Bug#433597: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Panic with CR2: 0000000000100108 on SATA with software raid-1

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: breaks the whole system The problem only happened to me once, and before my last upgrade (with version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12), but the changelog does not seem to indicate that this problem w

Bug#432620: psi_0.11~beta2-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: build-depends on removed package

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:11:18AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Package: psi > Version: 0.11~beta2-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > your package build-depends on libqt4-debug-dev which doesn't exists > anymore. You are, of course, right. While the fix is trivial, I hold off uploading a new

Processed: retitle 401810 to RM: libpfm3 -- RoM; deprecated; replaced with libpfm3-3.2 ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > retitle 401810 RM: libpfm3 -- RoM; deprecated; replaced with libpfm3-3.2 Bug#401810: duplicate package Changed Bug title to `RM: libpfm3 -- RoM; deprecated; replaced with libpfm3-3.2

Bug#433332: checkgmail: Undefined value error

Hi Lucas, upstream author suggest to test that behavior using an UTF8 locale: could you please odd this? Regards, Sandro On 7/18/07, Owen Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Sandro, Can your user try with a UTF8 locale? Thanks, Owen On 7/18/07, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi

Bug#432971: Duplicates

#432650, #432815, #432817 and #432971 are duplicates. Please, merge it all. -- Marco de Freitas, NBR para a Internet já! Porque meu navegador não é penico. http://www.softwarelivre.org/news/2472 http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byLanguage?language=pt-br

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 433590 serious Bug#433590: warsow: FTBFS (ia64) snd_qf/snd_mix.c asm errors Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > tags 433590 patch help Bug#433590: warsow: FTBFS (ia64) snd_qf/snd_mix.c asm errors There were no tags set. Tags added: patch

Processed: submitter 433591

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > submitter 433591 Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#433591: Doesn't show reports for anything but bug number Changed Bug submitter from Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Baruch Even

Bug#433591: Doesn't show reports for anything but bug number

Package: bug-triage Version: 0.1-1 Severity: grave Any query other than bug number doesn't show any bug report, this makes the program quite unusable. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-rc4-mexhat Debian Release: lenny/sid 500 unstablewww.debia

Bug#432496: gconf: FTBFS: unmet build dep libdb3-dev

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:03:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I have uploaded this change as an NMU to the DELAYED/5-day queue on gluck. > If you disagree that this is an acceptable solution, or you have any other > objections to the NMU, please let me know. Except I didn't do this, I uplo

Bug#432496: marked as done (gconf: FTBFS: unmet build dep libdb3-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432496: fixed in gconf 1.0.9-7.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#433278: inotify-tools: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers

tag 433278 pending thanks Version 3.10-2 uploaded a few hours ago will fix this issue, but I forgot to add (Closes: #433278) to the changelog, so it's not automatically marked as such. The package is currently waiting in the NEW queue due to splitting into a binary package and a library package

Bug#433583: libcairo-ocaml-dev: Errors when linking with cairo.cma

Package: libcairo-ocaml-dev Version: 20070306-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to link with cairo.cma gives the following errors: /tmp/ccES9j8A.o:(.data+0x1a10): undefined reference to `ml_cairo_scaled_text_extents' /tmp/ccES9j8A.o:(.data+0x1bac): undefined re

Processed: Re: Bug#433278: inotify-tools: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433278 pending Bug#433278: inotify-tools: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers Tags were: patch sid Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#432496: gconf: FTBFS: unmet build dep libdb3-dev

tags 432496 patch thanks Hi Kitame-san, I've prepared a patch for this bug which allows the gconf source to build against libdb4.5 instead of libdb3. Please find this patch attached. Although the database formats for db3 and db4.5 are compatible, the transaction logs are not; so as documented a

Processed (with 1 errors): merge 423337 and 401810

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 401810 serious Bug#401810: duplicate package Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > reassign 401810 ftp.debian.org Bug#401810: duplicate package Bug reassigned from package `libpfm3' to `ftp.debian.org'. > merge 423337 401810 Bug#401810: d

Processed: Re: gconf: FTBFS: unmet build dep libdb3-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 432496 patch Bug#432496: gconf: FTBFS: unmet build dep libdb3-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#427463: marked as done (libhpricot-ruby - FTBFS: error: 'struct RString' has no member named 'ptr')

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427463: fixed in libhpricot-ruby 0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#433141: Clarifications on issues for this bug

Le Wednesday 18 July 2007 03:59:40 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit : > Of coourse, a fork, or better, a commit access > to the project would be perfect, but I don't have enough time for this.. Another possibility is to switch back to some other codebase.. The basic question for me is: could php's

Bug#433141: Clarifications on issues for this bug

Hi maintainers ! These bugs have different issues to solve before we may close them.. * Licence version: the licence under which the file is licenced (either 2 or 3.01) has to be cleared. * Location of the file: We already have three packages using it, with SPIP it will be 4, so it's tim

Bug#433573: amsn failed to load after upgrade to 0.97~rc1

Package: amsn Version: 0.97~rc1+dfsg1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After a upgrade amsn fails to load with the error message: Loading TKCximage failed. This module is needed to run aMSN. Please compile amsn first, instructions on how to compile are located in the file

Bug#422468: marked as done (FTBFS: wiimotefunctions.c:59: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'wiimote_connect')

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422468: fixed in transfermii 1:0.5~rc5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#433031: marked as done (qt4-x11: broken threading on alpha, hangs uselessly on startup)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:03:27 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433031: fixed in qt4-x11 4.3.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#418322: package is orphaned

This package is orphaned for some time now: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352661 -- Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#432408: Lintian Fixes

Greetings, I have done some work and got most of the lintian warnings etc... cleared up. There are two I am not sure what to do about so I just left them as is. They are: lintian fireflier-client-gtk_1.1.7_i386.deb W: fireflier-client-gtk: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory usr/share/doc/firefli

Bug#433564: decibel-audio-player: Does not start: "ImportError: No module named gnome"

Package: decibel-audio-player Version: 0.03-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable decibel-audio-player crashes with an "ImportError: No module named gnome" error: $ decibel-audio-player Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/decibel-audio-player", line 22, in ?

Bug#428931: marked as done (gqcam: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/videodev2.h:465: error: field 'timestamp' has incomplete type)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428931: fixed in gqcam 0.9.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#433523: #433523: netsurf: depends on not available package

Damyan Ivanov escribió: > Hi, > > Simply rebuilding netsurf without any changes seems to fix the problem > here. Hi, You are right. The same here; simply rebuilding netsurf from source without changes it works for me too. It seems that the package libcurl4-openssl isn't needed at all for netsurf

Bug#432267: marked as done (Crashes on startup)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:22:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Bug#428680 closed by Arnaud Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#428680: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-4) has caused the attached Bug report to be mark

Bug#413283: marked as done (libghc6-cairo-dev: Missing dependency on libghc6-mtl-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413283: fixed in gtk2hs 0.9.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#432408: PATCH: fireflier-1.1.7.patch

Greetings, This time I have actually attached the patch file :). Regards, Jason diff -ur fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control testing/fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control --- fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control 2007-07-01 15:59:28.0 -0400 +++ testing/fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control 2007-07-17 17:35:38.

Bug#433551: autofs5_5.0.2-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dep

package autofs5 merge 433551 433546 tags 433546 + pending retitle 433546 autofs5: arch-independent FTBFS thankyou Hi Frank, > Package: autofs5 > Version: 5.0.2-1 > Severity: serious I know, I know. ;) It is already fixed and waiting to be uploaded. I'm reading the buildd logs regularly, especial

Processed: Re: Bug#433551: autofs5_5.0.2-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dep

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package autofs5 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: autofs5 > merge 433551 433546 Bug#433546: autofs5: FTBFS on mipsel (was: Log for failed build of autofs5_5.0.2-1 (dist=experimental)) Bug#433551: autofs5_5.0.2-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-d

Bug#433546: autofs5: FTBFS on mipsel (was: Log for failed build of autofs5_5.0.2-1 (dist=experimental))

package autofs5 tags 433546 + pending thankyou Hi Martin, > Version: 5.0.2-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Fails to build from source > Tags: experimental I know, I've already studied the experimental buildd logs and fixed my package. I'm currently waiting for my sponsor to upload my fix.

Bug#433551: autofs5_5.0.2-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dep

Package: autofs5 Version: 5.0.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, your package failed to build from source since it tried to find modprobe, but didn't build-depend on module-init-tools. | Automatic build of autofs5_5.0.2-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm | Build started at 20070717

Processed: fglkfgkj

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 432262 Bug#432262: libc6-i386 is uninstallable 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#432326: libc6-i386: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z1 Bug#432330: libc6-i386: trying to o

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 432330 serious Bug#432330: libc6-i386: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z Bug#432262: libc6-i386 is uninstallable Bug#432326: libc6-i386: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib32', which is also in package lib32z1 Bug#43

Bug#432408: PATCH: fireflier-1.1.7.patch

Greetings, I created a new patch for fireflier-1.1.7. It has the build-deps for automake1.8 you mentioned as well as the other fix. I have patched and built the package with the new patch and it builds ok. Please let me know if the new patch is acceptable. Regards, Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#433523: #433523: netsurf: depends on not available package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Simply rebuilding netsurf without any changes seems to fix the problem here. Perhaps a binNMU is due? - -- Damyan IvanovJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG w

Bug#432901: marked as done (New version available - blocking update of gpe-calendar)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:34:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432901: fixed in libgpevtype 0.50-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#432768: marked as done (bashisms in sh scripts)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432768: fixed in tipcutils 1.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:84)

tags 432541 + confirmed thanks Hi Lucas, Le mardi 10 juillet 2007 à 12:10 +, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Package: eclipse-cdt > version: 3.1.2-1 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070708 > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all pack

Bug#433546: autofs5: FTBFS on mipsel (was: Log for failed build of autofs5_5.0.2-1 (dist=experimental))

Package: autofs5 Version: 5.0.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source Tags: experimental Hi, your package FTBFS on mipsel experimental buildd. For a detailed buildd log see http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=autofs5&ver=5.0.2-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1184688504&file=

Bug#430273: marked as done (ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:35:43 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430273: fixed in mpfr 2.2.1.dfsg.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#433544: gnustep-make_2.0.1-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: binary-arch depends on b-d-i

Package: gnustep-make Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, your package fails to build. Since binary-arch depends on install-indep, you can't use Build-Depends-Indep. | Automatic build of gnustep-make_2.0.1-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm | Build started at 20070717

Processed: Re: Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:84)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 432541 + confirmed Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:84) There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#432913: apt segfaults when upgrading

Package: apt Version: 0.7.3 Severity: grave Apt segfault when using "upgrade" or "dist-upgrade". Please find below a log from gdb: Titoune:/var/lib# gdb apt-get GNU gdb 6.6-debian Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, a

Bug#432408: PATCH: fireflier-1.1.6.patch

Greetings, I realized that I created the patch for the wrong version. I should have been patching fireflier-1.1.7 and not fireflier-1.1.6. Sorry for the mistake. Regards, Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: bug 433501 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7388

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > forwarded 433501 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7388 Bug#433501: Oops in kcryptd Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.c

Processed: block

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # liborbit2-dev is an indirect build dependency of libgoffice-1-dev, so it > # needs to make the transition first. > block 430255 by 430280 Bug#430280: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390 Bug#430255: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc,

Bug#433332: checkgmail: Undefined value error

Hi Owen, a Debian user just reported this bug:could you please give it a look? Thanks in advance, Sandro On 7/16/07, Lucas Di Pentima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: checkgmail Version: 1.12-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Checkgmail worked the first run, later o

Processed: Re: Bug#432408: PATCH: fireflier-1.1.6.patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 432408 patch Bug#432408: fireflier - FTBFS: ./configure: line 2018: [test: command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#432408: PATCH: fireflier-1.1.6.patch

tag 432408 patch thanks Jason Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/07/2007): > I have attached a patch that I believe fixes the build problem. > > Please let me know if it is acceptable. Hi, this patch is not sufficient, though, because gnomeclient/configure needs install-sh, which in this director

Bug#289668: marked as done (gnucash: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev')

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289668: fixed in gnucash 2.0.5-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#433515: marked as done (firmware-iwlwifi: missing conflicts/replaces)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:42:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433515: firmware-iwlwifi: missing conflicts/replaces has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#433523: netsurf: depends on not available package

Package: netsurf Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22 Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=

Bug#433500: libc6-dev uninstallable

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 18:48 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > linux-kernel-headers does not exists, you have to install > > linux-libc-dev now. Maybe sth is not resolved properly by your apt for > > one reason or the other, but t

Bug#433500: libc6-dev uninstallable

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 18:48 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > linux-kernel-headers does not exists, you have to install > linux-libc-dev now. Maybe sth is not resolved properly by your apt for > one reason or the other, but the package is definitely installable on > my > machine. Installed linux-l

Bug#433515: firmware-iwlwifi: missing conflicts/replaces

Package: firmware-iwlwifi Version: 0.6 Severity: serious firmware-iwliwifi should Replaces+Conflicts firmware-iwl3945 (and probably firmware-iwl4965 as well). -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stabl

Bug#433500: libc6-dev uninstallable

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:21:22PM +0100, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 18:06 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:28:54PM +0100, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > > > Package: libc6-dev > > > Severity: grave > > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > >

Bug#433283: marked as done (toshset: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433283: fixed in toshset 1.72-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#432408: PATCH: fireflier-1.1.6.patch

Greetings, I have attached a patch that I believe fixes the build problem. Please let me know if it is acceptable. Regards, Jason Harrison diff -ru fireflier-1.1.6/gnomeclient/configure testing/fireflier-1.1.6/gnomeclient/configure --- fireflier-1.1.6/gnomeclient/configure 2006-10-25 13:34:44.00

Bug#433510: Local changes to /etc/default/mailgraph are overwritten

Package: mailgraph Version: 1.13-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 We set MAIL_LOG=/var/log/maillog in /etc/default/mailgraph and upgraded. The local change was ignored and set to the value stored in debconf. This took down mailgraph for two days. Unhappiness ensued. Please fix.

Bug#433500: libc6-dev uninstallable

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 18:06 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:28:54PM +0100, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > > Package: libc6-dev > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > After having upgraded Debian, libc6-dev got uninstalled. Now I can't > > ins

Bug#431831: marked as done (sun-java5-jdk: Integer overflow in ICC profile parser allows execution of arbitrary code)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:14:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line sun-java5-jdk: Integer overflow in ICC profile parser allows execution of arbitrary code has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#433483: sun-java6-jre 6-01-1 uninstallable on amd64

severity 433483 wishlist thanks please read about bug severities before filing bug reports; the package is not yet built by the buildd. C. Dominik Bodi schrieb: > Package: sun-java6-jre > Version: 6-01-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > sun-java6-jre_6-01-1 depends

Processed: Re: Bug#433483: sun-java6-jre 6-01-1 uninstallable on amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 433483 wishlist Bug#433483: sun-java6-jre 6-01-1 uninstallable on amd64 Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Bug#433500: marked as done (libc6-dev uninstallable)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:06:07 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433500: libc6-dev uninstallable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#433505: sun-java5-jre_1.5.0.12-1 missing dependency sun-java5-bin_1.5.0.12-1 in amd64

Package: sun-java5-jre Version: 1.5.0.12-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable sun-java-5-jre_1.5.0.12-1 depends on sun-java5-bin_1.5.0.12-1 which is not available in unstable for amd64. Only the older version sun-java5-bin_1.5.0.11-1 is available. However, the corresponding ve

Bug#433504: linux-headers-2.6.22-1-amd64 missing dependency linux-kbuild-2.6.22

Package: linux-headers-2.6.22-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.22-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable linux-headers-2.6.22-1-amd64 depends on linux-kbuild-2.6.22 wich is not available in unstable for amd64. This renders the package uninstallable. Regards, C. Dominik Bodi -- System Info

Bug#433500: libc6-dev uninstallable

Package: libc6-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After having upgraded Debian, libc6-dev got uninstalled. Now I can't install it. Apt reports the following: Package libc6-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is mis

Bug#433501: Oops in kcryptd

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2 Severity: critical This is also on the kernel's bugzilla ( http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7388) It happens at random interval (1 out of 20 times), when doing a "cryptsetup luksOpen". After that, as soon as the file (/dev/mapper/xxx)

Bug#433394: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'futimens'

Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:54:03PM +0200, you wrote: >>Alright. Will there be an update? Upstream already is at version 6.9. > > I'm aware of the upstream version. The difficulty is with the > integration of the selinux stuff (which wasn't in the experime

Bug#433133: still not fixed... downgraded to 1.1.0-4

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > I had to downgrade nfs-common to make it work. > > nfs-common_1%3a1.1.0-10_amd64.deb > still doesn't work. Try setting ASYNCMOUNTNFS=no in /etc/default/rcS. I'm currently talking to the initscripts maintainers to try to find

Processed: Re: Bug#433283: toshset: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433283 pending Bug#433283: toshset: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers Tags were: patch sid Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#433283: toshset: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers

tag 433283 pending thanks "Roberto C. Sánchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/07/2007): > Incidentally, since the package is owned by the QA group, you are more > than welcome to perform a QA upload yourself (with someone sponsoring > your upload if necessary, as it appears you are in NM). You can look

Processed: tagging 429463, tagging 433486

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > tags 429463 - lenny Bug#429463: RM: ufsparse -- ROM; superseded by suitesparse Tags were: lenny Tags removed: lenny > # oops... > tags 433486 + lenny Bug#433486: depends on removed l

Bug#433486: tagging 429463, tagging 433486

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 tags 429463 - lenny # oops... tags 433486 + lenny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#422475: 422475 is fixed in experimental

fixed 422475 0.90.1-1 thanks I have verified that the version of matplotlib in experimental builds properly. In case someone wants to backport the patch to unstable, instead of uploading that version to unstable, it appears that the propper change would be to define DEFPY := $(shell pyversions -

Processed: 422475 is fixed in experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > fixed 422475 0.90.1-1 Bug#422475: matplotlib: FTBFS: Missing plugin file _ns_transforms.so: Failing build Bug marked as fixed in version 0.90.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Processed: severity of 433486 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > severity 433486 serious Bug#433486: depends on removed libufsparse Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: tagging 433486

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > tags 433486 + pending Bug#433486: depends on removed libufsparse There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Bug#433394: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'futimens'

Hi Michael. Now I got your answer directly. Who knows … Michael Stone, 17.07.2007 16:02: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:54:03PM +0200, you wrote: >> Alright. Will there be an update? Upstream already is at version 6.9. > > I'm aware of the upstream version. The difficulty is with the > integration

Bug#433133: still not fixed... downgraded to 1.1.0-4

I had to downgrade nfs-common to make it work. nfs-common_1%3a1.1.0-10_amd64.deb still doesn't work. -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#433394: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'futimens'

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:54:03PM +0200, you wrote: Alright. Will there be an update? Upstream already is at version 6.9. I'm aware of the upstream version. The difficulty is with the integration of the selinux stuff (which wasn't in the experimental version). If that managed to get integrat

Bug#432043: closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve M. Robbins) (Bug#432043: fixed in ipe 6.0pre28-4)

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:38:55AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm open to being persuaded otherwise. Let me know how you feel. > > I haven't tried ipe (yet), but I'd rather be able to try it out without > text than not at all. Yes, for sure.

Bug#433394: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'futimens'

Hi Michael. Do you have an idea why I get no notifications about answers anymore? If I hadn’t passed by here by accident, I would never have read your answer. Michael Stone, 16.07.2007 19:36 > Please don't waste time/effort on this experimental package; I've asked for > it to be removed. Alright

Bug#433180: bug-buddy: Bug buddy error - failed to parse the xml-rpc response

Fernando Herrera wrote: > Hi Luk, thanks for your answer, it's really useful. It seems that > there is an encoding problem while reading the .xsession-errors file > (that text is inserted onto the GtkTextBuffer, so it should be UTF-8 > valid). Anyway, when getting the text from the buffer to sent i

Bug#433483: sun-java6-jre 6-01-1 uninstallable on amd64

Package: sun-java6-jre Version: 6-01-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable sun-java6-jre_6-01-1 depends on sun-java6-bin_6-01-1 which is not available in unstable for amd64. Only the older version sun-java6-boin_6-00-2 is available. However, as that older version of the sun-jav

Bug#427562: Bug#315762: similar problem

reassign 315762 texlive-base-bin clone 427562 -1 reassign -1 texlive-base-bin severity -1 important reopen -1 forcemerge -1 315762 found -1 2007-12 thanks Németh Márton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hope this helps a bit. Thank you for caring, but actually we have already analysed the problem in

Processed: Re: Bug#315762: similar problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 315762 texlive-base-bin Bug#315762: tetex-bin: Fork bomb in postinst/fmtutil? Bug reassigned from package `tetex-bin' to `texlive-base-bin'. > clone 427562 -1 Bug#427562: texlive-base-bin: Launches forkbomb on upgrade/install Bug 427562 cloned

Bug#369576: marked as done (scm: Error messages while installing)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#369576: fixed in scm 5e3-6.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#422395: marked as done (lilypond: FTBFS: ! I can't find file `lcircle10'.)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422395: fixed in lilypond 2.8.7-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#420342: Patch for the NMU

Hi, I'm just searching a sponsor for my NMU for papaya, my changes are attached to this mail in the form of a patch. Thank you and regards, Mario -- .''`. Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud user of Debian unstable `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do th

Bug#433254: [python2.5]: glibc detected/free(): invalid pointer

reassign 433254 python-bibtex tags 433254 + patch thanks > My understanding is that even with a faulty setup.py, python2.5 > shouldn't break so badly, that's why I'm opening an RC bug against it. > I'll try to get back to this once I've finished my walk through the RC > bug list. your understandi

Processed: Re: [python2.5]: glibc detected/free(): invalid pointer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 433254 python-bibtex Bug#433254: [python2.5]: glibc detected/free(): invalid pointer Bug reassigned from package `python2.5' to `python-bibtex'. > tags 433254 + patch Bug#433254: [python2.5]: glibc detected/free(): invalid pointer Tags were: s

Bug#359299: marked as done (guile-g-wrap: Please upgrade libglib1.2 dependency to libglib2.0-0)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#359299: fixed in g-wrap 1.9.6-3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 424524 pending Bug#424524: libgpevtype: FTBFS if built twice in a row There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 427240 pending Bug#427240: ITP: libhtml-tiny-perl -- Lightweight, dep

Bug#433456: dh-make-php: phppkginfo does not open package.xml properly

Package: dh-make-php Version: 0.2.3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm sorry for reporting bug in yet unreleased package version, but the 0.2.2 version is almost unusable because of bug #432880 and I tried the svn version as Uwe Steinmann suggested. New dh-make-php dropped

Bug#399892: nepenthes_0.2.0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: tries to use static library compiled without -fPIC

Hi Luciano, On Wednesday 20 June 2007 19:15, Luciano Bello wrote: > I need your opinion and comments about: http://bugs.debian.org/399892 > Nepenthes has a module (modulehoneytrap.so) linked with libipq (IPQ > library for userspace), which is part of iptables-dev. Libipq looks like it

Bug#422395: NMU? lilypond: FTBFS: ! I can't find file `lcircle10'

On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:40:17PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > It's been nearly two weeks since the patch became available. I've > tested at this end and your patch does work. > > Are you willing to do an NMU if Thomas does not respond? > > If not, let me know - I'm happy to do an NMU to close

  1   2   >