, I'm reassigning this to the KDE package in the hope the maintainers can help you. This isn't a grave bug against the CD or debian-installer packages. On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:05:01PM -0500, operator wrote: > >Subject: cdrom: sound system

Processed: Re: Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 455017 kde Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work Bug reassigned from package `cdrom' to `kde'. > severity 455017 important Bug#455017: cdrom: sound system does not work Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping proces

Bug#436140: cdrom: Most of the system's files have a future timestamp causing at least update/config problems.

reassign 436140 debian-installer thanks Hi, This bug is in the installer, most likely caused by a clock initialisation problem. I'm reassigning it to the debian-installer team for their input. On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 07:20:50PM +0200, os wrote: >Package: cdrom >Severity: grave > > >I cannot dete

Bug#441686: marked as done (f-spot: FTBFS: ./Glitz.cs(115,34): error CS0214: Pointers and fixed size buffers may only be used in an unsafe context)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441686: fixed in f-spot 0.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#447986: marked as done (f-spot crashes on double-click on image, or on selecting a tag while in looking at pic.)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447986: fixed in f-spot 0.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: emacs22: Wrong encoding of UTF-8 characters

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 456235 serious Bug#456235: emacs22: Wrong encoding of UTF-8 characters Severity set to `serious' from `important' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Processed: Re: Bug#436140: cdrom: Most of the system's files have a future timestamp causing at least update/config problems.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 436140 debian-installer Bug#436140: cdrom: Most of the system's files have a future timestamp causing at least update/config problems. Bug reassigned from package `cdrom' to `debian-installer'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please conta

Bug#456237: bzip2: Build from source makes uninstallable package

Package: bzip2 Version: 1.0.3-7 Severity: serious If I rebuild bzip2 from source, the resulting package fails to install with: ... Setting up bzip2 (1.0.3-7) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/bzip2.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This

Processed: setting package to clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc, tagging 443804, tagging 448431, tagging 450452

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: clisp clisp-dev clisp-doc > tags 443804 + pending Bug#443804: clisp: Please add support for module berkeley-db There

Bug#453195: marked as done (valgrind: FTBFS: configure: error: Valgrind requires glibc version 2.2 - 2.6)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453195: fixed in valgrind 1:3.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#443722: Not an f-spot bug

severity 443722 normal I hadn't been able to trigger this bug at the time when I reported it using anything but f-spot, no matter how I tried; and it had happened about 30 times (off the back of my head). Last weekend, however, I did reproduce this bug using digiKam; so either some library that i

Bug#456201: marked as done (nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:38:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed (with 5 errors): Not an f-spot bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 443722 normal Bug#443722: Tagging pictures corrupts the image Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > I hadn't been able to trigger this bug at the time when I reported it Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > using anything bu

Processed: Re: Bug#456199: libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 undefined symbol: DPMSDisable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 374062 456199 Bug#374062: TTF_RenderUNICODE_Solid fails when rendering strings containing spaces Bug#456199: libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 undefined symbol: DPMSDisable Bug#386285: libfreetype6: GlyphToBitmap fails for monochrome rendering of space-

Processed: Marking bugs fixed in svn as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Marking bugs fixed in collab-maint/ext-maint/splint SVN repository as > # pending. > tags 171437 +pending Bug#171437: splint: K&R / standard C mismatch Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: pending > tags 298261 +pending Bug#298261: splint:

Bug#450464: Patch

tags 450464 + patch thanks As discussed in private mail, the current gnucash sources in sid require goffice 0.4.x which is now packaged as source package goffice0.4 and whose development files are in libgoffice-0-dev. The following patch fixes the FTBFS for me: diff -ru gnucash-2.2.1.old/debian/

Bug#452585: fixed upstream in mono 1.2.6, not RC

severity 452585 important tags 452585 + fixed-upstream upstream pending thanks This bug is annoying but currently only effects nemerle, thus downgrading to important. With Mono 1.2.6 this bug will be fixed. -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8 FOSS Developer[EMAIL PROTE

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 450464 + patch Bug#450464: gnucash: FTBFS: E: Couldn't find package libgoffice-1-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#447469: marked as done (javahelp2: FTBFS: class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.depend.Depend was not found)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447469: fixed in javahelp2 2.0.05-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#453227: Patch for ruby-defaults build failure

package ruby-defaults tags 453227 + patch thanks Here's a patch which fixes the build failure by avoiding the superfluous calls to dpkg-gencontrol. -- Daniel Schepler Binary files ruby-defaults-1.8.2.old/debian/.rules.swp and ruby-defaults-1.8.2/debian/.rules.swp differ diff -urN ruby-defaults-1

Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 06:06:36PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Stephen Gran schrieb: > >This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said: > > > >>* license for the database is BSD with advertisement clause which I'm > >> unsure is DFSG free > >> > > > >It is. > > > Hello, > > it is n

Processed: Patch for ruby-defaults build failure

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package ruby-defaults Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ruby-defaults > tags 453227 + patch Bug#453227: ruby-defaults: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: warning: duplicate files list entry for package libracc-runtime-ruby (line 30) There were no tags set. Tags add

Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:56:12AM -0500, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 13 December 2007 11:46:59 am Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:08:47AM -0500, Daniel Schepler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: nspr > > > Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 > > > Seve

Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong

Stephen Gran schrieb: This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said: * license for the database is BSD with advertisement clause which I'm unsure is DFSG free It is. Hello, it is not DFSG free - it's a known issue and yesterday I recieved an email from maxmind (Upstream) wh

Bug#456203: dumb reportbug

Dear Debian, So, reportbug forgot to inlcude the majority of the report: USB pendrive fails when syncing file systems (works OK with big sequential copies) with "reset high speed USB device" and "device descriptor read/64, error -110" and "sd 0:0:0:0: scsi: Device offlined - not ready after e

Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols

On Thursday 13 December 2007 11:46:59 am Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:08:47AM -0500, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: nspr > > Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 > > Severity: serious > > > > From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): > > > > ... > > dh_compress -a > > dh

Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols

On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:08:47AM -0500, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: nspr > Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 > Severity: serious > > From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): > > ... > dh_compress -a > dh_fixperms -a > dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' > dpkg-gensy

Bug#456201: nspr: FTBFS: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols

Package: nspr Version: 4.7.0~1.9b1-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): ... dh_compress -a dh_fixperms -a dh_makeshlibs -a -V 'libnspr4-0d (>= 4.7.0~1.9b1)' dpkg-gensymbols: failure: Can't open debian/../../libnspr4-0d.symbols: : No such file or directory dh_makeshlibs: com

Bug#430842: marked as done (stores run-time data in /etc)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430842: fixed in no-ip 2.1.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#427591: Doesn't work with all above method

Package: enigmail Version: 2:0.95.0+1-3 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I tried both above way to get enigmail work with Icedove. But, it seems that none of methods are working for me. --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 Debian Rel

Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong

This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said: > * license for the database is BSD with advertisement clause which I'm > unsure is DFSG free It is. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | :

Bug#455482: PyZenity

Actually, it looks like it would be pretty easy to implement properly in PyGTK. I took a quick look at the source of Zenity last night and I see no problems with using Zenity's own glade file for the widgets and translating the C to Python. It looks like a weekend project to me. It might be

Bug#456190: geoip: debian/copyright is wrong

Package: geoip Severity: serious * libgeoip is NOT under the GPL but the LGPL. * Source for the geolite database is not in the package, hence it's not DFSG free, though it's downloadable from http://www.maxmind.com/app/geolitecity, it should be packaged independently along with the CSV gene

Processed: disabling caca makes it build

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 454118 serious Bug#454118: FTBFS: caca.c:309: error: 'struct caca_event' has no member named 'type' Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > tags 454118 +patch Bug#454118: FTBFS: caca.c:309: error: 'struct caca_event' has no member named 't

Bug#456102: FTBFS: error: 'INT_MAX' undeclared

On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:19:51PM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > cdrwtool.c: In function 'cdrom_open_check': > > cdrwtool.c:606: error: 'INT_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) This puzzled me at first, as line 606 reads: ret = ioctl(fd, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS, CDSL_CURRENT); Both co

Bug#455698: ampache: contains a non-free font

Charliej wrote: > Paul Wise wrote: > >> Package: ampache >> Version: 3.3.3.5-dfsg-2 >> Severity: serious >> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Usertags: non-free >> >> ampache contains a non-free font: >> >> /usr/share/ampache/www/modules/captcha/COLLEGE.ttf >> http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/review/

Bug#455698: Replaced with FreeMono-Medium.ttf in Upstream

I've replaced COLLEGE.ttf with FreeMono-Medium.ttf (from the debian fonts package) Please let me know if you find any other componets that don't comply with the Debian DSFG-required freedoms. -Karl Vollmer Ampache Lead Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#455961: marked as done (openoffice.org-writer: Dependency problem with openoffice.org-common)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:18:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#455961: fixed in openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#454748: marked as done (openoffice.org-base-core: fails to install during upgrade from openoffice 2.3.0)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:18:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454625: fixed in openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#454625: marked as done (openoffice.org-base-core: Replaces field is missing the epoch)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:18:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454625: fixed in openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#432755: please upload to volatile.

Hello, Could you please upload the new version of flashplugin-nonfree to volatile? (as soon as it reaches testing... this is requirement for volatile) This way stable users will be allowed to upgrade w/o using version from backports, testing, whatever... Thank you. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [

Bug#455819: marked as done (Subject: base: sound system failure (arts)?)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:33:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#455819: close

Hi, I could have tagged #455819 as moreinfo as well, and reassign this to the "proper" package, but considering you filed #453733 and #455996 with equally no information, and havent replied to the request for moreinfo on #453733, I've decided to just close these bugs. You're welcome to file th

Bug#454133: marked as done (pwlib: CVE-2007-4897 remote denial of service)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:52:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454133: fixed in pwlib 1.8.4-1+sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426224: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#426224: shutdown patches - the choices

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kel Modderman pisze: > Package: sysvinit > Version: 2.86.ds1-38.1 > > Hi, > > I'm following up on this ticket, since I've not received any response for the > best part of 6 months. > > The patch I proposed here is, IMHO, the most complete of the ones o