Bug#436314: marked as done (up-imapproxy: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libwrap-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#436314: fixed in up-imapproxy 1.2.4-10.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#436307: marked as done (diald: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libwrap-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#436307: fixed in diald 0.99.4-7.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#436307: diald: diff for NMU version 0.99.4-7.3

tags 415355 + patch tags 422534 + patch tags 436307 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my diald 0.99.4-7.3 NMU. Ana diff -u diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po --- diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po +++ diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po @@ -1,23 +1,15 @@ -# -#Translators,

Processed: diald: diff for NMU version 0.99.4-7.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 415355 + patch Bug#415355: diald: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: patch > tags 422534 + patch Bug#422534: diald : [INTL:pt] Portuguese translation for debconf messages Tags were: l10n patch Tags added

Bug#424782: marked as done (axyl: affected by php4-removal)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424782: fixed in axyl 2.1.14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#436314: up-imapproxy: diff for NMU version 1.2.4-10.2

tags 421838 + patch tags 436314 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my up-imapproxy 1.2.4-10.2 NMU. diff -u up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog --- up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog +++ up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +up-imapprox

Bug#439441: polipo 0.9.12 from Etch segfaulting

Package: polipo Version: 0.9.12-1 Severity: grave This should be of interest to the security team. I tried to contact them in debian.security about a month ago but with no result. Summary: polipo crashes because of a null-pointer dereference in the dns-handling code. Detailed report including t

Processed: up-imapproxy: diff for NMU version 1.2.4-10.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 421838 + patch Bug#421838: [INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: patch > tags 436314 + patch Bug#436314: up-imapproxy: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libwrap-dev Tags were: sid lenny Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping proc

Processed: tagging 425897

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > tags 425897 - unreproducible Bug#425897: libfilesys-diskspace-perl: FTBFS: Test failure Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > End of message, stopping processing h

Processed: tagging 425897

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > tags 425897 + moreinfo Bug#425897: libfilesys-diskspace-perl: FTBFS: Test failure There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#425897: Still FTBFS (usually) for me

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, > First of all, I didn't see any of your comments to the bug before it was > closed, because you never CC'd me or 425897-submitter... Very sorry. My fault. :( > With the latest version, the package still failed to build for me. I had a >

Bug#439411: marked as done (kdelibs4c2a: kstartupconfig missing)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:03:28 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439411: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#439437: linphone: error while loading shared libraries: libosipparser2.so.3

Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007): > $ linphone > linphone: error while loading shared libraries: libosipparser2.so.3: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > I guess some library is missing from archive and dependencies? #439196 Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois

Bug#439437: linphone: error while loading shared libraries: libosipparser2.so.3

Package: linphone Version: 1.7.1-3 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I just installed linphone and all I get from this $ linphone linphone: error while loading shared libraries: libosipparser2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I gue

Processed (with 2 errors): merge duplicate

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reasign 439426 gaim-galago Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > forcemerge 430949 439426 Bug#430949: gaim-galago needs porting to pidgin (untested patch included) Bug#439426: Package should be updated for libpurple/pidgin Mismatch - onl

Bug#430894: marked as done (please turn gaim-librvp into a transition package for pidgin-librvp)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430894: fixed in gaim-librvp 0.9.5-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#430892: marked as done (please turn gaim-encryption into a transition package to pidgin-encryption)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430892: fixed in gaim-encryption 3.0~beta7-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#430892: NMU patch

I plan to NMU gaim-encryption to fix this bug. Here is the patch against -1 to do so. gaim-encryption_3.0~beta7-1.1.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#430894: NMU patch

I plan to NMU gaim-librvp package to fix this bug. Attached is the patch to do so. gaim-librvp_0.9.5-2.1.nmudiff Description: Binary data

Bug#439426: Package should be updated for libpurple/pidgin

Package: galago-gaim-feed Version: 0.5.0-2 Severity: serious The galago-gaim-feed package currently does nothing in sid, since the gaim package is just a transitional one to install pidgin. A version of this package that works with libpurple and/or pidgin should be uploaded, and this package made

Processed: Fix up OOo gdk bug versions with epoch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 423636 1:2.3.0~oog680m2-1 Bug#423636: oowriter: spits repeated glib/gdk assertion errors 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1:2.3.0~oog680m2-1, send any further explanations to

Bug#434666: marked as done (FTBFS: "bin/mpif90[f77] you provided with --with-mpi-dir=/usr does not work")

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#434666: fixed in petsc 2.3.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#438191: tzdata: gets worse

notfound 2007f-11 thanks Benoît Dejean a écrit : > Package: tzdata > Version: 2007f-11 > Followup-For: Bug #438191 > > Yes, i saw this bug to. > Now i just upgraded to 2007f-11 which happily deleted my /etc/timezone. > This is an expected behaviour, version 2007f-10 destroy your settings, 2007f

Bug#439411: i have the same problem

i just upgraded and the same problem occured. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#439421: marked as done (speedbar: "Recursive `require' for feature `sb-info'" with emacs22)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:42:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439421: speedbar: "Recursive `require' for feature `sb-info'" with emacs22 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#439421: speedbar: "Recursive `require' for feature `sb-info'" with emacs22

Package: speedbar Version: 1:1.0pre3-7 Severity: grave File: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/speedbar/sb-info.el since upgrading to emacs22, it is no longer possible to access the "info" mode in emacs. When trying to execute the "info" command in emacs, i get the following error message: "Recursive `re

Bug#436310: marked as done (atftp: FTBFS: unmet build dep libwrap-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#436310: fixed in atftp 0.7.dfsg-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#439366: marked as done (atftp: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libwrap-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#436310: fixed in atftp 0.7.dfsg-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#438191: tzdata: gets worse

Package: tzdata Version: 2007f-11 Followup-For: Bug #438191 Yes, i saw this bug to. Now i just upgraded to 2007f-11 which happily deleted my /etc/timezone. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel:

Processed: severity of 439411 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > severity 439411 serious Bug#439411: kdelibs4c2a: kstartupconfig missing Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#423631: marked as done (gdb: FTBFS on ia64: timeout)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423631: fixed in gdb 6.6.dfsg-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#439215: marked as done (schroot: FTBFS because of boost change)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439215: fixed in schroot 1.1.5-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#437514: Problem seems to be fixed

Haven't had a problem since: 1) Upgrade udev to 114 2) Upgrade initramfs for custom built kernel (which was built before the udev upgrade) via 'dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.21' OK to close. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Bug#434604: marked as done (depends on non-essential package ucf in postrm)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:48:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#434604: fixed in monotone 0.36-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: forcibly merging 436310 439366

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > # oops, sorry ... > forcemerge 436310 439366 Bug#436310: atftp: FTBFS: unmet build dep libwrap-dev Bug#439366: atftp: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libwrap-dev Forcibly Merged 436310 439366. >

Bug#439404: postman: purge does leaves traces behind

Package: postman Version: 2.1-2 Severity: serious purge of the package: 1) Does not remove the postman users 2) Leaves dpkg statoverride entries behind: postman www-data 750 /var/lib/postman/calendar postman www-data 750 /var/lib/postman/databases -- System Information: Debian Release

Bug#439215: [Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#439215: schroot: FTBFS because of boost change

Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > schroot FTBFS[1] because of a boost change between single-threaded and > multi-threaded librairies[2]. > > The attached patch fixes configure.ac to look in the right lib. The patch looks great. Unfortunately, I need to work on my MSc thesis until the

Bug#439339: libnet-ssh-perl-perl: package requires Math::Pari to operate which does not seem to be in the archive

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-24 13:53]: > > Package: libnet-ssh-perl-perl > > This package is not in Debian. What does > dpkg -p libnet-ssh-perl-perl | grep Maintainer: > say? # dpkg -p libnet-ssh-perl-

Bug#439339: libnet-ssh-perl-perl: package requires Math::Pari to operate which does not seem to be in the archive

* Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-24 13:53]: > Package: libnet-ssh-perl-perl This package is not in Debian. What does dpkg -p libnet-ssh-perl-perl | grep Maintainer: say? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Bug#439392: backup-manager: password disclosure in backup uploads

Package: backup-manager Version: 0.7.5-3 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Hi, I just discovered that backup-manager disclosures the FTP password during a running FTP upload in the process list. A user which has shell access on the computer simply needs to run t

Bug#439394: libgnash0 depends on unavailable libboost-date-time1.34.0 libboost-thread1.34.0

Package: libgnash0 Version: 0.8.0~cvs20070611.1016-1 Severity: serious Justification: unknow Impossible to install gnash The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgnash0: Depends: libboost-date-time1.34.0 (>= 1.34.0~rc2-1) but it is not installable Depends: libboost-threa

Bug#439389: dependency changes break other packages

Package: libxine1 Version: 1.1.7-2 Severity: serious Most of the dependencies were turned into "Recommends:" beginning with version 1.1.7-2. This renders the package unusable for almost (possibly that there's exception; but I can't imagine any) every user of the library; except for those people wh

Bug#437454: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#437454: Bug#437454: fix for Etch still missing

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 08:10:38PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 17:11:04 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > what is the status of this bug regarding Etch? The Etch version is > > > affected, too, and the fix shou

Bug#421082: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

On Thursday 23 August 2007 14:33, you wrote: > The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) > you maintain in Debian: > > === polyxmass-doc: > = This package has 1 RC bug(s) more than 30 days old: > - #421082 > FTBFS due to TeX Live transition

Bug#439363: marked as done (youtube-dl: Does not work any longer -- has youtube.com changed their system?)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439363: fixed in youtube-dl 2007.08.24-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#437454: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#437454: fix for Etch still missing

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 17:11:04 +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > what is the status of this bug regarding Etch? The Etch version is > > affected, too, and the fix should also apply to the Etch version. > > I have untested packages for

Bug#439276: Acknowledgement (idesk: X11/Xorg testing crash with intel driver 865G hardware.)

On 23 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please > send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and *not* to > [EMAIL PROTECTED]). This system crash re-occurred without using the idesk package. Please close this bug/ticket (or maybe redirect the bug/t

Processed: reassigning

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 439339 libnet-ssh-perl-perl Bug#439339: libnet-ssh-perl-perl: package requires Math::Pari to operate which does not seem to be in the archive Bug reassigned from package `libnet-ssh-perl' to `libnet-ssh-perl-perl'. > thanks Stopping processin

Bug#439357: xserver-xorg: X server faild-no usable configuration

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 14:17:24 +, unknown wrote: > (EE) I810(0): No Video BIOS modes for chosen depth. Can you remove the DefaultDepth line from your config and try again? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Bug#439176: marked as done (libcurl3-gnutls: cannot depend on libssh2-0, which depends on libssl0.9.8)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439176: fixed in curl 7.16.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#437454: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#437454: fix for Etch still missing

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > what is the status of this bug regarding Etch? The Etch version is > affected, too, and the fix should also apply to the Etch version. I have untested packages for stable at: http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4-terminal-fix/ If you have

Bug#439357: X server faild-no usable configuration

I actually upgraded to testing. That didn't work. I have reinstalled stable again and it has worked the second time. I am not sure what I could do differently. other then running installgui the first time and install the second time. I have installed package 915resolution to fix the 1440x900 reso

Bug#439378: pdns: FTBFS (on etch)

Package: pdns Version: 2.9.21-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source pdns 2.9.21-2 fails to build from source on an etch system; maybe one of the build-depends needs to be versioned? Or a build-conflicts missing? Here are the versions of the build-depends I have: ii deb

Bug#439240: forwarded to upstream and lowering severity

severity 439240 important forwarded 439240 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Hi I tried it again here on an amd64 machine and a friend of mine started it on an i386 machine and it worked without any problems. Therefore, I dare lowering the bugreport to "important", so that it is not blocking the testing

Bug#437454: fix for Etch still missing

Hi, what is the status of this bug regarding Etch? The Etch version is affected, too, and the fix should also apply to the Etch version. Regards, Tino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#439372: ocsinventory-server: fresh installation -- complete failure

Package: ocsinventory-server Version: 1.01-2 Severity: serious Trying to install ocs-inventory from scratch. The database is on a different computer. Several bugs cropped up, and I still not haven't gotting things working: 1) Debconf asked whether I wanted to use dbconfig for database installatio

Processed: forwarded to upstream and lowering severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 439240 important Bug#439240: marble: Fails to start saying "Install map too large!" Severity set to `important' from `grave' > forwarded 439240 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#439240: marble: Fails to start saying "Install map too large!" Noted your sta

Bug#439281: libapache2-mod-perl2_2.0.3-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tests fail

Niko Tyni dijo [Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:13:20PM +0300]: > > My vague guess about the reason is that "use of undefined variable in > > socket". > > > > Could it be that getprotobyname('tcp') returns undef? > > Yes, the package should build-depend on netbase for /etc/protocols. Frank, could you pl

Bug#439335: CVE-2007-4131: GNU tar Directory Traversal Vulnerability

On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 11:35 +0200, Luca Bruno wrote: > Package: tar > Version: 1.18-1 > Severity: grave Why does this merit a 'grave' severity when there is no apparent priv escalation involved? Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Bug#424471: marked as done (lucene - FTBFS: Cannot use Kaffe rmic, as it is not available)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424471: fixed in lucene 1.4.3.dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#439366: atftp: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libwrap-dev

Package: atftp version: 0.7.dfsg-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-

Bug#438702: Asterisk v1.4.9~dfsg-1 Crashed

Hello Faidon, On 8/24/07, Faidon Liambotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It would be better if you used a binary of our own[1] and preferrably > the latest upstream version 1.4.11 (i.e. packages >= 1:1.4.11~dfsg-1) I just tried first the same call scenario without enabling dumping the core

Processed: libqt4-qt3support needs tighter dependency on libqt4-*

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 438746 libqt4-qt3support Bug#438746: wpa_gui not useable : Cannot mix incompatible Qt libraries Bug reassigned from package `wpagui' to `libqt4-qt3support'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#438746: libqt4-qt3support needs tighter dependency on libqt4-*

reassign 438746 libqt4-qt3support thanks libqt4-qt3support can be installed alongside incompatible qt4 libs, eg: libqt4-core4.3.1-2 libqt4-gui 4.3.1-2 libqt4-qt3support 4.3.0-4 The above combination of packages inhibited wpagui to start for a user

Bug#439363: youtube-dl: Does not work any longer -- has youtube.com changed their system?

Package: youtube-dl Version: 2007.06.22-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable youtube-cl ceased to work, independent of the file to download: , | | $ youtube-dl -t http://youtube.com/watch?v=fSgWZ-iR1IE | Retrieving video webpage... done. | Extracting video title... done.

Bug#439362: lastfmsubmitd: Spool.sync does not honour the configured spool_path

Package: lastfmsubmitd Version: 0.35-3 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hello... again. O:-) The sync() method of Spool does not honour the configured spool_path. This causes data loss when the daemon exits but there are pending submissions on the queue. Please find a (tested) trivial patch below, tho

Bug#439098: liblzo-dev: Not coinstallable with liblzo2-dev

Hi, On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 12:17 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > Unpacking liblzo-dev (from .../liblzo-dev_1.08-3_ia64.deb) ... > > dpkg: error processing > > /x/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/cache/apt/archives/liblzo-dev_1.08 > >-3_ia64.de

Processed: Re: Bug#439339: libnet-ssh-perl-perl: package requires Math::Pari to operate which does not seem to be in the archive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 439339 libnet-ssh-perl Bug#439339: libnet-ssh-perl-perl: package requires Math::Pari to operate which does not seem to be in the archive Bug reassigned from package `libnet-ssh-perl-perl' to `libnet-ssh-perl'. > -- Stopping processing here.

Bug#439348: ftp.debian.org: Too low priority for libwpg-0.1-1

Hi, Sven Joachim wrote: > The latest upload of openoffice.org-draw to unstable added a > dependency on libwpg-0.1-1 which is of priority "extra". This > priority needs to be bumped to "optional". Yep, I noticed to late that (damn, dh_make which defaults to extra now) that I uploaded with the wro

Processed (with 1 errors): merge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 439344 important Bug#439344: gossip: Won't load my account configuration Severity set to `important' from `serious' > merge 439344 439315 Bug#439315: gossip - lost account config after upgrade Bug#439344: gossip: Won't load my account configur

Bug#439348: ftp.debian.org: Too low priority for libwpg-0.1-1

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious The latest upload of openoffice.org-draw to unstable added a dependency on libwpg-0.1-1 which is of priority "extra". This priority needs to be bumped to "optional". Rene, is the dependency correct? I would assume that a "Recommends" or even "Suggests"

Bug#439346: XSS issue

Package: mapserver Severity: grave Tags: security See http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2256 It needs updating to 4.10.3. Patch provided for etch to secteam in the meanwhile. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, '

Bug#439344: gossip: Won't load my account configuration

Package: gossip Version: 0.27-1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When I run gossip 0.27, I get: /home/sam/.gnome2/Gossip/accounts.xml:4: element account: validity error : Element account content does not follow the DTD, expecting (name , id , resource? , password

Bug#438702: Asterisk v1.4.9~dfsg-1 Crashed

GNUbie wrote: > So, after a few call attempts to a GSM mobile phone and PSTN telephone, > the Asterisk service crashed and you can download the core dump file it > generated at http://files-upload.com/files/47/core.asterisk-1.4.9 or > at http://www.filecrunch.com/file/~jab6ay >

Bug#439098: liblzo-dev: Not coinstallable with liblzo2-dev

Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 12:17 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Unpacking liblzo-dev (from .../liblzo-dev_1.08-3_ia64.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing > /x/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/cache/apt/archives/liblzo-dev_1.08 >-3_ia64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite > `/usr/share/lzo/minilzo/

Bug#439339: libnet-ssh-perl-perl: package requires Math::Pari to operate which does not seem to be in the archive

Package: libnet-ssh-perl-perl Version: 1.30-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Net::SSH::Perl->new() failed: Can't locate Math/Pari.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /

Bug#438702: Asterisk v1.4.9~dfsg-1 Crashed

Hello all, Although I already made a response to Mr. Tzafrir Cohen's original message regarding this bug 4 days ago, I am now re-sending it to the Debian BTS for record purposes. On 8/19/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Indeed. > > So let's try to track this down. Ok, here are

Bug#439335: CVE-2007-4131: GNU tar Directory Traversal Vulnerability

Package: tar Version: 1.18-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - From CVE-2007-4131: "The vulnerability is caused due to an input validation error when extracting tar archives. This can be exploited to extract files to arbitrary locations outside t

Bug#439281: libapache2-mod-perl2_2.0.3-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tests fail

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:57:14AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > My vague guess about the reason is that "use of undefined variable in > socket". > > Could it be that getprotobyname('tcp') returns undef? Yes, the package should build-depend on netbase for /etc/protocols. Cheers, -- Niko Tyni

Bug#439251: marked as done (python-pythonmagick: fails to contain the actual module)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#439251: fixed in pythonmagick 0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#439281: libapache2-mod-perl2_2.0.3-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tests fail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=| Frank Lichtenheld, 24.08.2007 00:18 |=- > | Automatic build of libapache2-mod-perl2_2.0.3-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa > 98-farm > | /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib \ > | t/TEST -clean > | [warning] setting ulimit to allow core files > |

Bug#439314: Several security issues in ircu [CVE-2007-4404..11]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Package: ircd-ircu > Severity: serious > Tags: security > > Hi! > > Several security issues have been reported against ircu: > CVE-2007-4411 (ircu 2.10.12.05 and earlier allows remote attackers to > discover > the ...) > CVE-200

Bug#439314: Several security issues in ircu [CVE-2007-4404..11]

Package: ircd-ircu Severity: serious Tags: security Hi! Several security issues have been reported against ircu: CVE-2007-4411 (ircu 2.10.12.05 and earlier allows remote attackers to discover the ...) CVE-2007-4410 (ircu 2.10.12.05 and earlier does not properly synchronize a kick ...) CVE-2007-

Bug#432371: marked as done (player: FTBFS: Nested quantifiers in regex [..] at /usr/bin/dh_pycentral line 191.)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432371: fixed in python-central 0.5.15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#424906: marked as done (python-central: fails when package with "++" in control file, i.e. libsomething++)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432371: fixed in python-central 0.5.15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#424906: marked as done (python-central: fails when package with "++" in control file, i.e. libsomething++)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424906: fixed in python-central 0.5.15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#432371: marked as done (player: FTBFS: Nested quantifiers in regex [..] at /usr/bin/dh_pycentral line 191.)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424906: fixed in python-central 0.5.15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: fixup errant BTS change

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 439062 serious Bug#439062: Fwd: [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.4.11 released Severity set to `serious' from `grave' > tags 439062 = security Bug#439062: Fwd: [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.4.11 released Tags were: pending confirmed security Ta

Bug#429231: swig1.3: build-depends on php4 which is going to be removed for lenny

retitle 429231 [FTBFS] swig1.3: build-depends on php4 which has been removed thanks dear Torsten, Since you somehow managed to miss my bugreport and the patch attached to it, swig has now failed to build on all architectures... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: swig1.3: build-depends on php4 which is going to be removed for lenny

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 429231 [FTBFS] swig1.3: build-depends on php4 which has been removed Bug#429231: build-depends on php4 which is going to be removed for lenny Changed Bug title to `[FTBFS] swig1.3: build-depends on php4 which has been removed' from `build-depen

Processed (with 6 errors): Re: Bug#439062: Broken Build-Depends in asterisk_1.4.11~dfsg-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 439062 grave Bug#439062: Fwd: [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.4.11 released Severity set to `grave' from `serious' > tags 439062 confirmed pending Bug#439062: Fwd: [asterisk-announce] Asterisk 1.4.11 released Tags were: security Tags added: con

Bug#439062: Broken Build-Depends in asterisk_1.4.11~dfsg-1

severity 439062 grave tags 439062 confirmed pending merge 439197 439062 thanks, control Hi Sheldon, On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 03:10:18PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > The new asterisk_1.4.11~dfsg-1 source package fails to backport in an > Etch chroot because of a broken Build-Depends. > > The