Hi,
is there any reason why this bug is still not yet fixed? We have 2.6.22
in testing now, and the patch to fix this problem is in the BTS since
the end of June.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:45:39 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:44:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445283: fixed in jetty 5.1.10-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: amsn
Version: 0.97~rc1+dfsg1-5
Followup-For: Bug #444546
Hi, I've downgraded tcl/tk like the original bug reporter did to get
amsn to work.
Running amsn with the newer tcl/tk just gives "Segmentation fault".
Would an strace or other debugging be helpful?
Regards...
-- System Informa
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: grave
As can be witnessed from the build logs on buildd.d.o[1], gcc-4.2
produces an ICE when trying to build pbx_dundi.c on hppa.
The log doesn't show the gcc arguments (upstream Makefiles have the "pretty"
build feature, disabled in our trunk). These a
tags 439283 patch
thanks
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 05:27:54PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: mbr
> Version: 1.1.9-2
> Severity: serious
[...]
> +Unexpected event 255, code 0x at :7c00
> FAIL: tests/mbr-2
> ...
> =
> 12 of 13 tests failed
> ==
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439283 patch
Bug#439283: mbr: FTBFS on i386: Test failures
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 423349 normal
Bug#423349: mozilla-locale-tr: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 423349 ftp.debian.org
Bug#423349: mozilla-locale-tr: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `m
Your message dated Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441726: fixed in sqlite3 3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:47:14 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#65: S30procps.sh in /etc/rcS.d not executed at boot
time
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
severity 423349 normal
reassign 423349 ftp.debian.org
retitle 423349 RM: mozilla-locale-tr -- RoQA, old, depends on mozilla
thanks
- Forwarded message from "Roberto C. Sánchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:43:27PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> As Michael
Your message dated Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441725: fixed in sqlite 2.8.17-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 445283 + patch
Bug#445283: CVE-2006-6969 predictable session identifiers
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
The patch to fix this issue for 5.1.10 is available
http://jetty.cvs.sourceforge.net/jetty/Jetty/src/org/mortbay/jetty/servlet/AbstractSessionManager.java?r1=1.52&r2=1.53
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 445283 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Greg Wilkins of jetty provides a patch from their cvs for
this issue.
You can find it on:
http://jetty.cvs.sourceforge.net/jetty/Jetty/src/org/mortbay/jetty/servlet/AbstractSessionManager.java?r1=1.52&r2=1.53&view=patch
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngo
tags 445230 + pending
thanks
Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 17:43 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> Ah, yes, have the -dev depend on openmpi-common. I read your mail 'the other
> way around'. We don't want every user of -common to also have to have -dev.
Full ACK! It wouldn't solve the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 445230 + pending
Bug#445230: libopenmpi-dev 1.2.4-2 compiler wrappers don't work
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
On 5 October 2007 at 00:28, Manuel Prinz wrote:
| Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 17:10 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > Manuel, you said that you replicated Andreas' finding.
|
| I did.
|
| > What version was that?
|
| 1.2.4-2
|
| > (My home system is still 1.2.3-2 as on testing, so whatev
Manuel Prinz wrote:
>
> To reproduce the problem, uninstall all packages dispite libopenmpi-dev.
> If you run mpicc.openmpi then, it's missing mpicc-wrapper-data.txt,
> which is in openmpi-common. (As you wrote already.)
>
> Installing -common makes mpicc happy and everything compiles nicely. So
Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 17:10 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> Manuel, you said that you replicated Andreas' finding.
I did.
> What version was that?
1.2.4-2
> (My home system is still 1.2.3-2 as on testing, so whatever we may
> have broken in the 1.2.3-{3,4} versions doesn't bite me).
Andreas' bug was
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mpicc.openmpi
> Cannot open configuration file
> /usr/share/openmpi/mpicc.openmpi-wrapper-data.txt
> Error parsing data file mpicc.openmpi: Not found
and I was thinking that it is _not_ that
/usr/share/openmpi/mpicc.openmpi-wrapper-data.txt
_is m
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445315: fixed in ntfs-3g 1:1.913-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi again,
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-04 22:47]:
> * Brandon Philips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-04 22:27]:
> > On 21:16 Thu 04 Oct 2007, Romain Francoise wrote:
> > > Please use mktemp(1) to create temporary files.
> >
> > I have contacted Josef Sipek, the author, about the issue a
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442967: fixed in xtide-data 20070318-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
* Brandon Philips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-04 22:27]:
> On 21:16 Thu 04 Oct 2007, Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Please use mktemp(1) to create temporary files.
>
> I have contacted Josef Sipek, the author, about the issue and he will
> work on it for the next release.
>
> I will close this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> severity 445308 grave
Bug#445308: Multiple symlink vulnerabilities
Severity set to `grave' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On 21:16 Thu 04 Oct 2007, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Please use mktemp(1) to create temporary files.
I have contacted Josef Sipek, the author, about the issue and he will
work on it for the next release.
I will close this bug when the next release hits Debian.
Thanks,
Brandon
--
To U
Package: ntfs-3g
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for ntfs-3g.
CVE-2007-5159[0]:
| The ntfs-3g package before 1.913-2.fc7 in Fedora 7, and an ntfs-3g
| package in Ubuntu 7.10/Gutsy, assign incorrect permissions (setuid
| ro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 445308 grave
Bug#445308: Multiple symlink vulnerabilities
Severity set to `grave' from `critical'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Please send testcases where GNU gzip works and busybox gzip doesnt - to me.
> I will try to fix those.
It's easy enough to reproduce for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>echo foo | gzip > test.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>echo bar | gzip >> test.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>gunzip < test.gz
f
Hi,
* Sergei Golovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-04 21:49]:
> On 10/4/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> > published for tk8.3.
>
> I'll upload a fixed version shortly. Should I also prepare a package
> for uploading to st
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445303: fixed in tk8.3 8.3.5-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On 10/4/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for tk8.3.
I'll upload a fixed version shortly. Should I also prepare a package
for uploading to stable-security?
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 445190 serious
Bug#445190: libgcc1-dbg: dependency on libgcc1 lacks epoch
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> tag 445190 + pending
Bug#445190: libgcc1-dbg: dependency on libgcc1 lacks epoch
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> t
Package: guilt
Version: 0.27-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
guilt makes extensive use of the '$$' shell variable for temporary
files in /tmp. This is a serious security vulnerability; on multi-user
systems it allows an attacker to clobber files with something like the
following:
for i in
Package: tk8.3
Version: 8.3.5-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for tk8.3.
CVE-2007-5137[0]:
| Buffer overflow in the ReadImage function in generic/tkImgGIF.c in Tcl
| (Tcl/Tk) before 8.4.16 allows remote attackers t
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443112: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
96.43.01-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:42:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367825: fixed in boost 1.34.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, peter green wrote:
> Package: gtk+2.0
> Severity: serious
Which version?
> I tried to build gtk+2.0 in my i386 sid chroot but it failed with the
> following error.
>
> creating autotestfilechooser
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link -o autotestkeywords
> libtool: un
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:38:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441044: fixed in apertium 3.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:38:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425885: fixed in apertium 3.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:38:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439851: fixed in apertium 3.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:32:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443787: fixed in mpich 1.2.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: pykdeextensions
Severity: serious
Justification: Python policy
This package should be named python-kdeextensions, according to the
python policy.
Furthermore, there are several issues in this package that prevent
upgrading to python 2.5:
* The 2.4 version is hardcoded in debian/rules.
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:39:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line jetty should not reenter testing until some security issues
have
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: jetty
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for jetty.
CVE-2006-6969[0]:
| Jetty before 4.2.27, 5.1 before 5.1.12, 6.0 before 6.0.2, and 6.1
| before 6.1.0pre3 generates predictable session identifiers using
| java.util
Upstrem is working in a new version.
luciano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hi,
after i removed konqueror with "apt-get remove konqueror" it runned well,
but when i then tried to use apt-get, it crashed everytime i
tried an operation.
I have tried to delete Cache and reinstall a
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:19:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439642: fixed in snort 2.7.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Please send testcases where GNU gzip works and busybox gzip doesnt - to me.
I will try to fix those.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Hocevar a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
Could you please avoid sending NMU's diff to an active maintainer ?
Adam, being aggressive towards beginners taking part to a bug
squashing party and trying to learn and improve Debian is not
tolerable.
S
Hi, sorry I didn't supply any additional information as to how the bug
has been resolved, but to cut a long story short.
I had to reinstall as a direct result of Bug#392915 and due process
involved there caused this bug#441951 to become resolved, so it is no
longer a problem, but I don't know exact
On Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> If you can test it earlier, let me know. Otherwise you'll hear from
> me later this week.
I couldn't test it any further than compiling as only some drivers use
the code, none of which I own a display for. Please refer to the thread
for a lis
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> Could you please avoid sending NMU's diff to an active maintainer ?
Adam, being aggressive towards beginners taking part to a bug
squashing party and trying to learn and improve Debian is not
tolerable.
Stop objecting to NMUs and consid
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:21:10 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug in aMule
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:21:10 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug in aMule
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:21:10 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug in aMule
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:02:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441269: fixed in kdebase 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 367825 pending
Bug#367825: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: bjam segfaults
Tags were: sid lenny patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 443160 pending
Bug#443160: libboost-dev: Missing dependency on libboost-se
Package: gdesklets
Version: 0.35.3-4+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is what happens when I try to start gdesklets:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdesklets
gDesklets wurde das erste Mal gestartet.
Eine Überprüfung der Abhängigkeiten wird jetzt durchgeführt...
Überprüfung
Package: gpib-modules-source
Version: 3.2.09-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
m-a a-i gpib fails with
/usr/bin/make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=/usr/src/modules/gpib/tnt4882-tms
gcc-4.1 -I/usr/src/modules/gpib -I/usr/src/modules/gpib/include
-Wp,-MD,/usr/src/modules/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> severity 445211 important
Bug#445211: installation-report: Kernel panics every time I try to boot it.
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processin
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 445230 confirmed
Bug#445230: libopenmpi-dev 1.2.4-2 compiler wrappers don't work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
tags 445230 confirmed
thanks
Hi Andreas!
Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 00:58 -0700 schrieb Andreas Kabel:
> Compiler wrappers don't work. Required data files
> are not part of the package, nor are they in any
> package libopenmpi-dev depends on.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mpicc.openmpi
> Cannot o
Your message dated Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:52:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kaffe is installable again now in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Version: 1.1.8-1
Version 1.1.8-1 of kaffe fixed that issues. Sorry for forgetting to mention
that in the changelog.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Koch
Senior Developer
Enough Software
S�gestr. 70
28195 Bremen
Germany
Web: http://www.enough.de
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +49-(0)421-9889 131
Fa
Hi,
I'm just curious on what causes the delay in uploading a patched package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 445104 xserver-xorg-core
severity 445104 important
thanks
On Thu, Oct 4, 2007 at 11:01:47 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> > Sounds like X is dying on vt switch.
> I guess so.
>
> > I assume this doesn't happen when xscreensaver isn't running?
> Indeed.
>
> > If X is indeed crashing,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 445104 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#445104: xscreensaver: aborts X session if I let the log-back-in screen time
out while switched to a virtual console
Bug reassigned from package `xscreensaver' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> severity 445104 important
Bu
> Sounds like X is dying on vt switch.
I guess so.
> I assume this doesn't happen when xscreensaver isn't running?
Indeed.
> If X is indeed crashing, can you attach your X log after the crash?
> (should be /var/log/Xorg.0.log, or /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old after X has
> been restarted)
In the inter
Package: libghc6-pandoc-dev
Version: 0.44
Severity: serious
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libghc6-pandoc-dev.postinst fails unless
`libghc6-xhtml-dev' package is already present.
# aptitude install libghc6-pandoc-dev
[...]
Errors were encountered while processing:
libghc6-pandoc-dev
E: Sub-process /usr/bi
Subject: libopenmpi-dev: compiler wrappers not working.
Package: libopenmpi-dev
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Compiler wrappers don't work. Required data files
are not part of the package, nor are they in
82 matches
Mail list logo
