On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:55:53PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:17:10AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> >> Hi Kurt,
> >>
> >> How does you get this error? When? Some specific shortcut combination?
> >
> > I don't touch anythi
Hey guys,
vlc is uninstallable in Sid since one month now.
Is there any update regarding this (broken) transition?
Regards
Evgeni
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 452462 - patch
severity 452462 important
thanks
Thank you for your feedback. It is very motivating to hear from other
testeres of insserv.
[Martin Braure de Calignon]
> According to /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.runlevels.gz #6 in
> runlevel 6 and 0 scripts begin with S?? should be rename i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 452462 - patch
Bug#452462: update-bootsystem-insserv violates sysv-rc policy, breaking init
sequence
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> severity 452462 important
Bug#452462: update-bootsystem-insserv violates sysv-rc policy, breaking init
se
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:30:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422481: libemail-mime-modifier-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:59:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing security bugs of removed firebird1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:59:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing security bugs of removed firebird1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:59:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing security bugs of removed firebird1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:59:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing security bugs of removed firebird1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 05:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452338: fixed in dpkg 1.14.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 05:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452339: fixed in dpkg 1.14.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 05:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452262: fixed in dpkg 1.14.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Huh? Pidgin 2.2.2-1 doesn't depend on intltool, so why should it matter what
version is installed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Package: linhdd
> Version: 0.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Linhdd builds a single _all.deb despite providing an architecture
> dependent binary. /usr/share/doc/linhdd/README.Debian suggests this
> was done to save space in the archive.
>
> The consequence, however, is that it
Package: pidgin
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
as i said in the subject.
intltool 0.36 is being currently provided with lenny.
for a problem workaround please see:
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=42486&forum=11&;
thank
Package: linhdd
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: serious
Linhdd builds a single _all.deb despite providing an architecture
dependent binary. /usr/share/doc/linhdd/README.Debian suggests this
was done to save space in the archive.
The consequence, however, is that it won't work on any other
architecture t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> tags 432463 - lenny sid patch
Bug#432463: maypole: Depends on libapache-request-perl, which is due to be
removed
Tags were: sid patch lenny
Bug#452426: Apache::MVC: require Apache::
Package: systemimager-boot-i386-standard
Version: 3.6.3dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
The systemimager-boot-i386-standard package contains device files.
According to http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt 5(i) this
is a RC bug.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> reassign 452426 maypole
Bug#452426: Apache::MVC: require Apache::Request..
Bug reassigned from package `libmaypole-perl' to `maypole'.
> reassign 452433 maypole
Bug#452433: Apache::
Package: scilab
Version: 4.1.1-2
Severity: serious
The scilab_4.1.1-2_all.deb provides x86 binaries in
/usr/lib/scilab-4.1.2/macros/. The build system in that place
suggests the package should provide no binaries at all, as they
are supposed to get built at install time or later.
Thiemo
--
T
Package: insserv
Version: 1.09.0-1
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
According to /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.runlevels.gz #6
in runlevel 6 and 0 scripts begin with S?? should be rename in the future to
K1??
that mean S scripts should be execute aft
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:49:57 +
Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 22 November 2007, Ken Bloom wrote:
> > severity 452244 serious # Violates debian policy 9.3.3
> > thanks
>
> Thanks Ken,
>
> Yes there is a bit of work to do there.
>
> In part we have started backporting t
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:58:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429103: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:47:55 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429118: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:16:39 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447093: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:14:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429092: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> close 452424
Bug#452424: Apache::MVC: use mod_perl.pm;
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Al Nikolo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> package libmaypole-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libmaypole-perl
> forcemerge 432463 452426 452433
Bug number 432463 belongs to package maypole, skipping.
> found 452424 2.10
Your message dated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:22:08 +0930
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line synfigstudio: 452442: fixed in 0.61.07
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thursday 22 November 2007, Ken Bloom wrote:
> severity 452244 serious # Violates debian policy 9.3.3
> thanks
Thanks Ken,
Yes there is a bit of work to do there.
In part we have started backporting the ubuntu work for the package to bring
it back into Debian, so the postinst does need some w
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:05:44AM +, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: qdbm
> Version: 1.8.74-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: LFS support is a release goal
>
> Hi,
>
> there's no LFS support in qdbm, which makes it unsuitable for lenny,
> since LFS is a release goal. It also doesn't
I have this problem since I upgraded to mail-notification &
mail-notification-evolution version 4.1.dfsg.1-4.
With mail-notification running and Evolution not running I get "Unable
to contact Evolution". This used to work before.
Evolution version 2.12.0.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: synfigstudio
Version: 0.61.06-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Running synfigstudio renders:
synfigstudio: symbol lookup error: synfigstudio: undefined symbol:
_ZN6synfig5Color4hex_E
Here
http://jabber.deepdarc.com/logs.php/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/20070621
is said
Package: octaviz
Version: 0.4.5-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.3-slh64-smp-4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale:
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.2-2.4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Apache::MVC requires Apache::Request instead of Apache2::Request.
The package itself should list libapache2-request-perl in Depends.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
A
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.2-2.4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Apache::MVC requires wrong class names: Apache::Request.. instead of
Apache2::Request..
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:05:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Apache::MVC: use mod_perl.pm;
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439923: fixed in guile-1.8 1.8.3+1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 452424 libmaypole-perl
Bug#452424: Apache::MVC: use mod_perl.pm;
Bug reassigned from package `libapache2-mod-perl2' to `libmaypole-perl'.
> reassign 452426 libmaypole-perl
Bug#452426: Apache::MVC: require Apache::Request..
Bug reassigned from
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:17:10AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> How does you get this error? When? Some specific shortcut combination?
>
> I don't touch anything at all. I'm just seeding a few debian iso
> images, and after some time I get that er
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448873: fixed in iscsitarget 0.4.15-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.2-2.4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Apache::MVC requires wrong class name: mod_perl instead of mod_perl2.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:56:12AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 21/11/2007, peter green wrote:
> > package: iceweasel
> > version: 2.0.0.9-1
> > severity: serious
> >
> > I tried to reproduce in my amd64 sid chroot but instead of the failure from
> > the buildd I got a different failure:
> >
package: cronosii
version: 0.2.2.23.1-3.2
severity: serious
tags: patch
dpkg-source: building cronosii using existing
cronosii_0.2.2.23.1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building cronosii in cronosii_0.2.2.23.1-3.2.diff.gz
dpkg-source: cannot represent change to po/de.gmo: binary file contents
change
Further to my earlier report, here is the Xorg.0.log.old file from a
session that froze up.
- Ben
X.Org X Server 1.4.0
Release Date: 5 September 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4.1~git20071119-1)
Current Operating System: Linux benh 2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> severity 452244 serious
Bug#452244: hplip: depends on sysv-rc
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
tags 450472 +patch
thanks
This package needs the automake command to point to automake 1.4 for the
package to build successfully. There is a conflict on automake1.9 but
not on any other version of automake.
the automake package (which contains automake1.10) will break the build
simply by bei
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399724: fixed in klibc 1.5.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 450472 +patch
Bug#450472: cronosii: FTBFS: your implementation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from
an old Automake version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 452386 serious
Bug#452386: sofia-sip: Library is leaking memory.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:17:10AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> How does you get this error? When? Some specific shortcut combination?
I don't touch anything at all. I'm just seeding a few debian iso
images, and after some time I get that error. I got the same
or atlea
Package: hplip
Version: 2.7.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: undeclared preinstallation dependency
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 05:28:15PM +0100, René Mérou wrote:
> El Wednesday 21 November 2007 21:06:34 Daniel Baumann escribió:
> > Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > IIRC
Nico Golde wrote:
I'll package 0.99.7pre1, I'll then investigate the problems also
present in Etch/Sarge packages.
> Beyond Security discovered that Wireshark could loop excessively
> while reading a malformed DNP packet.
> Versions affected: 0.10.12 to 0.99.6
Etch.
> Stefan Esser discovered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 452367 normal
Bug#452367: hal: can no longer suspend
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> reassign 452367 pm-utils
Bug#452367: hal: can no longer suspend
Bug reassigned from package `hal' to `pm-utils'.
> merge 452367 450601
Bug#450601: pm
severity 452367 normal
reassign 452367 pm-utils
merge 452367 450601
thanks
Benoît Dejean schrieb:
> Package: hal
> Version: 0.5.10-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> hal can no longer suspend my laptop.
> gnome-power-manager no longer shows the suspend option and
>
Looking into this problem, to find out why klibc-utils segfault, I found
some things that might be related:
When I replace the ARCH=sparc64 in debian/rules with ARCH=sparc I get
working binaries. Both the static binaries and the dynamic binaries
seem to work. (I only tried to run the static binari
package apt
reassign 452377 synaptic
thanks
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:53:02AM +, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.7.9
> Severity: grave
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> Today, in sid, I marked for upgrade xserver-xorg-core (2:1
Package: luatex
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
luatex is currently uninstallable in sid because it depends on the obsoleted
libpoppler1 which has been removed from sid.
If a user works around this problem by installing libpoppler1 from another
archive, t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package apt
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: apt
> reassign 452377 synaptic
Bug#452377: A package marked for reinstall, if conflicting, is removed *without
warning*
Bug reassigned from package `apt' to `synaptic'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Package: rawstudio
Version: 0.6+20071101-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ rawstudio
Segmentation fault
Re-building without optimization and with debug symbols yields the attached
backtrace.
Thanks
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefe
severity 450907 important
quit
Hi,
I do not really think this is a serious bug but important since does
lock the screen and I do not believe showing data is a security issue.
Regards,
Jose Luis.
--
ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - htt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 450907 important
Bug#450907: xscreensaver: fireworxx shows live screen contents when xcompmgr is
running
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Hi Kurt,
How does you get this error? When? Some specific shortcut combination?
Regards,
Jose Luis.
--
ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org
http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es
San Crist
Hi Kurt & Dean,
I'm checking right now this issue, I haven't get it and I'm using
amd64... Maybe it's related to the gcc version? I will check this
further trying to get the error.
Regards,
Jose Luis.
--
ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/
Package: wireshark
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
from: http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2007-03.html
Wireshark 0.99.7 fixes the following vulnerabilities:
Wireshark could crash when reading an MP3 file.
Versions affected: 0.99.6
Beyond Security discovered that Wireshark could lo
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.9
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Today, in sid, I marked for upgrade xserver-xorg-core (2:1.4-3) to 2:
1.4.1~git20071119-1. Synaptic asked to remove xserver-xorg-input-all (1:
7.3+6) and xserver-xorg-input-wacom (0.7.7.11-1). Before comm
* Daniel Smolik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-21 22:03]:
>> OK, I see it with 2.6.22... and it happens quite often too.
> And with 2.6.23 is it OK ?
This change, which went into 2.6.23, fixes the bug:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=864022344caf43dab7
Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#451662: fixed in xmms-crossfade 0.3.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 452069 linux-2.6
Bug#452069: nfs-kernel-server: broken NFS server on Thecus N2100
Bug reassigned from package `nfs-kernel-server' to `linux-2.6'.
> owner 452069 !
Bug#452069: nfs-kernel-server: broken NFS server on Thecus N2100
Owner recorded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
> tags 452339 + pending
Bug#452339: dpkg-dev: fails to parse some shlibs files
There were no tags
Package: gnome-orca
Version: 2.20.1-2
Severity: grave
Orca currently fails to start:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ orca
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/orca/orca.py", line 55, in ?
import braille
File "/var/lib/python-support/pytho
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> No associated package found for /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: No dependency information found for libusb-0.1.so.4
> (used by debian/kzenexplorer/usr/bin/kzenexplorer).
> Looking up shlibs dependency of libusb-0.1.so.4 provided by '
Hi,
Benoît Dejean [2007-11-22 10:42 +0100]:
> hal can no longer suspend my laptop.
> gnome-power-manager no longer shows the suspend option and
>
> $ sudo /usr/sbin/pm-suspend
> Error: kernel cannot suspend to ram.
Just a quick note: This is an issue in pm-utils. On powerpc,
/sys/power/state onl
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:11:50AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.14.9
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > >From my build log:
> >
> > dh_compress -pkzenexplorer -X .dcl -X .docbook -X -license -X .tag -X .sty
> > -X .el
The text licence changed, can we close this bug ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.10-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hal can no longer suspend my laptop.
gnome-power-manager no longer shows the suspend option and
$ sudo /usr/sbin/pm-suspend
Error: kernel cannot suspend to ram.
Going back to 0.5.9.1-6 re-enables suspend.
--
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:08:09PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Any schedule on when this fix will be included in debian? This is preventing
> a
> security fix on ardour [1]. Note that there is no explicit mention in the bug
> log but there was some talk at debian-multimedia about it (scons f
tag 452338 pending
thanks
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> libR.so is a private library that has no SONAME, and that is installed
> in /usr/lib/R/lib/. It should be ignored by dpkg-dev has it was the
> cases in the previous versions.
That was the intent from the beginning. However a b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 452338 pending
Bug#452338: dpkg-dev: should ignore private libraries
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.14.9
> Severity: serious
>
> >From my build log:
>
> dh_compress -pkzenexplorer -X .dcl -X .docbook -X -license -X .tag -X .sty -X
> .el
> dh_fixperms -pkzenexplorer
> dh_makeshlibs -pkzenexplorer
> dh_installdeb -pkzene
On 21/11/2007, peter green wrote:
> package: iceweasel
> version: 2.0.0.9-1
> severity: serious
>
> I tried to reproduce in my amd64 sid chroot but instead of the failure from
> the buildd I got a different failure:
>
> "dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libxpcom_core.so (note: only
81 matches
Mail list logo
