Bug#447648: fixed in 0.5.6

this bug is fixed in the latest release (0.5.6), fyi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#443897: Rather obvious phallus Muriel

elephantin rod for Esmeralda http://mcattk.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#443626: get a enlarged phallus Moses

Jamie's giant shaft http://mcattk.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: fixed 390697 in 2.0.9-8

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > fixed 390697 2.0.9-8 Bug#390697: OpenVPN occasionally generates general protection faults Bug marked as fixed in version 2.0.9-8. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#336526: openvrml - FTBFS: needs awful amounts of memory to build

Here is the pertinent upstream bug report: My comment on 2007-10-16 outlines what I'd expect in a patch to address this issue. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTE

Bug#425899: additional - "status" action of /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 called by dpkg --configure on tomcat5.5-admin or tomcat5.5-webapps

note also that installing tomcat5.5-admin or tomcat5.5-webapps will generate an additional warning which indicates a related issue in the /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 script [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/drupal/sites/default/files$ sudo apt-get install tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps Rea

Bug#443004: patch seems to work

FWIW, I've had this problem on two systems recently, one that was updated, another fresh install. I don't remember what I did to get around it the first time, but on the fresh install system I used this patch and it was indeed able to write the xorg.conf. thanks, tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#430249: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:17:56PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > [d-release CC-ed for oppinion] > [please CC at least debian-perl] > -=| Christian Hammers, Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:24:50PM +0200 |=- > > > > On 2007-06-23 Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > Package: libdbi-perl > > > > > This package h

Bug#446675: marked as done (kipi-plugins_0.1.5~beta1-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: ./configure: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:02:20 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446675: fixed in kipi-plugins 0.1.5~beta1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#444721: marked as done (hpoj: Depends on libsnmp10 which is no more available for sid)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:02:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444721: fixed in hpoj 0.91-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#444528: marked as done (hpoj: FTBFS: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'const')

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:02:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444528: fixed in hpoj 0.91-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: setting package to kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-doc, tagging 446675

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > package kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kipi-plugins kipi-plugins-doc > tags 446675 + pending Bug#446675: kipi-plugins_0.1.5~beta1-1(hppa/experimental):

Processed: setting package to hpoj hpoj-xojpanel, tagging 444528, tagging 444721

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > package hpoj hpoj-xojpanel Ignoring bugs not assigned to: hpoj hpoj-xojpanel > tags 444528 + pending Bug#444528: hpoj: FTBFS: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__'

Bug#444509: grow a sizeable fuckstick Gilbert

titanic shaft for Dexter http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#443626: enormous rod for Gabriel

obtain a queen-sized member Jeffery http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#440414: incur a fat penis Marcelino

Rae's whacking shaft http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#238245: Taylor's queen-sized rod

Lillie's fat cock http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#436965: Mabel's overlarge erectile organ

make a obvious phallus Chuck http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#244169: get a colossal rod Ella

have a biggish member Darwin http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#442208: marked as done (dosemu-freedos: /usr/lib/freedos/bin/rerror.com fails DFSG #1?)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:56:17 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#442208: fixed in dosemu-freedos 1:0.0.b9r5a+etch.1-0etch1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#435711: marked as done (CVE-2007-3905: SQL injection vulnerability in Zoph)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:56:18 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#435711: fixed in zoph 0.3.3-12sarge3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#447455: entagged: FTBFS: source not available

On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 07:55:28AM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Tue, 23 Oct, 2007 at 11:38:29AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > > This is cause by a bug in dak (e.g. #232730). A possible workaround is > > to do a complete update with a new orig tarball. This means a new > > versi

Bug#447341: marked as done (CVE-2007-5208 arbitrary command execution via unfiltered from address)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447341: fixed in hplip 1.6.10-4.2+lenny1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#435841: Upstream has released new version with PAM support

Hello, Upstream has released version 1.3.0 and changed drastically the code concerning environment variables. The method SwitchUser::SetEnvironment does no more exist, and is mostly replaced inside App::Login. The package for 1.3.0 is ready and build with libpam0g, and the code itself uses sever

Processed: slim#435841

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 435841 fixed-upstream Bug#435841: slim does not cleanse environment Tags were: security Tags added: fixed-upstream > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#447964: (no subject)

Thanx for your answer. Following your indication, I fixed the problem. In any case, I hope the next Debian releases will be able to accomplish the whole configuration process, as well as in the past, for the former versions of Vim. Thanx MS -- linux user no.: 353546 public key at http://keyser

Bug#447304: marked as done (digikam is currently uninstallable on amd64 unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:03:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line binNMU request digikam amd64 was: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#447304: digikam is currently uninstallable on amd64 unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#447655: I can only send one message, then I have to restart licq to be able to send more messages

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:07:56 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anders Lagerås wrote: > > Package: licq-plugin-msn > > Version: 1.3.4-3 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > > > I can only send one message, then I have to restart licq to be able >

Bug#447964: Vim doesn't start ("command not found")

On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:07:14AM +0200, Mauro Sacchetto wrote: > When I try to lauch Vim from shell, I obtain: "Command not found" > and the program doesn't starts. > = > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ vim > bash: vim: command not found >

Processed: reassign 447964 to vim-full, forcibly merging 446462 447964

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > reassign 447964 vim-full Bug#447964: Vim doesn't start ("command not found") Bug reassigned from package `vim' to `vim-full'. > forcemerge 446462 447964 Bug#446462: /usr/bin/vim is l

Bug#448024: rpm_4.4.2.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: type qualifiers ignored on function return type

Package: rpm Version: 4.4.2.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of rpm_4.4.2.1-1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98 > Build started at 20071025-0529 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depend

Bug#447846: marked as done (python-apt: dependency problem)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:59:33 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447846: python-apt: dependency problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: dosemu-freedos: removing rerror

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 442208 pending Bug#442208: dosemu-freedos: /usr/lib/freedos/bin/rerror.com fails DFSG #1? There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#447457: marked as done (gedit-plugins: FTBFS: No package 'gedit-2.16' found)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#447457: fixed in gedit-plugins 2.20.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: setting package to cmucl cmucl-clm cmucl-docs cmucl-source, tagging 443705

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27ubuntu13 > package cmucl cmucl-clm cmucl-docs cmucl-source Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cmucl-source cmucl-clm cmucl cmucl-docs > tags 443705 + pending Bug#443705: FTBFS: sectsty.sty

Bug#448002: libvformat1: Package name does not match soname

Package: libvformat1 Version: 1.13-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.1 The soname of the library in this package is libvformat.so.0, so the package name should be libvformat0, not libvformat1. mizar:[/tmp] dpkg -c libvformat1_1.13-4_i386.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-07-02 10

Bug#442316: Xorg hotplugging problems [WAS: Re: Bug#442316: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev from experimental messes up my keyboard layout]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:55:35PM -0400, ext David Nusinow wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:53:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: > > As I've said before, the X server isn't the only user of the field. :) > > Ubuntu were trying to move to cxkb a year or so ago, and the only thing > > that stopped

Bug#447304: binNMU request digikam amd64 was: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#447304: digikam is currently uninstallable on amd64 unstable

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:57:22PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote: > Could you schedule a binNMU for digikam on amd64 as it appears to > still depend on the obsolete libraries. I suspect it may also need > a binNMU for other arches as well. Yes, on all archs. BinNMUs scheduled. Cheers, -- Steve L

Bug#436277: libpcre3: Is this bug fixed by the fix for #441345?

Package: libpcre3 Followup-For: Bug #436277 I see that the shlibdeps were bumped recently in response to #441435. Does that also fix this bug? -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'experimental'), (600, 'unstable') Architectu

Processed: tagging 447858, tagging 447859

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 447858 pending Bug#447858: file conflicts between packages There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 447859 pending Bug#447859: file conflicts between packages There we

Bug#436277: pcregrep: Cannot reproduce, but suspect dependency problem

Package: pcregrep Followup-For: Bug #436277 Reporter, did you install libpcre3 7.2 on your system? pcregrep depends only on libpcre3 >= 6.0, but maybe it uses flags that are not in libpcre3 until a later version, and hence the dependency needs to be bumped. If I install pcregrep 7.3-2 and libpcre

Bug#447986: f-spot crashes on double-click on image, or on selecting a tag while in looking at pic.

Package: f-spot Version: 0.3.5-1.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable ... open uri = file:///home/sam/Photos/2005/10/16/img_1100.jpg open uri = file:///home/sam/Photos/2005/10/16/img_1100.jpg Exception in Gtk# callback delegate Note: Applications can use GLib.ExceptionM

Bug#439389: marked as done (Depends->Recommends dependency change breaking other packages)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:11:34 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439389: fixed in xine-lib 1.1.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y