Processed: RM: bandersnatch -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs (upstream is MIA)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 442046 RM: bandersnatch -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs > (upstream is MIA) Bug#442046: O: bandersnatch -- Log Jabber conversations to a peer-visible database Changed Bug title to `RM: bandersnatch -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security

Bug#444494: orpie_1.5.1-2 (hppa/unstable): FTBFS: "Architectures with double-word alignment for doubles are not supported"

Package: orpie Version: 1.5.1-2 Severity: serious Hi Uwe, orpie is failing to build on hppa and sparc with this error: [...] cd gsl && ocamlc -ccopt "-I/usr/include -DHAVE_INLINE -DHAVE_FENV -g -O2" -c mlgsl_blas.c In file included from mlgsl_vector.h:9, from mlgsl_vector_doub

Bug#444495: After gnome upgrade amule dies when it try to update server list

Package: amule Version: 2.1.3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After the system upgrade to gnome 2.20 amule stop to work. When it starts it suddendly die when it tries to upgrade server list. This seem to be a know bug and will be resolved in the next release (2.2.0 now

Bug#443036: linux-libertine: FTBFS: Failed to find NameList: LinLibertine-2.6.8

severity 443036 important thanks Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > I was not really able to reproduce the problem on my own machine. It > just seems to me than it takes an amazing amount of resources (both in > time and space) to build... yes, that's because the fontforge script is dump; it builds the ttf

Processed: Re: Bug#443036: linux-libertine: FTBFS: Failed to find NameList: LinLibertine-2.6.8

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 443036 important Bug#443036: linux-libertine: FTBFS: Failed to find NameList: LinLibertine-2.6.8 Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Processed: RM: bandersnatch -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs (upstream is MIA)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 435709 RM: libffm -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs (upstream > is MIA) Bug#435709: multiple vulnerabilities in bandersnatch Changed Bug title to `RM: libffm -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs (upstream is MIA)' from `multiple vul

Bug#443007: marked as done (gnome-system-monitor: FTBFS: proctable.cpp:1024: error: invalid conversion from 'pid_t*' to 'unsigned int*')

Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:03:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443007: fixed in gnome-system-monitor 2.20.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: RM: bandersnatch -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs (upstream is MIA)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 435709 RM: bandersnatch -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs > (upstream is MIA) Bug#435709: RM: libffm -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security bugs (upstream is MIA) Changed Bug title to `RM: bandersnatch -- RoQA; no remedy yet for security b

Bug#444465: marked as done (S30procps.sh in /etc/rcS.d not executed at boot time)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2007 06:26:29 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#65: Acknowledgement (S30procps.sh in /etc/rcS.d not executed at boot time) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#443454: icedove: Dies when accessing settings dialog

Hi. Applying the patch from #444149 makes all crashes disappear. I highly recommend adding it to Iceweasel als ASAP. Regards, Mathias -- debian/rules signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#443455: marked as done (icedove: Dies when replying to mail)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:43:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443455: Acknowledgement (icedove: Dies when replying to mail) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: gparted: Bug#433871: severity important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 433871 important Bug#433871: gparted: allows more than 4 Primary partitions without error Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: Re: Bug#444439: kopete crashes when icq starts up

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 39 normal Bug#39: kopete crashes when icq starts up Severity set to `normal' from `critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#444439: kopete crashes when icq starts up

severity 39 normal thanks On Friday 28 September 2007, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > Package: kopete > Version: 4:3.5.7-4 > Severity: critical ha ha. remote root? serious dataloss? breaks unrelated software? /Sune -- Do you know how to enable the GUI? From Word you neither have to receive a U

Bug#444486: Can't start amule

Package: amule Version: 2.1.3-4 Severity: serious Justification: 3 Can't start amule gdb log: [New Thread 0xb65b9b90 (LWP 20518)] *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/amule: double free or corruption (out): 0x08a77dd0 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0xb748ae15] /lib/libc.so.6(cfree+

Bug#443905: File agains gtk?

I also experienced this, and the patch posted at the Ubuntu link worked for me. The bug is already fixed in Ubuntu. Maybe this report should be reassigned to libgtk2.0-0? cheers, Christian Henz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Processed: Re: Bug#444404: libapache2-mod-defensible - FTBFS: make: *** [clean] Error 1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 04 patch Bug#04: libapache2-mod-defensible - FTBFS: make: *** [clean] Error 1 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#444404: libapache2-mod-defensible - FTBFS: make: *** [clean] Error 1

tag 04 patch thanks Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/09/2007): > > test -f Makefile && /usr/bin/make distclean Trivial patch attached. Lintian is your friend, BTW. :p -- Cyril Brulebois diff -u libapache2-mod-defensible-1.4/debian/changelog libapache2-mod-defensible-1.4/debian/changelo

Bug#429155: marked as done (Uninstallable due to missing /var/games/zblast)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429155: fixed in zblast 1.3-2.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#431577: marked as done (missing dependency on ed)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431577: fixed in gnarwl 3.3-8.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#444481: mldonkey-server: mlnet does not start on alpha

Package: mldonkey-server Version: 2.9.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It reports file system to be full, while it is not: 4:32 pts/11 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/mldonkey-2.9.1 41> /usr/bin/mlnet 2007/09/29 04:32:46 [cO] Starting MLDonkey 2.9.1 ... 2007/09/29 04:32:46 [c

Bug#429155: zblast: diff for NMU version 1.3-2.3

Hi, Attached is the diff for my zblast 1.3-2.3 NMU. Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- diff -u zblast-1.3/debian/c

Processed: Re: Bug#443787: libmpich1.0ldbl: seems bug #441946(#441882, #443502) is still there... because of a typo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 443787 patch Bug#443787: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/mpich/lib/shared/libfmpich.so.1.0', which is also in package libmpich1.0c2 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#443787: libmpich1.0ldbl: seems bug #441946(#441882, #443502) is still there... because of a typo

tag 443787 patch thanks Marco Bodrato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24/09/2007): > Replaces: libmpich1.0, libmpich1.0c2, libmpich1.0-noslog >^ > A "p" is missing... Indeed. Tagging accordingly. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgpU62YG6sciX.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#443990: Should be merged

Hi! This one should be merged with bug #443820 since the resolution there solves the problem. bye Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#439448: marked as done (ttt: FTBFS: error: argument 'device' doesn't match prototype)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439448: fixed in ttt 1.7-3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#439448: ttt: diff for NMU version 1.7-3.2

Hi, Attached is the diff for my ttt 1.7-3.2 NMU. Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- diff -u ttt-1.7/debian/changel

Bug#431201: marked as done (qc-usb-source: Fails to compile on linux 2.6.21.5)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:03:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Processed: Re: Bug#443021: gnome-main-menu: FTBFS: Package libnm-util was not found in the pkg-config search path.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 443021 patch Bug#443021: gnome-main-menu: FTBFS: Package libnm-util was not found in the pkg-config search path. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Bug#435164: gimmie: diff for NMU version 0.2.7-1.1

Package: gimmie Version: 0.2.7-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my gimmie 0.2.7-1.1 NMU. The idea is to disable the custom exception hook gimmie sets, so exceptions are handled the normal way and won't cause the program to stop. Regards, Fredeic diff -u gimmi

Bug#443021: gnome-main-menu: FTBFS: Package libnm-util was not found in the pkg-config search path.

tag 443021 patch thanks Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18/09/2007): > Package 'libnm-util', required by 'NetworkManager', not found You're lacking a B-D on libnm-util-dev, probably due to a package split some time ago. (You could also s/ ,/, / on the B-D line.) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois

Processed: battery-stats: diff for NMU version 0.3.3-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 367745 + patch Bug#367745: battery-stats: must use invoke-rc.d Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Processed: merging

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 444357 serious Bug#444357: gnome-core not istallable due to broken libwnck18i package (not available). Severity set to `serious' from `critical' > merge 444363 444357 Bug#444357: gnome-core not istallable due to broken libwnck18i package (not

Processed: Re: Bug#443030: gnat-gps: FTBFS: /build/user/gnat-gps-4.0.1/docs/gps.texi:340: epsf.tex not found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 443030 patch Bug#443030: gnat-gps: FTBFS: /build/user/gnat-gps-4.0.1/docs/gps.texi:340: epsf.tex not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#367745: marked as done (battery-stats: must use invoke-rc.d)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367745: fixed in battery-stats 0.3.3-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#443030: gnat-gps: FTBFS: /build/user/gnat-gps-4.0.1/docs/gps.texi:340: epsf.tex not found

tag 443030 patch thanks Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18/09/2007): > /build/user/gnat-gps-4.0.1/docs/gps.texi:340: epsf.tex not found, I must confess I stopped the build before the end, but I guess adding texlive-generic-recommended to B-D-I should help. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgpI

Processed: tagging 444285

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > tags 444285 sid Bug#444285: gimp-data: Generated cache was invalid There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#432755: flashplugin-nonfree: Still old version in repository

"G.P. Burth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18/09/2007): > I still have the "old" 9.0.31 version of the package shown to me in > aptitude although there should be an update according to this bug list > -- so i still get the "md5 error". rmadison (devscripts package) is your friend: $ rmadison flashplugin-no

Processed: Re: Bug#444315: python-gobject-dev: Missing Depends on libffi4-dev.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 444315 2.14.0-2 Bug#444315: python-gobject-dev: Missing Depends on libffi4-dev. Bug no longer marked as found in version 2.14.0-2. > found 444315 2.14.0-1 Bug#444315: python-gobject-dev: Missing Depends on libffi4-dev. Bug marked as found in v

Bug#444315: python-gobject-dev: Missing Depends on libffi4-dev.

notfound 444315 2.14.0-2 found 444315 2.14.0-1 close 444315 2.14.0-2 thanks On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 27 septembre 2007 à 20:13 +0200, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > Package: python-gobject-dev > > Version: 2.14.0-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > Hi, >

Bug#444435: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 04:23:37PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:19:11PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Thanks. Is there any chance of fixing this for oldstable? > > > > The security team wasn't interested in doing updates for > > oldstable-security before. > > Eh?

Bug#443036: linux-libertine: FTBFS: Failed to find NameList: LinLibertine-2.6.8

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Package: linux-libertine > version: 2.6-1 > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > [...] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. > > Relevant part: > [...] > make: *** [build-stamp] Segmentation fau

Bug#444472: does not apply to linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch3

Package: kernel-patch-openvz Version: 028.18.1etch4 Severity: grave Tags: patch The security updates present in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch3 conflict with two hunks of the openvz patch. The attached patch is sufficient to make it apply, athough the line numbers could use some adjustment.. -- System In

Bug#444468: miss-represents license in debian/copyright

Package: gs-esp Version: 8.15.3.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious debian/copyright refers to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL text, which can be GPLv3. Since the package is GPLv2-only, it should refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 instead. In addition, it also missrepresents the license with the "a

Bug#444467: miss-represents GPLv2-only license

Package: gs-gpl Version: 8.54.dfsg.1-5 Severity: serious debian/copyright refers to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL text, which can be GPLv3. Since the package is GPLv2-only, it should refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefer

Bug#418320: marked as done (php4: Should not be included in Lenny)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:07:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing right bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#444435: marked as done (openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers())

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:47:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#35: fixed in openssl 0.9.8e-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#444465: S30procps.sh in /etc/rcS.d not executed at boot time

Package: procps Version: 1:3.2.7-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.3.1 Debian Policy Manual says: 9.3.1 "Also, if the script name ends in .sh, the script will be sourced in runlevel S rather than being run in a forked subprocess, but will be explicitly run by sh in all other runlevels.

Bug#444435: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:19:11PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Thanks. Is there any chance of fixing this for oldstable? > > The security team wasn't interested in doing updates for > oldstable-security before. Eh? I must have missed that. We claim to support oldstable for 1 year, which mean

Bug#444435: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:59:46PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:53:34PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > I've also prepared an upload for stable-security at > > people.debian.org/~kroeckx/openssl > > Thanks. Is there any chance of fixing this for oldstable? The sec

Bug#444435: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:53:34PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I've also prepared an upload for stable-security at > people.debian.org/~kroeckx/openssl Thanks. Is there any chance of fixing this for oldstable? noah signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#444435: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:16:15PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 04:16:02PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Package: openssl > > Version: 0.9.8c-4, 0.9.7e-3sarge4 > > Severity: critical > > Tags: sarge, etch, security > > Since this applies to sid (and oldstable) too, those ta

Processed: fixed 434954 in 4.2.0-4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > fixed 434954 4.2.0-4 Bug#434954: FTBFS (ia64): Exec failed: No such file or directory Bug marked as fixed in version 4.2.0-4. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#431054: aptitude don't react after install somethings

Package: aptitude Followup-For: Bug #431054 O.k. the bug allready exists and is marked as fixed but I do'nt see so. I think that aptitude should also work on Kernel 2.6.18-4. So what ist to do now? Thanks for Your work. Best regards, Torsten Wiebke Beste Grüße. -- System Information: Debian Rele

Processed: Re: Bug#444452: Undeclared build dependency: libboost-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 52 serious Bug#52: Undeclared build dependency: libboost-dev Severity set to `serious' from `minor' > tag 52 patch pending Bug#52: Undeclared build dependency: libboost-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending >

Bug#443718: Bug#444452: Undeclared build dependency: libboost-dev

severity 52 serious tag 52 patch pending thanks "Trent W. Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/09/2007): > Package: rrootage > Severity: minor > > This package fails to build from source unless the package > `libboost-dev' is installed. Hi. Bumping severity since it's a serious bug. You might h

Bug#434954: marked as done (FTBFS (ia64): Exec failed: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:26:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Version: 4.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#442349: bongoproject_0.2.0-3(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: undefined reference to `lucene::document::Field::setBoost(double)'

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15/09/2007): > | src/agents/store/filters/bongostore-filter.o: In function > `FilterAddTextWithBoost(lucene::document::Document*, wchar_t const*, char > const*, float, bool)': > | /build/buildd/bongoproject-0.2.0/src/agents/store/filters/filter.cpp:182: > u

Processed: downgrading severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 438185 minor Bug#438185: fails when compiling with --enable-debug Severity set to `minor' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Processed: Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 35 - sarge etch Bug#35: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers() Tags were: etch sarge security Tags removed: sarge, etch > clone 35 -1 Bug#35: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL

Bug#444435: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:16:15PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers function in OpenSSL > > 0.9.7l and 0.9.8d might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary > > code via a crafted packet that triggers a one-byte buffer underflow. So, it seems to be th

Bug#442260: marked as done (fftw2 should depend on libmpich1.0ldbl)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:20:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#442260: fftw2 should depend on libmpich1.0ldbl has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#427199: marked as done (gxmms2 - FTBFS: error: too few arguments to function 'xmmsc_playlist_shuffle')

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427199: fixed in gxmms2 0.6.4-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#441164: marked as done (gxmms2: fails to install)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441164: fixed in gxmms2 0.6.4-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#444435: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

tags 35 - sarge etch clone 35 -1 reassign -1 openssl097 0.9.7k-3.1 thanks On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 04:16:02PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Package: openssl > Version: 0.9.8c-4, 0.9.7e-3sarge4 > Severity: critical > Tags: sarge, etch, security Since this applies to sid (and oldstable) too,

Bug#444458: fbset tries to create /dev/fb device on upgrade

Package: fbset Version: 2.1-20 Severity: serious durting upgrade, I get this: Setting up fbset (2.1-20) ... error making /dev/fb: File exists dpkg: error processing fbset (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9 Errors were encountered while processing: fb

Bug#432893: Accepted dpkg 1.14.7~newshlib (source i386 all)

Raphael Hertzog writes ("Accepted dpkg 1.14.7~newshlib (source i386 all)"): > [stuff] I'm very pleased to see all of this work being done on the Perl scripts - I'm hoping for big compatibility improvements from Raphael's shared library management changes. But I did want to comment on this: >*

Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC static object into shared object

On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 12:58:12AM +1000, skaller wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:26 +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > > > In particular I could do it if INR

Processed: severity of 444455 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > severity 55 normal Bug#55: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686: After kernel update from security.d.o hibernate fails Severity set to `normal' from `critical' > End of message, stoppin

Bug#444455: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686: After kernel update from security.d.o hibernate fails

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Resuming from hibernate after kernel change fails due to certain checks/mismatches. I would be nice to get some kind of warning about such possibilities while upgrading. -- S

Bug#444441: pidgin: Exits immediately on startup

Ari Pollak wrote: What happens if you rename your ~/.purple directory? I removed it immediately before starting and it still does the same thing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#444441: pidgin: Exits immediately on startup

What happens if you rename your ~/.purple directory? On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:54 -0400, jlquinn (optonline) wrote: > Ari Pollak wrote: > > Please install the pidgin-dbg and libgtk2.0-0 packages, and get a > > backtrace as described here: > > http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/GetABacktrace > > Also,

Bug#444441: pidgin: Exits immediately on startup

Ari Pollak wrote: Please install the pidgin-dbg and libgtk2.0-0 packages, and get a backtrace as described here: http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/GetABacktrace Also, moving your ~/.purple directory out of the way and trying again might help, as will attaching the output of "pidgin -d". I've att

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 444285 serious Bug#444285: gimp-data: Generated cache was invalid Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#444441: pidgin: Exits immediately on startup

Please install the pidgin-dbg and libgtk2.0-0 packages, and get a backtrace as described here: http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/GetABacktrace Also, moving your ~/.purple directory out of the way and trying again might help, as will attaching the output of "pidgin -d". On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:00 -

Processed: setting package to libapache2-mod-ocamlnet libequeue-gtk2-ocaml-dev libequeue-ocaml libequeue-ocaml-dev libnetclient-ocaml-dev libnethttpd-ocaml-dev libocamlnet-gtk2-ocaml-dev libocamlnet-o

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > package libapache2-mod-ocamlnet libequeue-gtk2-ocaml-dev libequeue-ocaml > libequeue-ocaml-dev libnetclient-ocaml-dev libnethttpd-ocaml-dev > libocamlnet-gtk2-ocaml-dev libocamlnet-

Bug#444441: pidgin: Exits immediately on startup

Package: pidgin Version: 2.2.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just upgraded from pidgin 2.0 and now pidgin exits silently as soon as you run it. There are no messages in .xsession, and nothing printed to the console. I don't know enough to see why it's unhappy from

Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC static object into shared object

On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:26 +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > > In particular I could do it if INRIA said that they would support the > > > change in some future re

Bug#430967: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#430967: xen-3.0: FTBFS with gcc-4.2 [i386]: C99 inline functions are not supported

reassign 430967 xen-3 close 430967 3.1-1 thanks On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:11:57AM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote: > From my pbuilder build log, using a chroot with packages mostly from sid > except that gcc-defaults is from experimental: Fixed. Bastian -- The heart is not a logical organ.

Bug#444439: kopete crashes when icq starts up

Package: kopete Version: 4:3.5.7-4 Severity: critical My kopete crashes since yesterday when i want to login into my icq account. All other protocols I tried worked (jabber, msn). I'll include a backtrace of on of this kopete session into this bugreport Greetings Patrick -- System Information:

Processed: Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#430967: xen-3.0: FTBFS with gcc-4.2 [i386]: C99 inline functions are not supported

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 430967 xen-3 Bug#430967: xen-3.0: FTBFS with gcc-4.2 [i386]: C99 inline functions are not supported Bug reassigned from package `xen-3.0' to `xen-3'. > close 430967 3.1-1 Bug#430967: xen-3.0: FTBFS with gcc-4.2 [i386]: C99 inline functions ar

Bug#442857: marked as done (medusa: please update libssh dependency)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#442857: fixed in medusa 1.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: severity of 444428 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > severity 28 serious Bug#28: libwnck-common replaces libwnck1, but does not provide it Severity set to `serious' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Bug#444435: openssl: [CVE-2007-5135] Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers()

Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8c-4, 0.9.7e-3sarge4 Severity: critical Tags: sarge, etch, security According to http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-5135 (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-5135 is not yet available): Off-by-one error in the SSL_get_shared_ciphers funct

Processed: Patches for these issues against 6.2.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 444267 patch Bug#444267: CVE-2007-4985, CVE-2007-4986, CVE-2007-4987, CVE-2007-4988 multiple vulnerabilities Tags were: security Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#444267: Patches for these issues against 6.2.3

tags 444267 patch thanks Hi, I've received these patches against 6.2.3 from a helpful third party. These might be helpful to fix the Debian packages. Please credit Jonathan Smith when using the patches. Thanks! Thijsdiff -r 6e2f7c2469aa coders/dcm.c --- a/coders/dcm.c Fri Sep 28 03:02:20 2007 -

Bug#367831: 367831: builds fine on amd64, too

hi, unfortunately, i don't have access to powerpc at the moment, so Martin, any help would be greatly appreciated. cheers, Paul On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:18:50PM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > Just as a data point, freebirth builds fine on amd64 as well. I might > eventually get around to bo

Bug#444430: CVE-2007-4993 privilege escalation

Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for xen-3.0. CVE-2007-4993[0]: | pygrub (tools/pygrub/src/GrubConf.py) in Xen 3.0.3, when booting a guest | domain, allows local users with elevated privi

Bug#444428: libwnck-common replaces libwnck1, but does not provide it

Package: libwnck-common Version: 2.20.0-1 Severity: critical --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Package conflicts and replaces libwnck1 (<= 0.10-1), but does not provide it, so that all packages depending on it are going to be deinstalled ore are broken. # apt-get install libwnck-

Bug#444429: dhelp: error linking against libdb4.5

Package: dhelp Version: 0.5.24-0.1 Severity: serious Setting up dhelp (0.5.24-0.1) ... Building HTML tree .../usr/sbin/dhelp_parse: /usr/lib/libdb-4.5.so: no version information available (required by /usr/sbin/dhelp_parse) /var/lib/dpkg/info/dhelp.postinst: line 45: 14800 Segmentation fault (cor

Bug#444427: libpam-modules: pam_group: bad users matching

Package: libpam-modules Version: 0.99.7.1-4 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, this line should add the group floppy to the user "us" according to the documentation. group.conf : "xsh;tty*&!ttyp*;us;Al-2400;floppy". But this line give all the "us*" users th

Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC static object into shared object

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > In particular I could do it if INRIA said that they would support the > > change in some future release (see the exception "Patches Heading > > Upstream"). But o

Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC static object into shared object

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:10:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > In particular I could do it if INRIA said that they would support the > change in some future release (see the exception "Patches Heading > Upstream"). But otherwise this is quite a large ABI change -- if > Fedora users started to bu

Bug#443070: hylafax-server: faxaddmodem doesn't release lock file in /var/lock/

On 9/28/07, Giuseppe Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > I read your logs, but I need one more information (at least): what shell > are you using? And what version is it? faxserver:/home/x# sh --version GNU bash, version 3.1.17(1)-release (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 2005 Free

Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC static object into shared object

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:32:16PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:17:00PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > No I don't actually. It's strange because I didn't hit this bug at > > all when compiling ocamlnet for Fedora. > > Are you building the Apache connector? The bu

Bug#443206: (no subject)

I've contacted upstream author to know if he plan to publish a 0.5 release soon, otherwise I'll put the svn diff in a patch. Arthur. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC static object into shared object

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:17:00PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > No I don't actually. It's strange because I didn't hit this bug at > all when compiling ocamlnet for Fedora. Are you building the Apache connector? The bug manifests itself only if you're building that, and only on architecture in w

Bug#444360: ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to link non-PIC static object into shared object

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:59:20PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:59:45AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Aaaarggh, right! IIRC that's an upstream issue for which exists a patch > > (by Richard Jones maybe ...), isn't it? What about applying it in the > > OCaml D

Bug#444363: gnome-core not istallable due to broken libwnck18i package (not available).

severity 444363 serious stop On Fri, Sep 28, 2007, Arnfinn Ringvold wrote: > dependency problem in sid gnome-core. This is why it's sid; please run testing if you want the guarantee that packages are installable all the time. -- Loïc Minier

Processed: Re: Bug#444363: gnome-core not istallable due to broken libwnck18i package (not available).

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 444363 serious Bug#444363: gnome-core not istallable due to broken libwnck18i package (not available). Severity set to `serious' from `critical' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

  1   2   >