Bug#423322: Maintainership of SWI-Prolog

Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Any update on this? I've uploaded the package to my personal repository (ping me on IRC for the URL, as it will change) so that my usual sponsor can check it out. My packaging is available in Git[0]. There are still three outstanding issues: * It modifies RPATH * Some

Bug#440140: marked as done (Current version broken ("can't find message"), please take new upstream)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#440140: fixed in fetchyahoo 2.11.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#440577: marked as done (libdkim-dev: Package namespace conflict)

Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2007 17:39:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bugs missed by changelog has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#453902: marked as done (preinst fails: update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/hplip exists during rc.d purge)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453902: fixed in hplip 2.7.10-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#453902: preinst fails: update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/hplip exists during rc.d purge

On Sunday 02 December 2007, Josh Triplett wrote: > Version: 2.7.10-4 > Severity: grave > > hplip's preinst fails: Thanks Josh, The rules for update-rc.d are a little tricky in that the init.d file needs to off allready been removed before one can call update-rc.d. So while the upgrade works for

Processed: setting package to hpijs hpijs-ppds hplip hplip-data hplip-dbg hplip-doc hplip-gui, tagging 453902

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package hpijs hpijs-ppds hplip hplip-data hplip-dbg hplip-doc hplip-gui Ignoring bugs not assigned to: hpijs-ppds hpijs hplip-data hplip-gui hplip-dbg hplip hplip-doc > tags 453902

Bug#453885: dpkg-shlibdeps changes can't track symlinks (/usr/lib, /usr/lib64)

Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > The gcj-4.X packages fail to build with this version of dpkg: > > > > > > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for > > > > /usr/lib64/libgcj_bc.so.1 (used by > > > > debian/gcj-4.3/usr/lib/gcc/x8

Bug#454081: Class not found JDBC4Connection

Package: libmysql-java Version: 5.1.5+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable when trying to instance a Connection with a org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource and a valid Connection URL, a ClassNotFoundException is thrown, and no Connection is available. Here is an extra

Bug#426224: shutdown patches - the choices

On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:56:23 +1000 Kel Modderman wrote: [...] > Ok, there are too many damn numbers listed below with references. But > you get the picture I hope, that I'm concerned about the direction the > maintainers [10] intend to take in order to fix this issue, and that > I've laid out as mu

Bug#451327: I like this feature

I actually like this feature, because I share my home directory/profile across the machines, and otherwise I can't run any browser at all on the other machine, since the profile is in use. If you do fix it, how about adding a check to see if the profile directory is the same on the local/rem

Bug#445861: marked as done (hal: HAL daemon exited with return code 1)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447860: fixed in hal 0.5.10-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#447860: marked as done (fails to start, leaves stray processes around)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447860: fixed in hal 0.5.10-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#447860: marked as done (fails to start, leaves stray processes around)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#445861: fixed in hal 0.5.10-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#445861: marked as done (hal: HAL daemon exited with return code 1)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#445861: fixed in hal 0.5.10-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#453885: dpkg-shlibdeps changes can't track symlinks (/usr/lib, /usr/lib64)

On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > The gcj-4.X packages fail to build with this version of dpkg: > > > > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for > > > /usr/lib64/libgcj_bc.so.1 (used by > > > debian/gcj-4.3/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3/ecj1). > > > dh_s

Bug#454062: tutos2: should this package be removed?

severity 454062 normal reassign 454062 wnpp retitle 454062 O: tutos2 -- The Ultimate Team Organization Software thanks On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:21:45PM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > In fact I'm no more in a position to maintain this package anymore, but I've > been told it works ok with som

Processed: Re: Bug#454062: tutos2: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 454062 normal Bug#454062: tutos2: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 454062 wnpp Bug#454062: tutos2: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `tutos2' to `wnpp'. > retitle 454

Processed: Re: Bug#453925: libgtk2.0-doc: lot of files disappeared in the latest update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 453925 important Bug#453925: libgtk2.0-doc: lot of files disappeared in the latest update Severity set to `important' from `grave' > forcemerge 453878 453925 Bug#453878: libgtk2.0-doc: Most documentation does not build Bug#453925: libgtk2.0-do

Bug#453925: libgtk2.0-doc: lot of files disappeared in the latest update

severity 453925 important forcemerge 453878 453925 thanks Am Sonntag, den 02.12.2007, 12:53 +0100 schrieb Patrizio Bruno: > Package: libgtk2.0-doc > Version: 2.12.2-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > After the dist-upgrade in 01 dec 2007 I lost most of html files in

Bug#454062: tutos2: should this package be removed?

Hi, Le Sunday 02 December 2007 20:33:23 Filippo Giunchedi, vous avez écrit : > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible > candidate for removal from Debian, because: > > * affected by php4 removal (424828) > * last maintainer upload in 2005-11-03 > * seems unmaintained

Bug#441684: patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry, but this patch do not apply against version 0.5.8 of libdb4.3-ruby the extconf file is totally different. Cheers, filipe { @ icewall.org GPG1024D/A6BA423E Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] } On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, akira ya

Bug#447339: A current work-around

Hello, it installs fine if you stop acpid before the installation: /etc/init.d/acpid stop # Install as usual # Or finish a previous installation run using dpkg --configure -a I guess either the scripts should stop acpid before restarting it (if it's safe), or /etc/init.d/acpid should not f

Bug#454062: tutos2: should this package be removed?

Package: tutos2 Version: 2.0.20050413-3.2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * affected by php4 removal (424828) * last maintainer upload in 2005-

Bug#441684: patch

On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, akira yamada / ?? wrote: Basically, we should not use RUBY_VERSION_CODE. So I think that an approach likes the following patch is better. ... Cool, nothing like do things the Right Way. There is just one problem: renmazuo:/libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src# pwd /libdb4.3-ruby-0.5

Bug#445861: HAL daemon exited with return code 1

Hi, This bug seems to take an annoyingly long time to fix, so I tried to run "hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes" under valgrind and I got: ==9630== Invalid read of size 1 ==9630==at 0x4A07AC4: strcmp (mc_replace_strmem.c:341) ==9630==by 0x4C2E68D: (within /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3.4.0) ==9630=

Bug#453934: kvm-source: emulation failed (pagetable)

On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 17:50 +0100, Bastian Scholz wrote: > > Which commandline do you use to run kvm? > > kvm -hda win2k-c.img -m 192M (-no-kvm) > > I try it with -no-acpi and -no-kvm-irqchip, too. All the same. > > > Which guest OS are you using? > > Win-2000 Pro, but not relevant I think. Th

Bug#453804: stellarium: segfaults on startup

Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > >> I installed stellarium on my Debian box (details below) and invoked it >> from commandline inside gnome-terminal. The splash screen came up with >> a progress bar and after the progress b

Bug#421725: marked as done (turkey: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libgcj7-awt)

Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2007 18:52:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line turkey: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libgcj7-awt has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#435421: myphpmoney: can't install, remove or purge

Hi Christian, this is a ping, looks like you forogt about this item :) Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpurnWnkzH2F.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: centerim: Bug 39: icq contacts all show as offline

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 453189 grave Bug#453189: centerim: Bug 39: icq contacts all show as offline Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#432755: flashplugin-nonfree

I am trying to be a medium level linux user, after several attempts to update the apt package list, I decided to get the updated package from the ftp manually and then dpkg -i to install. No problems yet, even worked without a need to restart X. __

Bug#453934: kvm-source: emulation failed (pagetable)

> Which commandline do you use to run kvm? kvm -hda win2k-c.img -m 192M (-no-kvm) I try it with -no-acpi and -no-kvm-irqchip, too. All the same. > Which guest OS are you using? Win-2000 Pro, but not relevant I think. The problem occurs with an empty hdd-image, too. I think it is a "pre-OS" fai

Bug#453902: hplip: Reinforcement for #453902

Package: hplip Followup-For: Bug #453902 I have encountered this problem for the last couple weeks. Was suprised to discover that a bug report had only very recently been filed. No such problem in 32-bit Sid. Trying to upgrade hplip yields the following: debian64:~# aptitude install hplip Readi

Bug#453934: kvm-source: emulation failed (pagetable)

On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 13:50 +0100, Bastian Scholz wrote: > After updating kvm-source from kvm-28 to kvm-54 kvm only shows a black > screen, even the virtual BIOS is not shown (but I can enter the kvm-monitor > and can type commands). If I load the old kvm-28 module or disable kvm > with -no-kvm t

Bug#425921: try again...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 merge 425921 441668 thanks On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Daniel Schepler wrote: Well, now I can't reproduce the bug I originally submitted, but the build process fails later on with: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/postgresql-pljava-1.3.0/build/

Processed: Re: Bug#425921: try again...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 425921 441668 Bug#425921: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Bug#441668: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: /build/user/postgresql-pljava-1.3.0/src/C/pljava/Makefile:27: /usr/lib/postgresql/8.2/lib/pgxs/src/makefiles/pgxs.mk: No such file or

Bug#453748: marked as done (yacas: postinst failure compiling emacs elisp files)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453748: fixed in yacas 1.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: setting package to jakarta-log4j liblog4j1.2-java liblog4j1.2-java-doc liblog4j1.2-java-gcj ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package jakarta-log4j liblog4j1.2-java liblog4j1.2-java-doc > liblog4j1.2-java-gcj Ignoring bugs not assigned to: liblog4j1.2-java-gcj liblog4j1.2-java-doc jakarta-log4j liblog4j1.

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # setting severity to important until it can be verified > severity 441159 important Bug#441159: 9base - FTBFS: fatal error:can't create , :1 Severity set to `important' from `serious' > tags 441159 +unreproducible Bug#441159: 9base - FTBFS: fatal erro

Bug#453900: marked as done (libvirt: malformed Standards-Version control header)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453900: fixed in libvirt 0.3.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: reopening 441159

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > reopen 441159 Bug#441159: 9base - FTBFS: fatal error:can't create , :1 Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Bug#453944: FreeBSD: CVE-2007-6150 programming error in random number generator

Package: kfreebsd-5 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for kfreebsd-5. CVE-2007-6150[0]: | The "internal state tracking" code for the random and urandom devices | in FreeBSD 5.5, 6.1 through 6.3, and 7.0 beta 4 allows l

Bug#453283: CVE-2007-6103: remote DoS

Hi, * Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-29 00:12]: > Steffen Joeris wrote: > > CVE-2007-6103: > > > > I Hear U (IHU) 0.5.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause (1) a > > denial of service (infinite loop) via a packet that contains zero in the > > size field in its header, wh

Bug#453941: liblog4j1.2-java-gcj is an empty package

Package: liblog4j1.2-java-gcj Version: 1.2.15-1 Severity: serious Apparently, this was introduced while repackaging the new upstream code. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#453421: marked as done (doxygen-gui: Library incompatibility)

Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2007 14:36:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453421: doxygen-gui: Library incompatibility has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#453936: nyello: should this package be removed?

Package: nyello Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * as per maintainer request, proposing removal If you think that it should be

Bug#453934: kvm-source: emulation failed (pagetable)

Package: kvm-source Version: 54+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After updating kvm-source from kvm-28 to kvm-54 kvm only shows a black screen, even the virtual BIOS is not shown (but I can enter the kvm-monitor and can type commands). If I load the old kvm-28 module

Bug#446343: cutter: does not work at all

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: >I am not able to reproduce it. Does cutter still behave like this if >you try it now? Also, did you run it as root? Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Free Software Developer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin signa

Bug#446343: cutter: does not work at all

Hi, On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:13:44AM +0100, Chris Davies wrote: >Cutter does not work as described; it always reports "No matching >connections found". Here is a repeatable example: > >netstat -an | grep 'ESTABLISHED' >tcp0 0 192.168.130.5:38101 10.1.30.129:22 ESTABLISHED >t

Bug#453885: dpkg-shlibdeps changes can't track symlinks (/usr/lib, /usr/lib64)

Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: dpkg-dev > > Severity: serious > > Version: 1.14.12 > > > > The gcj-4.X packages fail to build with this version of dpkg: > > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for > > /usr/lib64/libgcj_b

Bug#453927: gqview: configuration not saved atomically

Package: gqview Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch configuration is not saved atomically. So on errors like out of space a 0 sized file overwrites a good configuration. Instead gqview should write configuration to a temp file and when everything went OK replace the new configuration fil

Bug#453925: libgtk2.0-doc: lot of files disappeared in the latest update

Package: libgtk2.0-doc Version: 2.12.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After the dist-upgrade in 01 dec 2007 I lost most of html files in libgtk2.0-doc and GTK+ disappeared from the devhelp's summary. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstab

Bug#453924: lzma: Incomplete copyright file - CPL text not included

Package: lzma Version: 4.43-9 Severity: serious According to debian/copyright, "LZMA SDK is available under any of the following licenses:" , | [...] | 2. Common Public License (CPL) | -- | | Please see | [...] ` Th

Bug#453767: marked as done (Missing methods break normal programs)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453767: fixed in gst0.10-python 0.10.9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#453881: marked as done (gnome-panel-data: fail on postinst)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453881: fixed in gnome-panel 2.20.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426224: shutdown patches - the choices

Package: sysvinit Version: 2.86.ds1-38.1 Hi, I'm following up on this ticket, since I've not received any response for the best part of 6 months. The patch I proposed here is, IMHO, the most complete of the ones offered so far. Recently, I was made aware of someone also claiming [0] the patch [1

Processed: Orphaning postman

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 453876 normal Bug#453876: postman: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 453876 wnpp Bug#453876: postman: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `postman' to `wnpp'. > retitl

Processed: setting package to gst0.10-python python-gst0.10, tagging 453767

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package gst0.10-python python-gst0.10 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: python-gst0.10 gst0.10-python > tags 453767 + pending Bug#453767: Missing methods break normal programs There we

Bug#453767: no longer starts after python-gst0.10 upgrade

On Sat, Dec 01, 2007, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > i'd really prefer to terminate commands with "fucking idiots" though I don't know to whom this is targetted at, but please be respectful in the BTS. -- Loïc Minier

Bug#444092: marked as done (xnec2c does not show UI, but three processes running)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 10:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444092: fixed in xnec2c 1.0b3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#453767: no longer starts after python-gst0.10 upgrade

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007, Ari Pollak wrote: > I'm reassigning this back to python-gst0.10 since the python-gst package > no longer exists, but there does not seem to be a proper upgrade path > for people who already had python-gst installed from etch. What upgrade path would you expect? The apps' pa

Bug#453118: closed by Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cannot reproduce FTBFS)

On Sun, Dec 02, 2007, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > after intensive testing with different setups the FTBFS cannot be > reproduced, so please file a more complete testcase on how to get this > including all steps if you still get it. Thanks for investigating, I don't get the FTBFS anymore e

Bug#453885: dpkg-shlibdeps changes can't track symlinks (/usr/lib, /usr/lib64)

On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Severity: serious > Version: 1.14.12 > > The gcj-4.X packages fail to build with this version of dpkg: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for > /usr/lib64/libgcj_bc.so.1 (used by > debian/gcj-4.3/usr/lib/

Bug#453802: marked as done (mlterm: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for debian/mlterm-common/usr/lib/libkik.so.11 (used by debian/mlterm/usr/bin/mlterm).)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453802: fixed in mlterm 2.9.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#453789: [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#453789: libterralib: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libtiff.so.1 needed by debian/libterralib1c2a/usr/lib/libterralib.so.1.0.0 (its RPATH is '').

On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: libterralib > version: 3.0.3b2-3.1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071130 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package faile