Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:46:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed also by this upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:46:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed also by this upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:46:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed also by this upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:46:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed also by this upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:46:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed also by this upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:46:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed also by this upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:37:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line also fixed in unstable now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391201: fixed in hlatex 1.0.1-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 410403 2007-01-R1b-1.1
Bug#410403: kismet: FTBFS on 64 it arches: gpsmap.cc:2249: error: cast from
'void*' to 'int' loses precision
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2007-01-R1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 385881
Bug#385881: tinysnmp-agent: does not start due to libabz0 ABI change
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> th
reopen 385881
thanks
Hi,
as the bug is not yet fixed (and the status closed is just from an
workaround), reopening the bug.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:20:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing with the right version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please use these changes as part of your next maintainer upload.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur hlatex-1.0.1~/debian/changelog hlatex-1.0.1/debian/cha
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422385: fixed in gtkam 0.1.12-2.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur gtkam-0.1.12~/debian/changelog gtkam-0.1.12/debian/changelog
--- gtkam-0.1.12~/debian/changelog 2007-06-10 05:48:0
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423280: fixed in dx 1:4.4.0-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423280: fixed in dx 1:4.4.0-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur dx-4.4.0~/debian/changelog dx-4.4.0/debian/changelog
--- dx-4.4.0~/debian/changelog 2007-06-09 22:37:00.0 +
+++ d
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 03:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428172: fixed in cpufrequtils 002-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Saturday 09 June 2007 19:06:56 pm Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Daniel Schepler]
>
> > Running all tests in basic_tests.py...FAILURE
> > Running all tests in commit_tests.py...FAILURE
> > Running all tests in update_tests.py...FAILURE
> > Running all tests in switch_tests.py...FAILURE
>
> Thanks for
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424012: fixed in scim-hangul 0.2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 365363 pending
Bug#365363: multipath fails when cheap USB disk present
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: pending
> tags 422600 pending
Bug#422600: multipath-tools: Please consider advert
Package: enigmail
Version: 2:0.95.0+1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading to icedove 2.0.0.0-4 and enigmail 2:0.95.0+1-3, I
couldn't send email when using enigmail:
When set to sign a message (with PGP/Mime), when I send I get: When
Status is "Creating mail
[Daniel Schepler]
> Running all tests in basic_tests.py...FAILURE
> Running all tests in commit_tests.py...FAILURE
> Running all tests in update_tests.py...FAILURE
> Running all tests in switch_tests.py...FAILURE
Thanks for the report. I can't reproduce it using pbuilder here. I
guess I'll look
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421071: fixed in freefem 3.5.8-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur freefem-3.5.8~/debian/changelog freefem-3.5.8/debian/changelog
--- freefem-3.5.8~/debian/changelog 2007-06-09 22:33:28.000
Hi all!
How do we continue with this bug. It seems to be the last really open RC
bug of the texlive packages (a side the etch-ignore and dummy bugs).
On Die, 05 Jun 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> An alternative would be to teach fmtutil about "depending formats" and
> let it skip a format if there i
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jun 2007 23:17:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line also fixed in current version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 21:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417673: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
severity 428194 minor
thanks
* Peter Samuelson:
> [Florian Weimer]
>> Subversion 1.4.4 has been released, containing some security fixes:
>>
>> * fixed: security flaw in 'svn prop*' commands [CVE-2007-2448]
>> (r25095, -099, -104, -105, -10)
>>
>> I haven't yet figured out, what
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 428194 minor
Bug#428194: CVE-2007-2448: "security flaw in 'svn prop*' commands"
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
[Florian Weimer]
> Subversion 1.4.4 has been released, containing some security fixes:
>
> * fixed: security flaw in 'svn prop*' commands [CVE-2007-2448]
> (r25095, -099, -104, -105, -10)
>
> I haven't yet figured out, what the exact problem is, and
> subversion.tigris.org appears
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:35:10PM +0200, Reuben Thomas wrote:
If you single-step in gdb from the call to search_forward you should be
able to see where bogosity sets in. (But don't worry about that too much; a
correct backtrace is the main thing, I thin
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:52:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405500: fixed in lifelines 3.0.50-2etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420999: fixed in alsa-lib 1.0.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424310: fixed in alsa-lib 1.0.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422513: fixed in alsa-lib 1.0.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.2dfsg1-2
Tags: security
Severity: grave
Subversion 1.4.4 has been released, containing some security fixes:
* fixed: security flaw in 'svn prop*' commands [CVE-2007-2448]
(r25095, -099, -104, -105, -10)
I haven't yet figured out, what the exact pro
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426444: fixed in talloc 1.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: libguichan0
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Hello.
Some symbols were dropped in the 0.6 version of this library, so the
soname should have been bumped.
If you need an explanation about this, or need assistance for fixing
this bug, feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
Package: libumfpack4
Severity: grave
Unpacking libumfpack4 (from .../libumfpack4_4.4-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libumfpack4_4.4-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libamd.so.1', which is also in
package libsuitesparse
-- Syst
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-4
Severity: serious
File: /etc/init.d/loadcpufreq
$ sudo /etc/rc2.d/S05loadcpufreq start
Loading cpufreq kernel modules... /etc/rc2.d/S05loadcpufreq: 240:
/usr/sbin/laptop-detect: not found
You either should check whether laptop-detect is present and fail
gracef
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> # found in stable, too. not in oldstable though.
> found 428157 3.0.dfsg.1-10+b1
Bug#428157: mail-notification: Silently falls back to unencrypted connection:
password sent in cleart
* Jose Luis Rivas Contreras [Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:02:49 -0400]:
> Added build-depend on linux-kernel-headers. Patch attached. Now builds
> ok, tested on pbuilders.
Hello Jose Luis. Thanks for your efforts to fix RC bugs. Unfortunately,
your patch is not an appropriate solution: linux-kernel-header
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> # ttbomk
> tags 427275 - patch
Bug#427275: camstream: FTBFS: video_def.h:2:27: error: linux/linkage.h: No such
file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: patch
>
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> # looks like this exists in testing too
> found 428157 4.0~rc2.dfsg.1-4
Bug#428157: mail-notification: Silently falls back to unencrypted connection:
password sent in cleartext
Bug m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> severity 428157 grave
Bug#428157: mail-notification: Silently falls back to unencrypted connection:
password sent in cleartext
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
>
End of mess
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:17:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427899: fixed in update-manager 0.42.2ubuntu22-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427594: fixed in wmwave 0.4-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Itai Seggev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose the fact that you could install
> tetex-base 2007-9 w/o also pulling in texlive or some other useful
> pacakge is another bug.
Exactly - but since tetex-base is not supposed to depend on anything
(it's an empty transitional package), we should l
Package: libafterimage-dev
Version: 2.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
at least dependencies to librsvg2-dev, gobject-2.0, gdk_pixbuf, gmodule,
glib are missing from libafterimage-dev. without them, programs won't
link.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers un
Package: londonlaw
Version: 0.2.1-7
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
hi reinhard,
i noticed that starting london-server results in a python backtrace,
though the client appears to run fine!
here's the console output i get:
London Law does not appear to be insta
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428096: fixed in liquidsoap 0.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: amule
Version: 2.1.3-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When trying to start
localhost:~$ amule
Illegal instruction
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (995, 'uns
Package: sun-java6-jre
Version: 6-00-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Setting up sun-java6-bin (6-00-2) ...
Could not create the Java virtual machine.
dpkg: error processing sun-java6-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-instal
Simon Waters wrote:
>
> I will try purging the packages as per the original poster.
No joy with purge reinstall.
The problem here maybe resolved, hard to be sure.
I disabled all functional extensions, and re-enabled this didn't help.
Possibly removing the Tango theme did the trick.
Possibly i
I've read part of the source code of liblber and the problem seems related to
an invalid socket buffer (please don't take it for granted).
int ber_sockbuf_ctrl( Sockbuf *sb, int opt, void *arg )
{
Sockbuf_IO_Desc *p;
int ret = 0;
assert( sb != NULL );
assert
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 423653 pending
Bug#423653: apache2.2-common: mod_disk_cache fills /var after etch upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: democracyplayer
Version: 0.9.5.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.1 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (char
59 matches
Mail list logo
