Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

On 15/10/07 at 11:47 +1000, Niv Sardi wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > > came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: > > > > * 1 RC bug opened for a l

Bug#422822: libgstreamer-perl: FTBFS: Failed 3/31 test scripts, 34/492 subtests failed

Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 08/05/07 at 12:16 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: >> [..] >> > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed >> > >> --- >> > t/GstGhostPad.t 255 65280

Bug#446724: SAME SITUATION - initramfs-tools: creates broken initramfs image as reported on Bug #445688

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.90a Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, I have the same situation described by Beojan in one of my boxes but not the other two - all three are debian testing. His solution - yaird - also worked for me. Reading the bug report I came ab

Bug#436249: marked as done (pennmush: possible vulnerabilities in pennmush cause DoS)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#436249: fixed in pennmush 1.8.2p7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#446524: marked as done (linhdd: Execute error: /usr/bin/linHDD line 411)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:26:28 +0530 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line linHDD: Please check.. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Processed: Severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #428186 normal Bug#428186: libguichan0: symbols dropped without soname bump Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Processed: Re: package 'vncserver' should be removed from amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 276948 grave Bug#276948: vncserver: Segmentation fault on amd64 Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 446711 grave Bug#446711: ntp: Please build against OpenSSL 908070 Severity set to `grave' from `important' > merge 446711 446710 Bug#446710: ntpd won't start up due to upgraded libssl Bug#446711: ntp: Please build against OpenSSL 908070 Merged

Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?

On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: > > * 1 RC bug opened for a long time. This bug is tagged help for a while and nobody has

Bug#446710: ntpd won't start up due to upgraded libssl

Package: ntp Version: 1:4.2.4p3+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Recently libssl0.9.8 was upgraded to 0.9.8f-1 When this happenned the following occured in the logs: Oct 15 14:03:28 jandi3 ntpd[3848]: ntpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 13 16:20:18 UTC 2007 (1) Oct 15 14

Processed: Setting back to serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #428186 serious Bug#428186: libguichan0: symbols dropped without soname bump Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 445720 pending Bug#445720: segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #428186 normal Bug#428186: libguichan0: symbols dropped without soname bump Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#432414: marked as done (vcdimager is GPLv2 or later, debian/copyright says GPLv2 only)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432414: fixed in vcdimager 0.7.23-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#428186: Consider offering only a dev version.

Severity: normal Brandon wrotes: You might want to consider only offering a dev version of guichan, and require that packages using guichan link statically. This is recommended by the debian policy manual in certain cases, such as for "libraries whose interfaces are in flux or under development.

Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?

Hi Roy, On 15/10/07 at 11:03 +1300, Roy Ward wrote: >> * New upstream release available for a long time now > > I'm working on packaging that - it's still going to take some time (in the > order of weeks). > > > If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from > > Debian, p

Bug#428186: Consider offering only a dev version.

You might want to consider only offering a dev version of guichan, and require that packages using guichan link statically. This is recommended by the debian policy manual in certain cases, such as for "libraries whose interfaces are in flux or under development." http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-p

Bug#446693: uclibc: should this package be orphaned?

Package: uclibc Version: 0.9.27-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * 4 RC bugs opened for a long time, with no action from the mainta

Bug#422822: libgstreamer-perl: FTBFS: Failed 3/31 test scripts, 34/492 subtests failed

Hi Marc, On 08/05/07 at 12:16 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Package: libgstreamer-perl > Severity: serious > Version: 0.09-1 > Justification: policy violation > > hi, > > Lucas has rebuild the archive on i386 and your package Failed to Build > from Source with the following error(s): > >

Bug#446692: twin: should this package be orphaned?

Package: twin Version: 0.5.1-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * 3 RC bugs, 2 of them opened for a long time, all of them without

Bug#446691: defrag: should this package be removed?

Package: defrag Version: 0.73pjm1-8 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * 4 RC bugs, opened for a long time, with no resolution path in sight. * on

Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?

Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: mercury Version: 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian, because: * 4 RC bugs opened for a long time Of the bugs: * #281369: Dummy RC bug

Bug#446665: marked as done (mercury: should this package be removed?)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:10:59 +1300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line I intend to adopt this has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#446690: cl-mcclim: Failure in building mcclim

Package: cl-mcclim Version: 0.9.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I followed the guide [1] and ran the following command: (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :mcclim) Here is the error message I got: ** - READ from # : # has no external symbol with na

Processed: retitle 413658 to CVE-2007-1444 netserver logs to insecure temporary file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > retitle 413658 CVE-2007-1444 netserver logs to insecure temporary file Bug#413658: netserver logs to insecure temporary file Changed Bug title to `CVE-2007-1444 netserver logs to inse

Bug#446432: marked as done (wordtrans: build-depends on obsolete kdelibs-dev in preference to kdelibs4-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:02:11 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446432: fixed in wordtrans 1.1pre15-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#433747: marked as done (t38modem - FTBFS: help2man: can't get `--help' info from obj_linux_x86_r/t38modem)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:47:29 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433747: fixed in t38modem 0.8.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#436102: marked as done (t38modem: FTBFS: undefined reference to `operator<<(std::basic_ostream >&, H323Channel::Directions)')

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:47:29 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#436102: fixed in t38modem 0.8.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: forcibly merging 446462 446599

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > forcemerge 446462 446599 Bug#446462: /usr/bin/vim is left broken when alternative is manual and points to vim-full Bug#446599: vim-full doesn't contain the file /usr/bin/vim.full Bug

Bug#444543: tiny patch to fix FTBFS

Hi, * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-14 22:00]: > Hi Bruno, > * Bruno Kleinert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-07 21:09]: > > the attached patch appears to fix this bug. but it appears as if it's a > > bug in scons itself because it crashes during "scons --clean" on an > > already cleaned bui

Processed: reassign 446683 to vim-full, forcibly merging 446462 446683

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 > reassign 446683 vim-full Bug#446683: vim, gvim no longer valid commands Bug reassigned from package `vim' to `vim-full'. > forcemerge 446462 446683 Bug#446462: /usr/bin/vim is left b

Bug#445731: mplayer stops working after kernel update to 2.6.21

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Sean Zimmermann wrote: > I tried playing the file with totem, and, though it begins to play > the file correctly, audio cuts out within the first few seconds, > though it continues to play the video. this IMHO means that ALSA is still broken overall

Bug#444543: tiny patch to fix FTBFS

Hi Bruno, * Bruno Kleinert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-07 21:09]: > the attached patch appears to fix this bug. but it appears as if it's a > bug in scons itself because it crashes during "scons --clean" on an > already cleaned build tree. > > to ignore a failing scons --clean in debian/rules mak

Bug#423317: ppscsi: should this package be orphaned?

reassign 423317 wnpp retitle 423317 O: ppscsi -- set of drivers for parallel port attached scanners thanks #include * Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, Oct 13 2007, 04:37:09PM]: > On 11/05/07 at 22:35 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > #include > > * Michael Ablassmeier [Fri, May 11 2007, 01:15:59AM]: > > > Pack

Bug#446675: kipi-plugins_0.1.5~beta1-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: ./configure: No such file or directory

Package: kipi-plugins Version: 0.1.5~beta1-1 Severity: serious Hi, your package failed to build from source. | Automatic build of kipi-plugins_0.1.5~beta1-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm | Build started at 20071014-2018

Processed: Re: Bug#423317: ppscsi: should this package be orphaned?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 423317 wnpp Bug#423317: ppscsi: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `ppscsi' to `wnpp'. > retitle 423317 O: ppscsi -- set of drivers for parallel port attached scanners Bug#423317: ppscsi: should this package be orphan

Bug#446667: supercollider: should this package be removed?

Package: supercollider Version: 20060416-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * RC bugs, including one open for a very long time without any commen

Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?

Package: mercury Version: 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian, because: * 4 RC bugs opened for a long time * not suitable for a stable release according to #281369 * Low p

Bug#446664: inform: should this package be removed?

Package: inform Version: 6.30-2.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Has not migrated to testing for a very long time. * Low popcon * non-fr

Bug#446666: arb: should this package be removed?

Package: arb Version: 0.0.20050526-7 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi Andreas, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Very low popcon, despite being in Debian since 2005 (9 insts) *

Bug#429923: libapache-mod-suphp: Inserting suphp in modules.conf causes memory errors

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:52:40PM +0200, Robin Edgar wrote: > Package: libapache-mod-suphp > Version: 0.6.2-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > When changing /etc/apache/modules.conf to have both the php5 module AND suphp > loaded (the following 2 lines in /etc/apac

Bug#211765: [3]:

What is OEM? OEM means Original Equipment Manufacturer . In general it is 100% fully functional software. But it lacks manuals, promo-discs and bulk-boxes. We offer the software for downloads only. It means that you do not receive a fancy package and a printed manual that actually aggregate the

Bug#289690: Attention:Our Lucky Winner

Hello from YouSendIt, You have a file or files called YOU HAVE WON US$820,000.pdf (1 file(s)) from [EMAIL PROTECTED] waiting for download. You can click on the following link to retrieve your File. The link will expire in 14 days. Link: http://download.yousendit.com/152EDAE4171F06DD Message

Processed: tagging 444983

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444983 + etch Bug#444983: Some files are in wrong directory (amd64, stable) There were no tags set. Tags added: etch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: tagging 444721

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444721 + sid Bug#444721: hpoj: Depends on libsnmp10 which is no more available for sid There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Processed: tagging 444697

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444697 + lenny sid Bug#444697: vnc4server: segfaults on key press with newer X.org There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Pl

Processed: tagging 444606

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444606 + sid Bug#444606: Please rebuild against ghc 6.6.1 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Processed: tagging 444558

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444558 + lenny sid Bug#444558: sdcc: FTBFS: Package lyx-xforms has no installation candidate There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: tagging 444560

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444560 + lenny sid Bug#444560: libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl: FTBFS: Package libapache-request-perl has no installation candidate There were no tags set. Tags added:

Bug#446633: marked as done (Amarok hangs on start-up)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:20:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#446633: Acknowledgement (Amarok hangs on start-up) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#446650: lirc-modules-source: Don't compile with 2.6.23.1

Package: lirc-modules-source Version: 0.8.0-13 Severity: grave can't compile with latest kernel. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/apps/kernel/modules/lirc$ fakeroot ./debian/rules KSRC=/home/nias/apps/kernel/linux-2.6.23.1 KVERS=2.6.23.1-nias binary-modules sed -e "s!\$KVERS!2.6.23.1-nias!g; s!\$KSRC!/home/

Bug#444676: acpid: using the power button on server

Torsten Werner wrote: > installing the nut package is the most sane solution for *this* > problem, as long as your switches are powered by the UPS. With our network topology (several independent administrative clusters), I do not think it can be setup (the problem would be administrative, not tech

Bug#444549: Bug#444551: mailutils: FTBFS: grep: /usr/lib/libntlm.la: No such file or directory

On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 06:29:53AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > severity 444311 grave > tag 444311 patch > block 444551 by 444311 > tag 444551 patch > thanks I don't see a patch in the BTS anywhere. > Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/09/2007): > > libtool: link: warning: > > `/usr/lib/g

Bug#444543: tiny patch to fix FTBFS

On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote: > Package: abakus > > hi, > > the attached patch appears to fix this bug. but it appears as if it's a > bug in scons itself because it crashes during "scons --clean" on an > already cleaned build tree. If it's a bug in scons, please

Processed: tagging 444529

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444529 + lenny sid Bug#444529: trayer: FTBFS: error: expected ')' before '*' token Tags were: patch Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Processed: tagging 444522

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444522 + lenny sid Bug#444522: gdmap: FTBFS: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of me

Processed: severity of 444531 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > severity 444531 serious Bug#444531: galculator: FTBFS: error: conflicting types for 'gdk_color_to_string' Bug#440844: patch to fix FTBFS with newer GTK versions Bug#440845: Patch for

Processed: tagging 444519

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444519 + lenny sid Bug#444519: gnome-randr-applet: FTBFS: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'GtkTooltips' There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of

Processed: tagging 444502

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444502 + lenny sid Bug#444502: jack-rack: FTBFS: undefined reference to `GTK_FILE_SELECTION' There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: tagging 444508

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444508 + lenny sid Bug#444508: polyxmass-bin: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 444512

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444512 + lenny sid Bug#444512: xdx: FTBFS: error: 'GtkTooltips' undeclared Tags were: patch Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: tagging 444511

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444511 + lenny sid Bug#444511: lock-keys-applet: FTBFS: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'GtkTooltips' There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of me

Processed: closing 444460

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > close 60 0.9.7k-3.1etch1 Bug#60: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers() 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#clo

Processed: tagging 444147

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # Only a problem with a graphviz not in etch > tags 444147 + lenny sid Bug#444147: Generated images are *much* larger Tags were: patch Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stoppi

Bug#446633: Amarok hangs on start-up

Package: amarok Version: 1.4.7-1+b1 Severity: grave When starting Amarok, as soon as the GUI appears the application hangs. Running strace gives the following output immediately before/around the time the application hangs: munmap(0xb6ce1000, 73697) = 0 open("/etc/passwd", O_RDONL

Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package be removed?

On 11/05/07 at 11:02 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in > the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the > licensing issues that would allow the fix to be done. Hi Jeremy, The bugs about thoose license

Bug#444928: marked as done (CVE-2007-5156 remote php file inclusion vulnerability in fckeditor)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444928: fixed in knowledgeroot 0.9.8.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#445452: marked as done (the elf.5 man pages is stripped of part of its copyright headers)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#445452: fixed in manpages-fr 2.64.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#445780: Reverting to 1.5.0-2 from testing fixes the problem

So if its a bug in xlib as author suggest, then at least its a combination of CVS code and xlib... -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#444928: marked as done (CVE-2007-5156 remote php file inclusion vulnerability in fckeditor)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:47:42 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444928: fixed in knowledgeroot 0.9.8.4-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#446596: gcj-4.2: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

Ludovic Brenta writes: > Matthias, I just saw your commit to Subversion: > > * Make 4.2.2-2 a requirement for frontends built from separate sources. > Addresses: #446596. > > Could you please elaborate on why this change addresses the bug? The files in gcclibdir are accessed via '4.1.3'. > Does

Processed: Re: Bug#446513: Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423202 normal Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423202 ftp.debian.org Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `topal' to `ftp.debian.org

Bug#423202: Bug#446513: Bug#423202: topal: should this package be removed?

severity 423202 normal reassign 423202 ftp.debian.org retitle 423202 RM: topal -- RoQA; RC-buggy, would need upstream work thanks On 13/10/07 at 18:23 +0100, Phil Brooke wrote: > Upsteam isn't quite dead because it's me -- but I have, as is very clear, > had too little time to carry out the upstr

Bug#444928: NMU patch for whitelisting

tags 444928 patch thanks Hi Attached you will find the NMU I just uploaded to fix this issue. I am always wondering about the check for extensions and if there are better ways to tell, if the data in question is really php or other stuff. For now, let's stick with whitelisting :) Cheers Steffen

Processed: NMU patch for whitelisting

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 444928 patch Bug#444928: CVE-2007-5156 remote php file inclusion vulnerability in fckeditor Tags were: security Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Processed: found 442441 in 8.4-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > found 442441 8.4-1 Bug#442441: gcompris: assertion `main_loops != NULL' failed Bug marked as found in version 8.4-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#446596: gcj-4.2: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

Matthias, I just saw your commit to Subversion: * Make 4.2.2-2 a requirement for frontends built from separate sources. Addresses: #446596. Could you please elaborate on why this change addresses the bug? Does it affect gnat-4.2 too? -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#446462: /usr/bin/vim is left broken when alternative is manual and points to vim-full

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:43:52PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > > *sigh* I don't know what made piuparts succeed before but it is > > definitely exhibiting the reported behavior now. Looks like it's time for > > another update-alternatives hack. Ok, also because I had indeed other out of bounds rep

Bug#439495: Processed: tagging 439495

On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:48:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > > tags 439495 + lenny sid > Bug#439495: maint-guide: FTBFS: debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: maint-guide.ko.

Processed: Re: Bug#446500: Severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 446500 normal Bug#446500: roundcube: Needs versioned dependency on dbconfig-common Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#446500: Severity

severity 446500 normal thanks Le Sunday 14 October 2007 02:55:07 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : > On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 01:49:27 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote: > > severity 446500 wishlist > > thanks > > > >   Hi ! > > > > Thanks for the report, but this certainly not a serious bug. > > > >

Bug#446596: gcj-4.2: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:38:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > ? > > $ dpkg -S libgcj.spec > gcc-snapshot: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/libgcj.spec > libgcj7-dev: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj.spec > libgcj8-dev: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2/libgcj.spec For some reason it worked n

Processed: notfixed 443974 in 2.20.0-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # We need an unversioned close > notfixed 443974 2.20.0-1 Bug#443974: gnome-applets: package is not installable Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 2.20.0-1. > End of message, s

Bug#445475: marked as done (CVE-2007-5198: Buffer overflow in the redir function in check_http.c)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#445475: fixed in nagios-plugins 1.4.8-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#440472: marked as done (kvm: Contains non-free elpin VGABIOS image)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:02:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#440472: fixed in kvm 46+dfsg-0.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: closing 443906

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # This is CVE-2007-3387 > close 443906 3.01-9etch1 Bug#443906: CVE-2007-5049 stack based buffer overflow 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug m

Processed: notfixed 443970 in 2.20.0-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # We need an unversioned close > notfixed 443970 2.20.0-1 Bug#443970: gnome-power-manager: package is not installable Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 2.20.0-1. > End of mess

Processed: notfixed 443971 in 0.3.7-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # We need an unversioned close > notfixed 443971 0.3.7-1 Bug#443971: notification-daemon: package not installable Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 0.3.7-1. > End of message,

Processed: tagging 443913

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # No need to set the etch tag > tags 443913 - etch Bug#443913: CVE-2007-5037 buffer overflow in inotifytools_snprintf Tags were: etch patch security Tags removed: etch > End of messa

Processed: tagging 443586

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 443586 + lenny sid Bug#443586: libapache2-mod-mime-xattr: Uninstallable with current Apache2-packages There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping

Processed: tagging 442997

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 442997 + sid Bug#442997: please rebuild with ocaml 3.10 (currently uninstallable in sid) There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Processed: tagging 442977

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 442977 + lenny sid Bug#442977: libglade-gnome0: libglade-gnome.la has /usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la which is wrong. There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, sto

Processed: notfixed 442988 in 1.00-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # We need an unversioned close > notfixed 442988 1.00-1 Bug#442988: lurkftp - FTBFS: ftpsupt.h:32:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #waring Bug no longer marked as fixed in v

Processed: tagging 442973

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 442973 + lenny sid Bug#442973: nemerle: FTBFS: ** ERROR **: file metadata.c: line 950 (mono_metadata_decode_row): assertion failed: (res_size == count) There were no tags set. T

Processed: tagging 442967

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 442967 + lenny sid Bug#442967: xtide-data: FTBFS: make: build_tide_db: Command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing her

Processed: tagging 442906

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 442906 + lenny sid Bug#442906: squashfs: FTBFS with 2.6.22-2 There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: tagging 442237

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # abinit isn't in etch, so this doesn't affect etch > tags 442237 + lenny sid Bug#442237: file conflicts between packages There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of mess

Processed: tagging 442313

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 442313 + lenny sid Bug#442313: abntex: texlive-latex-recommended is insufficient for Build-Depends There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping proc

Bug#446596: gcj-4.2: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

? $ dpkg -S libgcj.spec gcc-snapshot: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/libgcj.spec libgcj7-dev: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj.spec libgcj8-dev: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2/libgcj.spec Kurt Roeckx writes: > Package: gcj-4.2 > Version: 4.2.2-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > When buildi

Bug#441504: marked as done (remove ignore.d.server/thttpd filter)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441504: fixed in thttpd 2.25b-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

  1   2   >